Thank you all for commenting. Note: this post is not intending to prove anything, only to describe the reaction of most people we meet who are not yet awake to the shenanigans of the world power structure.
āThe info I present on persons claimed to be dead but who may still be alive is just for example and discussion, but not fully provable. The Challenger crew still being alive seems well documented. It is hard NOT to believe they are alive. On Staycer being Lennon, besides looking like a plastic surgerized Lennon with the same freckles, there are no young man photos of Staycer and no internet footprint of what bands or gigs he played before and no Wiki bio. He's clearly a professional guitar player and should have been since the 80's when he was in his 30s.
āHand gestures are clearly made, but what they really mean in any one instance is not fully provable.
āThe part on banking is just proof of the structure of the banking system, the operation of which is open for all.
šPart 2 will be about egregious but provable topics, and of course malignant breakdown.
Stage Five: 9.11. Stage 6: Nukes, Stage 7: Wars & what they are a cover for, Stage 8: Viruses & Vaxes. Hopefully I can dig up some new info and twists.
PM, I don't think that the Challenger disaster people still being alive isn't provable. According to my "rules of reality" the Challenger disaster people are definitely walking around alive and they tell us they are - as is their wont with their psyops - by complete nonsense apart from the gobsmacking zero effort to hide the people by giving them different identities, eg:
In the 15m clip you link to we are shown former governor of Hawaii, George Ariyoshi, tell the remarkable tale of how Ellison Onizuka showed him a family photo that he was going to take up on the Challenger, inscribe it on its return and give it to him. Guess what? It survived the explosion and two months at sea after which Ellisonās brother Claude gave it to the governor. So reminiscent of the magic passport, of course.
'The only thing we discover about Resnik in the Esquire article is that her ex-boyfriend sued NASA over the loss of a Dunhill cigarette lighter she carried in her personal preference kit aboard Challenger. You read that correctly: he didnāt sue NASA over his former girlfriendās wrongful death, but because they lost his cigarette lighter somewhere in the Atlantic. What a guy. Itās telling that NASAās astronaut corps provided no comments to the authors during the research and writing phases of āThe Epic Flight of Judith Resnik.ā'
Nonsensical from at least three angles:
--- Judith Resnik had no need of a cigarette lighter aboard a spaceship and payload would have been strictly controlled weight-wise.
--- Regardless of function, JR would never have taken aboard such a dangerous item as a lighter in an oxygen-rich environment
--- JR's boyfriend would not have tried to sue NASA over the loss of his cigarette lighter.
It's so interesting what people find signifies proof and what doesn't.
To my mind if there are quite a number of items that favour an hypothesis and there are zero items that contradict it and no other reason to doubt it then I call that proof.
In the case of the Challenger disaster while there might seem to be an item that calls the fake hypothesis into question, namely that there is evidence of Judith Resnik acting in both professions of astronaut and legal academic, there is actual evidence that allows this rather extraordinary situation - she was a brilliant student and attended humanities day classes in one institution and evening engineering classes in another institution a short distance away contemporaneously.
Where we do have strong evidence that calls an hypothesis into question is that of Mark Staycer really being John Lennon and that is of the funeral service for Mark (https://www.youtube.com/live/Fmw4S-mG2tw) where friends from childhood, a guy he worked with, his son and his wife (-ex?) speak about him in a manner and with details that simply do not match fake at all. We also don't have what I'd call very strong evidence of them being the same person in the first place as I think while they look remarkably alike they don't look like the same person - although I accept that work could be done to alter them slightly (as was done with the Challenger people in the case of Dick Scobie's ears and Ronald McNair's teeth) they just don't look like the same person to me whereas all the Challenger people do. I do not accept certain claims by MM of similarity such as vein pattern in hands and index fingers although other similarities may exist such as matching loss of bicuspid teeth but even there it's not 100% clear.
I accept that JL's death may have been faked and I shall look into it and it seems that the film, Let Him Be, deliberately created a sense of ambiguity about whether Mark Staycer was really him but that doesn't make the two guys the same person.
My opinion is that you should get rid of the Mark Staycer / John Lennon thing. If you want normies to recognise the lies we are told I think it's best to avoid items that lack solidity and that item definitely lacks solidity. Obviously, each time you put forward an item that someone else won't accept you undermine yourself when putting forward other items. There are so very many items which are clearly psyops why choose something which isn't solid?
Again thanks for your efforts! I 99% believe Challenger was fake yes, but that is not proof as we donāt have dental records, fingerprints to compare, though FPs are not 100%, and DNA, well we know where that belongs.
On JL well the point of my post is not to PROVE yes or no for each example, it is to see who will show inquisitiveness and who will just buck like a ānormieā. There are lots of yes MS is JL and some or lots of no, maybeā¦. All the Beatles were spooks and when spooks die we should just say, āthey faked it againā.
See my disclaimer in the top pinned comment and thanks as always! I would say though that me and you should not take up too many comments on the post, you can move to DM if you really want. But no, Iām not removing it. My disclaimer and your comments are enough to spark people to think.
But why truncate the conversation? Just asking? What is the motivation to do that? I'd like to read more but if anyone doesn't, there's always the scroll bar, yeah?
You mean between me and Petraļ¼ We have a few year history of long drawn out discussion. Some are ok and I respect her. But I have other personal things I need to do and she knows I have only so much ability for long engagements. To some degree, I will moderate the comment sections for readability for everyone. Most readers do not favor long back and forth discussions and this SS has incurred a number of attacks, and multiple long diatribe comments can be a form of attack. I hope you can understand my feelings here.
I'm very sympathetic to your feelings, however I am more sympathetic to humanity's survival. And free speech IS our only way of survival. It is our only means of countering the advantages that our adversaries optimize to degrade humanity. I understand that it's hard sometimes to put up with trolls, etc., however we have to grow also, and trolls only help us figure out how we do it. Convenience is often the way "evil" gets us to agree with them, gets us to make conditions right for them. There is NO reason to censor AT ALL. Though I am an absolutist on this, (because I understand it is our key outta here) I think we still need to make provision for certain circumstances that may arise, such as spammers, etc. Therefore the way to handle it best of all if we are going to censor is to get the pulse of how others feel and do a survey or a poll before cutting someone's expression off. It ought NEVER to be done unilaterally in the public sphere. Imagine if we did this, and felt it to heart how important it is - the psychos wouldn't have a leg to stand on. Everything they would do would be out in the open, which makes the conditions perfect for us and not for them!
I am very clear and strong on this and may sound pedantic but free speech is our only way out of this labyrinth. Watch them squirm when the people, when every individual, is granted the fortification of this birthright. It would make the "ph" unfavorable for psychopaths to live with. They would not be able to blatantly breach this inviolable birthright, it would be shocking to witness, in a world we create that is open and transparent. Won't you be on the side of freedom? Free speech is the gateway to it. I cannot emphasize how important this is for our emancipation. Surely a little tolerance or ignoring comments or articles we don't like, is sufficient "payment" to have freedom of speech?
I don't really understand the long engagement problem, PM. Sure, if you don't wish to continue the discussion because you're otherwise occupied then you can just say, "I'm busy, that's all I'm prepared to say on the subject," and then if the other person wishes to say more themselves then that's OK, no? even if you've said all you're prepared to say.
I have to say I find it a little odd that quite a number of Substackers feel it's perfectly fine to block others because like Denise I rank freedom of speech very, very highly ... and when you consider how gagged we are by the mainstream, if we start gagging people too then don't we risk being just like them? These are three comments I got from someone a few days ago on my post on American Moon.
"Petra, youāre as dumb as the box of rocks they pretended to bring bk."
"You must wear slipon shoes. Kindly fk off now, your deflections are lame af."
" ... Make sure to reply again though to ensure you have the last comment, you 77th brigade retardette š
Totally out of order, no? No need to block though, he only exposes himself and eventually the "conversation" dies. There wouldn't have been a conversation if I'd just ignored his first comment and sometimes I do that ... and probably should have on this occasion as it certainly didn't go anywhere good. I think in future I shall always ignore these kinds of comments.
Yes Iām busy with a āreal jobā and other things and the SS is completely free. If the person is just cursing or being stupid but nasty they get a warning., but actually the post says you need to be polite so its a 2nd warning already. So they are free so say any opinion yes, attacks no.
I did let Latypova and Broze, go on a nasty diatribe before, for the same reason you mention-to let them show themselves. But that was when I was new and these folks were quite prominent people. Been there done that, don't need to let people show anymore.
As I said this is like a college classroom. Opinion is great, if you start calling your teacher or classmates assholes or prick heads you will likely be asked to leave the class and fail the class if you continue. Free speech and nasty social interaction are not the same thing. On this, no I do not want to discuss further, full stop. You are always polite, your opinions are welcome even if I disagree, I don't recall asking you to edit a comment. But sure, it is not my business to tell you how to run your place, nor do I care much how others want to arrange their space.
I think when people comment with illwill like that, I make sure I give them a good public "schlapping". We are evolving and so we have to learn to take things in our stride and understand that most people are unaware of what's going on let alone our evolution. I think we're going to catapult our evolution because we have been held down so long. And free speech will most probably be the basis of the enlightened society. It supports individual sovereignty more than anything else. I'd like to also see everyone condemning vociferously the fact that we kill our own species intentionally. Sure it will happen by accident, but it's no accident to have armies to do it, or even abortion. The idea of intentionally killing our own kind would cause listeners to recoil. If we were like this, the media couldn't exist like it does. We are such a killing society - it's like the only solution to everything is kill, kill, kill. Or censor. We really need to change these programs. I sure hope Proton Magic does. It's funny to see other truthers react the way he did. I have the utmost respect for him but it just seems so unenlightened or something.
If I was Staycer and NOT Lennon, I would be very open about who I was as a child and young man, and I would be open about my great ability to play the Lennon role. I would not want crazy groupies or dangerous people coming after me.
I can not find any childhood or young man Staycer photos, or what bands he played for in the past. If he can play Lennon near perfectly he should have had a past music history, even among night clubs and an internet footprint as such. He just came out of nowhere to be a perfect Lennon imitator at a professional level of guitar playing? I don't buy that. Every American has a high school yearbook photo, and even if you lose yours, there are usually 100 others who have theirs, these donāt disappear from the world. Where is his?
Same as if I was called a Challenger astroNUT, I would prove I was not and happily charge lot of $$$ for interviews. Did Staycer do that? Not that I know.
Could Staycer be hiding who he really is even if not Lennon, or could Lennon be hiding that he is Staycer? To die at 69 is a bit young, and does the Staycer photo in the post from 2017 look 63? Sorry I donāt think so. He looks well over 70.
PM, there is a slideshow of photos shown at his memorial some of which show him younger including one photo that looks like a yearbook photo and at 3:50 there's a photo where you can see who I think it's safe to infer is his son, Christian, on the right of him.
Mark did quite a lot of radio work by the sound of it and one person pays tribute to his knowledge of country music. While Mark was obviously very much into John Lennon and the Beatles he seemed to have a love of music generally and he was in a Beatles tribute band before the movie - that's how he was selected to be in it.
"I have lost another... I'm not sad, I'm celebrating the life of an amazing man. Mark Staycer and I worked together at WTCM radio back in the day. We were definitely the odd ones there. We got along great as we both loved music, horsing around (no, not us), collecting guitar picks and I even had him play on Billy B's CD on the song Gimmie More which you can hear in the comments. (that's him talking at the beginning and playing the acoustic guitar). This has definitely been a rough week, but I'm good, I'm playing music, cleaning the house and enjoying life. RIP MICK"
Thanks for your great efforts Petra! As usual we will just have to continue our friendly discussionsā”.
To make reading easier Iāll make a list,
1. We donāt really know who these folks are in the Tribute video. Many āsort-ofā Staycer looking persons donāt really have the shape of his face. The guy with the mustache and black hair doesnāt look like Staycer or any of the other lookalikes, to me. You may have a different opinion but still, we canāt prove who these persons are.
2. My opinion on what plastics can do differs from yours. I do know persons in their 70s in my personal life who look 58 after surgery. This famous Japanese actress https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tetsuko_Kuroyanagi
Was 82 in this Wiki photo, but could pass for 68. She is heavily surgerized. I saw her in the lobby of a hotel around 10 yrs ago when she was 82, did not look like an old lady one bit.
3. The photos in the Tribute are a mix of Staycer as we know him over the past 15-20 yrs mixed in with supposed, āhim in the pastā (that don't look like him nor each other), and unknown persons. They are an not organic montage as you might see in a google photo search.
4. I could not find any organic montage photos of vids of Staycer on air on any of the radio stations, DJs should have many.
5. None of the photos shown of past Staycer has any way of confirmation, like a yearbook or graduation photo where we can see the name and date and maybe even call the school registrar. Where are the photos of this professional guitarist over the decades being in a band or solo gig? He can play just like Lennon but didnāt make $ from gigs in the 80s and 90s? He just came out of nowhere to be the greatest thing besides a young Lennon? That makes no sense.
6. If Staycer was Lennon, we know heās got handlers in INTEL and this is the exact kind of vid they would make. Saddened he died (maybe died?), they would make us think this pic show was truly Staycer from young to old but it misses any actual proof of these folks or him as I have mentioned above. Iām sure you remember my post on Manson with the Sharon and Patti Tate BS. That they like to fake us on famous persons a given.
āFor now we just have to agree there is no absolute proving or disproving, we should stay open to anything.
For me to consider that Mark Staycer is really John Lennon, what I need to start is a golden nugget that suggests there is fakery and I don't see any golden nugget. Everything presented seems consistent to me with Mark Staycer being who he's said to be. All the things that might be considered anomalous I'd not judge as being so anomalous that they favour fakery and so there's simply no starting point for me. Sure, he could have had plastic surgery to look younger but "coulds" without any golden nugget don't mean anything to me. The thing is he just does not look as if he's John Lennon to me - he looks like someone who looks like John Lennon. And all the tributes seem 100% genuine and I simply do not see any of the Revelation of the Method signs apart from that 55:11 video length which, of course, could be purely coincidental.
Considering though that there's nothing definitive that says he really is John Lennon I'd most strenuously argue that it's not a good idea to put the idea forward to normies.
When my sister tried to tell me that controlled demolition was used on 9/11 I feel that her previous attempt at getting me to disbelieve the moon landings which I felt was very poor (and still do) probably biased me against considering her argument for 9/11. It could have just been that the notion of staging seemed too far-fetched because I was clueless but no doubt the ML thing did not help.
We don't want to be treated as the Boy Who Cried Wolf, right? That's something we surely want to avoid as much as possible and I cannot get that through to the disbelievers of the ML. There are so many agents out there saying we didn't go to the moon and all that money spent on them has a very good reason - undermining our credibility.
āThe sum of, fake Lennon death, Staycer comes out of nowhere, no past history of professional music playing, no full set of docs from his past nor is he open about it. He does not welcome challenge to present all or even any of his docs (birth certif, ss card, HS/college Yearbook. HS/college matriculation/registration/graduation docs), friends from school days that are also confirmable from Yearbooks, no Wiki page-I suspect they don't want you to see what's NOT there.
šStaycer provides NO DOCS photos, names of coworkers/associates for any of these things. HE IS BLATANTLY HIDING HIS PAST.
āBesides the Wiki page I personally have all these docs right in my desk drawer and file cabinet, and copies or origs in multiple other places. You could call my coworkers from 20-30-40 years ago, call others in my Yearbook. If I was Staycer I would NOT want to be hounded as Lennon. I would show my IDs etc and even charge $$$ to curiosity seekers for interviews. He is doing the same thing as the Challenger crew is doing, the "Oh, I'm not the dead person you think I am, but sorry I won't prove it".
āAll my photos from childhood to now are clearly me, you can see the exactness slowly change every few years. I have printed and digital albums of this and all my family, like most people. Where are his besides the non-lookalikes on the tribute vids.
āStaycer's Age in 2017 does not look 63, and the icing on all this case is the match of 2 freckles/moles on face. Did anyone do a forensic voice analysis? I suspect they don't want to do this.
As usual we've both said our parts and time to move on!
Indeed, the present "money" system is a stranglehold on Our planet. But when One sees that, irrespective of the form of energy accounting tokens, the psychopaths will always be the Ones promoted to the top, even tangibles used to account for the energy We add into a system allow the psychopaths to take control (not stopping short of breaking the three Laws of Ethics as most of Us would), it is clear that irrespective of "debt" or any other such added element, psychopaths will garner the most for the power over Others it offers.
And even if We all started out with equal amounts, it would not be long before Most live in poverty, and the psychopaths are living richly, able to buy the things and the People to Their agendas.
Most who are "awake" still think We MUST keep money of some kind, when in fact, We don't.
Money accounts for Our energy added into a system. Free energy technology makes accounting for energy pointless. 80% of Us presently do little more than move money around - clearly not needed for the necessary work We need done - food, clothing, shelter, transportation, and communication.
Given that, the way to end the control of the moneyed psychopaths is to obsolete Their single tool to widespread power over Us. And that will be done by getting the free energy tech out in the open - 100% of the cost of EVERYTHING is energy; the resources sit here freely but it takes energy to put them into useful configuration.
I guess in 10 years after free energy emerges in the open, as the cost of energy is removed, automation of necessary work no One wants to do will have happened, and the remaining work will be creative and enough of Us will want to do it.
Maybe 5% of Us would be required.
The "normie" does not see this. (S)He believes the lies that "free energy is impossible." Because the moneyed psychopaths in control keep saying that, using "thermodynamics" as "proof." They don't see that We swim in an ocean of energy and that accessing it does not break any "laws."
That the einsteinian bunk, with all its ad hoc additions and multiple "renormalizations" (where the math goes to infinity and reality does not) and many "mysteries" was deliberately foisted on Us because it does NOT predict the energy in the aether We swim in.
In fact, there is a theory that has no need for ad hoc things and renormalizations, and has no mysteries - and predicts the energy in the aether and that We can extract it. It needs no "bending of spacetime - being euclidean.
That theory is subquantum kinetics (SQK) by the late Dr. Paul A. LaViolette. He took an "as above, so below" approach, with chemical kinetics, applying them subquantumly. And everything worked.
I will persist in advocating for obsoleting that dangerous (it promotes psychopaths to power) and archaic (They hide the tech that makes it so) tool and freeing Humanity to the vast abundance of Our planet.
With the three Laws of Ethics ruling, and the Betterment Ethic (to look for what You love to do that helps the most) encouraged, Humanity will emerge from this dark, moneyed age, into a glorious future.
Most welcome. It is My mission to solve for those moneyed psychopaths that indoctrinate normies, and pay for psyops and more. My love for Humanity, so beset, drives Me.
They have indoctrinated us thoroughly with the money spell. Yes we could live fantasmagorically without money but it's not going to happen if we simply wait for free energy to appear. That's being passive and the folks that hold the blueprints (and the weapons) plan everything to a tee. Debt-based money trains us to be in an artificial scarcity. Our psyche has been programmed to see everything in scarcity term, (there's not enough) The issuance of money ensures scarcity and that's because interest is slapped on the top of the money we borrow (only borrowed money comes into the economy). That means only money issued by banks comes into the economy. So, who gets all the colostrum? The banks of course. Therefore if "the people" bit by bit, more by more, stopped paying interest on their loans, who would that affect? Who would that target? The banks of course! Such an easy method but who's talking about it? There is no discussion of it to imagine it and breakdown how to do it. Very possible, only takes a decision. But one thing that will energize this into synergy - not only will we be poking a finger in the bankster's eyes, but we will share that saving (of not paying interest) with someone we know who could use a monthly stipend. That would go towards our benefaction endowment, and not the bankers. Nobody needs permission to do this. But even before doing it, let's talk about it, let's toss it around. Why not hey? You're not too chicken to, are you? (You = whoever is reading this)
I am not waiting. I am encouraging Ones who CAN to bring it out. Avidly and often. I would happily do it Myself if I could.
Any money debt based or not will promote psychopaths to the top. Yes, it has added issues, but at the foundation itās because money promoted psychopaths.
Without the illusion, this boardgame turned digital wouldn't be any "fun" for those that see its digi-holographic nature. We need the normies to help us connect dots in their own weird way of bending to their "reality".
It's been a good game for those that have played & see thru the illusion :)
Another interesting variable of the script is that Nick Cage was in snake eyes & the CharLIE Kirk fakery connects to Cage who is ALSO playing Marilyn Manson AND the character Jeffree Star. ALL these actors play multiple characters.
This MK mind F@ck is meant to SPLIT personalities & create different characters The Not Sees were big on twins & twinning/splitting of the mind that has led to digital twinning. Once you know ........
I'm playing with the idea that the Transformer agenda connects to the biggest Biblical script involving King James & the promotion of industrial idol warship which has children confused & chopping off body parts or becoming happy/gay. It's pretty wild.
I suspect that the normies CAN'T SEE what's going on because they are running a consciousness drone program much like the actors are playing their characters on the whirled stage.
This guy does take his work very deeply, discussing how these actors are all essentially *the same person," based on ancient templates. It's really effing interesting.
No doubt Sharine! ConsciousX's content is mind bending for sure! I just watched the one on Elvis ... the KING. So many "lab grown" Trump connections! AND, on top of THAT, we just had the No Kings ritual!
The thing I've learned is that anyone I can't speak to by texting or picking up the phone or emailing, is not in my interest. Celebrities and public or famous people are part of the Big Stage. I feel we need to come back to our own circles. There are plenty of interesting characters there, and we're part of the drama, instead of just being a spectator.
He's a mercenary, keeps the information hostage until you give him a fee. Oh these types don't know what they're doing - they're keeping the same paradigm loud and strong!
Good points. But why do we not have our own narrative? That term "gay" they usurped - it used to be a word that bestowed joy, but now it is only used to elevate homosexuality. That may have been needed when minds were more closed, but now we ought to have a different name for homosexuality and reclaim the word gay, to be a generic term, not limited to simply homosexuals. We need a supplementary dictionary! Why wait for the overlords? What's a word we can use instead of "gay" while keeping the meaning of homosexuality to it?
It really is excellent, re Lennon, it is highly plausible the death fakery. The Beatles came out of Tavistock and nothing good comes out of that fkn mind control place. Please excuse any typos i am squinting coz iām too lazy to go get my specs!š¤
I love all the comments they make me smile and chuckle which is much needed in this weird and wonderful game of life!šwell done Protonšš»
Excellent as always Proton! What to believe, what not to believe is a dice roll now. Itās safe to assume that everything is fake until proven otherwise. I still have a majority of family and friends who are still being ātestedā for propaganda narrative, and are convinced that their sniffles and sore throat are the ālong versionā of the aforementioned narrative. One brother in-law who still believes that aluminum jetliners flew through a structural steel office tower and the fuel on board vaporized 500,000 tons of steel, concrete, plumbing fixtures, office furniture and peopleā¦.( I must unroll my eyes in order to continue). Another brother in-law is heartbroken by the āwarā in Ukraine and that the evil empire of Russia must be defeated. I show him videos of the dance clubs in Kiev that are full of young raverās.. they must all be on leave from their duties at the Russian front. (I realize these videos could be fake as well.. but what isnāt?). My favourite new addition to this war movie is that not only does the leader and military genius of Ukraine dress in olive drab fatigues as he jets around the world for photo opportunities, guns and money, but the leader of the evil empire is now clad in camouflage military gear as he gives his latest address on the status of the āwarā. I can hardly wait to see which uniform Donald is going to wear for Halloween! The whole world is a stage, but the people are more concerned with why a baseball player who earns $70 million dollars a year hasnāt decimated the opposing team single handed than paying attention to what has been fed to them for decades! I believe it was Nero who said ābread and circusesāā¦ this is a ātruthā!
Thanks Woody, unfortunately these bros in laws run rampant. Stage 5 will be 9.11 already written, and and Stage 6 will be fake nukes also already written just now. These will be nearly undebunkable short essays.
By next week you should get these and can send to your bros in law "from Proton magic with love".
2. Staycer - good impersonator - he really goes the whole hog as he's American but speaks with a bit of a Liverpudlian accent with the US accent showing through - https://youtu.be/SEXPK5_XLtk?si=KjL1KQxVfOtnKJuI&t=130
3. Occult signs - irrefutable
4. FSB - never heard of it but no doubt you're totally right on that one.
Maybe, maybe its Lennon with a poor Michigan accent? See the link at the top of that section to the Mathis post, it is much more thorough than my abstract. Happy you give more detail after reading it, but dont give us and AI report! Ahhhhh.....
It's simply not certain enough, PM. The notion of John Lennon altering his accent in that way strikes me as highly improbable. I don't think you can expect people to believe things that don't have sufficient evidence and judging by how he looks and that funny accent I'm not convinced and even if I looked further and found things that were more compelling I still wouldn't be convinced. If someone researched and found there was no trace of Mark Staycer growing up then OK I'd pay attention. Mark seems reverential and John Lennon was not the reverential type. We are told Mark died peacefully in his sleep a couple of years ago - wonder if it was the jab.
If you are coming at it without reading the fakery of the killing and more details about Staycer I can agree. So again, if you read the MM article you would have a better position pro or con. This post though is not to trying to make full proofs on things. It is whether a staunch normie would buck, how hard, or be inquisitive and open minded.
I started trying to read MM's article but it's difficult to read a pdf on the phone. I found a video of friends and loved ones giving eulogies at Mark Staycer's funeral and the people seem totally genuine. I'll have at look at MM's article next time I'm on a computer but I think the funeral service puts paid to Mark really being JL for me. Fakery of his death I'm open to however.
as yet another piece of the puzzle . . . May I submit for consideration the fact that no airliner ever flown could have performed in a crash as was alleged for FLT11, FLT175, FLT77, & FLT93 . .
Thanks Bob, you are correct. There are so many topics on the planes, like where speed vs air pressure would break the plane apart etc. I wanted to give proofs with imagery and a few indisputable points because the post can only be so long. Once we know the planes at the WTC were image projections, and the other two just stories, the rest is moot so to speak. Without indisputable proof, people could, and did, still argue there were planes but souped up military grade yada yada...but you can't argue planes melting into buildings or into the ground!
Okay, as much love as I have for you, PM, I have to say this, too:
There is a sign that is "hook 'em horns" that is the sign for the U of Texas Longhorns! Similarly, there is a sign that looks like a peace sign, but with the thumb out, and I BELIEVE that is the Sign Language sign for "I love you," but I still have to look that up...
All that said, there's no doubt that these geeks like to play little games that are all about "WE are in the club, and YOU are not, and you don't even know what's what" bull pucky, yes, INDEED. We are "talking cows," after all. (rolling mine eyes, in a very canine way) Regardless, good post.
Obviously the Lennon death, like most high profile, premature deaths of ācelebritiesā was faked. This is because the cryptocracy are obsessed with bi-Baal references, using astrotheological rituals and human sacrifice re-enacted on certain dates, rather than carry out real killings. The Rosicrucian signature is usually always present in these hoaxes. Such as Lennon posing with a rose. And a single rose on his memorial.
However, Miles Mathis gets so much wrong, definitely on purpose. He promotes the fake constitution, the separate country delusion, the fraudulent legal system, fake physics and fake history among other idiotic tropes. He never fingers the Vatican or Jesuits, because heās obviously a cult member.
His essay on Staycer-Lennon is non-sense: In my humble opinion. They donāt look remotely alike. I found nine points of difference in the two men. Mathis has poor visuo-spatial ability and heās a pathological liar.
With regard to ānormiesā ā¦ Whatās normal? Mass delusion? Regurgitation without research?
Adults who need govt or a āleaderā, or anyone to tell them how to live or assist them live are basically children. Theyāre infants in adult bodies.
I prefer the word ānescientā to describe those who arenāt aware of all the frauds and fakery.
Walking, talking, mask wearing, triple boosted zombies can only repeat what theyāve been told on tv or at school, because they never learned how to question false authority or think for themselves.
Thereās nothing normal about them, unfortunately.
The arrogant cult members with their asinine oral traditions, their childish cult clubs like Jobs daughters, Rainbow girls or DeMolay are just as mind controlled.
Almost everyone is under heavy mind control, unfortunately. Itās obviously deliberate. Everyone has their version of reality and truth and this is because thereās nothing but layer upon layer of disinformation.
Society, religion, language, culture and education are designed so that mass mind control is almost inescapable.
If people donāt know how mind control actually works, how can they possibly know how to reverse it themselves?
Mind control is definitely not MKULTRA experiments, thatās a laughable CIA psyop.
Mind control is simply repetition, plus societal pressure to conform and obey. This has been proven again and again in many psychological experiments with children and adults.
Humans learn by mimicry, are highly suggestible and easily mind controlled.
If you dare to challenge their false perceptions, delusions or the beliefs of someone under mind control, youāll get immediate overreaction, open hostility, circular logic, unsupported claims and links to their non-sense articles with even more unsupported claims.
Those who claim theyāre awake (but are really just Saturn-solar cult members) like to push magical thinking fantasies, obvious psyops, hoaxes and complete delusions. Theyāre recycled scripts. They should try something new.
They donāt offer practical solutions - like what we can do right now - they just want to impose THEIR version of tyranny.
They seem to forget they donāt have a right to tell anyone how to live, what to do, or what to āabolishā.
Iād like to abolish all stupidity and lies but thatās obviously not realistic. All we can do is change ourselves. Our behavior. Individually. Thatās it.
Does anyone here realize how much labor, time, effort and knowledge it takes to grow a small vegetable garden? How much time and effort it takes to can enough foods to get through a frozen winter? Or how to raise and kill their own livestock?
The non-sense I see here everyday is hilarious. Shills wonāt stop shilling and liars wonāt stop lying.
There are immediate solutions to the tyranny that shills on substack wonāt address such as jury nullification, which offers a way to hobble the cryptocracy immediately.
What I want to know (which I never see on substack or anywhere else on the internet) is does anyone here have any suggestions for what topics trigger curiosity from the sleepwalkers to awaken, or have ideas on how can we coax the vaxxed zombies and our own relatives and friends out of their tv watching stupors, to rejoin living men and women, discard their citizenSHIP illusion, their fear of contagion and their belief in the sanctity of debt slavery?
Thanks for those insights. I knew MM was narrative twisting clearly when I saw āheā barely said anything about Covid and was against the no-virus concept.
Today Greg Reese has put out an astrotheological discussion about a supposed comet passing the solar system now. I suspect he's signaling to his minions but also pushing the āaliens are comingā PSYOP. I think you would find it amusing but it may have some deeper and malevolent meaning for things on the ground.
Nothing the controllers do would surprise me. Project Blue Beam. A War of the Worlds type faux attack on certain cities or ānationsā. Using conventional weaponry from the āStar Warsā program.
The Post article is complete propaganda. I wonder if the Loeb sitting photo was almost a self FM handshake or attempting to be one. Anyway, heās a paid bullshitter. Thanks.
Lol. Of course itās āpropagandaā. Thereās no aliens. Thereās no alien tech.
What I was trying to intimate (not very successfully, obviously) is that the controllers are pushing this alien non-sense in the mainstream media. They donāt print or promote anything without a reason. Without a plan.
FYI, I added this to the post. It is not proof that Staycer is Lennon, but the whole story about Staycer is quite rotten if he is not JL because 1. There is no bio, photos, or history of prior gigs or bands though he plays guitar and sings at a professional level, 2. He puts out no provable info on his upbringing, family, past schooling, young photos etc. 3. If I was not Lennon and only an impersonator I would want to be clear I was just an impersonator and I would be quite open about my past and willing to show it. I would not want curiosity seekers to barrage or harass me, or even worse, if they thought I was really Lennon. 4. Staycer is said to have died in '23 at 69 years old. The photo in the post in '17 of a 63 y/o Staycer looks like a man past 75 not 63. Lennon or not, Staycer is not being honest about something. I lean to think he is a surgerized Lennon.
I'm politely and logically agreeing with you.š I have seen all these behaviours and been at their receiving end since convid. There's none so blind as those who do not wish to see. I take it you've read escape-key (esc) on this platform? Comprehensive analyses of the financial and clearing house system.
Yup! He's encyclopaedic in his research and incredibly thorough. Well worth the attempt - or at least to download as a reference source. It's incredibly meticulously put together.
I love your posts but when I saw this demand :"ļ½You must be polite and logical to comment on this postļ½" I nearly lost my coffee load. Oh really? What if I'm not polite? Who decides what's polite? You? Oh yeah, because you "own the page" right? Yeah that's the kind of thinking that keeps us in this mess. I want to pass something to ya, if we want a new paradigm, we need to act different (sic), we need to think different (sic). We need to understand the imperative importance of free speech. I take it you're FOR free speech, yeah? If someone asked you, you'd say you defend it I'm sure. However telling people what to write is not free speech, it is not demonstrating the belief that we are each a sovereign. Just sayin'. New paradigm needs new thinking.
As for money, money that issues debt is like using a tool to smack you in the face with. Money IS a tool, but this money system is a tool for bashing people in the face with. We can't be without it immediately because that would cause unknowable shockwaves, but we can be laying a path where we will eventually be without it. And it is my bet that we can be totally without money within ten years. But so inured to its spell and hypnosis, the belief in scarcity is so woven into our fiber, that it will take another money system to show how money can be "done right". Money that is used as a tool FOR everyone not as a cudgel. This is so easy to be done but nobody is seeking it.
There is no way to get from this barbarianism and retardation (what they've done to our psyche) without some kind of money system to get us to a no-money world. An alternative money system will only be the bridge. Ten years is probably plenty of time to test it and it can be done by anyone who wants to while this retarded system is still chugging.
To insist on a no money system means sentencing humanity to something it simply cannot do. It would relegate anyone who lived on a gifting system to experience poverty and deprivation. We can make it differently, where we prosper not suffer.
When it all breaks down which it inevitably will, it should be good thinking that takes its place. You can be sure the current warped thinking is on the starting block to occupy that space. We need to occupy it by seeking an alternative money system TODAY! (Never crypto - which means of the crypt - still part of this paradigm)
Disagreement can be discussed politely without reverting to nasty wordage so I donāt agree with keeping anyone in a mess. Details on the basic criteria are in the About page. Basically, discussion and debate would be like you were in a college class on critical thinking where various concepts are welcome, but devolving into nasties are not. If nasty or ad hominem comments are better for you, you are free to take any part of this comment section to your own SS and make your own post.
Well I was hoping you could get beyond the hype of all this "mandated politeness". What you are advocating is censorship. This matrix is very tricky, I'm sure you know that. It's important we hold each other to thinking in the proper paradigm. You must be for censorship then. If someone is not polite, you just give them a public "schlapping", address what is going on so that you and they may evolve. How can we evolve when we keep cutting each other off? I can hear a tad of hostility in your tone which is something I didn't expect. What I expected was to have a rational and raw discussion without all that liberal sh!t. I suppose you think I'm being impolite by stating my views but that would be ad hominen instead of addressing the issue. I have this trouble fairly often with truth activists. The matrix is a program and it is very well entrenched. We need to be open to hearing other's assessments and honest feedback. I want to have a discussion amongst people who can speak candidly without worrying about the cultural norms what we call politeness. If someone is not polite, then just give them a dose of sarcomedy. NEVER EVER EVER must we censor. You did not address the seriousness of my message which is we must uphold free speech NO MATTER WHAT. It will benefit everyone. I'd love to dive deeper into this topic of politeness. I find it suffocating to be honest, everyone has a different opinion on what's polite. Often they find speakers of truth impolite, and that's the program running.
Thank you all for commenting. Note: this post is not intending to prove anything, only to describe the reaction of most people we meet who are not yet awake to the shenanigans of the world power structure.
āThe info I present on persons claimed to be dead but who may still be alive is just for example and discussion, but not fully provable. The Challenger crew still being alive seems well documented. It is hard NOT to believe they are alive. On Staycer being Lennon, besides looking like a plastic surgerized Lennon with the same freckles, there are no young man photos of Staycer and no internet footprint of what bands or gigs he played before and no Wiki bio. He's clearly a professional guitar player and should have been since the 80's when he was in his 30s.
āHand gestures are clearly made, but what they really mean in any one instance is not fully provable.
āThe part on banking is just proof of the structure of the banking system, the operation of which is open for all.
šPart 2 will be about egregious but provable topics, and of course malignant breakdown.
Stage Five: 9.11. Stage 6: Nukes, Stage 7: Wars & what they are a cover for, Stage 8: Viruses & Vaxes. Hopefully I can dig up some new info and twists.
PM, I don't think that the Challenger disaster people still being alive isn't provable. According to my "rules of reality" the Challenger disaster people are definitely walking around alive and they tell us they are - as is their wont with their psyops - by complete nonsense apart from the gobsmacking zero effort to hide the people by giving them different identities, eg:
In the 15m clip you link to we are shown former governor of Hawaii, George Ariyoshi, tell the remarkable tale of how Ellison Onizuka showed him a family photo that he was going to take up on the Challenger, inscribe it on its return and give it to him. Guess what? It survived the explosion and two months at sea after which Ellisonās brother Claude gave it to the governor. So reminiscent of the magic passport, of course.
https://youtu.be/BXkt9XZ6jsA?si=xFI66hstJTL6L0pd&t=559
Another clear example of their deliberate nonsense is given to us in a post about an Esquire article:
https://medium.com/the-making-of-an-ex-nuke/i-wanted-to-write-a-biographical-piece-about-judy-resnik-15bdd1ac9122
'The only thing we discover about Resnik in the Esquire article is that her ex-boyfriend sued NASA over the loss of a Dunhill cigarette lighter she carried in her personal preference kit aboard Challenger. You read that correctly: he didnāt sue NASA over his former girlfriendās wrongful death, but because they lost his cigarette lighter somewhere in the Atlantic. What a guy. Itās telling that NASAās astronaut corps provided no comments to the authors during the research and writing phases of āThe Epic Flight of Judith Resnik.ā'
Nonsensical from at least three angles:
--- Judith Resnik had no need of a cigarette lighter aboard a spaceship and payload would have been strictly controlled weight-wise.
--- Regardless of function, JR would never have taken aboard such a dangerous item as a lighter in an oxygen-rich environment
--- JR's boyfriend would not have tried to sue NASA over the loss of his cigarette lighter.
It's so interesting what people find signifies proof and what doesn't.
To my mind if there are quite a number of items that favour an hypothesis and there are zero items that contradict it and no other reason to doubt it then I call that proof.
In the case of the Challenger disaster while there might seem to be an item that calls the fake hypothesis into question, namely that there is evidence of Judith Resnik acting in both professions of astronaut and legal academic, there is actual evidence that allows this rather extraordinary situation - she was a brilliant student and attended humanities day classes in one institution and evening engineering classes in another institution a short distance away contemporaneously.
Where we do have strong evidence that calls an hypothesis into question is that of Mark Staycer really being John Lennon and that is of the funeral service for Mark (https://www.youtube.com/live/Fmw4S-mG2tw) where friends from childhood, a guy he worked with, his son and his wife (-ex?) speak about him in a manner and with details that simply do not match fake at all. We also don't have what I'd call very strong evidence of them being the same person in the first place as I think while they look remarkably alike they don't look like the same person - although I accept that work could be done to alter them slightly (as was done with the Challenger people in the case of Dick Scobie's ears and Ronald McNair's teeth) they just don't look like the same person to me whereas all the Challenger people do. I do not accept certain claims by MM of similarity such as vein pattern in hands and index fingers although other similarities may exist such as matching loss of bicuspid teeth but even there it's not 100% clear.
I accept that JL's death may have been faked and I shall look into it and it seems that the film, Let Him Be, deliberately created a sense of ambiguity about whether Mark Staycer was really him but that doesn't make the two guys the same person.
My opinion is that you should get rid of the Mark Staycer / John Lennon thing. If you want normies to recognise the lies we are told I think it's best to avoid items that lack solidity and that item definitely lacks solidity. Obviously, each time you put forward an item that someone else won't accept you undermine yourself when putting forward other items. There are so very many items which are clearly psyops why choose something which isn't solid?
Again thanks for your efforts! I 99% believe Challenger was fake yes, but that is not proof as we donāt have dental records, fingerprints to compare, though FPs are not 100%, and DNA, well we know where that belongs.
On JL well the point of my post is not to PROVE yes or no for each example, it is to see who will show inquisitiveness and who will just buck like a ānormieā. There are lots of yes MS is JL and some or lots of no, maybeā¦. All the Beatles were spooks and when spooks die we should just say, āthey faked it againā.
See my disclaimer in the top pinned comment and thanks as always! I would say though that me and you should not take up too many comments on the post, you can move to DM if you really want. But no, Iām not removing it. My disclaimer and your comments are enough to spark people to think.
But why truncate the conversation? Just asking? What is the motivation to do that? I'd like to read more but if anyone doesn't, there's always the scroll bar, yeah?
You mean between me and Petraļ¼ We have a few year history of long drawn out discussion. Some are ok and I respect her. But I have other personal things I need to do and she knows I have only so much ability for long engagements. To some degree, I will moderate the comment sections for readability for everyone. Most readers do not favor long back and forth discussions and this SS has incurred a number of attacks, and multiple long diatribe comments can be a form of attack. I hope you can understand my feelings here.
I'm very sympathetic to your feelings, however I am more sympathetic to humanity's survival. And free speech IS our only way of survival. It is our only means of countering the advantages that our adversaries optimize to degrade humanity. I understand that it's hard sometimes to put up with trolls, etc., however we have to grow also, and trolls only help us figure out how we do it. Convenience is often the way "evil" gets us to agree with them, gets us to make conditions right for them. There is NO reason to censor AT ALL. Though I am an absolutist on this, (because I understand it is our key outta here) I think we still need to make provision for certain circumstances that may arise, such as spammers, etc. Therefore the way to handle it best of all if we are going to censor is to get the pulse of how others feel and do a survey or a poll before cutting someone's expression off. It ought NEVER to be done unilaterally in the public sphere. Imagine if we did this, and felt it to heart how important it is - the psychos wouldn't have a leg to stand on. Everything they would do would be out in the open, which makes the conditions perfect for us and not for them!
I am very clear and strong on this and may sound pedantic but free speech is our only way out of this labyrinth. Watch them squirm when the people, when every individual, is granted the fortification of this birthright. It would make the "ph" unfavorable for psychopaths to live with. They would not be able to blatantly breach this inviolable birthright, it would be shocking to witness, in a world we create that is open and transparent. Won't you be on the side of freedom? Free speech is the gateway to it. I cannot emphasize how important this is for our emancipation. Surely a little tolerance or ignoring comments or articles we don't like, is sufficient "payment" to have freedom of speech?
I couldn't agree more with you on free speech, Denise.
I don't really understand the long engagement problem, PM. Sure, if you don't wish to continue the discussion because you're otherwise occupied then you can just say, "I'm busy, that's all I'm prepared to say on the subject," and then if the other person wishes to say more themselves then that's OK, no? even if you've said all you're prepared to say.
I have to say I find it a little odd that quite a number of Substackers feel it's perfectly fine to block others because like Denise I rank freedom of speech very, very highly ... and when you consider how gagged we are by the mainstream, if we start gagging people too then don't we risk being just like them? These are three comments I got from someone a few days ago on my post on American Moon.
"Petra, youāre as dumb as the box of rocks they pretended to bring bk."
"You must wear slipon shoes. Kindly fk off now, your deflections are lame af."
" ... Make sure to reply again though to ensure you have the last comment, you 77th brigade retardette š
Totally out of order, no? No need to block though, he only exposes himself and eventually the "conversation" dies. There wouldn't have been a conversation if I'd just ignored his first comment and sometimes I do that ... and probably should have on this occasion as it certainly didn't go anywhere good. I think in future I shall always ignore these kinds of comments.
Yes Iām busy with a āreal jobā and other things and the SS is completely free. If the person is just cursing or being stupid but nasty they get a warning., but actually the post says you need to be polite so its a 2nd warning already. So they are free so say any opinion yes, attacks no.
I did let Latypova and Broze, go on a nasty diatribe before, for the same reason you mention-to let them show themselves. But that was when I was new and these folks were quite prominent people. Been there done that, don't need to let people show anymore.
As I said this is like a college classroom. Opinion is great, if you start calling your teacher or classmates assholes or prick heads you will likely be asked to leave the class and fail the class if you continue. Free speech and nasty social interaction are not the same thing. On this, no I do not want to discuss further, full stop. You are always polite, your opinions are welcome even if I disagree, I don't recall asking you to edit a comment. But sure, it is not my business to tell you how to run your place, nor do I care much how others want to arrange their space.
I think when people comment with illwill like that, I make sure I give them a good public "schlapping". We are evolving and so we have to learn to take things in our stride and understand that most people are unaware of what's going on let alone our evolution. I think we're going to catapult our evolution because we have been held down so long. And free speech will most probably be the basis of the enlightened society. It supports individual sovereignty more than anything else. I'd like to also see everyone condemning vociferously the fact that we kill our own species intentionally. Sure it will happen by accident, but it's no accident to have armies to do it, or even abortion. The idea of intentionally killing our own kind would cause listeners to recoil. If we were like this, the media couldn't exist like it does. We are such a killing society - it's like the only solution to everything is kill, kill, kill. Or censor. We really need to change these programs. I sure hope Proton Magic does. It's funny to see other truthers react the way he did. I have the utmost respect for him but it just seems so unenlightened or something.
I added this to the post FYI
If I was Staycer and NOT Lennon, I would be very open about who I was as a child and young man, and I would be open about my great ability to play the Lennon role. I would not want crazy groupies or dangerous people coming after me.
I can not find any childhood or young man Staycer photos, or what bands he played for in the past. If he can play Lennon near perfectly he should have had a past music history, even among night clubs and an internet footprint as such. He just came out of nowhere to be a perfect Lennon imitator at a professional level of guitar playing? I don't buy that. Every American has a high school yearbook photo, and even if you lose yours, there are usually 100 others who have theirs, these donāt disappear from the world. Where is his?
Same as if I was called a Challenger astroNUT, I would prove I was not and happily charge lot of $$$ for interviews. Did Staycer do that? Not that I know.
Could Staycer be hiding who he really is even if not Lennon, or could Lennon be hiding that he is Staycer? To die at 69 is a bit young, and does the Staycer photo in the post from 2017 look 63? Sorry I donāt think so. He looks well over 70.
PM, there is a slideshow of photos shown at his memorial some of which show him younger including one photo that looks like a yearbook photo and at 3:50 there's a photo where you can see who I think it's safe to infer is his son, Christian, on the right of him.
Slideshow - https://www.tributeslides.com/tributes/show/XH65T27J2N37459Y
At his memorial, Christian and his wife, Jan, also speak as do people who've known him since childhood and others.
It all seems very convincing to me, certainly I don't see any obvious psyop clues ... other than his memorial service video is 55:11 :)
Memorial - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fmw4S-mG2tw
Mark did quite a lot of radio work by the sound of it and one person pays tribute to his knowledge of country music. While Mark was obviously very much into John Lennon and the Beatles he seemed to have a love of music generally and he was in a Beatles tribute band before the movie - that's how he was selected to be in it.
In this clip from 2012 he would have been about 58 and I think that's the age he looks - certainly I think he looks more that age than the 73 John Lennon would have been. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2I4Dd2PzlWQ&list=PLx6TboQfxLC4h8Dr177h3VU_6flkMuT32
From a Beatles festival FB page - https://www.facebook.com/groups/826492950728535/?multi_permalinks=7453067864737644
"I have lost another... I'm not sad, I'm celebrating the life of an amazing man. Mark Staycer and I worked together at WTCM radio back in the day. We were definitely the odd ones there. We got along great as we both loved music, horsing around (no, not us), collecting guitar picks and I even had him play on Billy B's CD on the song Gimmie More which you can hear in the comments. (that's him talking at the beginning and playing the acoustic guitar). This has definitely been a rough week, but I'm good, I'm playing music, cleaning the house and enjoying life. RIP MICK"
Thanks for your great efforts Petra! As usual we will just have to continue our friendly discussionsā”.
To make reading easier Iāll make a list,
1. We donāt really know who these folks are in the Tribute video. Many āsort-ofā Staycer looking persons donāt really have the shape of his face. The guy with the mustache and black hair doesnāt look like Staycer or any of the other lookalikes, to me. You may have a different opinion but still, we canāt prove who these persons are.
2. My opinion on what plastics can do differs from yours. I do know persons in their 70s in my personal life who look 58 after surgery. This famous Japanese actress https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tetsuko_Kuroyanagi
Was 82 in this Wiki photo, but could pass for 68. She is heavily surgerized. I saw her in the lobby of a hotel around 10 yrs ago when she was 82, did not look like an old lady one bit.
3. The photos in the Tribute are a mix of Staycer as we know him over the past 15-20 yrs mixed in with supposed, āhim in the pastā (that don't look like him nor each other), and unknown persons. They are an not organic montage as you might see in a google photo search.
4. I could not find any organic montage photos of vids of Staycer on air on any of the radio stations, DJs should have many.
5. None of the photos shown of past Staycer has any way of confirmation, like a yearbook or graduation photo where we can see the name and date and maybe even call the school registrar. Where are the photos of this professional guitarist over the decades being in a band or solo gig? He can play just like Lennon but didnāt make $ from gigs in the 80s and 90s? He just came out of nowhere to be the greatest thing besides a young Lennon? That makes no sense.
6. If Staycer was Lennon, we know heās got handlers in INTEL and this is the exact kind of vid they would make. Saddened he died (maybe died?), they would make us think this pic show was truly Staycer from young to old but it misses any actual proof of these folks or him as I have mentioned above. Iām sure you remember my post on Manson with the Sharon and Patti Tate BS. That they like to fake us on famous persons a given.
āFor now we just have to agree there is no absolute proving or disproving, we should stay open to anything.
For me to consider that Mark Staycer is really John Lennon, what I need to start is a golden nugget that suggests there is fakery and I don't see any golden nugget. Everything presented seems consistent to me with Mark Staycer being who he's said to be. All the things that might be considered anomalous I'd not judge as being so anomalous that they favour fakery and so there's simply no starting point for me. Sure, he could have had plastic surgery to look younger but "coulds" without any golden nugget don't mean anything to me. The thing is he just does not look as if he's John Lennon to me - he looks like someone who looks like John Lennon. And all the tributes seem 100% genuine and I simply do not see any of the Revelation of the Method signs apart from that 55:11 video length which, of course, could be purely coincidental.
Considering though that there's nothing definitive that says he really is John Lennon I'd most strenuously argue that it's not a good idea to put the idea forward to normies.
When my sister tried to tell me that controlled demolition was used on 9/11 I feel that her previous attempt at getting me to disbelieve the moon landings which I felt was very poor (and still do) probably biased me against considering her argument for 9/11. It could have just been that the notion of staging seemed too far-fetched because I was clueless but no doubt the ML thing did not help.
We don't want to be treated as the Boy Who Cried Wolf, right? That's something we surely want to avoid as much as possible and I cannot get that through to the disbelievers of the ML. There are so many agents out there saying we didn't go to the moon and all that money spent on them has a very good reason - undermining our credibility.
āThe sum of, fake Lennon death, Staycer comes out of nowhere, no past history of professional music playing, no full set of docs from his past nor is he open about it. He does not welcome challenge to present all or even any of his docs (birth certif, ss card, HS/college Yearbook. HS/college matriculation/registration/graduation docs), friends from school days that are also confirmable from Yearbooks, no Wiki page-I suspect they don't want you to see what's NOT there.
šStaycer provides NO DOCS photos, names of coworkers/associates for any of these things. HE IS BLATANTLY HIDING HIS PAST.
āBesides the Wiki page I personally have all these docs right in my desk drawer and file cabinet, and copies or origs in multiple other places. You could call my coworkers from 20-30-40 years ago, call others in my Yearbook. If I was Staycer I would NOT want to be hounded as Lennon. I would show my IDs etc and even charge $$$ to curiosity seekers for interviews. He is doing the same thing as the Challenger crew is doing, the "Oh, I'm not the dead person you think I am, but sorry I won't prove it".
āAll my photos from childhood to now are clearly me, you can see the exactness slowly change every few years. I have printed and digital albums of this and all my family, like most people. Where are his besides the non-lookalikes on the tribute vids.
āStaycer's Age in 2017 does not look 63, and the icing on all this case is the match of 2 freckles/moles on face. Did anyone do a forensic voice analysis? I suspect they don't want to do this.
As usual we've both said our parts and time to move on!
Yes, it is all a Truman Show. Even Trump, even Obama, the whole cast.
"EVEN Trump, EVEN Obama" ? lol
I'd say of all the people most likely to be LIARS, it's govt. types. Western ones, anyway.
Indeed, the present "money" system is a stranglehold on Our planet. But when One sees that, irrespective of the form of energy accounting tokens, the psychopaths will always be the Ones promoted to the top, even tangibles used to account for the energy We add into a system allow the psychopaths to take control (not stopping short of breaking the three Laws of Ethics as most of Us would), it is clear that irrespective of "debt" or any other such added element, psychopaths will garner the most for the power over Others it offers.
And even if We all started out with equal amounts, it would not be long before Most live in poverty, and the psychopaths are living richly, able to buy the things and the People to Their agendas.
Most who are "awake" still think We MUST keep money of some kind, when in fact, We don't.
Money accounts for Our energy added into a system. Free energy technology makes accounting for energy pointless. 80% of Us presently do little more than move money around - clearly not needed for the necessary work We need done - food, clothing, shelter, transportation, and communication.
Given that, the way to end the control of the moneyed psychopaths is to obsolete Their single tool to widespread power over Us. And that will be done by getting the free energy tech out in the open - 100% of the cost of EVERYTHING is energy; the resources sit here freely but it takes energy to put them into useful configuration.
I guess in 10 years after free energy emerges in the open, as the cost of energy is removed, automation of necessary work no One wants to do will have happened, and the remaining work will be creative and enough of Us will want to do it.
Maybe 5% of Us would be required.
The "normie" does not see this. (S)He believes the lies that "free energy is impossible." Because the moneyed psychopaths in control keep saying that, using "thermodynamics" as "proof." They don't see that We swim in an ocean of energy and that accessing it does not break any "laws."
That the einsteinian bunk, with all its ad hoc additions and multiple "renormalizations" (where the math goes to infinity and reality does not) and many "mysteries" was deliberately foisted on Us because it does NOT predict the energy in the aether We swim in.
In fact, there is a theory that has no need for ad hoc things and renormalizations, and has no mysteries - and predicts the energy in the aether and that We can extract it. It needs no "bending of spacetime - being euclidean.
That theory is subquantum kinetics (SQK) by the late Dr. Paul A. LaViolette. He took an "as above, so below" approach, with chemical kinetics, applying them subquantumly. And everything worked.
I will persist in advocating for obsoleting that dangerous (it promotes psychopaths to power) and archaic (They hide the tech that makes it so) tool and freeing Humanity to the vast abundance of Our planet.
With the three Laws of Ethics ruling, and the Betterment Ethic (to look for what You love to do that helps the most) encouraged, Humanity will emerge from this dark, moneyed age, into a glorious future.
.
Love always!
Thanks AS for the interesting comment!
Most welcome. It is My mission to solve for those moneyed psychopaths that indoctrinate normies, and pay for psyops and more. My love for Humanity, so beset, drives Me.
Love always, little proton!
They have indoctrinated us thoroughly with the money spell. Yes we could live fantasmagorically without money but it's not going to happen if we simply wait for free energy to appear. That's being passive and the folks that hold the blueprints (and the weapons) plan everything to a tee. Debt-based money trains us to be in an artificial scarcity. Our psyche has been programmed to see everything in scarcity term, (there's not enough) The issuance of money ensures scarcity and that's because interest is slapped on the top of the money we borrow (only borrowed money comes into the economy). That means only money issued by banks comes into the economy. So, who gets all the colostrum? The banks of course. Therefore if "the people" bit by bit, more by more, stopped paying interest on their loans, who would that affect? Who would that target? The banks of course! Such an easy method but who's talking about it? There is no discussion of it to imagine it and breakdown how to do it. Very possible, only takes a decision. But one thing that will energize this into synergy - not only will we be poking a finger in the bankster's eyes, but we will share that saving (of not paying interest) with someone we know who could use a monthly stipend. That would go towards our benefaction endowment, and not the bankers. Nobody needs permission to do this. But even before doing it, let's talk about it, let's toss it around. Why not hey? You're not too chicken to, are you? (You = whoever is reading this)
I am not waiting. I am encouraging Ones who CAN to bring it out. Avidly and often. I would happily do it Myself if I could.
Any money debt based or not will promote psychopaths to the top. Yes, it has added issues, but at the foundation itās because money promoted psychopaths.
Without the illusion, this boardgame turned digital wouldn't be any "fun" for those that see its digi-holographic nature. We need the normies to help us connect dots in their own weird way of bending to their "reality".
It's been a good game for those that have played & see thru the illusion :)
Thanks JM!
Another interesting variable of the script is that Nick Cage was in snake eyes & the CharLIE Kirk fakery connects to Cage who is ALSO playing Marilyn Manson AND the character Jeffree Star. ALL these actors play multiple characters.
This MK mind F@ck is meant to SPLIT personalities & create different characters The Not Sees were big on twins & twinning/splitting of the mind that has led to digital twinning. Once you know ........
I'm playing with the idea that the Transformer agenda connects to the biggest Biblical script involving King James & the promotion of industrial idol warship which has children confused & chopping off body parts or becoming happy/gay. It's pretty wild.
I suspect that the normies CAN'T SEE what's going on because they are running a consciousness drone program much like the actors are playing their characters on the whirled stage.
I totally agree, my friend. A YTer who goes by "Conscious X" does amazing analyses of these multi-character actors:
https://www.youtube.com/@ConsciousX777/videos
The one he did on Elvis blew my mind!
This guy does take his work very deeply, discussing how these actors are all essentially *the same person," based on ancient templates. It's really effing interesting.
No doubt Sharine! ConsciousX's content is mind bending for sure! I just watched the one on Elvis ... the KING. So many "lab grown" Trump connections! AND, on top of THAT, we just had the No Kings ritual!
This place is a trip! ((hugs))
The thing I've learned is that anyone I can't speak to by texting or picking up the phone or emailing, is not in my interest. Celebrities and public or famous people are part of the Big Stage. I feel we need to come back to our own circles. There are plenty of interesting characters there, and we're part of the drama, instead of just being a spectator.
Have you seen Noel Joshua Hadley's writings? He did a fabulous breakdown of Lucille Ball's ancestry. "Queen" of Comedy, wink wink.
Kingsā ļø and Queensš everywhere!
Hugs back!
I have NOT, But now you've piqued my interest so I shall look into Hadley's work. Thank You !
& Lol :)
He's a mercenary, keeps the information hostage until you give him a fee. Oh these types don't know what they're doing - they're keeping the same paradigm loud and strong!
Very interesting!
Good points. But why do we not have our own narrative? That term "gay" they usurped - it used to be a word that bestowed joy, but now it is only used to elevate homosexuality. That may have been needed when minds were more closed, but now we ought to have a different name for homosexuality and reclaim the word gay, to be a generic term, not limited to simply homosexuals. We need a supplementary dictionary! Why wait for the overlords? What's a word we can use instead of "gay" while keeping the meaning of homosexuality to it?
Lolol, A new narrative isn't really needed.
I hear the š kids are calling themselves "munchers" ... as in carpet munchers/pillow munchers.
I think they have this handled :)
I love this mind expanding substack.
It really is excellent, re Lennon, it is highly plausible the death fakery. The Beatles came out of Tavistock and nothing good comes out of that fkn mind control place. Please excuse any typos i am squinting coz iām too lazy to go get my specs!š¤
I love all the comments they make me smile and chuckle which is much needed in this weird and wonderful game of life!šwell done Protonšš»
Are you saying that governments lie?
Iād be lying if I said they never lied.
Excellent as always Proton! What to believe, what not to believe is a dice roll now. Itās safe to assume that everything is fake until proven otherwise. I still have a majority of family and friends who are still being ātestedā for propaganda narrative, and are convinced that their sniffles and sore throat are the ālong versionā of the aforementioned narrative. One brother in-law who still believes that aluminum jetliners flew through a structural steel office tower and the fuel on board vaporized 500,000 tons of steel, concrete, plumbing fixtures, office furniture and peopleā¦.( I must unroll my eyes in order to continue). Another brother in-law is heartbroken by the āwarā in Ukraine and that the evil empire of Russia must be defeated. I show him videos of the dance clubs in Kiev that are full of young raverās.. they must all be on leave from their duties at the Russian front. (I realize these videos could be fake as well.. but what isnāt?). My favourite new addition to this war movie is that not only does the leader and military genius of Ukraine dress in olive drab fatigues as he jets around the world for photo opportunities, guns and money, but the leader of the evil empire is now clad in camouflage military gear as he gives his latest address on the status of the āwarā. I can hardly wait to see which uniform Donald is going to wear for Halloween! The whole world is a stage, but the people are more concerned with why a baseball player who earns $70 million dollars a year hasnāt decimated the opposing team single handed than paying attention to what has been fed to them for decades! I believe it was Nero who said ābread and circusesāā¦ this is a ātruthā!
Look forward to reading your next chapter!
Thanks Woody, unfortunately these bros in laws run rampant. Stage 5 will be 9.11 already written, and and Stage 6 will be fake nukes also already written just now. These will be nearly undebunkable short essays.
By next week you should get these and can send to your bros in law "from Proton magic with love".
1. Challenger - absolutely
2. Staycer - good impersonator - he really goes the whole hog as he's American but speaks with a bit of a Liverpudlian accent with the US accent showing through - https://youtu.be/SEXPK5_XLtk?si=KjL1KQxVfOtnKJuI&t=130
3. Occult signs - irrefutable
4. FSB - never heard of it but no doubt you're totally right on that one.
Maybe, maybe its Lennon with a poor Michigan accent? See the link at the top of that section to the Mathis post, it is much more thorough than my abstract. Happy you give more detail after reading it, but dont give us and AI report! Ahhhhh.....
It's simply not certain enough, PM. The notion of John Lennon altering his accent in that way strikes me as highly improbable. I don't think you can expect people to believe things that don't have sufficient evidence and judging by how he looks and that funny accent I'm not convinced and even if I looked further and found things that were more compelling I still wouldn't be convinced. If someone researched and found there was no trace of Mark Staycer growing up then OK I'd pay attention. Mark seems reverential and John Lennon was not the reverential type. We are told Mark died peacefully in his sleep a couple of years ago - wonder if it was the jab.
If you are coming at it without reading the fakery of the killing and more details about Staycer I can agree. So again, if you read the MM article you would have a better position pro or con. This post though is not to trying to make full proofs on things. It is whether a staunch normie would buck, how hard, or be inquisitive and open minded.
I started trying to read MM's article but it's difficult to read a pdf on the phone. I found a video of friends and loved ones giving eulogies at Mark Staycer's funeral and the people seem totally genuine. I'll have at look at MM's article next time I'm on a computer but I think the funeral service puts paid to Mark really being JL for me. Fakery of his death I'm open to however.
https://www.youtube.com/live/Fmw4S-mG2tw?si=20d1Otl7Lg15Me-I
as yet another piece of the puzzle . . . May I submit for consideration the fact that no airliner ever flown could have performed in a crash as was alleged for FLT11, FLT175, FLT77, & FLT93 . .
can U dig it?
Thanks Bob, you are correct. There are so many topics on the planes, like where speed vs air pressure would break the plane apart etc. I wanted to give proofs with imagery and a few indisputable points because the post can only be so long. Once we know the planes at the WTC were image projections, and the other two just stories, the rest is moot so to speak. Without indisputable proof, people could, and did, still argue there were planes but souped up military grade yada yada...but you can't argue planes melting into buildings or into the ground!
Thanks, I appreciate your input.
If its funny fake money, there can't be any debt, can there.
Correct! DINOs do exist: Debt In Name Only (aka if you believe it)
Okay, as much love as I have for you, PM, I have to say this, too:
There is a sign that is "hook 'em horns" that is the sign for the U of Texas Longhorns! Similarly, there is a sign that looks like a peace sign, but with the thumb out, and I BELIEVE that is the Sign Language sign for "I love you," but I still have to look that up...
All that said, there's no doubt that these geeks like to play little games that are all about "WE are in the club, and YOU are not, and you don't even know what's what" bull pucky, yes, INDEED. We are "talking cows," after all. (rolling mine eyes, in a very canine way) Regardless, good post.
Obviously the Lennon death, like most high profile, premature deaths of ācelebritiesā was faked. This is because the cryptocracy are obsessed with bi-Baal references, using astrotheological rituals and human sacrifice re-enacted on certain dates, rather than carry out real killings. The Rosicrucian signature is usually always present in these hoaxes. Such as Lennon posing with a rose. And a single rose on his memorial.
However, Miles Mathis gets so much wrong, definitely on purpose. He promotes the fake constitution, the separate country delusion, the fraudulent legal system, fake physics and fake history among other idiotic tropes. He never fingers the Vatican or Jesuits, because heās obviously a cult member.
His essay on Staycer-Lennon is non-sense: In my humble opinion. They donāt look remotely alike. I found nine points of difference in the two men. Mathis has poor visuo-spatial ability and heās a pathological liar.
With regard to ānormiesā ā¦ Whatās normal? Mass delusion? Regurgitation without research?
āAdult naĆÆvetĆ©ā is the term I saw yesterday to describe those sleepwalking through life.
Adults who need govt or a āleaderā, or anyone to tell them how to live or assist them live are basically children. Theyāre infants in adult bodies.
I prefer the word ānescientā to describe those who arenāt aware of all the frauds and fakery.
Walking, talking, mask wearing, triple boosted zombies can only repeat what theyāve been told on tv or at school, because they never learned how to question false authority or think for themselves.
Thereās nothing normal about them, unfortunately.
The arrogant cult members with their asinine oral traditions, their childish cult clubs like Jobs daughters, Rainbow girls or DeMolay are just as mind controlled.
Almost everyone is under heavy mind control, unfortunately. Itās obviously deliberate. Everyone has their version of reality and truth and this is because thereās nothing but layer upon layer of disinformation.
Society, religion, language, culture and education are designed so that mass mind control is almost inescapable.
If people donāt know how mind control actually works, how can they possibly know how to reverse it themselves?
Mind control is definitely not MKULTRA experiments, thatās a laughable CIA psyop.
Mind control is simply repetition, plus societal pressure to conform and obey. This has been proven again and again in many psychological experiments with children and adults.
Humans learn by mimicry, are highly suggestible and easily mind controlled.
If you dare to challenge their false perceptions, delusions or the beliefs of someone under mind control, youāll get immediate overreaction, open hostility, circular logic, unsupported claims and links to their non-sense articles with even more unsupported claims.
Those who claim theyāre awake (but are really just Saturn-solar cult members) like to push magical thinking fantasies, obvious psyops, hoaxes and complete delusions. Theyāre recycled scripts. They should try something new.
They donāt offer practical solutions - like what we can do right now - they just want to impose THEIR version of tyranny.
They seem to forget they donāt have a right to tell anyone how to live, what to do, or what to āabolishā.
Iād like to abolish all stupidity and lies but thatās obviously not realistic. All we can do is change ourselves. Our behavior. Individually. Thatās it.
Does anyone here realize how much labor, time, effort and knowledge it takes to grow a small vegetable garden? How much time and effort it takes to can enough foods to get through a frozen winter? Or how to raise and kill their own livestock?
The non-sense I see here everyday is hilarious. Shills wonāt stop shilling and liars wonāt stop lying.
There are immediate solutions to the tyranny that shills on substack wonāt address such as jury nullification, which offers a way to hobble the cryptocracy immediately.
Introduction to jury nullification:
https://player.captivate.fm/episode/d83a9f3c-d5b8-4728-9e36-0a1db1ca4a9f/
What I want to know (which I never see on substack or anywhere else on the internet) is does anyone here have any suggestions for what topics trigger curiosity from the sleepwalkers to awaken, or have ideas on how can we coax the vaxxed zombies and our own relatives and friends out of their tv watching stupors, to rejoin living men and women, discard their citizenSHIP illusion, their fear of contagion and their belief in the sanctity of debt slavery?
Thanks for those insights. I knew MM was narrative twisting clearly when I saw āheā barely said anything about Covid and was against the no-virus concept.
Today Greg Reese has put out an astrotheological discussion about a supposed comet passing the solar system now. I suspect he's signaling to his minions but also pushing the āaliens are comingā PSYOP. I think you would find it amusing but it may have some deeper and malevolent meaning for things on the ground.
With regard to the alleged comet, itās very interesting.
Reese = Infowars = DoD
Check out the āAlien techā angle here:
https://nypost.com/2025/09/29/science/comet-and-potential-alien-probe-3i-atlas-larger-than-predicted/
The alien narrative is something the controllers have been cultivating long before the Area 51 psyop.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extraterrestrials_in_fiction
Nothing the controllers do would surprise me. Project Blue Beam. A War of the Worlds type faux attack on certain cities or ānationsā. Using conventional weaponry from the āStar Warsā program.
Kim KarTRASHian was promoting the moon landing hoax a few days ago, so thereās definitely a scripted, premeditated theme thatās being pushed hard by the controllers. https://eu.usatoday.com/story/entertainment/celebrities/2025/10/31/kim-kardashian-moon-landing-nasa/87004664007/
Another divide and conquer hoax possibly?
The Post article is complete propaganda. I wonder if the Loeb sitting photo was almost a self FM handshake or attempting to be one. Anyway, heās a paid bullshitter. Thanks.
Lol. Of course itās āpropagandaā. Thereās no aliens. Thereās no alien tech.
What I was trying to intimate (not very successfully, obviously) is that the controllers are pushing this alien non-sense in the mainstream media. They donāt print or promote anything without a reason. Without a plan.
AI is failing to live up to the hype: https://www.weforum.org/stories/2025/10/is-the-ai-cyber-bubble-about-to-burst/
Thereās a stock market bubble.
The faked Israel-Gaza war isnāt for nothing, theyāre fulfilling Bi-Baal prophesy.
Something is in the works. A ādisasterā hoax is on the horizon.
WEF has long predicted a cyber-polygon-pandemic.
MITRE predicts an EMP attack:
https://www.mitre.org/news-insights/impact-story/electromagnetic-pulse-dangerous-overlooked-threat
More recently - in 2024 - MITRE ran a tabletop exercise:
āMITREās 2024 tabletop exerciseāwhich simulated a prolonged, multi-region, multisector cyberattack targeting U.S. critical infrastructure.ā
These two authors on the link below in 2011, āpredictedā the faux-demic (EMF/vaccine deaths).
Whatever hoax is planned next, is probably on their list of controller menu items:
https://jfsdigital.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/162-A05.pdf
āSome Wild (and "Not-so-Wild") Cards:
ō° Global pandemic kills tens of millions
ō° Nuclear weapon(s) exploded
ō° Israel attacks Iran's nuclear capability
ō° Internet crippled for months by cyberwar or cyberterror
ō° Huge volcanic explosion cuts food production by half
ō° Clear discovery of extraterrestrial intelligence
ō° Cheap and widely available life extension techniques
ō° "Big One" earthquake in California
ō° Nuclear power plant failure puts industry on hold [we listed this in 2010; it
is now happening to some degree due to the March 2011 Fukushima disas-
ter.]
ō° Synthetic biology creates many new life forms
ō° Cloning of humans
ō° Stadium-size asteroid hits earth [very unlikely, but widely considered]ā
Yes, completely agree
FYI, I added this to the post. It is not proof that Staycer is Lennon, but the whole story about Staycer is quite rotten if he is not JL because 1. There is no bio, photos, or history of prior gigs or bands though he plays guitar and sings at a professional level, 2. He puts out no provable info on his upbringing, family, past schooling, young photos etc. 3. If I was not Lennon and only an impersonator I would want to be clear I was just an impersonator and I would be quite open about my past and willing to show it. I would not want curiosity seekers to barrage or harass me, or even worse, if they thought I was really Lennon. 4. Staycer is said to have died in '23 at 69 years old. The photo in the post in '17 of a 63 y/o Staycer looks like a man past 75 not 63. Lennon or not, Staycer is not being honest about something. I lean to think he is a surgerized Lennon.
Please note that the 4th amendment is routinely violated at every airport in this Republic and for absolutely NO reason whatsoever . . .
Jeannettecally Modifiedš
What a Brilliant handle!
Gave me a chuckle considering what the crazies are doing.
Thank You :) š
Excellent, thank you.
I'm politely and logically agreeing with you.š I have seen all these behaviours and been at their receiving end since convid. There's none so blind as those who do not wish to see. I take it you've read escape-key (esc) on this platform? Comprehensive analyses of the financial and clearing house system.
Thank you. Can you tell me what, "reade escape-key (esc)" means? Sorry is that a SS name? If so pls give link, thx.
Hi. No problem. It's a Substack writer. Here is one of his posts:
https://open.substack.com/pub/escapekey/p/the-financialisation-of-compliance?r=ts037&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
Its very thorough-a bit too long for busy people-but I will bookmark it!
Yup! He's encyclopaedic in his research and incredibly thorough. Well worth the attempt - or at least to download as a reference source. It's incredibly meticulously put together.
He should have a short and long version, like a link at the top for short. That gets better readership.
Yes. That would be a good idea!
The "reade" was just a typo! Corrected.
I love your posts but when I saw this demand :"ļ½You must be polite and logical to comment on this postļ½" I nearly lost my coffee load. Oh really? What if I'm not polite? Who decides what's polite? You? Oh yeah, because you "own the page" right? Yeah that's the kind of thinking that keeps us in this mess. I want to pass something to ya, if we want a new paradigm, we need to act different (sic), we need to think different (sic). We need to understand the imperative importance of free speech. I take it you're FOR free speech, yeah? If someone asked you, you'd say you defend it I'm sure. However telling people what to write is not free speech, it is not demonstrating the belief that we are each a sovereign. Just sayin'. New paradigm needs new thinking.
As for money, money that issues debt is like using a tool to smack you in the face with. Money IS a tool, but this money system is a tool for bashing people in the face with. We can't be without it immediately because that would cause unknowable shockwaves, but we can be laying a path where we will eventually be without it. And it is my bet that we can be totally without money within ten years. But so inured to its spell and hypnosis, the belief in scarcity is so woven into our fiber, that it will take another money system to show how money can be "done right". Money that is used as a tool FOR everyone not as a cudgel. This is so easy to be done but nobody is seeking it.
There is no way to get from this barbarianism and retardation (what they've done to our psyche) without some kind of money system to get us to a no-money world. An alternative money system will only be the bridge. Ten years is probably plenty of time to test it and it can be done by anyone who wants to while this retarded system is still chugging.
To insist on a no money system means sentencing humanity to something it simply cannot do. It would relegate anyone who lived on a gifting system to experience poverty and deprivation. We can make it differently, where we prosper not suffer.
When it all breaks down which it inevitably will, it should be good thinking that takes its place. You can be sure the current warped thinking is on the starting block to occupy that space. We need to occupy it by seeking an alternative money system TODAY! (Never crypto - which means of the crypt - still part of this paradigm)
Disagreement can be discussed politely without reverting to nasty wordage so I donāt agree with keeping anyone in a mess. Details on the basic criteria are in the About page. Basically, discussion and debate would be like you were in a college class on critical thinking where various concepts are welcome, but devolving into nasties are not. If nasty or ad hominem comments are better for you, you are free to take any part of this comment section to your own SS and make your own post.
Well I was hoping you could get beyond the hype of all this "mandated politeness". What you are advocating is censorship. This matrix is very tricky, I'm sure you know that. It's important we hold each other to thinking in the proper paradigm. You must be for censorship then. If someone is not polite, you just give them a public "schlapping", address what is going on so that you and they may evolve. How can we evolve when we keep cutting each other off? I can hear a tad of hostility in your tone which is something I didn't expect. What I expected was to have a rational and raw discussion without all that liberal sh!t. I suppose you think I'm being impolite by stating my views but that would be ad hominen instead of addressing the issue. I have this trouble fairly often with truth activists. The matrix is a program and it is very well entrenched. We need to be open to hearing other's assessments and honest feedback. I want to have a discussion amongst people who can speak candidly without worrying about the cultural norms what we call politeness. If someone is not polite, then just give them a dose of sarcomedy. NEVER EVER EVER must we censor. You did not address the seriousness of my message which is we must uphold free speech NO MATTER WHAT. It will benefit everyone. I'd love to dive deeper into this topic of politeness. I find it suffocating to be honest, everyone has a different opinion on what's polite. Often they find speakers of truth impolite, and that's the program running.