The trinary trick called Covid-19🪄
Could looking at what was different with kids expose the trick? You can bet your swabbed ass it could.
I knew from the venom in the water claim that one reason this couldn’t be true was that neither kids nor pets were showing signs of envenomation.
With claims that 5G was causing sickness in 2020 though, I was stuck on wondering why kids and animals did not get sick nearly as often as adults. One shocking study found a “clear relationship between “coronavirus” outbreaks and the presence of 5G networks”.
Kids not getting sick would fit with the official story of a virus where older persons would be more susceptible to illness so the planners might try to fake this up.
What was different between kids and pets vs. adults? Besides a few Covid-deranged owners and vets, pets didn’t get pcr swabs. In a study conducted in Texas, 4.8% of dogs and 13.4% of cats tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 using PCR swabs in 2020. That added to the hyped scare a bit.
Frequency of clinical signs of disease reported by owners of pets with active infections did not differ from uninfected ones, suggesting that not all reported signs are attributed to SARS-CoV-2 infection. [👈They are essentially admitting the test is just invalid, well there is no virus anyway.]
We don’t know the percent of the total pet dog and cat population that got tested, we can assume it’s small.
Routine testing of pets for COVID-19 is not recommended; testing is only considered for animals showing symptoms and that have been exposed to a person with COVID-19. Most pets that have been tested have returned negative results, except for a small number of confirmed cases.
Was there something different about pcr tests for kids? You bet your little swabbed ass there was.
☞The percentage of children who underwent PCR tests was lower than that for adults. During the peak testing week, tests conducted among children and adolescents aged 0–17 years represented only 9.5% of all tests performed. Young adults aged 18–24 years represented 15.3%.
This AI response only seems to report on the percent of the whole population tested, not the percent of tested children to all children, a value I can’t find. Looking at total population numbers however, in 2019, about 22% of the U.S. population was under age 18. This suggests that the 9.5% of those under 18 that were tested is a considerably lower proportion than those above age 18 that were tested.
☞PCR swabs for children are typically smaller than those used for adults, especially for younger children under 5 years of age, where mini-tip swabs are often used to ensure comfort and safety during testing.
The smaller swab tip portends a lower amount of material from swabs getting into children vs. adults.
👉Why not use mini-tips in adults too? I guess viruses can hide from mini tips in adults? You can easily see where this clown-world nonsense is going.
👉One choice is that pcr testing (swabbing) needs to be mixed with 5G to get ill, the combination of parts or binary hypothesis. Elements, particles and/or chemicals that may have been on pcr swabs along with 5G (or some type of EMF) made adults sicker than kids. This would explain why kids and pets were not sick very much. You can recall that few of the gatekeepers online would talk about 5G/EMFs as causing illness. Some would even argue on my posts that 5G couldn’t cause illness.
Post on 5G and microwave illness:
👉Of course there were other roads leading to getting ill and a diagnosis of Covid in 2020. Colds could be relabeled, other illnesses could be blamed on Covid clinically, or completely asymptomatic persons could be called Covid with just a positive test.
Proof that “virus finding” was faked:
Assuming the planners want to bury the actual causes for plausible deniability, they could use various concentrations of elements/chemicals by batch of pcr swabs (and later shots) in a binary witch’s brew to cause illness. Adding a so called anti-viral drug like remdesivir to these ill persons could make the brew a trinary cocktail (the reason behind today’s post title).
Remdesivir causes pulmonary edema, kidney failure and contributes to ventilator induced pneumonia and patient death.
In 2020, Remdesivir was not given to children as often as adults. This was primarily because it was only approved for use in children under 12 years of age in April 2022, while it had been available for adults since October 2020. The treatment for children is also limited to those who are hospitalized or at high risk for severe COVID-19 illness.
The smaller % of child testing along with the smaller swabs is one card on the table that fits this bill quite nicely on the face of it. Still, we do not have a dose-response toxicity curve for a specific element in the swabs vs. 5G/EMFs in our hands to prove this conjecture.
But, there may be more factors involved: one is vaping.
From an article in Aug. 2020: Young people who had used both cigarettes and e-cigarettes in the previous 30 days were almost five times as likely to experience COVID-19 symptoms, such as coughing, fever, and difficulty breathing as those who never smoked or vaped. They were more likely to receive COVID-19 testing.
While vaping clearly contributed to the fake pandemic, if vapers got more pcr swabs as noted in the article above then we can’t tease apart the pcr swab factor from vaping that easily (so I won’t include it in the trinary trick just yet), but kids did not vape so would not be getting sick from vaping. Between metals coming out of the vaping coils and the tobacco, vaping+pcr+5G/EMFs is a witches’ brew for getting quite ill.
👉The more parts to the story the easier it is to hide what is really making people sick. Yes, shots also made persons ill, just focusing on 2020 helps to focus in illness sans shots.
Who knows what’s really in a remdesivir shot? Could include the same shit inside Covid “vaccines”.
Lets finish up with some data on the low rate of child “cases” and thus supposedly being sick in 2020:
The outbreak in China at the start of 2020:
● The vast majority of cases in China 87% were in people ages 30 to 79, the China Center for Disease Control reported last month based on data from all 72,314 of those diagnosed with Covid-19 as of Feb. 11.
● Teens and people in their 20s also encounter many others, at school and work and on public transit, yet they don’t seem to be contracting the disease at significant rates:
● Only 8.1% of cases were 20-somethings, 1.2% were teens, and 0.9% were 9 or younger.
● The World Health Organization mission to China found that 78% of the cases reported as of Feb. 20 were in people ages 30 to 69.
Thank all of your for coming out to read this post. I want to make a postscript here to clarify some points that you may wonder about. This post is only about 2020 before shots came out.
The reason I did not include vaping in the trinary:
●In 2020 less than 4% of the population vaped. And many of those that vaped and had illness got pcr tests confusing this variable. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/db524.htm
●More than 2,800 e-cigarette users required hospital admission due to e-cigarette or vaping product use-associated lung injury between April 2019 thru February 2020 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2019%E2%80%932020_vaping_lung_illness_outbreak
☞This is concerning, though a small % of the population and there’s no data I can find of the percent of vapers who had pcr tests. I imagine that data is hard to come by.
Masks were also not included in the trinary:
●Correlating persons who masked with those that did or did not get pcr tests is nearly impossible so I did not consider that variable. Masks do contain fibers, micro plastics, bacterial overgrowth, and disinfectants of unknown make-up so that all I can say about masks is that they are not healthy. But here in Japan, though 95% of persons were masking in packed trains in 2020, only a small percent of the population got ill and I personally saw very few. People were said to have serious Covid illnes so there should have been lots of mild cases with coughing etc. on the packed trains but there was not.
On vents and deaths:
●This post was on illness, of which death is an extension of and so would be included in some of the persons noted to be ill. While terrible, it is a redundant variable. Deaths would also likely be caused by other hospital drugs like midazolam and opiates mixed with vents. These were not the causes of the initial illness thus not included in what made persons ill.
👉There are many moving parts to the Covid story including the suspicion that different batches of the various products involved would hide the toxicities. I do not portend to have the whole story down. We all have to think together.
From 2020 I remember feeling unwell after I was swabbed. Strange feeling at the back of my nose and higher heart rate for days.