Cognitive Extortion On Slope⛷

Dolores Cahill crashes no-virus issue on off-piste ski course

A Novel No-Virus Comedy Emerges Sometime in 2023*

Abstract

• Dr. Sherri Tenpenny: “how can viruses not be true?”

• Dr. Dolores Cahill: “It’s a good question I’m trying to find out, it’s very easy to sort-out, but let’s talk about RNA fragments, infertility, and travel restrictions….”

---

Redacted summary of discussion*:

Tenpenny: “how can viruses not be true? Mark Bailey has read 10 million, oh er 10,000 papers or something and can’t find one proving a virus.”

⇒It may seem at the start of the vid that the discussion is gonna be honest but that’s part of the trick.

Cahill:

• “[The finding of a virus] is easy to sort out…it would take two technicians 4 weeks to do it” [well its been 4 yrs Dolores, where is or isn’t it? I guess we’ll let everyone get the shots first.]

  

  Cahill @ Rapid Research Speed

• “There are symptoms, probably malnutrition is the cause” [Not relabeling? People won’t take malnutrition as cause of cold symptoms and think you are off].

• “People have samples” [Samples means viruses? Where is the proof?]

• “Just because no gov’t has a sample doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist” [she’s confusing not exist with never found].

• “Bacteriophages exist and can infect bacteria and kill E. coli”, and we can inject people with them and have sequenced phage genetics from them.” [Bacteriophages are small spores bacteria make when dying, they don’t infect nor kill bacteria. Sounds like Dolores is blowing a last breath of life into the fake virus psyop].

Tenpenny can’t wrap her head around symptoms, transmission, and what are all those GOF papers talking about, can it not be true? “How can all these scientists make all these artistic renditions of viruses, and how can it be no other viruses exist?”

👉this little proton is feeling like puking on Dr T’s nice sweater.

Cahill goes off-piste and doesn’t answer the question directly. Seems she has been to the same ski classes as Judy Mikoshits.

Tenpenny, “how do kids with measles all get sick at the same time”?

Cahill, doesn’t challenge the premise that they all get sick at the same time and skis waaay off-pist onto molecular mimicry-“you can target the ACE receptor with an RNA fragment and kill heart cells or trigger symptoms” (Jane & Joe have long closed the video because Cahill can’t stay on the trail). To be clear, later she says the RNA fragments are from the shots, though she was asked about getting sick from before shots. BUT, you already knew that Proton Magic could not find mRNA in the shots with certainty even after staying up all night and looking:

Proton’s Last Theorem

👉You REALLY have to see this part to believe the discussion spin here starting about 32:00. Even Tenpenny says, “I don’t see the correlation”, right there is no correlation, Dolores is just crashing off-piste.

Tenpenny moves back to the Pharma track, “don’t vaxes make antibodies to things? What about contagion? Something is being passed, is it a virus?” [Gotta get back to the virus plug].

Cahill, “80% of all scientific papers are not reproducible this is fraud..”[goes off track again], wants a repository to show Sars exists [isn’t a research paper enough?]. Shoots off again this time to freedom to travel (off-piste I guess).

Tenpenny, “So what makes people sick?”

Cahill, “you only need a few nucleotides” or “priming people because the RNA is not natural” and, “vaxed grandma can shed to kids…fragments can get into the lining of the womb” [WTF?? What about simple relabeling of other illnesses Dolores? I Can’t decide whether her hair or her logic has more spin in it…it’s clearly a boat ride going in circles around the Irish isles ].

Beautiful spin hairdo, and just about ready for a blepharoplasty

Tenpenny finally gets a word in and gives us a partial truth that foreign material should not be injected. She emphasizes she’s been a Dr for 35 years so she won’t throw it all out and has read, “all the literature” (ahem, but not the Sars-Cov-2 papers, and certainly not the 10k Mark Bailey has read), and she reminds us that 80% of all medical papers are all fraud so [the system] all has to come down [meaning we also can’t evaluate the original Sars discovery papers right?].

Cahill, “That’s my expertise to find out” [well Delores what did you find out today?] “The pcr is fraud.” [but don’t look at the no virus discovery papers].

Tenpenny, closes with a quote from the bible, just to remind us she’s honest in front of God?

Notice the subtle acting and propaganda roles here, Tenpenny acts the serious “official narrative must be true role”, and Cahill acts the off-beat “genius scientist” role which never debunks Tenpenny, making Tenpenny seem correct that viruses must exist.

They never dare mention the Sars-Cov-2 “discovery” paper by Fan Wu which only found a string of letters they call a “genome”, no viral object was ever found.

Proton Magic Falls For Fan Wu💘

---

Cahill doesn’t look like she’s going against the official bio narrative anytime soon:

1. https://profdolorescahill.com/about-dolores-cahill-phd/

2. https://biotech-atelier.com/speakers/prof-dolores-cahill/

• Co-founded Protagen AG in Dortmund (https://protagen.com/) (1996-2019) to commercialize diagnostic and personalized medicine applications of her discoveries.

• Founded Protagen Protein Services (https://protagenproteinservices.com/) a spin-off company of Protagen since 2013 – expertise in protein, antibody, proteomics and peptide contract services to the pharmaceutical industry.

In 2020 Dolores said she believes in Sars viruses, spike proteins, ADE, prior Corona viruses, antibody reaction to viruses, RSV virus, RNA from viruses, viruses in your lungs: https://www.bitchute.com/video/LOJsa31LAr31/

And finally here it is at 1:06:21, the lying smirk of a spook making lots of moolah:

Cahill’s last words with a big fake smile, “It’s easy to uncover lies”.

👉I agree Dolores, that’s exactly what we have done with you here:

---

Trust the experts and you’ll be fine.

Yours Truly, Proton Magic & Co.

---

* Today’s post is not an exact nor chronological quote of the video

---

---