Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Proton Magic's avatar

👉This will be my first and last post on this topic.

👉I expect lots of argument on this post so there has to be some moderation guideline to keep the section readable. Many COINTELPRO ops only require argument and confusion to spread to be successful. Should be no exception here. Besides the commentary guidelines in the About section https://protonmagic.substack.com/about please note:

👉If you wish to list many points, put them in one comment.

One large comment per commenter is allowed, but multiple spammy stand-alone comments will be removed-no warning. You can always edit a comment you’ve made and add to it.

👉If there are arguments back and forth, this will be allowed with a volley-max of 3 times per account. After that, please take your debates to a direct message thread, other medium, or make your own post for God’s sake!

👉Any name calling will result in your comment to be removed, no warnings. Calling people fake, untrustworthy, dishonest, or alluding to a pejorative will be considered name calling.

👉This post has made things pretty clear. Don’t expect me to reply to, “how do you explain this or that about the Earth's geometry?”

Expand full comment
Dave aka Geezermann's avatar

This is a well made article. I am 73 years old. I watched the moon landing on TV in 1969. I also was a very good student of science, and took in everything I was taught. It wasn't until about ten years ago that I learned NASA faked the moon landing. That was a hard thing to accept.

About that time there was all this flat earth nonsense being ballyhooed all over. I ignored it. Once in awhile I allowed myself to listen to one of those idiots on someone's program. I was sure it was a government psyop.

Then I happened across a few videos on YouTube from Eric Dubay. I still wondered how his views jived with what I was taught and believed all my life, the helio-centric model. I am openminded enough to listen and consider, and I am intelligent enough to understand facts as opposed to theories.

For example, the theory of evolution is just that, a theory, never proven, and actually disproven. So after a year or so of fence sitting I was forced to conclude that everything Eric Dubay said is backed up by science, actual observable and reproducible science.

There is no curve. Everything is visible as far as the eye, or high powered telescopes, can see. Even the video footage from high altitude balloons at 100K feet confirms this. There is no motion. There is no spinning or revolving. Pilots, including my cousin, fly with total disregard for a curvature, or the earth spinning underneath them. They know the earth is a stationary plane.

I have finally accepted this fact, and am thankful that at my age I know this truth, and have jettisoned the brainwashing of NASA and the globe earthers.

And yes, there is no "law of gravity". What a crock that is. Everything is explained by the actual laws of density and buoyancy.

But thank you for an interesting and well written article. I do not argue with anyone about this subject. But I also do not hide my beliefs anymore. I do understand the difficulty in accepting either stance, I thoroughly believed one way for my entire life, and thought I was right.

Expand full comment
124 more comments...

No posts