Now, Aussie17 being an ex-Pharma guy (https://www.aussie17.com/about) could be ok, but to delete a polite comment that was aimed at the Japanese Dr’s “research” as promoting virus stuff, not Mr. Aussie17, starts to make one think, “WTF is going on here?”
👉Proton Magic comments are always polite, if you delete them you will surely get your own unique PM post about it.
If it's in the "news," it's part of the play. And yes, anything that supports "deadly - or non-deadly - viruses" or "contagion" is there to maintain the fear that will drive People to volunteer to have toxins and who knows what else jabbed into Their flesh.
"Here, really, the boogeyman will get You, if You do not come to the temple and have Us get You!"
Big pHARMa/mediKILL industry for profit and control...
It's a bit more than that. The highest-level operatives usually spill a lot of facts; they just point in the wrong direction or simply compartmentalize:
Obviously, it has never been about profit. The condemned paying for the rope he is hanged with has been only slowing down inflation. The globalist objective has been out there at least since 2001:
Oh, agreed! Controlled opposition, telling enough truth to be "trusted," and then dragging People along to the wrong destination.
And though, perhaps not profit, per se - though the lower level Ones surely help for profit (doctors and such) - They "profit" when They impoverish Us, irrespective of what They gain.
And yes, indeed, the plans have been there and They're taking Our failure to say, "NO!," as "implied consent." Not Ethical when Most have not seen the plans, and They actively put out stuff to divert attention.
Well... I persistently say I do not consent to any unEthical thing. Unless They have put the data in front of Me, in the vernacular, and in clear and certain terms, and receive My acknowledgement that I received the data, there is no consent, implied or otherwise, and They cannot Ethically act to My detriment.
Unless They want to be beneath the beasts. Which, scum as They are, They might...
While an international movement (FLCCC https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Front_Line_COVID-19_Critical_Care_Alliance) asserts the fearful presence of synthetic 'gene' (polynucleotide) sequences and demands their identification as 'gene' products (as opposed to veiling and labelling them as 'vaccines') it is fascinating to note that early on, Bliden et al. (2021) ~ Evolution of Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG Antibody and IgG Avidity Post Pfizer and Moderna mRNA Vaccinations ~ stated, "We did observe highly variable immune responses including those with well below average anti-RBD IgG levels and avidity." Consequently, an absence of generalisability was evident around the shots from early on, (ie. a predictable dose/response relationship as alluded to in your earlier commentary and links), which together with a huge range of potential Pfizer BNT162B2 AESIs listed in the Appendix of 5.3.6 Cumulative Analysis of Post-authorization Adverse Event Reports that runs to 1,223 "associated" events pointed to a more predictable though topographically dependent dose/response (ie. anaphylaxis from LNPs)?
Meanwhile in New Zealand, the "Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines against hospitalisation, death and infection over time in Aoteroa New Zealand: a retrospective cohort study" Sept. 2024 Mbinta J. et al. has been published in the NZ Med Journal. It is a fascinating study in methodological gymnastics that appears to show the inverse of the Cleveland clinic study.
I am still having problems with believing that the globalists are stupid enough to modify genes, unless through 5G signals (or comparable technologies) targeting specific individuals through cell phones, home Wi-Fi, or some other means of tracking (e.g. dental anesthetics).
I'm with you on that. The modRNA as an inducting synthetic gene vector appears to possess uncertain / unknown reliability, if any at all. The toxic consequences of shots hinge just as nicely on LNPs. And who's to say pre-formulated 'spike' is not a component of some batches?
There is not much evidence that when "antibodies" are found in the blood, they can be linked to a specific pathogen. Most likely, they are immune responses to some kind of poisoning, just like "viruses" are acquired as tiny particles the body sheds during its detox process:
To me, it looks more and more like the Baileys were targeted & stalked - until they started to lose it. Even designated LARPers can get targeted & stalked.
It's a good reminder to never let down your situational awareness.
Maybe Pete, there is more to that MEGA post I just didn't put in, but I think they've been on a mission from the get go. Some is just opinion, lets just leave it at that. See you!
LARPers are often legit soft disclosure but at the same time they gonna serve to keep the people busy & thus distract from real elements of the psyop, so nobody tries to reverse engineer the stage magic of the psyops:
Margaret "Peggy" Hamburg, Stephen Morse (May 1995) "Ebola outbreak in Zaire" Charlie Rose (FDA NYC)
Aussie17 deleted my comment that was shared on this note: https://substack.com/@protonmagic/note/c-68245647
Now, Aussie17 being an ex-Pharma guy (https://www.aussie17.com/about) could be ok, but to delete a polite comment that was aimed at the Japanese Dr’s “research” as promoting virus stuff, not Mr. Aussie17, starts to make one think, “WTF is going on here?”
👉Proton Magic comments are always polite, if you delete them you will surely get your own unique PM post about it.
I encountered the same problem, when I challenged Latypova a day ago, although she still didn't ban me yesterday. Haven't checked today. :)
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/the-highest-level-operatives-are
If it's in the "news," it's part of the play. And yes, anything that supports "deadly - or non-deadly - viruses" or "contagion" is there to maintain the fear that will drive People to volunteer to have toxins and who knows what else jabbed into Their flesh.
"Here, really, the boogeyman will get You, if You do not come to the temple and have Us get You!"
Big pHARMa/mediKILL industry for profit and control...
It's a bit more than that. The highest-level operatives usually spill a lot of facts; they just point in the wrong direction or simply compartmentalize:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/the-highest-level-operatives-are
Obviously, it has never been about profit. The condemned paying for the rope he is hanged with has been only slowing down inflation. The globalist objective has been out there at least since 2001:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/a-nasa-document-from-2001-predicts
Oh, agreed! Controlled opposition, telling enough truth to be "trusted," and then dragging People along to the wrong destination.
And though, perhaps not profit, per se - though the lower level Ones surely help for profit (doctors and such) - They "profit" when They impoverish Us, irrespective of what They gain.
And yes, indeed, the plans have been there and They're taking Our failure to say, "NO!," as "implied consent." Not Ethical when Most have not seen the plans, and They actively put out stuff to divert attention.
Well... I persistently say I do not consent to any unEthical thing. Unless They have put the data in front of Me, in the vernacular, and in clear and certain terms, and receive My acknowledgement that I received the data, there is no consent, implied or otherwise, and They cannot Ethically act to My detriment.
Unless They want to be beneath the beasts. Which, scum as They are, They might...
While an international movement (FLCCC https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Front_Line_COVID-19_Critical_Care_Alliance) asserts the fearful presence of synthetic 'gene' (polynucleotide) sequences and demands their identification as 'gene' products (as opposed to veiling and labelling them as 'vaccines') it is fascinating to note that early on, Bliden et al. (2021) ~ Evolution of Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG Antibody and IgG Avidity Post Pfizer and Moderna mRNA Vaccinations ~ stated, "We did observe highly variable immune responses including those with well below average anti-RBD IgG levels and avidity." Consequently, an absence of generalisability was evident around the shots from early on, (ie. a predictable dose/response relationship as alluded to in your earlier commentary and links), which together with a huge range of potential Pfizer BNT162B2 AESIs listed in the Appendix of 5.3.6 Cumulative Analysis of Post-authorization Adverse Event Reports that runs to 1,223 "associated" events pointed to a more predictable though topographically dependent dose/response (ie. anaphylaxis from LNPs)?
Meanwhile in New Zealand, the "Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines against hospitalisation, death and infection over time in Aoteroa New Zealand: a retrospective cohort study" Sept. 2024 Mbinta J. et al. has been published in the NZ Med Journal. It is a fascinating study in methodological gymnastics that appears to show the inverse of the Cleveland clinic study.
I am still having problems with believing that the globalists are stupid enough to modify genes, unless through 5G signals (or comparable technologies) targeting specific individuals through cell phones, home Wi-Fi, or some other means of tracking (e.g. dental anesthetics).
I'm with you on that. The modRNA as an inducting synthetic gene vector appears to possess uncertain / unknown reliability, if any at all. The toxic consequences of shots hinge just as nicely on LNPs. And who's to say pre-formulated 'spike' is not a component of some batches?
This is perhaps why they are promoting the dodgy Japanese paper about the nano injectables
NO virus has EVER been isolated. After many, many tries, for a long, long time, NOTHING.
What does that tell us?
Um...
Maybe that vaccines are a HUGE money-maker due to FEAR, fear of "viruses," not because of "viruses." It's simple: They're LIARS.
Hi May I query how you survive/earn a living if you don’t receive donations or have products ? Thanks
Hi Tony, Like most Clark Kents, work and investments, the writing is usually just a few hrs a week.
Moreover, "antigen" tests are at the same level as the fraudulent, humiliating, and toxic PCR tests:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/re-posting-old-articles-that-remain-e75
There is not much evidence that when "antibodies" are found in the blood, they can be linked to a specific pathogen. Most likely, they are immune responses to some kind of poisoning, just like "viruses" are acquired as tiny particles the body sheds during its detox process:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/catching-the-idea-of-a-virus
Big Kaposi on the loose?
It's being called "Narcissus' Necrosis" by a fringe faction of the no-virus community.
To me, the picture looks like "flesh-eating bacteria" from the Russian experiment with cheap street drugs...
To me, it looks more and more like the Baileys were targeted & stalked - until they started to lose it. Even designated LARPers can get targeted & stalked.
It's a good reminder to never let down your situational awareness.
Maybe Pete, there is more to that MEGA post I just didn't put in, but I think they've been on a mission from the get go. Some is just opinion, lets just leave it at that. See you!
LARPers are often legit soft disclosure but at the same time they gonna serve to keep the people busy & thus distract from real elements of the psyop, so nobody tries to reverse engineer the stage magic of the psyops:
Margaret "Peggy" Hamburg, Stephen Morse (May 1995) "Ebola outbreak in Zaire" Charlie Rose (FDA NYC)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/zLcJ1Mg85yvK