RED ALERT: Do Not Take Ivermectin
"Ivermectin Worked!" is the same BS as "Safe & Effective" and we all know how that turned out.
There is no Covid virus to treat (there is no virus anywhere period). Ivermectin will collect graphene in you and do other nasty things like give you funky neurological disorders. If you’re lucky it might only destroy your parasites making you feeling better but now full of heavy metals and graphene in your tummy.
A little graphene in your gut anyone? Sprinkle on some WIFI and Click to see the Ivermectin “Shake & Bake”:
Other ivermectin toxicity links:
Put “ivermectin toxicity” into duckduckgo.com
The post below is twisted propaganda, don’t fall for it and Do NOT comply with anything the 2nd Smartest Guy in the World tells you. Full Stop.
BS in Situ:
PURE EVIL:
"Ivermectin Worked!": Peer-Reviewed Study Finds 74% Reduction in Excess Deaths
Let this be another tally mark for when the “conspiracy theorists” got it right all along.
Aug 15
Originally Published on Vigilant News
“It’s now peer-reviewed and published. Ivermectin worked!” exclaimed Kim Iversen on her news show.
Ivermectin, a controversially-discussed drug in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, was found in a 2020 study from Peru to significantly reduce COVID-related deaths. With the backing of a peer-reviewed publication, this assertion is more potent than ever.
Dr. Pierre Kory, an early advocate for Ivermectin in the treatment of COVID-19, highlighted this particular study. At the time, it was merely a preprint - meaning it hadn’t undergone the rigorous peer-review process that acts as a hallmark for credible scientific research. Yet, the data was compelling enough for Dr. Kory and his associates at the FLCCC to champion widespread Ivermectin distribution.
Detractors pointed out the lack of peer review, dismissing the study and likening Ivermectin's use for COVID-19 to “taking horse medicine.” Fast forward two years, and this once-dismissed preprint has been rigorously examined and accepted by a renowned scientific journal.
Breaking Down the Study
The study delved into the effectiveness of Ivermectin in reducing excess COVID-19-related deaths across Peru’s 25 states in 2020. It was observed that different regions implemented varying degrees of Ivermectin distribution. While some states went all out and distributed maximum doses, others adopted a moderate approach, and a few limited its distribution.
The findings were staggering: states with the most intensive Ivermectin use observed a 74% average reduction in excess deaths within 30 days post-peak deaths.
When a subsequent Peru presidential administration limited Ivermectin use, there was a notable rise in the death rate. The correlation between Ivermectin use and decreased mortality seemed undeniable. Before Ivermectin use was restricted under the new president, Peru experienced a 14-fold reduction in nationwide excess deaths. However, this was followed by a 13-fold increase in the succeeding two months after Ivermectin's restriction. So, that’s another piece of additional evidence that, indeed, yes, “ivermectin worked!”
Ivermectin is vindicated — but it’s also too little too late.
Dr. McCullough has reported that about 97% of Americans have already developed natural immunity to COVID-19, which offers strong and robust protection. And after mass COVID vaccination has nearly come to a complete halt, the FDA has now finally admitted that doctors can freely prescribe ivermectin for COVID. The timing, by no stretch, is suspicious.
So, there you have it. Ivermectin works! But you probably already knew that two years ago. Let this be another tally mark for when the “conspiracy theorists” got it right all along.
And I implore you to visit my new website, vigilantnews.com, for more great stories that you won’t find here on Substack.
I restacked his post with a warning NOT TO TAKE IVER. I can't imagine he liked that, I now got this in my in box.
"Here’s a link to sign in to 2nd Smartest Guy in the World. This link can only be used once and expires after 24 hours. If expired, please try logging in again here."
I suppose it is to filter me or others out, anyone who knows welcome to tell me. I encourage anyone scribed to him to restack his post with a RED ALERT.
Notice about typos and misspellings. I got this nice mail from a patient reader. I think I need to decide to ask for paid subscriptions from any one who wants to complain about my finger positions.
------------Original Message------------------
Dear XXXX, sorry about the Typo. F and V are right next to each other on the keyboard. Also the subtitle on the Post isn't toggled the same as the SEO subtitle, you have to dig into another setting to change both. I do go over and fix posts but some of that takes time. I'm doing a real job and juggling dozens of comments over many posts at once.
If you never hit different keys well all the power to you. I'm also a volunteer, so typing perfectly is above my pay grade and way over what you and everyone pays for my info which is free. I am more polite than you though because I love everyone. Best wishes.
------- Original Message -------
XXXX<XXXX@gmail.com>
> " "Ivermectin Worked" is the same BS as "Save & Effective""
> In English, we would say, "Safe" & Effective. First sentence, first inappropriate word, Beautiful, just fucking beautiful. You ought to get someone who can read and write well in English to proofread your writing. Right there is where I quit reading; I figured that you weren't going to improve much, with such a goofy 1st sentence.