A sea-change is in the making. It’s either a breathtaking remedy for nanos based on old cures, or is there some kind of psyop or trap lurking in this hopium of information? I hope to God it is the former.
We’ve been thru twists and turns psyops before: ivermectin, HCQ, etc. Is this just another one?
You are either smoking an (h)opium pipe riding a dragon and you’re good to go, or at the end of a smoke you get a tour of the inside of the dragon.
I want to hear where the people are on this. Best we get data, papers, and reports, but since it is so new we may have to make due with anecdotal info.
👉Try not to make comments with a million links, tell us the bare bones of what we need to know.
Some issues of concern:
The EDTA recommended is microsomal (liposomal) EDTA. Encapsulated so that the EDTA doesn’t breakdown in your tummy and gets to where ever the nanos are.
👉That can be great, but dangerous payloads can be given throughout the body when encapsulated.
Is the EDTA recommended in the SGT video free of nanos itself? Hope we’re not hiring the nano-cleaners that spray-clean with more nanos, like the mosquito sprayers parading around town.
👉It seems hard to find oral microsomal EDTA on-line. Is that a good sign or a bad sign?
We really need to see some long-term outcome studies using ETDA made from various producers to standardize the contents and rule-out any hidden nanos.
I didn’t look into the management of the EDTA producer and seller. That’s a good job for the right investigator!
If you think this EDTA is great stuff, I’m heartened. Did you get any objective data? If not, it’s hard to make conclusions.
Today’s post is mainly a reader-initiated discussion. I’m just here for the ride, and I’m no expert on EDTA.
👉This is about the proposed treatment, we do not want to color facts with anything about Ana herself, what she has said in the past, or the pros or cons of the people she has worked with.
I hope we will get some info from some people I’ve been in close touch with like
, , and .Your vote for a nano-free humanity counts,
Some pertinent points I've garnered from this post.
👉The INDICATION for whatever is in shots etc. is not the same as what EDTA has been used for in the past. What may work and be safe for one indication may be completely different from another.
👉I notice the same ease to believe "safe and effective" brainwash for normies with the shots is now playing out with the red-pilled for treatments of nasties in the vax etc.
👉No one investigator's findings makes something safe and effective.
👉Trusting a person or not does not make something true.
Live commentary with "Targeted Justice" from this post
https://targetedjustice.substack.com/p/hey-cia-criminals-time-to-bug-out
TJ states in the post
"Dr Ana Mihalcea has personally researched the effects of EDTA on clearing the blood of nanotechnology from COVD shots. EDTA and Vitamin C have been proven to work."
["proven" wow, we don't need clinical trials anymore then?]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comments
Proton Magic
You knew EDTA is made from poison?
https://chemtrails.substack.com/p/edta-poison-the-3-ingredients-used/comments
Targeted Justice, Inc.
Chewing gum is made from toxic chemicals - that does not mean the final product is toxic. Clearly, you did not study chemistry.
/
So basically, you are saying - wait for the blood clot to form and accept instant death. No thanks. That's not an alternative. I did notice you did not provide a "safe" alternative. Nothing but criticisms. Are you working for the criminals?
/
"Agent 131711" - We also noticed you did not provide a real name, address, or email...
Proton Magic
https://targetedjustice.substack.com/p/hey-cia-criminals-time-to-bug-out/comment/69918670
Did you read the specs in Agent's post with Safety Data Sheets denoting EDTA as causing serious health effects and not for drug use? Would it be polite for me to say "Clearly, you did not study English?"
Proton Magic
Don't follow you. Why would anyone use a chemical known to be hazardous with no clinical trial of efficacy to prevent an outcome that has no proof of it preventing? We don't really know if/what Ana did, with what, it is only her report. Fauci also reported AZT was useful for AIDS-clearly now. Ana is using a known hazardous chemical-supposedly EDTA- and she does not do clinical trials under GCP or GMP, no safety review board or PMS.
Agent131711 is just posting public info. Getting his name and email address will not change that info.
Targeted Justice, Inc.
The same govt criminals said ivermectin should not be used to save your life. This is the same govt responsible for safety data. Did we miss something?
[Note: EDTA pusher, IVM pusher]