I don't understand why the 'no virus' crowd can't seem to wrap their heads around the idea of computer synthesized gene sequences being stuck together in Franken-adeno-corona-viral or exosome like chimeras that were released to promote a later need for a Franken-many pathogen-corona-chimeric spike mRNA jab/Trojan Horse for self-assembling nano-chips.
Hi Proton ,thank you for another excellent article.
I wonder if you can give me some advice. I am a big admirer of Team Bailey and I often tell my family that viruses do not exist and have never been seen isolated. Plus my daughter should not have her child vaccinated. I am losing the argument with my family. The immediate push back I get is " Ahh but Google says viruses exist and have been isolated " . I then go through how a virologist actually " isolates a virus " . So far so good. Then the next thing my family say is " why do you ,Suzanne ,think that you know more than all of these scientists who are working to help us combat disease? . The scientists have degrees and have been working in their subjects for years. You on the other hand listen to quacks like The Baileys and Proton etc. "
At this point I get angry and ask why my sources have to be demonised and called names. Also that I am 100% correct.
So ,as I say if is at this point that I struggle to assert my point of view . The other problem I have is my family will not read any of the excellent books i have purchased. I also show them graphs proving that hunan health Improved due to indoor plumbing and refrigeration. Good housing conditions . Good food. No child labour. I am told " but can you prove these graphs are true ?"
Thanks, I found my daily laugh at that video of her climbing the truth ladder without success. She fooled me at the beginning of all this but its getting more obvious now who's who for who.
My brain starts to fail when it gets too scientific but I knew Dolly was controlled opposition when she was supposedly deriding masks and saying that we could all refuse to wear them, breezily citing her experience of spending four hours detained in Dublin airport due to insisting on going maskless. Yeah, right and as if anyone's going to be encouraged to be brave by that kind of airport nightmare. I went maskless on a plane simply by claiming I was allergic (silently adding "to bullshit").
Another excellent piece. Indeed, so many of the "doctors" are playing controlled op. And yes... Money is always involved in what They spout. (Thus My work to solve for the problems created by that tool by removing the need for it...)
I have two articles on the twin towers of Rockefeller lies - viruses and contagion...
One has just gotta smile. Repairing to the seminal literature quickly shows the circular, uncontrolled, 'double-double toil and trouble' methodological game is up, and the fix is in. The arcane 'processes' including CPE have now been elevated to the 'magic' of in silico sequencing and "metagenomics."
Returning to the seminal literature reminds us of the eminently questionable foundational nonsense in play. For example: the seminal article that named the "coronavirus," Almeida, JD. & Tyrrell, DAJ. gen. Virol. (1967), 1, 175-178, or for further entertainment, Burtonboy G et al. Archives of Virology 61, 1 - 11 (1979) seminal paper describing canine hemorrhagic enteritis (parvovirus). For even greater amusement try the seminal paper describing, 'A virus obtained from influenza patients', Smith, W. Andrewes, CH. Laidlaw, PP. The Lancet July 8, (1933).
The sole purpose (as has been stated by many others) was the habituation of the global populace to shots. Once in place, the continued point blank discharge of needled barrel with dire, and unpredictably lethal and sickening consequences appears their goal. In the end, most will cotton on to the idea that standing in line for the next shot is not commensurate with a long, healthy life.
-Have you ever been love struck, had the world go silent and disappear, have pain melt away, been unable to think or speak all at once? (If not, well, sad. Very sad.)
-Do you have erogenous reactions to remote images and/or inanimate objects?
- Have audible vibrations, aka words, ever made you flip out, lose control of your body physically and emotionally?
-Did you lose your baby teeth? Did other children your age around you lose them at the same time?
- Ever just burst out crying or laughing from your own thoughts?
Obviously, none of the above are caused by invisible boogeymen, aka viruses. But if they could get away with it, you know Pharma would try to market a drug to treat any one of them. Oh, wait. SSRI's.
If you haven't noticed, any illness that the cause of has not yet been identified (or known but not revealed, or admitted) is blamed on a virus and all other possible causes, such as exposure to toxins, or shedding/exchange of cellular messengers or pheromones, are excluded from consideration and investigation.
Practicing medicine is akin to practicing magic. As is doctoring and deceiving and fooling. "Don't look behind the curtain. Just take this magic pill".
Thanks to the internet we can now see behind the curtain. And we're finding out most of those pills are not magic. They're poison.
"And then there is the psychological effect of the Big Lie which is axiomatic in gaslighting. The paradox here is that the bigger the lie, the harder it is for the mind to bridge the gulf between perceived reality and the lie that authority figures are painting as truth. I believe that the prospect of being deceived evinces a primitive emotional response on a par with staring death in the face. We are hard-wired to fear deception because we have evolved to interpret it as an existential threat. That’s why deception can elicit the same emotional response as the miscalculation of a serious physical threat. Lies told to us don’t always bear the same cost as a misjudged red light, but the primitive part of the brain can’t make this distinction and we rely on cerebral mediation for a more appropriate but delayed response. And in the long run, the lie is often just as dangerous as the physical threat. Many government whoppers – ‘safe and effective’ – do cost lives.
To avoid the death-like experience of being deceived, a mental defence is erected to deny that the lie is happening."
I concur, this no virus info was presented to these 2 at least 4 years ago, they ignored it with their other two geneticist mates, Northrup and the other one , no investigation or follow up, they've made a lot of money though from the truther community, not good.
To use his name in vain, and bear false witness........ no mercy.
Prove it. Lol. Since ya can’t see it you will just have to trust me. Are you feeling my love? Pre poison of oneself allows these biofields to manifest. See proved it right there. I have over 100 degrees and walk around in a lab coat. Right? Must be true.
S/, lighten the Fuk up and ignore these grandstanders and focus on the killers bearing down on us. Again it invisible to even a top shelf microscope. Got nano detector? Ha, see we all are alive but enjoying cog dis like all good…
Just provoking thoughts.
Time wasters with egos from being educated distracting us.
Totally get it!! Just hoping to get my hands on a written take down that dissects his bogus methods. Battling with the virus crew is time consuming 😀 but worth the effort!! As you well know!!
PM, I just found this paper by analytical chemist, Saeed Qureshi, whose work I've seen before but when his old website was updated all the links to his papers became invalid. I now just happened on this paper on a different website which is still a shocking mess but I think what he says seems valid. If I understand him correctly:
The initial step is not to aim for isolation (which doesn't rely on cause and effect) but to see if there is an effect so using sputum samples in the first instance to determine if there is an effect is an appropriate approach. If there is no effect then attempting isolation (which is the work of chemists) is a redundant step. So I guess what he's saying the argument should be is that no evidence of a virus has been shown following cause and effect experimentation rather than no virus has been isolated.
Hello！Hilarious take down of 2 bufoons!! Stefan Scoglio said on Transition TV that he's gonna put out a PDF in English on how the mRNA in the toxic jabs is not and cannot make our cells produce spike protein. Do you have that PDF or have any resource countering the whole shedding nonsense./ our cells become spike protein factories? It would be greatly appreciated.
I don't understand why the 'no virus' crowd can't seem to wrap their heads around the idea of computer synthesized gene sequences being stuck together in Franken-adeno-corona-viral or exosome like chimeras that were released to promote a later need for a Franken-many pathogen-corona-chimeric spike mRNA jab/Trojan Horse for self-assembling nano-chips.
Hi Proton ,thank you for another excellent article.
I wonder if you can give me some advice. I am a big admirer of Team Bailey and I often tell my family that viruses do not exist and have never been seen isolated. Plus my daughter should not have her child vaccinated. I am losing the argument with my family. The immediate push back I get is " Ahh but Google says viruses exist and have been isolated " . I then go through how a virologist actually " isolates a virus " . So far so good. Then the next thing my family say is " why do you ,Suzanne ,think that you know more than all of these scientists who are working to help us combat disease? . The scientists have degrees and have been working in their subjects for years. You on the other hand listen to quacks like The Baileys and Proton etc. "
At this point I get angry and ask why my sources have to be demonised and called names. Also that I am 100% correct.
So ,as I say if is at this point that I struggle to assert my point of view . The other problem I have is my family will not read any of the excellent books i have purchased. I also show them graphs proving that hunan health Improved due to indoor plumbing and refrigeration. Good housing conditions . Good food. No child labour. I am told " but can you prove these graphs are true ?"
My family are exasperating!!!
Thanks, I found my daily laugh at that video of her climbing the truth ladder without success. She fooled me at the beginning of all this but its getting more obvious now who's who for who.
Great work, PM.
My brain starts to fail when it gets too scientific but I knew Dolly was controlled opposition when she was supposedly deriding masks and saying that we could all refuse to wear them, breezily citing her experience of spending four hours detained in Dublin airport due to insisting on going maskless. Yeah, right and as if anyone's going to be encouraged to be brave by that kind of airport nightmare. I went maskless on a plane simply by claiming I was allergic (silently adding "to bullshit").
Another excellent piece. Indeed, so many of the "doctors" are playing controlled op. And yes... Money is always involved in what They spout. (Thus My work to solve for the problems created by that tool by removing the need for it...)
I have two articles on the twin towers of Rockefeller lies - viruses and contagion...
I Am Not Anti-vax; I Am Anti-virus! (article): https://amaterasusolar.substack.com/p/i-am-not-anti-vax-i-am-anti-virus
A Post to Be Viral (article): https://amaterasusolar.substack.com/p/a-post-to-be-viral
One has just gotta smile. Repairing to the seminal literature quickly shows the circular, uncontrolled, 'double-double toil and trouble' methodological game is up, and the fix is in. The arcane 'processes' including CPE have now been elevated to the 'magic' of in silico sequencing and "metagenomics."
Returning to the seminal literature reminds us of the eminently questionable foundational nonsense in play. For example: the seminal article that named the "coronavirus," Almeida, JD. & Tyrrell, DAJ. gen. Virol. (1967), 1, 175-178, or for further entertainment, Burtonboy G et al. Archives of Virology 61, 1 - 11 (1979) seminal paper describing canine hemorrhagic enteritis (parvovirus). For even greater amusement try the seminal paper describing, 'A virus obtained from influenza patients', Smith, W. Andrewes, CH. Laidlaw, PP. The Lancet July 8, (1933).
The sole purpose (as has been stated by many others) was the habituation of the global populace to shots. Once in place, the continued point blank discharge of needled barrel with dire, and unpredictably lethal and sickening consequences appears their goal. In the end, most will cotton on to the idea that standing in line for the next shot is not commensurate with a long, healthy life.
Kudos for the awesome sense of humor.
What do you think about Ana Mihalcea's work, if I may ask?
She now shares Karen Kingston's spooky moolah and to me that says how R.Malone is somewhere near as well.
There is so much fearmongering via "invisible enemies" that it is all hella suspicios to me. Makes me want to dismiss most of it!
Yawn....
-Have you ever been love struck, had the world go silent and disappear, have pain melt away, been unable to think or speak all at once? (If not, well, sad. Very sad.)
-Do you have erogenous reactions to remote images and/or inanimate objects?
- Have audible vibrations, aka words, ever made you flip out, lose control of your body physically and emotionally?
-Did you lose your baby teeth? Did other children your age around you lose them at the same time?
- Ever just burst out crying or laughing from your own thoughts?
Obviously, none of the above are caused by invisible boogeymen, aka viruses. But if they could get away with it, you know Pharma would try to market a drug to treat any one of them. Oh, wait. SSRI's.
If you haven't noticed, any illness that the cause of has not yet been identified (or known but not revealed, or admitted) is blamed on a virus and all other possible causes, such as exposure to toxins, or shedding/exchange of cellular messengers or pheromones, are excluded from consideration and investigation.
Practicing medicine is akin to practicing magic. As is doctoring and deceiving and fooling. "Don't look behind the curtain. Just take this magic pill".
Thanks to the internet we can now see behind the curtain. And we're finding out most of those pills are not magic. They're poison.
This is why they cannot SEE....
"And then there is the psychological effect of the Big Lie which is axiomatic in gaslighting. The paradox here is that the bigger the lie, the harder it is for the mind to bridge the gulf between perceived reality and the lie that authority figures are painting as truth. I believe that the prospect of being deceived evinces a primitive emotional response on a par with staring death in the face. We are hard-wired to fear deception because we have evolved to interpret it as an existential threat. That’s why deception can elicit the same emotional response as the miscalculation of a serious physical threat. Lies told to us don’t always bear the same cost as a misjudged red light, but the primitive part of the brain can’t make this distinction and we rely on cerebral mediation for a more appropriate but delayed response. And in the long run, the lie is often just as dangerous as the physical threat. Many government whoppers – ‘safe and effective’ – do cost lives.
To avoid the death-like experience of being deceived, a mental defence is erected to deny that the lie is happening."
(From https://leftlockdownsceptics.com/alleged-cia-involvement-in-jfk-assassination-goes-mainstream-so-now-what/ )
I concur, this no virus info was presented to these 2 at least 4 years ago, they ignored it with their other two geneticist mates, Northrup and the other one , no investigation or follow up, they've made a lot of money though from the truther community, not good.
To use his name in vain, and bear false witness........ no mercy.
Biofields answers all this nonsense.
That is the transmission mechanism.
Prove it. Lol. Since ya can’t see it you will just have to trust me. Are you feeling my love? Pre poison of oneself allows these biofields to manifest. See proved it right there. I have over 100 degrees and walk around in a lab coat. Right? Must be true.
S/, lighten the Fuk up and ignore these grandstanders and focus on the killers bearing down on us. Again it invisible to even a top shelf microscope. Got nano detector? Ha, see we all are alive but enjoying cog dis like all good…
Just provoking thoughts.
Time wasters with egos from being educated distracting us.
Totally get it!! Just hoping to get my hands on a written take down that dissects his bogus methods. Battling with the virus crew is time consuming 😀 but worth the effort!! As you well know!!
PM, I just found this paper by analytical chemist, Saeed Qureshi, whose work I've seen before but when his old website was updated all the links to his papers became invalid. I now just happened on this paper on a different website which is still a shocking mess but I think what he says seems valid. If I understand him correctly:
The initial step is not to aim for isolation (which doesn't rely on cause and effect) but to see if there is an effect so using sputum samples in the first instance to determine if there is an effect is an appropriate approach. If there is no effect then attempting isolation (which is the work of chemists) is a redundant step. So I guess what he's saying the argument should be is that no evidence of a virus has been shown following cause and effect experimentation rather than no virus has been isolated.
What do you think?
https://bioanalyticx.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/Virus-Debate.pdf
Hello！Hilarious take down of 2 bufoons!! Stefan Scoglio said on Transition TV that he's gonna put out a PDF in English on how the mRNA in the toxic jabs is not and cannot make our cells produce spike protein. Do you have that PDF or have any resource countering the whole shedding nonsense./ our cells become spike protein factories? It would be greatly appreciated.
PM thanks for this man! I'm not able to be everywhere all the time but I always enjoy when people expose the gatekeepers and you are one of the best.