NOTE: THIS POST IS UNDER ATTACK-Proving that the "Plasma Moon" story is propaganda aimed at the making the moon landing deniers coming 4 years later seem nutty, making part of the masses believe in any silly thing, and discrediting the other part that knows better.
Readers have written to me in complaint that two commenters, Fiona C. Hunt and The Blue Sky Maiden have made what seems a coordinated attack on the comment section. These comments have included aggressive and rude wordage, ad hominem attacks, and repetitive comments that to me are spamming alternative cosmic narratives. They have infringed on the Rules of Commentary Engagement noted in the About page at the top of this SS in multiple ways even after multiple requests by myself to be polite and desist from rude over-commentary that was also written clearly at the end of the post, and resulted in my banning them. This is a typical kind of "make a mess of the comment section" to discredit a post that normal persons would not do. They certainly just wasted their typing time, assuming they are not AI bots.
👉These 2 accounts also then jumped onto Sharine Borslien's SS most recent post and berated her there as well. Sharine is always polite and these accounts are clearly a tandem attack. They are helping us make a who's who of spooks that populate Substack. Considering their coming out on a post that is hanging out Medicine Girl's dirty laundry, myself and others have begun to assume they are connected to Medicine girl.
Most of the craters on the moon are not impact craters, they are the result of electrical scarring. They are too circular and too shallow to be impact craters. They also have other features that do not conform to a conventional impact crater. All the features conform perfectly with electrical scarring and have been demonstrated in the lab on a smaller scale.
The same is true for the rilles (channels) which scientists also cannot explain. For years they have told us they are collapsed lava tubes. But this makes no sense. They do not flow as lava would flow. They do, however, conform perfectly to electrical scarring channels, which have also been replicated in the lab, and are also sometimes produced in the ground on Earth by lightening strikes (at a smaller scale obviously).
The moon's features are consistent with the Electric Universe model, as promoted by the Thunderbolts Project and others. In this video you can see the results of electrical scarring, which match the features seen on the moon.
The dark 'seas' on the moon are consistent with expansion, an expansion which is also true for Earth and other planets. Neal Adams made some very good visualisations of this decades ago.
Note that this is not a theory, it is an observation. The continental plates of Earth fit together perfectly when you remove the much younger oceanic plates (essentially stuff them back into the rift zones where they came from). HOW the Earth expanded is still in the realm of theory, but the fact that it has is beyond doubt.
If the Earth has always been the same size then we have a situation where the continental plates happen to fit together perfectly on a much smaller sphere simply by removing the much younger oceanic crust - BY CHANCE! :)
That is infinitely improbable.
The much smaller Earth (200+ million years ago) allows for a much lower gravity back then, which also explains why the dinosaurs, insects and plant life were so much bigger back then, and why all life has consistently trended down in size over the last 500 million years.
The theories of Electric Universe and Expanding Earth (and other planets) upset the applecart and lead us to a new understanding of the 'laws' of nature, such as gravity. This probably opens the door to advance technologies (anti gravity, free energy etc) and this explains why these avenues of science are being ignored - at least in the public domain - and we are being spoon fed all the boring nonsense from official gatekeepers like Brian Cox and Neil deGrasse Tyson.
For the more inquisitive types they are fed the flat Earth and 'moon made out of cheese' theories to keep them occupied.
Ok thanks for the info. Perhaps there is electrical scarring, though I also see star shaped streaks from some craters suggesting debris from the crater are strewn out symmetrically like when you drop a golf ball into a pile of baking powder. Electrical or impacts, the results we see are indicative of a hard surface to me.
Impact theory is funny. Did prehistoric humans railgun the moon or whats up with the earth facing side looking like Verdun in 1917 ?
there is this machine out there, its called an electrical discharge machine, read about how it works. continents act as a capacitor on earth, and when they discharge its either one end to other end when the moon is on the other side of the planet or the moon if its above said unruly continent. you can reproduce every feature on the moon with that machine or the consequence of a sustained discharge event like supersonic winds carrying dust. but thats just my honest opinion.
Also the moon being plasma was the funniest thing i read this week, thanks.
I was reading that they suggest that electrostatic discharge events, possibly involving Earth-Moon capacitance dynamics, could have sculpted the lunar surface—especially if the Moon acted as a cathode during massive planetary-scale discharges. It's worth consideration.
Yes some of the craters are obviously impacts. I believe some impacts have been observed in real time. There was one in the 1800's I think which kicked up loads of dust for weeks.
But most of them are too circular and too shallow/ wide too be impacts.
Thanks, Proton. I have been deceived many times by such Mr. Foster's of the world and their "I'm not a shill, really" Medicine Girl type lapdogs. Reading your articles is helping me to hone my discerning abilities.
BSM has an admitted "speculative framework for cosmology", I'm not speculating what I can see on the moon's surface. I'm happy if you want to propose misconceptions, but you 1. need to have logical examples, not just critique linked elsewhere, and 2. you can't post this same comment in 2 places as that is spamming the comment section that is against the TOS in the About page.
Please delete one of them or I will do it for you. I want you to say your opinions openly and logically as I have noted. Vague critique and spamming is NG here.
Look, I do not wish you write on this post further. You have called me rude, smug, and unempathic. This is your last warning any further rude remark and I will ban you and delete all your comments. The post itself says you must be polite.
fiona, why are you berating me? I admitted to having been deceived, but also to figuring out how to trust my innate ability to discern. Have you never been deceived? (That's a rhetorical question.)
Good job and well played. I love that you capture everything you write.
Oh yes...I believe you used "rational" at least twice but meant the word "rationale" pronounced "raa-shun-naal" with those aa's as in rat. And which has a different meaning than "rational" btw.
PM, an interesting exploration of cultivated discombobulation, which now appears a foundational cornerstone of required institutional and individual 'bafflement', or a pursuit of AI induced psychosis, or merely following policy-based evidence, each ensuring that the erstwhile eugenicists continue with their pursuit of a multiple 'benefits' assault program.
Alerting the global multitude, or simply saving a crowd from wilful blindness, or just nudging a few away from conditioned acquiescence, all these appear laudable, ethical and principled ambitions.
I take heart in the observation that not everyone will stand patiently, tolerantly and without murmur in a line awaiting their terminal destination.
Have we now though, passed a point of diminishing return?
Erudite as always thank you Latus. I like this phrase very much, "foundational cornerstone of required institutional and individual 'bafflement". I would like to borrow it sometime without institutional or individual prejudice.
Besides letting off steam which is always an increasing return, I would say that educating the masses as to the purposes of these 2+2=5 memes is also a benefit because, 1. They normalize child think in adults aka derangement, 2. people start to repeat the meme and it catches on like fire on tumbleweed, and 3. These memes, when heard by uninitiated normies, only further the antipathy of normies to any rational conspiracy analysis. It's a clear night, going out to look see if I can find Medicine Girl's face in the moon.
You know my holographic stance already Proton so I won't be repeating myself here :) I agree that plasma moon doesn't fit the bill. There could be 2 moons. One we SEE & another that is a harmonic balancer that is solid. ... There is a theory that a moon was towed in to hold frequency gates. (impacting human consciousness)
I stand on freedom to voice opinion in opposition to those of the author if done so politely & with an OPEN mind & option to challenge dogma & change stance if better proof is presented.
What Medicine Girl did was obfuscate conversation leading to communication breakdown.
Speaking of, THIS IS CREEPY: I asked Chatbot about the moon situation & This was its response: "Want to chat about something else? I'm NOT able to discuss that topic, but I'm always happy to chat about other things! what else is on your mind?"
SO, IF the various moon theories are taboo to AI bots... They are DEFINATELY hiding something & nothing is as it APPEARS.
So of course I said" NO. I want to have an open discussion on what the moon REALLY is!" & it gave me several theories that you & I have already spoken on. SIGH ......
Hey JM! Interesting, try another AI and see. Yes, we got to be good conversation partners on this topic "back stage" didn't we. Thanks so much for that and for the comment here. Nobody realizes how deep you've gone into this with me as prelude to this post.
I feel like the LLM chatbot is only regurgitating everything that we discussed & packaged it in a way that I would WANT to hear. So, I discredit any further discussion with the data collecting, language mirroring chatbots.
Our conversations were most excellent Proton! Science met SIM & everything else in between! I Loved it!
I just had another thought about the "moon landing" & the phrase "one small step for man & a giant leap for mankind" I hate everything about that spell craft statement.
First we'd need to define man & mankind ... WHO is getting the short end of the stick? Man (origin)... or "kind of man".(container/clone)
Individual "man" is the participant in the spell of the symbolic boot & flag (sigil) stuffed in the ground (claiming resonance ownership) while "mankind" fuels the GLOBAList myth. The globalists want their boot on our neck & if the moon is a frequency resonator, then they may be symbolically stomping on our sovereign frequency with LIES using their CRAFT ... Spell craft (linguistic), witchcraft (conscious MANipulation), space craft (technological imprint) Mind craft (narrative engineering)
The Jewish gematria (291) on "moon landing" is interesting too. 291 also prompts phrases like Chosen one, psalms, eternal life, building, collision & prepare ... Very very interesting. You know I had to visit the esoteric side of this :)
I'm sure all this symbolism reverberated among their ilk like the proverbial flies on shit gang. I can only imagine what ET's would interpret here. He taught me a lot really and hope he is doing well.
Oh yeah! Spell kraft is their weapon. It's all about the signs & symbols ... IT's also HOW they speak to one another thru media. So deciphering their languishing language gives me hope that we can counter their icky ILK.
I miss ET sooo much, I was trying to channel my "inner ET". Whatever plane of perception he's on, I know he's shining his light bright!
Thanks AS. I have read that going thru the poles makes a shorter trip thru them but there would still be a long and steamy trip thru them. The post is really about whether the surface is hard or not, not whether you can get there which is indirectly connected yes, and the plasma propaganda guy.
This admission must have some intent to it because it goes against all the moon landings and even other non-human space exploration. They want to say they lost the tech to go thru the belts, but are developing some new kinds of tech. So they need to admit the tech isn’t there now, but, but, we had it before, we, we’ll get it again just wait…they need to have some reason why they don’t go thru the belts now. As in the vid I linked, and just like the plasma guy, they just make the story complex with admissions and denials on all kinds of things on all levels to the people who are dumb, dumbfounded, and plain old stupid and will argue with each other to protect the system from being exposed. It’s confusion propaganda, same as Medicine Girl.
they will tell you(eventually) the truth that biological humans cant exist outside of earths magnetic field and thats why transhumanism is a must for the future of mankind. the moon(and every planetary body) has its own field that doesnt carry what makes humans human. but thats just my opinion
Well... That's interesting, because about a decade ago They were saying that the poles made space accessible despite the belts. Even saw graphics showing it all. [shrug]
they show lof of things. just think about whats more realistic, having a rubberband of radiation or a shell of a radiation thats strongest in a rubber band
Maybe that’s what Michael Tsarion was talking about…
According to Michael Tsarion, there were some "Bad Guys" (BG) being chased across Our galaxy by some "Good Guys" (GG). The BG arrived in Our solar system, set up a decoy on Tiamat (the planet between Mars and Jupiter), then came to Earth and hunkered down.
The GG arrived, saw the decoy, checked for native sapient life, found none, and blew the planet up (explaining the asteroid belt). They were suspicious, though, and checked the other planets, somehow determining that the BG were here. And They found plenty of sapient life native to the planet. So... They put a barrier up around the globe above low earth orbit that We can't get through. They moved the moon into place to be a "guard tower" (explaining the many stories around the globe of a time when there was no moon, and the claims "the gods" put it there). Also explaining "The Watchers."
We can't get through that barrier and live...and They don't want Us to know.
Have you looked into Crow777's findings or VibesOfCosmos? Not necessarily about plasma, but about videoing the moon and its surface map. Crow found this repeating glitch that happens, as if we are not seeing what is really there, but a repeating scene-- similar to how robbers glitch the survellience camera I guess. VOC rocks. I don't care if no one else in the world see's it, lol, that's our realm!
However, that VoC map seems old. It seems pre-disaster, whatever that was, which took out so many for a Reset. So, whaked idea, maybe its frozen in time by the controllers. Whatever. Too many lies and controlled opp to know for sure.
Thanks for chiming in Jerome, IDK what to make of VOC, just saw JP Vibes of Cosmos 1st Book.
This post is mainly about the surface of the moon being hard and not a gas as can clearly be seen by millions with small binocs or scopes to have craters, and contours. Craters with symmetrical ejecta like a golf ball dropped onto baking power mean the surface is hard otherwise there would be no crater. The motif of the moon now is the same as in paintings and motif of the moon over 200 yrs ago, and surely for millions of years. Research does indicate that all of space is a rarefied plasma (gas) and that the ether does exist. I just take simple and provable aspects and see how humans may be honest or psyoping the topic.
PM's observation that drags serious objectors into the s*thole of morons MUST be widely publicized!
Some "authors" start out with good stuff, luring their readers into a bottomless hole of lies and nonsense (Mercola, 2nd Smartest, Midwestern Doctor, and Vigilant Fox come to mind, but there are lots more), or are simply captured (it's cheaper than buying them out) by "authorities" and are replaced with AI deepfakes, a process which has just gotten a boost even for ordinary people:
Compartmentalization targets the "smartest" "unbelievers"; it isolates a segment in which it all sounds logical and credible, but the module just doesn't fit back in the hole, which is an excellent method of gaslighting:
I had a Celestron refractor telescope in the 1980s. I used to look at the moon a lot because it was one of the easiest and richest celestial objects to view. It certainly looks like a big rock with holes to me, though I am now open to other explanations, given the level of deception our bastard elites use to manifest their agendas.
I've seen that clip referenced by flat earth theorists, many of whom seem like completely decent, seeking, well-meaning people. The thing with that clip is that there is no other information about it, right? So, it's not very persuasive, even as a psy-op to make those of us who question the moon landing, "crazy." I had never even considered it for that purpose, though, so thanks for pointing that out. Well done on that account.
Theoretically, it could have been a hologram in 1795, but that's a stretch of tech warping. If it wasn't, but is now, what did they do with the real moon that WAS there? I think it more likely they use these real objects/events as fodder for a then quirky twist and try to push that on normal thinking conspiracy analysts to discredit them. Reptiles on the moon, FE, etc.
I do not think it necessary to report details to you on another account, but anyone deleted or banned is warned, asked to edit, and noted to have infringed the TOS in the About page and I save a record of the thread.
You have said your points about BSM, and people can go read that. Please do not spam this section with more comments about BSM.
God doesn't need holograms per se, He simply created things that are beyond our understanding, and the government knows that our reality is entirely spiritual AND of course that God is real (which is why they regularly use witchcraft, energy draining, magik, portals, etc) but since their power is from Satan, they obviously want people to be think the moon is simply a giant, floating rock with craters on it.
And it *could* be but guess what? Not even the government knows exact how the sun, moon and even earth works, nor what they really are. I think that bothers the powers at be, they can obviously still lie about this stuff but without actually being able to get up to the moon (van allen belt or not), and they never will be able to because Good limits what any technology can do, not even the government can know exactly what's going on up there.
God has a sense of humor, He's trolling people who claim to be experts in things they'll never have the technology to understand.
There's a guy on YouTube named JakeTheAsshole, he's kind of obnoxious but he covers the outer space hoax really well when you go back and watch his fake space videos. He also debunks Earth being a globe/globe theory.
This is a rude comment "stop wasting time on professional shills", and a paste of the same comment you already have on this comment section. Pls see the Rules of Commentary Engagement on the About Page.
NOTE: THIS POST IS UNDER ATTACK-Proving that the "Plasma Moon" story is propaganda aimed at the making the moon landing deniers coming 4 years later seem nutty, making part of the masses believe in any silly thing, and discrediting the other part that knows better.
Readers have written to me in complaint that two commenters, Fiona C. Hunt and The Blue Sky Maiden have made what seems a coordinated attack on the comment section. These comments have included aggressive and rude wordage, ad hominem attacks, and repetitive comments that to me are spamming alternative cosmic narratives. They have infringed on the Rules of Commentary Engagement noted in the About page at the top of this SS in multiple ways even after multiple requests by myself to be polite and desist from rude over-commentary that was also written clearly at the end of the post, and resulted in my banning them. This is a typical kind of "make a mess of the comment section" to discredit a post that normal persons would not do. They certainly just wasted their typing time, assuming they are not AI bots.
👉These 2 accounts also then jumped onto Sharine Borslien's SS most recent post and berated her there as well. Sharine is always polite and these accounts are clearly a tandem attack. They are helping us make a who's who of spooks that populate Substack. Considering their coming out on a post that is hanging out Medicine Girl's dirty laundry, myself and others have begun to assume they are connected to Medicine girl.
This is what Fiona C.Hunt and The Blue Sky Maiden did to me. Prepare yourself because you will be reading absolute filth in their comments to me.
https://sharine.substack.com/p/a6268166-fc9d-4c17-a1fc-5b0da511d07a
Thanks Sharine very brave of you to share this. We are behind you!
Thank YOU, Proton.💝
Don't listen to skanky people. WE know you're one of the Good Guys (so to speak).
xo xo
Thanks, Jaan.
Most of the craters on the moon are not impact craters, they are the result of electrical scarring. They are too circular and too shallow to be impact craters. They also have other features that do not conform to a conventional impact crater. All the features conform perfectly with electrical scarring and have been demonstrated in the lab on a smaller scale.
The same is true for the rilles (channels) which scientists also cannot explain. For years they have told us they are collapsed lava tubes. But this makes no sense. They do not flow as lava would flow. They do, however, conform perfectly to electrical scarring channels, which have also been replicated in the lab, and are also sometimes produced in the ground on Earth by lightening strikes (at a smaller scale obviously).
The moon's features are consistent with the Electric Universe model, as promoted by the Thunderbolts Project and others. In this video you can see the results of electrical scarring, which match the features seen on the moon.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u5EjXhtKagg
The dark 'seas' on the moon are consistent with expansion, an expansion which is also true for Earth and other planets. Neal Adams made some very good visualisations of this decades ago.
Here is his visualisation for the moon.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x6_9bldsaxA
Here's the Earth's expansion visualised.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oJfBSc6e7QQ
Note that this is not a theory, it is an observation. The continental plates of Earth fit together perfectly when you remove the much younger oceanic plates (essentially stuff them back into the rift zones where they came from). HOW the Earth expanded is still in the realm of theory, but the fact that it has is beyond doubt.
If the Earth has always been the same size then we have a situation where the continental plates happen to fit together perfectly on a much smaller sphere simply by removing the much younger oceanic crust - BY CHANCE! :)
That is infinitely improbable.
The much smaller Earth (200+ million years ago) allows for a much lower gravity back then, which also explains why the dinosaurs, insects and plant life were so much bigger back then, and why all life has consistently trended down in size over the last 500 million years.
The theories of Electric Universe and Expanding Earth (and other planets) upset the applecart and lead us to a new understanding of the 'laws' of nature, such as gravity. This probably opens the door to advance technologies (anti gravity, free energy etc) and this explains why these avenues of science are being ignored - at least in the public domain - and we are being spoon fed all the boring nonsense from official gatekeepers like Brian Cox and Neil deGrasse Tyson.
For the more inquisitive types they are fed the flat Earth and 'moon made out of cheese' theories to keep them occupied.
Ok thanks for the info. Perhaps there is electrical scarring, though I also see star shaped streaks from some craters suggesting debris from the crater are strewn out symmetrically like when you drop a golf ball into a pile of baking powder. Electrical or impacts, the results we see are indicative of a hard surface to me.
Impact theory is funny. Did prehistoric humans railgun the moon or whats up with the earth facing side looking like Verdun in 1917 ?
there is this machine out there, its called an electrical discharge machine, read about how it works. continents act as a capacitor on earth, and when they discharge its either one end to other end when the moon is on the other side of the planet or the moon if its above said unruly continent. you can reproduce every feature on the moon with that machine or the consequence of a sustained discharge event like supersonic winds carrying dust. but thats just my honest opinion.
Also the moon being plasma was the funniest thing i read this week, thanks.
EDM is a fascinating concept! In this paper it speaks of plasma basically cascading past the moon causing shadows on the surface.
Proton, you may find this interesting: It's barely 2 pages.
https://www.lpi.usra.edu/announcements/artemis/whitepapers/2119.pdf
I was reading that they suggest that electrostatic discharge events, possibly involving Earth-Moon capacitance dynamics, could have sculpted the lunar surface—especially if the Moon acted as a cathode during massive planetary-scale discharges. It's worth consideration.
Yes some of the craters are obviously impacts. I believe some impacts have been observed in real time. There was one in the 1800's I think which kicked up loads of dust for weeks.
But most of them are too circular and too shallow/ wide too be impacts.
Much thanks.
Thanks, Proton. I have been deceived many times by such Mr. Foster's of the world and their "I'm not a shill, really" Medicine Girl type lapdogs. Reading your articles is helping me to hone my discerning abilities.
Pleasure Sharine!
BSM has an admitted "speculative framework for cosmology", I'm not speculating what I can see on the moon's surface. I'm happy if you want to propose misconceptions, but you 1. need to have logical examples, not just critique linked elsewhere, and 2. you can't post this same comment in 2 places as that is spamming the comment section that is against the TOS in the About page.
Please delete one of them or I will do it for you. I want you to say your opinions openly and logically as I have noted. Vague critique and spamming is NG here.
Look, I do not wish you write on this post further. You have called me rude, smug, and unempathic. This is your last warning any further rude remark and I will ban you and delete all your comments. The post itself says you must be polite.
Why remove the comments? It looks bad on P M.
I mean that in a polite way.
fiona, why are you berating me? I admitted to having been deceived, but also to figuring out how to trust my innate ability to discern. Have you never been deceived? (That's a rhetorical question.)
It's best not to fuck with me. You don't know me.
Good job and well played. I love that you capture everything you write.
Oh yes...I believe you used "rational" at least twice but meant the word "rationale" pronounced "raa-shun-naal" with those aa's as in rat. And which has a different meaning than "rational" btw.
Your're right Akgrrl, I fixed them and much thanks!
"Medicine" ..."Girl" is as Medicine Girl does.
PM, an interesting exploration of cultivated discombobulation, which now appears a foundational cornerstone of required institutional and individual 'bafflement', or a pursuit of AI induced psychosis, or merely following policy-based evidence, each ensuring that the erstwhile eugenicists continue with their pursuit of a multiple 'benefits' assault program.
Alerting the global multitude, or simply saving a crowd from wilful blindness, or just nudging a few away from conditioned acquiescence, all these appear laudable, ethical and principled ambitions.
I take heart in the observation that not everyone will stand patiently, tolerantly and without murmur in a line awaiting their terminal destination.
Have we now though, passed a point of diminishing return?
Erudite as always thank you Latus. I like this phrase very much, "foundational cornerstone of required institutional and individual 'bafflement". I would like to borrow it sometime without institutional or individual prejudice.
Besides letting off steam which is always an increasing return, I would say that educating the masses as to the purposes of these 2+2=5 memes is also a benefit because, 1. They normalize child think in adults aka derangement, 2. people start to repeat the meme and it catches on like fire on tumbleweed, and 3. These memes, when heard by uninitiated normies, only further the antipathy of normies to any rational conspiracy analysis. It's a clear night, going out to look see if I can find Medicine Girl's face in the moon.
Marvellous, PM. Look closely! People may scrutinise and criticise, though they may realise that, 'The Man In The Moon' is no subject of DIE delusion.
https://www.astronomy.com/observing/tonights-full-moon-offers-prime-view-of-man-in-the-moon/
in Indonesia and other parts of SE Asia parents tell their children there is a rabbit (not 'a man') in the moon :-))
LOL, PM!!!
This is kinda hilarious, after you get past the stupidity... (not yours)
But...
Maybe the moon is TRANS? ;)
You know my holographic stance already Proton so I won't be repeating myself here :) I agree that plasma moon doesn't fit the bill. There could be 2 moons. One we SEE & another that is a harmonic balancer that is solid. ... There is a theory that a moon was towed in to hold frequency gates. (impacting human consciousness)
I stand on freedom to voice opinion in opposition to those of the author if done so politely & with an OPEN mind & option to challenge dogma & change stance if better proof is presented.
What Medicine Girl did was obfuscate conversation leading to communication breakdown.
Speaking of, THIS IS CREEPY: I asked Chatbot about the moon situation & This was its response: "Want to chat about something else? I'm NOT able to discuss that topic, but I'm always happy to chat about other things! what else is on your mind?"
SO, IF the various moon theories are taboo to AI bots... They are DEFINATELY hiding something & nothing is as it APPEARS.
So of course I said" NO. I want to have an open discussion on what the moon REALLY is!" & it gave me several theories that you & I have already spoken on. SIGH ......
Hey JM! Interesting, try another AI and see. Yes, we got to be good conversation partners on this topic "back stage" didn't we. Thanks so much for that and for the comment here. Nobody realizes how deep you've gone into this with me as prelude to this post.
I feel like the LLM chatbot is only regurgitating everything that we discussed & packaged it in a way that I would WANT to hear. So, I discredit any further discussion with the data collecting, language mirroring chatbots.
Our conversations were most excellent Proton! Science met SIM & everything else in between! I Loved it!
I just had another thought about the "moon landing" & the phrase "one small step for man & a giant leap for mankind" I hate everything about that spell craft statement.
First we'd need to define man & mankind ... WHO is getting the short end of the stick? Man (origin)... or "kind of man".(container/clone)
Individual "man" is the participant in the spell of the symbolic boot & flag (sigil) stuffed in the ground (claiming resonance ownership) while "mankind" fuels the GLOBAList myth. The globalists want their boot on our neck & if the moon is a frequency resonator, then they may be symbolically stomping on our sovereign frequency with LIES using their CRAFT ... Spell craft (linguistic), witchcraft (conscious MANipulation), space craft (technological imprint) Mind craft (narrative engineering)
The Jewish gematria (291) on "moon landing" is interesting too. 291 also prompts phrases like Chosen one, psalms, eternal life, building, collision & prepare ... Very very interesting. You know I had to visit the esoteric side of this :)
I'm sure all this symbolism reverberated among their ilk like the proverbial flies on shit gang. I can only imagine what ET's would interpret here. He taught me a lot really and hope he is doing well.
Oh yeah! Spell kraft is their weapon. It's all about the signs & symbols ... IT's also HOW they speak to one another thru media. So deciphering their languishing language gives me hope that we can counter their icky ILK.
I miss ET sooo much, I was trying to channel my "inner ET". Whatever plane of perception he's on, I know he's shining his light bright!
I ponder the van Allen belts... Not that I don't think they're there, but that leaving via the poles should avoid them, I would think...
Anyway, excellent discussion on the bogus claim the moon is plasma. Thanks!!!
Thanks AS. I have read that going thru the poles makes a shorter trip thru them but there would still be a long and steamy trip thru them. The post is really about whether the surface is hard or not, not whether you can get there which is indirectly connected yes, and the plasma propaganda guy.
Anyway, did you not see the link to this vid in today's post where NASA, Obama and others admit you can't get our of low earth orbit: https://archive.org/details/NASA-CantLeaveLowEarthOrbit
I just had that thought come to mind. Will look at the vid - yes, I missed it. LOL! But I do ponder NASA’s “admissions…” Thank YOU!
This admission must have some intent to it because it goes against all the moon landings and even other non-human space exploration. They want to say they lost the tech to go thru the belts, but are developing some new kinds of tech. So they need to admit the tech isn’t there now, but, but, we had it before, we, we’ll get it again just wait…they need to have some reason why they don’t go thru the belts now. As in the vid I linked, and just like the plasma guy, they just make the story complex with admissions and denials on all kinds of things on all levels to the people who are dumb, dumbfounded, and plain old stupid and will argue with each other to protect the system from being exposed. It’s confusion propaganda, same as Medicine Girl.
they will tell you(eventually) the truth that biological humans cant exist outside of earths magnetic field and thats why transhumanism is a must for the future of mankind. the moon(and every planetary body) has its own field that doesnt carry what makes humans human. but thats just my opinion
perhaps the aim is to digitise man (and woman) eventually. digital is the buzz word of the moment or should i say, century....
Agreed! 🤗 💜 🤗
they call it a belt but its really a shell. the poles are even worse because the birkeland current going on there
Thanks to you, I looked it up
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Birkeland_current
You might also find the SAFIRE Project interesting too.
Ah, it's a whos who of how to make DEW weapons
https://safireproject.com/about-us/historical.html
& so much more
Well... That's interesting, because about a decade ago They were saying that the poles made space accessible despite the belts. Even saw graphics showing it all. [shrug]
I begin to think I'm in Videodrome.
they show lof of things. just think about whats more realistic, having a rubberband of radiation or a shell of a radiation thats strongest in a rubber band
Maybe that’s what Michael Tsarion was talking about…
According to Michael Tsarion, there were some "Bad Guys" (BG) being chased across Our galaxy by some "Good Guys" (GG). The BG arrived in Our solar system, set up a decoy on Tiamat (the planet between Mars and Jupiter), then came to Earth and hunkered down.
The GG arrived, saw the decoy, checked for native sapient life, found none, and blew the planet up (explaining the asteroid belt). They were suspicious, though, and checked the other planets, somehow determining that the BG were here. And They found plenty of sapient life native to the planet. So... They put a barrier up around the globe above low earth orbit that We can't get through. They moved the moon into place to be a "guard tower" (explaining the many stories around the globe of a time when there was no moon, and the claims "the gods" put it there). Also explaining "The Watchers."
We can't get through that barrier and live...and They don't want Us to know.
Who knows…
Great take down !👏
I am sick of all the useless, lying lackeys. When cornered and fenced in by her lies all she can do is erase.
She realised you, her opponent, was way too smart for her tiny numb skull. Good job we have you to kick their lying arses.
Have you looked into Crow777's findings or VibesOfCosmos? Not necessarily about plasma, but about videoing the moon and its surface map. Crow found this repeating glitch that happens, as if we are not seeing what is really there, but a repeating scene-- similar to how robbers glitch the survellience camera I guess. VOC rocks. I don't care if no one else in the world see's it, lol, that's our realm!
However, that VoC map seems old. It seems pre-disaster, whatever that was, which took out so many for a Reset. So, whaked idea, maybe its frozen in time by the controllers. Whatever. Too many lies and controlled opp to know for sure.
Thanks for chiming in Jerome, IDK what to make of VOC, just saw JP Vibes of Cosmos 1st Book.
This post is mainly about the surface of the moon being hard and not a gas as can clearly be seen by millions with small binocs or scopes to have craters, and contours. Craters with symmetrical ejecta like a golf ball dropped onto baking power mean the surface is hard otherwise there would be no crater. The motif of the moon now is the same as in paintings and motif of the moon over 200 yrs ago, and surely for millions of years. Research does indicate that all of space is a rarefied plasma (gas) and that the ether does exist. I just take simple and provable aspects and see how humans may be honest or psyoping the topic.
Thanks for reading and giving us info!
PM's observation that drags serious objectors into the s*thole of morons MUST be widely publicized!
Some "authors" start out with good stuff, luring their readers into a bottomless hole of lies and nonsense (Mercola, 2nd Smartest, Midwestern Doctor, and Vigilant Fox come to mind, but there are lots more), or are simply captured (it's cheaper than buying them out) by "authorities" and are replaced with AI deepfakes, a process which has just gotten a boost even for ordinary people:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/replacing-every-american-with-deepfakes
Compartmentalization targets the "smartest" "unbelievers"; it isolates a segment in which it all sounds logical and credible, but the module just doesn't fit back in the hole, which is an excellent method of gaslighting:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/the-highest-level-operatives-are
I had a Celestron refractor telescope in the 1980s. I used to look at the moon a lot because it was one of the easiest and richest celestial objects to view. It certainly looks like a big rock with holes to me, though I am now open to other explanations, given the level of deception our bastard elites use to manifest their agendas.
I've seen that clip referenced by flat earth theorists, many of whom seem like completely decent, seeking, well-meaning people. The thing with that clip is that there is no other information about it, right? So, it's not very persuasive, even as a psy-op to make those of us who question the moon landing, "crazy." I had never even considered it for that purpose, though, so thanks for pointing that out. Well done on that account.
why couldn’t the moon be a hologram?
Not in 1795, and if it could, we would already be mind-controlled smart city slaves and wouldn’t here to talk about it.
a divine hologram courtesy of God
Theoretically, it could have been a hologram in 1795, but that's a stretch of tech warping. If it wasn't, but is now, what did they do with the real moon that WAS there? I think it more likely they use these real objects/events as fodder for a then quirky twist and try to push that on normal thinking conspiracy analysts to discredit them. Reptiles on the moon, FE, etc.
I do not think it necessary to report details to you on another account, but anyone deleted or banned is warned, asked to edit, and noted to have infringed the TOS in the About page and I save a record of the thread.
You have said your points about BSM, and people can go read that. Please do not spam this section with more comments about BSM.
God doesn't need holograms per se, He simply created things that are beyond our understanding, and the government knows that our reality is entirely spiritual AND of course that God is real (which is why they regularly use witchcraft, energy draining, magik, portals, etc) but since their power is from Satan, they obviously want people to be think the moon is simply a giant, floating rock with craters on it.
And it *could* be but guess what? Not even the government knows exact how the sun, moon and even earth works, nor what they really are. I think that bothers the powers at be, they can obviously still lie about this stuff but without actually being able to get up to the moon (van allen belt or not), and they never will be able to because Good limits what any technology can do, not even the government can know exactly what's going on up there.
God has a sense of humor, He's trolling people who claim to be experts in things they'll never have the technology to understand.
There's a guy on YouTube named JakeTheAsshole, he's kind of obnoxious but he covers the outer space hoax really well when you go back and watch his fake space videos. He also debunks Earth being a globe/globe theory.
Medicine Girl is of the same ilk as Agent131711 and Tim Truth. An inflammatory nonsense spreader.
IMHO.
This is a rude comment "stop wasting time on professional shills", and a paste of the same comment you already have on this comment section. Pls see the Rules of Commentary Engagement on the About Page.