The main point of this post was to clarify a wide-reaching article by Jon Rappoport where he states, "The study’s concerns are based on the fact that injected DNA can insert itself into the human genome and stay there. Thereby making dangerous and destructive changes in the body.", and because Jon states the paper is complex and has only read parts of it. In addition, comments are behind a paywall, which could be ok for certain topics, but not one that is scaring people. So MY OPINION is this was an important piece to dive into and allow open and free discussion, even if I could make a mistaken conclusion-well that’s why we have comments.
In summary:
1.The shots studied were not the EUA formulation injected into the masses.
2. The DNA was not purified/quantified. Spectroscopy may be ok but it is not a direct measure and should have some direct corroborating methods or control groups, like the EUA shot, other shots, saline.
3. There was no study of DNA integration in the human genome.
4. The authors’ calling the shots “mRNA pharmaceuticals” implying some relationship to a pathogen has no basis from either this study nor other studies (see my post here covering RNA in shots in-depth: https://protonmagic.substack.com/p/protons-last-theorem).
5. Jon honestly notes the paper is complex topic and should have had expert consultants help him, unless he intentionally want to leave a scary post for public consumption, because the vast majority of persons will not go thru the paywall.
6. To persons that have 5G questions, this post was about DNA in shots. On May 18th I posted a detailed examination of 5G that has some very important papers on 5G roll-out associated with illness in 2020, and other numerous links on EMF dangers to biology, and possible connection to shot contents.
This was linked in today’s post and readers should read that carefully. Agree or disagree, my opinion is that 5G (meaning any XG), is a serious concern for humanity’s safety and can certainly be used nefariously to harm and as a psyop.
→ Another opinion of mine is to make this kind of information on the attack on humanity open and free. I can understand some persons wish to pledge, but I will never take any money for this. It is my calling to do this, I learn a lot from making and reading posts, discussions, and comradery. Sometimes my satire could go overboard, well I’m no pro at writing. I adjusted some points in today’s post and others over the last 2 years. This post IS NOT about the Wizard of Oz, and the post on Planet Claire IS NOT about the song. I try to mix something of popular interest that has some deep meaning itself, the purpose is to engage people to read. -Yours Truly Proton Magic
At least in the NYC mass casualty event of spring 2020, whatever killed people affected all adults over 45 more or less equally, and deaths increased with age after childhood. It killed 50k people in a small geographic region over 8 weeks. Seems like 5G is one thing that could possibly do that, if used as a targeted weapon. That event is the key to figuring out how the democide in 2020 that killed a half-million people was done IMO. I think it's possible that whatever they used killed more people than expected that first time.
I'm just spit-balling here, but they have these towers everywhere--maybe their purpose is to be turned on and off at will, for reasons that have nothing to do with cell phones or internet access. I think I recall reading a phone designer one time saying there is actually no way for the phones they are building to use 5G?
Your question is good out-of-the-box thinking (I also thought the Chinese never did metagenomic testing they just made a fraudulent report of a genome), but, my guess is that at least at the low freqs the 5G is working with phones, it wouldn't be good for people to start outing that fakery. But at high freqs IDK. If it could work they would use it as a cover, I think the FCC has approved those freqs but sorry don't know where the truth might end here.
What we really need is some way to see the activity on the networks. Obviously they did something in NYC in spring 2020 that they didn't do elsewhere, except possibly in DC, Connecticut, Massachusetts, and Michigan, to a lesser degree.
You are correct, the towers are programmable, and intensity of frequency can be changed and in different locations. I very much doubt that data would ever be available.
The paper was from Germany, Cominarty is said to have been shipped to Germany, don't know about the EUA, but the paper should have studied both to echew obfuscation.
Nice PM! Your relentless pointing out of bullshit is invaluable.
I hate the "mRNA /DNA is going to get integrated into our genome" narrative. It is pure fear mongering and it is based on sooooo much junk science it really is a joke.
The whole cental dogma of genetics is nonesense.
Our "genes / DNA" have never been shown to be responsible for our inherited traits nor has it been shown that our genome is our genetic blueprint - it's just a fat guess based on the appearance of chromosomes in certain cells (attributing a function to a form without proof).
It has never been shown that our DNA is altered by exposure to foreign genetic material - it's also a guess based on a unproven premise.
The way this integration is supposed to take place places reliance on structures in cells which can be demonstrated not to exist - namely nuclear pores.
From the article I wrote summaring Dr Hillman's work in the living cell :
"It is claimed that the purpose of mRNA in certain vaccines is to instruct our cells to make a specific protein, a viral spike protein, which will cause our bodies in turn to then make the appropriate antibodies which will defend the body against a specific virus. Gene-therapy on the other hand involves making deliberate changes to a person’s DNA by introducing a gene which allows the cells to make a specific protein that cures or alleviates a genetic condition.
Gene-therapy and mRNA vaccines converge because it is feared that if the mRNA from the vaccines is not converted into the spike proteins it may then wonder into the nucleus via the “nuclear pores” and join with our very tightly wrapped DNA, thereby permanently altering our DNA and all its daughter cells from there onwards. Again, if cells do not have protein factories and “nuclear pores” do not exist how is this all supposed take place?"
Thanks for this thorough comment and reminder of the Hillman post you guys made, a great post that is one of those deserving of a yearly re-run. Keep in touch Mia!
Here's how I explain the dangers of injections to people to keep it really simple:
1) Injecting anything into your body is probably not a good idea.
2) So-called vaccines are made by known criminal syndicates with mile long rap sheets. Since corporations are not persons, they can just pay some money (to individuals for damage, or lobbyists and bureaucrats for special rules and protection) to stay out of prison.
3) All of them, every single one, is loaded with ingredients and elements that will poison you. So it doesn't really matter if it is aluminum, formaldehyde, or some shit that will allegedly alter your 'DNA'. It's just poison. Run away.
4) You might get injured immediately, it might surface down the road, or maybe you'll be "lucky" and never even notice.
5) There's no such thing as "viruses", unless you're scared of pictures of tiny circles that appear after a cell is destroyed. So even if a vaccine was "safe", what would be the purpose?
6) If you haven't yet caught on to the absurdity of vaccination as a "health measure", you might be a little slow. Like the the slowest camper on the grounds when the bear attacks. Pick up your feet.
Not to mention the fact that many investigators could never find any evidence that anything biological was ever in the shots to begin with. Some of the vials were completely missing elements like nitrogen and phosphorus which means there was never anything organic in them.
Manning the barricades and standing against the demonic globalist juggernaut is the opportunity accorded to bear witness. It is rare in life one should be bestowed such a blessing. Shouting from behind a paywall seems much at odds with the desperate stakes at hand. I unfailingly remove authors hiding behind paywalls. It is simply not worth enduring the time wasted more than once on an algorithm where one attempts to comment and then finds is paywalled and unable to do so. Altruistic may be, but I was never here to snack on the fears of others.
Jon has been manning the barricades for decades and has put out a massive body of work that is freely available. So it's pretty funny to see him referred to as "hiding behind a paywall".
I wonder where I might find your comparable contribution. Or PM's. Or Mia's.
Do you share PM's apparent position that 86 year olds don't need or deserve to be compensated for any of their efforts?
The fact is Christine, he doesn't allow comments from people who won't give him money. How is that conducive to any real dialogue about the truth? The paywall shows you where his priorities really are.
Commenters hiding behind nom de plumes seems reasonable to me, but anonymous authors who want to be *followed* for their cleverness, who call out other authors' failings, actually doing a hit piece, cashing in on the click bait of a famous author's name, diminishing such authors' reputations, well that's too easy.
Cairn, you ought to try actually being targeted by the government off and on for the last 20 years like I have. This is why I and many others do not put our real names out there. Just go on X and see all the fucking shills with those blue check marks next to their names. People putting their real names out there means absolute squat to me. We certainly know all the real names of every lying journalist on TV don't we? I don't always agree with Proton and we have civil arguments from time to time but I can tell you from my long interaction with him that he is 100% real. Of course I am probably suspect as well............
Hey Cairn, I understand where you are coming from but to explain some things, the DNA in shots integrating fear narrative is not one to skip over. If Jon allowed comments I probably would take the 5 min to write one rather than the 3 hours to make a post and deal with all the comments. The situation we are in is quite serious, I do not need a reputation nor pledges from my work and refuse all money period. Now there is a complex web of intentional deception writers, unintentional wrong-narrative writers, and censuring games going on behind the scenes you may not fully realize. Baiting, gaslighting, turncoating, identity outing, profile and nexus of connection investigations are all around us. We the public need to try to keep these persons in check. I'm not saying Jon Rap is one of those, only his public post was not scientifically correct. Compared to Jon's followers I'm not much but every inch of truth bringing is valuable and I value your support and comments, but I'm not using JR for anything but to give you info. Take care.
I would also agree the attack on Jon Rappoport is out of line. Jon has spent the last 40 years providing valuable information to folks capable of learning. He has a proven long-term track record, something Proton Magic does not. Does that mean Jon is always 100% correct? Of course not, but he has one excellent track record. Get off your high horse PM!
I did not say JR didn't give good info in the past, you are putting words in my mouth. My post stated very clearly the logic to critique his post, track record has zero to do with each new article as it comes up. Though just look at my main post on my SS HP on RNA in the shots where I analyzed 4 papers directly related to this same topic on DNA in shots. You didn't read it did you? Did John write about that before? Nope, in fact he even states the paper is complex and didn't read all of it. And you don't know how many scientific papers I have written do you? It's not relevant to this post on John but it is relevant to your take on track record instead of the facts on the ground of what he said in that post. This is why we need free speech for discussion and revision of ideas as needed.
Just to add, John's SS is one of my top recommendations right on my SS HP. Why would I "attack" someone I recommend? Must be that it is not an attack as I explained.
I sometimes tell my best friend he's full of shit. Then he thinks about it and sometimes we'll argue a little more and other times he'll agree. We are still friends because most of the time I don't think he's full of shit. It's not an "attack".
As a long time follower of Rappoport (but not willing to pay for his substack), I never read this article as a hit piece. Why can't we be critical when we see a mistake that could use some cleaning up? I would think if Rappoport is the journalist with integrity he has demonstrated to be, he'd want to set the record straight. As Proton has pointed out, his new format makes that a more difficult proposition.
Thanks PM. Integration of the mother in law is what is the danger for many that are married! Maybe that is why I am happily divorced?! Haha!
In my experience, paywalled content from supposed truthers SOMEHOW always ends up being suspect. Why? Precisely because the reasons that you state. It does not accommodate for open discussion. And so such content seems to be designed not to inform and learn BUT TO PROJECT&INDOCTRINATE. Funny how instilling fear (of invisible threats) is always a byproduct eh?
I also remember seeing evidence that Jon is not that well informed. Much like Chomsky.
Nothing new really, failed "academics" (MONKEYdemics!) just keep on piling up! It is satisfying when we call them out tho. But that is a sign we should be mindful of! It means we are the ones who are now responsible for upholding what is REALLY real in our reality!
Btw, I like the fact that you publish around the time when I have my morning guarana ;)
If "they" get something so fundamentally wrong such as the conviction that bacteria attack living cells & tissue and cause contagious illnesses, then how far can you possibly trust them about ANYTHING, much less "DNA"?
I want to know if identification through DNA is real? I'm thinking about paternity tests and crime scene investigations...How often do "they" get it wrong? Have their tests been challenged by independent labs? I am thinking about the papaya and goat that tested positive for covid...I know that had nothing to do with DNA, but...
So, DNA is some sort of unique fingerprint found in bodily fluid?
Stefan Lanka said DNA is not fixed and that it changes...
What if DNA as a fingerprint has been proven scientifically but not proven as some sort of "builder" or blueprint?
I have attempted to study the subject but immediately feel as though I've wandered into a zone of pseudoscience...pretty much how I also feel when studying the subject of cancer...It's very difficult to take any of it serious even though the wordage is serious-sounding and scientific-looking...There's something too confident in their acceptance of supposed forgone conclusions regarding microscopic "things".... I don't trust their characterizations or their relations or interactions or supposed functions. All of it is based on microscopes and chemical mixtures -- all of it has been studied OUT OF BODY.
Just thinking aloud...
I, too, stopped reading & subscribing to Jon's SS when I realized I could not leave comments. His paywall, I imagine, only produces chump-change...but maybe he doesn't want any dissent or challenging comments and reckons no one would pay for the privilege. Good, strong man, Jon, damn good writer...One of the first to blow the whistle on the HIV/AIDS scamdemic way back in 1987...
Thank you. The article is dissenting and that's refreshing. I've seen documents like it before. I do not get the impression that the author knows how DNA is used for fingerprinting -- the mechanics of the method (and neither do I). He smells a rat but he did not convince me he found one.
And mind you, I am neither pro or anti DNA, it's just that I suspect strongly, as the author did, that it is not nearly as infallible as the "experts" claim -- and I agree with his conclusion that it may be a total fraud/hoax/pseudoscience. I just don't know.
Let's say for the sake of argument that DNA is a real thing >> Just as we know there is no gain of function of microbes, I doubt anyone's DNA can be ruined or changed by any means. Biological bodies can be poisoned but their fundamental elements are inviolable. You can mess with Mother Nature but you can't reverse her biological laws.
I'm all for the termination of the existence of microscopes, petri dishes, test tubes, and anything else that has to do with snooping around the insides of biological bodies. They are sealed for a good reason. We as a species lived without them for a very, very, very long time. They are NOT essential to our survival as a species. If anything, they have led to an enormous increase in iatrogenic problems and a kind of creeping iatrogenic genocide over the decades since Rockefeller. Do you think I am wrong?
Thank you. Exactly what I was looking for. I agree with his conclusion >> “let’s mix dead or living matter with chemicals, spin, boil, burn and document what happens”.
You're the hero gatekeeper, PM, rather than the malign type! You ensure - as far as you are able - to keep people on track.
I wanted to point something out to Jon on the completely different subject of an alleged rape as the media story has no credibility and was forced into a Note because of the paywall - less important perhaps than no proof of DNA in shots but my gatekeeping efforts are simply in the direction of "that's a staged event, that's a staged event, that's a staged event." https://substack.com/@petraliverani/note/c-55663028
(Just to say that the spelling of Jon's name is not consistent through your post.)
Hi Petra, Ah, I noticed that and DID fix it but had too many tabs open and updated the wrong tab thinking I updated the correct tab, thanks for keeping me focused and hope you keep up the good work too!.
As much as I liked Jon's work in the last several years, I also observed similar contradictions in his narrative in November, 2023, which made me doubt about his being himself:
These days, lots of authors are being replaced by AI or agents, so it's not out of the question. For some comic relief, I wrote the following about the problem a while ago, when the problem was already glaringly obvious:
I always laugh at the viroliegy and this argument they hate.
It is said that viruses are dead. Now dead cells do not contain ATP.
Basic biology tells us that living cells contain ATP. It is found in all living cells and is essential as it provides energy for the cell to function. Every living organism consists of cells that rely on ATP for their energy needs. Did biology in 1974 as a subject.
ATP is only found in live cells which essential for the enzyme in luciferase to bind to to use fluorescence spectrometry.
So, fluorescence spectrometry cannot be used to find non existent viruses.
Years ago I used to sell Bio Orbit Hygiene Monitoring and Control instruments for detecting contamination of surfaces and they used Bio-Chemiluminescence to detect ATP presence mainly in food production facilities.
My pleasure. PCR relies on bioluminescence to determine qualitatively and that is why it cannot be used as a diagnostic tool. Not just that it also cannot detect phantoms. Enjoy your posts BTW.
Glad you have direct experience with PCR! So let me ask you, when a Pepsi sample gets a positive Covid pcr result, my understanding this was because of high CT, the PCR system breaks down and often just lights up. I never thought of where the energy came from in this situation-there is no biological material in a Pepsi sample right-or is there some in the polymerase or reagent fluids?, do you have some pearls of wisdom for us on this?
doesn't pepsi have aborted fetal tissue proteins as flavoring 'agents'- or am I missing/hallucinating something, also it seems acidic,I recall narrative reports out of the u.k. which suggested that skool kidz were using orange juice on their take -home pcr's to validate their ( god-given right to ) truancy- ( might be some aborted fetal tissue in those 'drinks' as well... come to think of it)
Not an expert on PCR at all and have no experience with it either. My limited experience was with bioluminescence in a particular application. But I would suggest that it is most probably in the reagent fluids. The reagent will contain the luciferase enzyme to attach to a molecule. I have no clue what molecules are in Pepsi other than C02? Remember Mullis said with PCR you can find almost anything, It's a process or technique of magnification or amplification and replication.
ok thanks, sorry I misinterpreted your experience. I read a lot on it but not an expert either. When I said pepsi, I meant any non biologic material, in fact just a no sample test. My understanding was that when Ct is high the system breaks down and can just light up. Is that from a contaminant, or DNA cross over molecule, artifact, or just the machine itself IDK but always thought the latter, maybe the reagent as you say. Well Jack we don't have to know everything to know there is BS in this world!
Years before covid, before "spike protein", the lipids were found to be toxic.... Why did they go with multiple dose shots? Why are people falling for the spike protein while ignoring the real issue?
"For Moderna, that meant putting its Crigler-Najjar therapy in nanoparticles made of lipids. And for its chemists, those nanoparticles created a daunting challenge: Dose too little, and you don’t get enough enzyme to affect the disease; dose too much, and the drug is too toxic for patients."
Well everyone can get crazy like my husband did and bought a live blood microscope. He still checks his blood once in a while to make sure they are not clumping together and the shape is right. He is also the healthiest person in his corp job, and I believe the oldest. There surely is a much higher risk in such a closed environment with LED and Fluorescent light. His telomere’s must be replenished at a faster rate than mine as he still has more energy than I do.
If you’ve had shots and check your blood, you may find abnormal blood cells. This can help you and others to wake up and admonish people close to you not to get shots.
Can you please cite a valid controlled study, with no lingering questions, showing that 5G played a role in non-existent "covid" (which is diagnosed with lab tests, no symptoms required)?
Ditto re the shots "frying people to bits" when in 5G EMF at high frequency (to justify scaring your readers with such claims)?
You have an interesting way of demonstrating your "respect" for an 86 year old! Especially one with such an incredible body of work under his belt. And what's up with implying that 86 year olds don't need income?
I get asked similar questions and it’s always too much in a quick response. To live your best life, assume your body is already full of heavy metals long before Covid. No need to make yourself crazy and follow blood work that your doctors won’t do unless you have direct symptoms to say lead poisoning etc. The human body is remarkably resilient and can handle a reboot many times over. There are many ways to detox heavy metals without pharmaceuticals or even medial personal. Make detox apart of your daily life, then feed your cells the best medicine possible, good clean food and water. Keep a center peace in your heart and mind to prevent disease. These are all simple, yet I had to give up what I thought once upon a time were pleasures in life. Now my greatest pleasure is a high functioning mind. If I lose that, I have lost all freedom within this body.
Mia Breeze is on it. And in that spirit, THIS is excellent! Aleck Zeck has guests Dr. Mark Bailey and Steve Falconer for a sorta long, but captivating vid... Lots of really great info, whilst being genuinely interesting and even funny... Cheers, PM&C and Mia.
Understanding this concept of the human genome is not just about us as individuals it’s also important for people to understand that it affects our grandchildren and their children etc. Gene expression can be changed, yet most people are being manipulated to believe everything bad that happens to them is genetics
Genomes, DNA, and genetics are lots of smoke and mirrors. See this, it is very long but may shake you up. It is very hard to change one's belief system once it's in place and the planners of evil know this.
Loved this article, thank you for sharing this, I really enjoyed the historical context of the same topic which brings me to the real reason none of these things are brought up for open publication as the example stated. Term - Junk DNA is rarely even mentioned or even considered by academics in the field the human genome, yet 98% is uncoded DNA, and they won’t mention this ever in their publications. This would mean no great credit to funding research that hinges solely upon science and not a Master Creator. This is why I made the comment the gene expression can be turned on and off. Hence why the several people can be exposed to the same outside poisons and “viruses” (which a term I use loosely) another discussion of viral theory, for another time. Yet for the purpose of DNA being all knowing and able to replicate an entire human once again is completely impossible without a much larger view of the 98% of the genes that are present and not considered science. I giggle when anyone pressed for more they used always the term junk DNA. It’s not junk at all it’s makes us unqualified to be God, but also makes us an individuals apart of God, and fully understand our own creation and role in this constraint of earthly life. Sorry so long. My Sunday thoughts 💭
Yes it's quite a strange thing, and the human genome project was made to bolster this "scam" let's say. But DNA as a story doesn't prove there is a Master Creator in of itself, it just means the DNA story is BS to some small or large extent. There can be other chemical or electrical blueprints for life we the masses don't know.
Author's Statement
The main point of this post was to clarify a wide-reaching article by Jon Rappoport where he states, "The study’s concerns are based on the fact that injected DNA can insert itself into the human genome and stay there. Thereby making dangerous and destructive changes in the body.", and because Jon states the paper is complex and has only read parts of it. In addition, comments are behind a paywall, which could be ok for certain topics, but not one that is scaring people. So MY OPINION is this was an important piece to dive into and allow open and free discussion, even if I could make a mistaken conclusion-well that’s why we have comments.
In summary:
1.The shots studied were not the EUA formulation injected into the masses.
2. The DNA was not purified/quantified. Spectroscopy may be ok but it is not a direct measure and should have some direct corroborating methods or control groups, like the EUA shot, other shots, saline.
3. There was no study of DNA integration in the human genome.
4. The authors’ calling the shots “mRNA pharmaceuticals” implying some relationship to a pathogen has no basis from either this study nor other studies (see my post here covering RNA in shots in-depth: https://protonmagic.substack.com/p/protons-last-theorem).
5. Jon honestly notes the paper is complex topic and should have had expert consultants help him, unless he intentionally want to leave a scary post for public consumption, because the vast majority of persons will not go thru the paywall.
6. To persons that have 5G questions, this post was about DNA in shots. On May 18th I posted a detailed examination of 5G that has some very important papers on 5G roll-out associated with illness in 2020, and other numerous links on EMF dangers to biology, and possible connection to shot contents.
https://protonmagic.substack.com/p/planet-claire-has-arrived
This was linked in today’s post and readers should read that carefully. Agree or disagree, my opinion is that 5G (meaning any XG), is a serious concern for humanity’s safety and can certainly be used nefariously to harm and as a psyop.
→ Another opinion of mine is to make this kind of information on the attack on humanity open and free. I can understand some persons wish to pledge, but I will never take any money for this. It is my calling to do this, I learn a lot from making and reading posts, discussions, and comradery. Sometimes my satire could go overboard, well I’m no pro at writing. I adjusted some points in today’s post and others over the last 2 years. This post IS NOT about the Wizard of Oz, and the post on Planet Claire IS NOT about the song. I try to mix something of popular interest that has some deep meaning itself, the purpose is to engage people to read. -Yours Truly Proton Magic
At least in the NYC mass casualty event of spring 2020, whatever killed people affected all adults over 45 more or less equally, and deaths increased with age after childhood. It killed 50k people in a small geographic region over 8 weeks. Seems like 5G is one thing that could possibly do that, if used as a targeted weapon. That event is the key to figuring out how the democide in 2020 that killed a half-million people was done IMO. I think it's possible that whatever they used killed more people than expected that first time.
You are correct, here is the link you want showing NYC and 5G in the study
https://stateofthenation.co/?p=12846
I'm just spit-balling here, but they have these towers everywhere--maybe their purpose is to be turned on and off at will, for reasons that have nothing to do with cell phones or internet access. I think I recall reading a phone designer one time saying there is actually no way for the phones they are building to use 5G?
Your question is good out-of-the-box thinking (I also thought the Chinese never did metagenomic testing they just made a fraudulent report of a genome), but, my guess is that at least at the low freqs the 5G is working with phones, it wouldn't be good for people to start outing that fakery. But at high freqs IDK. If it could work they would use it as a cover, I think the FCC has approved those freqs but sorry don't know where the truth might end here.
What we really need is some way to see the activity on the networks. Obviously they did something in NYC in spring 2020 that they didn't do elsewhere, except possibly in DC, Connecticut, Massachusetts, and Michigan, to a lesser degree.
You are correct, the towers are programmable, and intensity of frequency can be changed and in different locations. I very much doubt that data would ever be available.
BTW:
The so called Comirnaty was the label that all the Phizer shot up NZers got.
Not that that proves anything about any ingredients which are one of the big mysteries.
The paper was from Germany, Cominarty is said to have been shipped to Germany, don't know about the EUA, but the paper should have studied both to echew obfuscation.
Who knows how many hundreds of different concoctions were brewed.
Nice PM! Your relentless pointing out of bullshit is invaluable.
I hate the "mRNA /DNA is going to get integrated into our genome" narrative. It is pure fear mongering and it is based on sooooo much junk science it really is a joke.
The whole cental dogma of genetics is nonesense.
Our "genes / DNA" have never been shown to be responsible for our inherited traits nor has it been shown that our genome is our genetic blueprint - it's just a fat guess based on the appearance of chromosomes in certain cells (attributing a function to a form without proof).
It has never been shown that our DNA is altered by exposure to foreign genetic material - it's also a guess based on a unproven premise.
The way this integration is supposed to take place places reliance on structures in cells which can be demonstrated not to exist - namely nuclear pores.
From the article I wrote summaring Dr Hillman's work in the living cell :
"It is claimed that the purpose of mRNA in certain vaccines is to instruct our cells to make a specific protein, a viral spike protein, which will cause our bodies in turn to then make the appropriate antibodies which will defend the body against a specific virus. Gene-therapy on the other hand involves making deliberate changes to a person’s DNA by introducing a gene which allows the cells to make a specific protein that cures or alleviates a genetic condition.
Gene-therapy and mRNA vaccines converge because it is feared that if the mRNA from the vaccines is not converted into the spike proteins it may then wonder into the nucleus via the “nuclear pores” and join with our very tightly wrapped DNA, thereby permanently altering our DNA and all its daughter cells from there onwards. Again, if cells do not have protein factories and “nuclear pores” do not exist how is this all supposed take place?"
https://open.substack.com/pub/dpl003/p/why-you-should-know-about-harold?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=10iiay
Thanks for this thorough comment and reminder of the Hillman post you guys made, a great post that is one of those deserving of a yearly re-run. Keep in touch Mia!
Here's how I explain the dangers of injections to people to keep it really simple:
1) Injecting anything into your body is probably not a good idea.
2) So-called vaccines are made by known criminal syndicates with mile long rap sheets. Since corporations are not persons, they can just pay some money (to individuals for damage, or lobbyists and bureaucrats for special rules and protection) to stay out of prison.
3) All of them, every single one, is loaded with ingredients and elements that will poison you. So it doesn't really matter if it is aluminum, formaldehyde, or some shit that will allegedly alter your 'DNA'. It's just poison. Run away.
4) You might get injured immediately, it might surface down the road, or maybe you'll be "lucky" and never even notice.
5) There's no such thing as "viruses", unless you're scared of pictures of tiny circles that appear after a cell is destroyed. So even if a vaccine was "safe", what would be the purpose?
6) If you haven't yet caught on to the absurdity of vaccination as a "health measure", you might be a little slow. Like the the slowest camper on the grounds when the bear attacks. Pick up your feet.
It's really not complicated.
Excellent FP thank you.
🎯🎯🎯🎯
Not to mention the fact that many investigators could never find any evidence that anything biological was ever in the shots to begin with. Some of the vials were completely missing elements like nitrogen and phosphorus which means there was never anything organic in them.
💯
Awesome, Mia!
YES.
Excellent comment! Thank you Mia Breeze
Manning the barricades and standing against the demonic globalist juggernaut is the opportunity accorded to bear witness. It is rare in life one should be bestowed such a blessing. Shouting from behind a paywall seems much at odds with the desperate stakes at hand. I unfailingly remove authors hiding behind paywalls. It is simply not worth enduring the time wasted more than once on an algorithm where one attempts to comment and then finds is paywalled and unable to do so. Altruistic may be, but I was never here to snack on the fears of others.
You said what I was thinking but I could have never written it that well. Amazing prose Latus, each time it's a pleasure to hear from you.
Jon has been manning the barricades for decades and has put out a massive body of work that is freely available. So it's pretty funny to see him referred to as "hiding behind a paywall".
I wonder where I might find your comparable contribution. Or PM's. Or Mia's.
Do you share PM's apparent position that 86 year olds don't need or deserve to be compensated for any of their efforts?
Do you know what PM does for a living?
The fact is Christine, he doesn't allow comments from people who won't give him money. How is that conducive to any real dialogue about the truth? The paywall shows you where his priorities really are.
You are eminently correct.
"So it's pretty funny to see him referred to as "hiding behind a paywall."
Thank you Christine. There is so little that seems amusing here, though your agreement is acknowledged.
Who is/are Proton Magic?
Commenters hiding behind nom de plumes seems reasonable to me, but anonymous authors who want to be *followed* for their cleverness, who call out other authors' failings, actually doing a hit piece, cashing in on the click bait of a famous author's name, diminishing such authors' reputations, well that's too easy.
Cairn, you ought to try actually being targeted by the government off and on for the last 20 years like I have. This is why I and many others do not put our real names out there. Just go on X and see all the fucking shills with those blue check marks next to their names. People putting their real names out there means absolute squat to me. We certainly know all the real names of every lying journalist on TV don't we? I don't always agree with Proton and we have civil arguments from time to time but I can tell you from my long interaction with him that he is 100% real. Of course I am probably suspect as well............
Moving comment Et's thank you!
Not saying PM should put their real name out there.
Just objecting to using Jon Rappoport to make a Substack about.
Obviously everyone is (unfortunately) only as good as their last post.
Fail one post and reputation shredded.
Edit: Et, if you are vouching for the genuine nature of PM, then I apologise for my outburst and I stand corrected.
Hey Cairn, I understand where you are coming from but to explain some things, the DNA in shots integrating fear narrative is not one to skip over. If Jon allowed comments I probably would take the 5 min to write one rather than the 3 hours to make a post and deal with all the comments. The situation we are in is quite serious, I do not need a reputation nor pledges from my work and refuse all money period. Now there is a complex web of intentional deception writers, unintentional wrong-narrative writers, and censuring games going on behind the scenes you may not fully realize. Baiting, gaslighting, turncoating, identity outing, profile and nexus of connection investigations are all around us. We the public need to try to keep these persons in check. I'm not saying Jon Rap is one of those, only his public post was not scientifically correct. Compared to Jon's followers I'm not much but every inch of truth bringing is valuable and I value your support and comments, but I'm not using JR for anything but to give you info. Take care.
Thank you PM for not banning me.
It's the old attack the argument not the person scenario.
And you saw yourself justifiably attacking the argument and I saw it as an attack on the person.
Anyway I am proud to stand up for Jon, and I feel that I owe him for not paying him when he is absolutely spot on.
Don't want to see him cancelled.
Your views PM are very cutting edge and not everyone is as sharp.
I would also agree the attack on Jon Rappoport is out of line. Jon has spent the last 40 years providing valuable information to folks capable of learning. He has a proven long-term track record, something Proton Magic does not. Does that mean Jon is always 100% correct? Of course not, but he has one excellent track record. Get off your high horse PM!
I did not say JR didn't give good info in the past, you are putting words in my mouth. My post stated very clearly the logic to critique his post, track record has zero to do with each new article as it comes up. Though just look at my main post on my SS HP on RNA in the shots where I analyzed 4 papers directly related to this same topic on DNA in shots. You didn't read it did you? Did John write about that before? Nope, in fact he even states the paper is complex and didn't read all of it. And you don't know how many scientific papers I have written do you? It's not relevant to this post on John but it is relevant to your take on track record instead of the facts on the ground of what he said in that post. This is why we need free speech for discussion and revision of ideas as needed.
Just to add, John's SS is one of my top recommendations right on my SS HP. Why would I "attack" someone I recommend? Must be that it is not an attack as I explained.
I sometimes tell my best friend he's full of shit. Then he thinks about it and sometimes we'll argue a little more and other times he'll agree. We are still friends because most of the time I don't think he's full of shit. It's not an "attack".
As a long time follower of Rappoport (but not willing to pay for his substack), I never read this article as a hit piece. Why can't we be critical when we see a mistake that could use some cleaning up? I would think if Rappoport is the journalist with integrity he has demonstrated to be, he'd want to set the record straight. As Proton has pointed out, his new format makes that a more difficult proposition.
Thanks PM. Integration of the mother in law is what is the danger for many that are married! Maybe that is why I am happily divorced?! Haha!
In my experience, paywalled content from supposed truthers SOMEHOW always ends up being suspect. Why? Precisely because the reasons that you state. It does not accommodate for open discussion. And so such content seems to be designed not to inform and learn BUT TO PROJECT&INDOCTRINATE. Funny how instilling fear (of invisible threats) is always a byproduct eh?
I also remember seeing evidence that Jon is not that well informed. Much like Chomsky.
Nothing new really, failed "academics" (MONKEYdemics!) just keep on piling up! It is satisfying when we call them out tho. But that is a sign we should be mindful of! It means we are the ones who are now responsible for upholding what is REALLY real in our reality!
Btw, I like the fact that you publish around the time when I have my morning guarana ;)
Have an awesome day!
Hey Sirius, your jokes are better with each comment. Love it.
If "they" get something so fundamentally wrong such as the conviction that bacteria attack living cells & tissue and cause contagious illnesses, then how far can you possibly trust them about ANYTHING, much less "DNA"?
I want to know if identification through DNA is real? I'm thinking about paternity tests and crime scene investigations...How often do "they" get it wrong? Have their tests been challenged by independent labs? I am thinking about the papaya and goat that tested positive for covid...I know that had nothing to do with DNA, but...
So, DNA is some sort of unique fingerprint found in bodily fluid?
Stefan Lanka said DNA is not fixed and that it changes...
What if DNA as a fingerprint has been proven scientifically but not proven as some sort of "builder" or blueprint?
I have attempted to study the subject but immediately feel as though I've wandered into a zone of pseudoscience...pretty much how I also feel when studying the subject of cancer...It's very difficult to take any of it serious even though the wordage is serious-sounding and scientific-looking...There's something too confident in their acceptance of supposed forgone conclusions regarding microscopic "things".... I don't trust their characterizations or their relations or interactions or supposed functions. All of it is based on microscopes and chemical mixtures -- all of it has been studied OUT OF BODY.
Just thinking aloud...
I, too, stopped reading & subscribing to Jon's SS when I realized I could not leave comments. His paywall, I imagine, only produces chump-change...but maybe he doesn't want any dissent or challenging comments and reckons no one would pay for the privilege. Good, strong man, Jon, damn good writer...One of the first to blow the whistle on the HIV/AIDS scamdemic way back in 1987...
This by Omar Jordan can get you on the Yellow Brick Road though may not be fully satisfying
https://docs.google.com/document/d/13k2Pl848yUW-VAB5c0WLTe69WAu6CDtZ2bC1gsUr2jk/edit
Thank you. The article is dissenting and that's refreshing. I've seen documents like it before. I do not get the impression that the author knows how DNA is used for fingerprinting -- the mechanics of the method (and neither do I). He smells a rat but he did not convince me he found one.
And mind you, I am neither pro or anti DNA, it's just that I suspect strongly, as the author did, that it is not nearly as infallible as the "experts" claim -- and I agree with his conclusion that it may be a total fraud/hoax/pseudoscience. I just don't know.
Let's say for the sake of argument that DNA is a real thing >> Just as we know there is no gain of function of microbes, I doubt anyone's DNA can be ruined or changed by any means. Biological bodies can be poisoned but their fundamental elements are inviolable. You can mess with Mother Nature but you can't reverse her biological laws.
I'm all for the termination of the existence of microscopes, petri dishes, test tubes, and anything else that has to do with snooping around the insides of biological bodies. They are sealed for a good reason. We as a species lived without them for a very, very, very long time. They are NOT essential to our survival as a species. If anything, they have led to an enormous increase in iatrogenic problems and a kind of creeping iatrogenic genocide over the decades since Rockefeller. Do you think I am wrong?
This is a long but enlightening read, go for it
https://criticalcheck.wordpress.com/2021/12/15/dna-discovery-extraction-and-structure-a-critical-review/
Thank you. Exactly what I was looking for. I agree with his conclusion >> “let’s mix dead or living matter with chemicals, spin, boil, burn and document what happens”.
You're the hero gatekeeper, PM, rather than the malign type! You ensure - as far as you are able - to keep people on track.
I wanted to point something out to Jon on the completely different subject of an alleged rape as the media story has no credibility and was forced into a Note because of the paywall - less important perhaps than no proof of DNA in shots but my gatekeeping efforts are simply in the direction of "that's a staged event, that's a staged event, that's a staged event." https://substack.com/@petraliverani/note/c-55663028
(Just to say that the spelling of Jon's name is not consistent through your post.)
Hi Petra, Ah, I noticed that and DID fix it but had too many tabs open and updated the wrong tab thinking I updated the correct tab, thanks for keeping me focused and hope you keep up the good work too!.
As much as I liked Jon's work in the last several years, I also observed similar contradictions in his narrative in November, 2023, which made me doubt about his being himself:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/the-fake-narratives-of-mrna-and-vaccine
“not himself.” Are you suggesting that JR’s post(s) are from someone else?
These days, lots of authors are being replaced by AI or agents, so it's not out of the question. For some comic relief, I wrote the following about the problem a while ago, when the problem was already glaringly obvious:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/welcome-to-the-fake-world-neo
No doubt AI is more and more prevalent, but AI isn’t good enough to do JR’s podcasts. At least not yet…
Underestimating AI can be a fatal mistake, and it's also a psyop:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/the-stupidity-of-ai-assists-human
Check out this one about my latest conjecturing (they usually turn out to be correct up to several decades later, but a couple of years is "normal"):
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/moving-to-more-uncharted-lands-the
I always laugh at the viroliegy and this argument they hate.
It is said that viruses are dead. Now dead cells do not contain ATP.
Basic biology tells us that living cells contain ATP. It is found in all living cells and is essential as it provides energy for the cell to function. Every living organism consists of cells that rely on ATP for their energy needs. Did biology in 1974 as a subject.
ATP is only found in live cells which essential for the enzyme in luciferase to bind to to use fluorescence spectrometry.
So, fluorescence spectrometry cannot be used to find non existent viruses.
Years ago I used to sell Bio Orbit Hygiene Monitoring and Control instruments for detecting contamination of surfaces and they used Bio-Chemiluminescence to detect ATP presence mainly in food production facilities.
Great reminder about ATP Jack thanks!
My pleasure. PCR relies on bioluminescence to determine qualitatively and that is why it cannot be used as a diagnostic tool. Not just that it also cannot detect phantoms. Enjoy your posts BTW.
Glad you have direct experience with PCR! So let me ask you, when a Pepsi sample gets a positive Covid pcr result, my understanding this was because of high CT, the PCR system breaks down and often just lights up. I never thought of where the energy came from in this situation-there is no biological material in a Pepsi sample right-or is there some in the polymerase or reagent fluids?, do you have some pearls of wisdom for us on this?
doesn't pepsi have aborted fetal tissue proteins as flavoring 'agents'- or am I missing/hallucinating something, also it seems acidic,I recall narrative reports out of the u.k. which suggested that skool kidz were using orange juice on their take -home pcr's to validate their ( god-given right to ) truancy- ( might be some aborted fetal tissue in those 'drinks' as well... come to think of it)
Not an expert on PCR at all and have no experience with it either. My limited experience was with bioluminescence in a particular application. But I would suggest that it is most probably in the reagent fluids. The reagent will contain the luciferase enzyme to attach to a molecule. I have no clue what molecules are in Pepsi other than C02? Remember Mullis said with PCR you can find almost anything, It's a process or technique of magnification or amplification and replication.
ok thanks, sorry I misinterpreted your experience. I read a lot on it but not an expert either. When I said pepsi, I meant any non biologic material, in fact just a no sample test. My understanding was that when Ct is high the system breaks down and can just light up. Is that from a contaminant, or DNA cross over molecule, artifact, or just the machine itself IDK but always thought the latter, maybe the reagent as you say. Well Jack we don't have to know everything to know there is BS in this world!
This is a run around people fell for.
Years before covid, before "spike protein", the lipids were found to be toxic.... Why did they go with multiple dose shots? Why are people falling for the spike protein while ignoring the real issue?
"For Moderna, that meant putting its Crigler-Najjar therapy in nanoparticles made of lipids. And for its chemists, those nanoparticles created a daunting challenge: Dose too little, and you don’t get enough enzyme to affect the disease; dose too much, and the drug is too toxic for patients."
https://www.statnews.com/2017/01/10/moderna-trouble-mrna/
Thanks always ProMag. Huge Jon Rappoport fan here. I, for one, am firmly in the "if he wants a paywall, he should have a paywall" camp.
Sure that is ok with me too, but truth is he will get less help with his post, especially this one where he admits it was too complex for him😁
Well everyone can get crazy like my husband did and bought a live blood microscope. He still checks his blood once in a while to make sure they are not clumping together and the shape is right. He is also the healthiest person in his corp job, and I believe the oldest. There surely is a much higher risk in such a closed environment with LED and Fluorescent light. His telomere’s must be replenished at a faster rate than mine as he still has more energy than I do.
If you’ve had shots and check your blood, you may find abnormal blood cells. This can help you and others to wake up and admonish people close to you not to get shots.
See: https://protonmagic.substack.com/p/21st-century-schizoid-vaxer
Complexity is the name for the sowing-circle that lines and hems the heavy, velvet, emerald-green drapes...suspended from a semi-circular rod.
Excellent word usage!
in retrospect, velvet should be replaced with satin (or sateen), the hems remain, and the hawing is the wizard's purview....
Can you please cite a valid controlled study, with no lingering questions, showing that 5G played a role in non-existent "covid" (which is diagnosed with lab tests, no symptoms required)?
Ditto re the shots "frying people to bits" when in 5G EMF at high frequency (to justify scaring your readers with such claims)?
You have an interesting way of demonstrating your "respect" for an 86 year old! Especially one with such an incredible body of work under his belt. And what's up with implying that 86 year olds don't need income?
I get asked similar questions and it’s always too much in a quick response. To live your best life, assume your body is already full of heavy metals long before Covid. No need to make yourself crazy and follow blood work that your doctors won’t do unless you have direct symptoms to say lead poisoning etc. The human body is remarkably resilient and can handle a reboot many times over. There are many ways to detox heavy metals without pharmaceuticals or even medial personal. Make detox apart of your daily life, then feed your cells the best medicine possible, good clean food and water. Keep a center peace in your heart and mind to prevent disease. These are all simple, yet I had to give up what I thought once upon a time were pleasures in life. Now my greatest pleasure is a high functioning mind. If I lose that, I have lost all freedom within this body.
Well presented! They do spew tripe at Us left and right! Thank You for Your caring heart!
I hope everyOne reads this!
Mia Breeze is on it. And in that spirit, THIS is excellent! Aleck Zeck has guests Dr. Mark Bailey and Steve Falconer for a sorta long, but captivating vid... Lots of really great info, whilst being genuinely interesting and even funny... Cheers, PM&C and Mia.
https://podcasts.apple.com/au/podcast/ep-91-bio-labs-anthrax-and-gain-of-fiction/id1544492743?i=1000654905624
Understanding this concept of the human genome is not just about us as individuals it’s also important for people to understand that it affects our grandchildren and their children etc. Gene expression can be changed, yet most people are being manipulated to believe everything bad that happens to them is genetics
Genomes, DNA, and genetics are lots of smoke and mirrors. See this, it is very long but may shake you up. It is very hard to change one's belief system once it's in place and the planners of evil know this.
https://criticalcheck.wordpress.com/2021/12/15/dna-discovery-extraction-and-structure-a-critical-review/
Loved this article, thank you for sharing this, I really enjoyed the historical context of the same topic which brings me to the real reason none of these things are brought up for open publication as the example stated. Term - Junk DNA is rarely even mentioned or even considered by academics in the field the human genome, yet 98% is uncoded DNA, and they won’t mention this ever in their publications. This would mean no great credit to funding research that hinges solely upon science and not a Master Creator. This is why I made the comment the gene expression can be turned on and off. Hence why the several people can be exposed to the same outside poisons and “viruses” (which a term I use loosely) another discussion of viral theory, for another time. Yet for the purpose of DNA being all knowing and able to replicate an entire human once again is completely impossible without a much larger view of the 98% of the genes that are present and not considered science. I giggle when anyone pressed for more they used always the term junk DNA. It’s not junk at all it’s makes us unqualified to be God, but also makes us an individuals apart of God, and fully understand our own creation and role in this constraint of earthly life. Sorry so long. My Sunday thoughts 💭
Yes it's quite a strange thing, and the human genome project was made to bolster this "scam" let's say. But DNA as a story doesn't prove there is a Master Creator in of itself, it just means the DNA story is BS to some small or large extent. There can be other chemical or electrical blueprints for life we the masses don't know.
Agreed. We are energy independent as human beings which allows outside forces to create diseases.