Christine Massey is a hero and a Rock Star. She is one of my favorite people ever.
I have celebrated Christine and her work every day for two years. She is brave and smart and kind. All the qualities that i wish I had.
I have such adoration, such respect, such veneration for dear Christine. I have such sweet affection for her. I would do almost anything for her. I would put my body in harms way to protect her. Great spirit.
I have never spoken an unkind word to her, or about her. I hold Christine in highest regards. I put her at the center of my collage of COnVID Heroes for a reason, right next to Nurse Rose.
I wish I was a rich man, I would give her my fortune. I would gladly fund her basic living expenses. I know Christine struggles.
Christine has been so kind to me. You cannot imagine. She endowed me with complete trust. I cried for her kindness, and the support and recognition she has shown me.
I wish Christine Massey peace and love.
I wish Christine Massey good health and happiness. I pray that Christine Massey is prosperous, and is recognized for her most important work, so that she can thrive, & doesn't have to suffer.
Christine, I pray that I have brought you only kindness and support. I pray that I have brought you something of value.
Beloved Christine, I pray that I am someone deserving of compassion in your eyes. I pray I am someone, of value, in your eyes.
I wish I could give you a big hug. I wish I could hold your heart next to mine. I wish I could thank you for all that you have done for me.
"Not in the scope of current scientific processes."
A quick google search of useage in science "Thus, delimitations are the characteristics that limit the scope and describe the boundaries of the study ....the researcher might also choose to use some research tools and methodologies to collect data but not others. These delimitations might be imposed for practical reasons, such as lack of time or financial resources to carry out a more thorough investigation. The delimitation section of the study should explain why specific choices were made while others were excluded and how this might affect the outcome of the research."
Are they required to explain in another FOI why the requested isolation is not within the scope of "current" scientific processes?
This is a good point. The institutions who accept FOI requests will usually say that the determination of scientific processes are up to individual researchers and their professional organizations, and if any of these are asked the reply is usually, "this is the current standard of research and practice in the field". Virologists give lots of cockamamie responses that "there are not enough viruses in patient samples to find they have to be in cell cultures", or "genetic sequencing is the gold standard of finding a type of virus" and other nonsense. You can try to ask any organization or institution on your own of course to see first hand.
Good point. They also seem to want us to think their statement of, "evidence of infection" (middle of p. 2) has the same meaning as "evidence of existing".
Christine Massey is a hero and a Rock Star. She is one of my favorite people ever.
I have celebrated Christine and her work every day for two years. She is brave and smart and kind. All the qualities that i wish I had.
I have such adoration, such respect, such veneration for dear Christine. I have such sweet affection for her. I would do almost anything for her. I would put my body in harms way to protect her. Great spirit.
I have never spoken an unkind word to her, or about her. I hold Christine in highest regards. I put her at the center of my collage of COnVID Heroes for a reason, right next to Nurse Rose.
I wish I was a rich man, I would give her my fortune. I would gladly fund her basic living expenses. I know Christine struggles.
Christine has been so kind to me. You cannot imagine. She endowed me with complete trust. I cried for her kindness, and the support and recognition she has shown me.
I wish Christine Massey peace and love.
I wish Christine Massey good health and happiness. I pray that Christine Massey is prosperous, and is recognized for her most important work, so that she can thrive, & doesn't have to suffer.
Christine, I pray that I have brought you only kindness and support. I pray that I have brought you something of value.
Beloved Christine, I pray that I am someone deserving of compassion in your eyes. I pray I am someone, of value, in your eyes.
I wish I could give you a big hug. I wish I could hold your heart next to mine. I wish I could thank you for all that you have done for me.
Bill, you sound a little besotted with Christine. :)
No, that's definitely not the right word. I choose my words very carefully.
The correct word is ADORATION. I adore Christine. I venerate her. I respect her. I hold her in highest regard.
That is all. The L word is overloaded, which is why I try to avoid it. My love for Christine has nothing to do with romance.
I hope this helps,
BH
🙏🙇♂️❤️🌹
Thanks PM.
FOI's Just blow smoke up people's fundamental orifices!
Lies lies & more demandable lies! Anything out of any govtards is useless these days!
"Not in the scope of current scientific processes."
A quick google search of useage in science "Thus, delimitations are the characteristics that limit the scope and describe the boundaries of the study ....the researcher might also choose to use some research tools and methodologies to collect data but not others. These delimitations might be imposed for practical reasons, such as lack of time or financial resources to carry out a more thorough investigation. The delimitation section of the study should explain why specific choices were made while others were excluded and how this might affect the outcome of the research."
Are they required to explain in another FOI why the requested isolation is not within the scope of "current" scientific processes?
This is a good point. The institutions who accept FOI requests will usually say that the determination of scientific processes are up to individual researchers and their professional organizations, and if any of these are asked the reply is usually, "this is the current standard of research and practice in the field". Virologists give lots of cockamamie responses that "there are not enough viruses in patient samples to find they have to be in cell cultures", or "genetic sequencing is the gold standard of finding a type of virus" and other nonsense. You can try to ask any organization or institution on your own of course to see first hand.
That could be quite droll. How many viruses does a man need really to die of a virus?
In the mask studies, they claim just "1 virion" is enough to make you sick lol
The CDC provided a bogus, red herring excuse in their March 1, 2021 response, see the bottom of page 3:
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/CDC-March-1-2021-SARS-COV-2-Isolation-Response-Redacted.pdf
The FOI had nothing to do with a "virus" replicating. And assigning properties to a never-show-exist particle is a logic fallacy.
Good point. They also seem to want us to think their statement of, "evidence of infection" (middle of p. 2) has the same meaning as "evidence of existing".
bingo!
Will do. Thank you
They are not very good looking are they.
👍🏻