The moonies turn your mind into mush-again🌚
The Artemis crew can't hide their buffoonery and a list of why human space travel is not possible.
I was never really into the moon-thing. I thought whatever it was had its day and didn’t want to waste my time on it. Now that I’m up to my neck in these posts it can’t be ignored anymore.
Doctored or not, we’ll use this fun clip to wet our lips for more serious info below. This type of discussion is called Masterful Speaking (3:01 vid).
Why does the shot to the moon coincide with the war in Iran? Could be distraction from this?
Lets turn to Jeff Bozos’ Bezos’ Blue Origin NS-31 sub-orbital spaceflight on April 14, 2025. Carrying a crew of 6 women astronuts, it reached reached a height of 107 kilometers above the earth. Atmospheric entry occurs by convention at the Kármán line at an altitude of 100 km (62 miles; 54 nautical miles) above the surface.
This is when you need a heat shield says the DuckDuckGo Search:
Good thing Bezos put a heat shield on it…right?
But what’s this? No heat marks, and those BIG PICTURE windows, they must be heat resistant, to protect from that “intense heat experienced during re-entry”, right?
This space shuttle graph seems to fit with the “intense heat” story requiring the New Shepard to have a heat shield. Then again the shuttle never really looked too cooked-up either.
What is the purpose of these skin tight, low-cut, boob-enhancing Blue Origin NS-31 uniforms? Is the point to catch your attention or to go into space?
Chat GPT, “The uniforms help sustain good lower extremity venous return in micro gravity.” Just joking….
👉This little proton isn’t agreeing to go up into space no matter how many pretty singers & models are in the cockpit
The Apollo window temperature problem
This page on the Apollo 11 re-entry thru earth’s atmosphere says “the temperature on the Apollo 11 Command Module’s surface climbed up to 5,000 degrees Fahrenheit, but the heat shields protected the inner structure of the CM”.
But the window specs here https://apollo11space.com/apollo-11-windows/ Say,”The outer windows were made of fused silica, known for its high melting point (3110°F) designed to protect against the extreme temperatures generated during re-entry”. 👉So there is 1890°F flub up here.
I finally stumbled on Anders Björkman’s writings that seemed to get most of the story straight.
Anders is also funny,
“Shouldn't the four boosters of the Ariane 6 rocket have stopped ejecting smoke after being ejected?”
They can’t even get their artistry right.
Can we prove or disprove space flight? Yes and no.
● Satellites can make a one-way trip to low earth orbit but will burn-up on return.
● Unmanned craft will have their electronics busted going thru the radiation belts that surround the earth.
● Humans can not go to low earth orbit because they don’t want to burn-up on return, and neither they nor their craft can get thru the radiation belts that surround the earth anyway.
● Craft in space are not floating along like a boat on the seas, they are always falling towards some celestial body at high speeds.
● The determination of when one celestial object has taken over the fall from all others is basically impossible, and the thrust to change from one fall line to another is enormous.
Remember that for the trips to the moon 50+ years ago NASA lost the tech to get past the Van Allen radiation belts that circle the earth (and no one on those projects recalled that tech in the ensuing decades?). They also lost the telemetry data (on position/speed/direction etc.) that the spacecrafts were on. They gathered and stored lots of data on individual citizens in those years but did not keep information on the “most significant achievement of mankind”? Give me a break.
There are always persons who can argue something around these no-goes. It’s not like finding an object like a virus. These are events. We can only logic the rationale and physics of these events, keeping in mind the financial gain, propaganda value, and other mind-mushing reasons to do these projects.
Space travel is one of the favorite psyops of the planners of society along with, 1. The Jews did it, 2. Islamic terrorists did it, 3. The virus did it/vaxes are safe and effective, 4. The earth is flat, and others. Hoards of nasty argumentative comments online want us to believe in the FE with no real proof, engage in ad hominem attacks, and give fantastic explanations for flatness in spite of facts that show the earth is round. See my post here:
Per Anders, the reasons that no human beings can go into space are simple: human beings cannot
(A) survive radiation in space,
(B) leave Earth orbits and enter other orbits, e.g. around the Sun, to proceed somewhere,
(C) carry enough rocket fuel in the spacecraft for a return trip,
(D) re-enter and land on Earth or other planets after a trip in space,
(E) define the trajectory and calculate the timetable of a trip between moving heavenly bodies and
(F) explain scientifically how it should be done.
Only satellites can be sent - one way - into orbits around Earth
If you think that spacecrafts or special capsules with human beings aboard
(1) have been sent in high speed Earth orbits in vacuum space by rockets, then
(2) have returned by re-entry, or from the orbits,
(3) have blasted off into new, higher initial speed trajectories/orbits in new directions by other rockets,
(4) stopped and visited the Moon 1969/72 or Mars, planned or promised 2019+ but done already 2012, then
(5) have blasted off again using more rockets,
(6) to finally return to/drop down on Earth at increasing speed via other trajectories/orbits,
(7) find the location at high altitude to start a re-entry ... through the atmosphere ... and finally land on Earth ... using
(8) a parachute or (9) braking with your rocket engine (!),
you are very badly informed. Actually you are brain washed to believe silly fairy tales!
“When we get off the planet we might come right back home.”
- Gregory Reid Wiseman, commander of the 2026 Artemis II
Yours Truly,
Proton Magic & Co.
Images requiring credit are linked to source and are for educational purposes only. Post Thumbnail.
～You must be polite and logical to comment on this post～
Recent related post
Space travel, especially the moon landings, are highly contentious topics. This is mainly because the space industry takes in huge $amounts$ and thus the world controllers have put an enormous effort into trying to prove they happened (just look at YT vids). They have also been on a smear campaign against deniers since the 60s making any questioning of these events seen nutty-just like viruses. Since space travel has so many moving parts that can not be fully proven or dis-proven, the conspiracy bashers have no limit to the excuses and twisted logic they can make to confuse and deflect.
I didn't put this topic in the post, but the elephant in the room is what will happen to your circulatory system and intracellular-extracellular fluid balance in microgravity. Needless to say your head will swell and your legs will shrink. You will ooze fluid from inside your skull out of your nose and ears, and the pressure increase in your head will cause your brain to herniate thru the holes in the skull. No, you won't be joining a post flight parade anytime soon, nor even later. Well who cares when you've been cremated free of charge @5,000 degrees F.
I expect lots of flak, on this post so I will allow a max of 5 comments per account, and no comments that need to be expanded. This will be for all so that the playing field is fair. I may clarify some things if necessary but I will generally not engage in argument.
If you want to make long comments or more than 5 comments you can make your own posts and put a link to them in your comments here.
I don’t pay attention to any of this ridiculous moon nonsense. Not worth my time. Same with the war in Iran. It’s all manufactured in my opinion. Just like our presidents are manufactured. Anyone who believes this nonsense, will believe anything.