Malignant Normie Breakdown Part Two: 9.11đ˘& Nukesâ˘ď¸
From blood tinged urination to gagging on one's own vomit, breaking the normie spell.
I held your hand in support as we went thru the easy stages 1 to 4 of normie reaction to fakery in the last post, but now weâre moving on to bigger and badder things together. Stages 5 & 6 described below stressed me out just imagining what it is like to talk to a normie I had to stop and take a break before going on to stage 7, sorry.
Part One in case you missed it:
Breakdown music video 2:37
Stage 5: The blood-tinged pants wetting, trembling, and profusely sweating normie, âurinae in braccas, trementes, et profusius sudantes Normieâ.
đ9.11 was one bad-ass day of destruction. It proved that trauma-based mind control can turn people into driveling idiots and blood thirsty revenge monsters willing to sacrifice themselves and kill hundreds of thousands of innocent people in far-away lands running after a group of fighters in caves that get pay checks from the CIA. Iâm gonna keep this short and sweet.
The soup du jour of 9.11 was not what they said it was: Huge steel frames and columns do not disintegrate symmetrically like a water fountain and turn to dust in a destruction-line moving at near free-fall speed. Note that itâs a line of destruction that is moving downward not a line of collapse that is falling downward. The people that make directed energy weapons donât care what you think about the laws of physics. Theyâll just make up 25 stories from Sunday to keep you busy arguing, but this is not dynamite, thermite, kryptonite, BudLite, nor any other kind of destruction that was seen by society prior to 9.11.
Jet fuel burns at temps ranging from 800 to 1,500°F. Steel melts at a temp of 2,750°F, While jet fuel can cause structures to catch fire and potentially weaken them, it does not reach temperatures high enough to melt steel.
Not to mention if the explosions upon the supposed jets hitting buildings were jet fuel, it seems that most all of it was used up on impact.
âIf Jet fuel weakened steel to cause collapse it would not dustify and it would not be a symmetric fall, and we would see large parts of the buildings break-off and fall to the sides not shoot up and out like a 360° fountain.
âThermite can melt steel, but it does not âdustifyâ steel. Instead, it creates molten iron and aluminum oxide.
âDynamite itself does not dustify steel; however, it can damage steel structures through explosive force. The resulting debris may include fine particles, but this is not the same as dustifying the steel itself.
âCan BudLite dustify steel? Search Assist: âPM, youâre pushing it buddy.â
Directed energy can dustify steel yes.
âClick the link for reference videos.
Next up, planes seem to melt into buildings.
If we only knew that volumetric projections (a movie in 3D) were a thing in 2001. 25 years later, normies who are not inquisitive by nature, still donât investigate:
United Airlines Flight 93 âwreckageâ site.
Where is that wreckage exactly?
Smoke rises behind investigators as they comb the crater
they madeleft by the crash of United Airlines flight 93 near Shanksville, Pennsylvania September 12, 2001.
The plane is said to be fully submerged because the ground was âsoftâ so that a slender aluminum can falling at 563-580 mph would not break (lol). Be sure, if there was a plane, it and the earth would be hitting each other, the plane is not just hitting the ground.
They told the families they wouldnât dig it up because it would be âtoo painful for the themâ (personal communication). Neither lack of crime scene investigations nor stories the laws of physics matter to normies under stress.
A number of witnesses reported seeing a small, white jet plane near the crash site, around the time Flight 93 reportedly goes down. Lee Purbaugh: âI didnât get a good look but it was white and it circled the area about twice and then it flew off over the horizon.â [Mirror, 9/12/2002] Susan Mcelwain: Less than a minute before the Flight 93 crash rocked the countryside, she sees a small white jet swoop low over her minivan near an intersection and disappear over a hilltop. [Bergen Record, 9/14/2001]. The FBI came and talked to me and said there was no plane around.⌠But I saw it and it was there before the crash. They did not want my storyânobody here did.â [Mirror, 9/12/2002]
đSee this page and the video at the top. For a great explanation.
Traumatized by the reality part of the show (building destruction), our normie friends conclude that the charade part was also real even though the physical evidence of any of plane crash is missing. The necessary forensic part was either declined to be done as in UA93 or was not open to the public (AKA there was no plane) as in the Pentagon, and our lovely planes at the WTC turned to fairy dust or was that pixie dust? Oh what the hell.
Emotionally challenged by these pictures, our trembling, pants-urinating, and sweat-dripping Normie screams,
âDonât take away my terrorists!!â
Just to reminisce, I did make a 9.11 post 2 yrs ago:
Stage 6: Our normie begins to vomit blood, gags on the vomit, and begs for forgiveness to have been so insanely naive and manipulated. âinsanus simplex et vomitus normie.â
đNuclear weapons are societyâs worst nightmare. Theyâll blow up a city but youâll be ok if you just duck under your desk (aka, âfear and obeyâ).
These kids ducking in 1962 are about 72 years-old now. Did you meet many folks in their 70s that were willing to question the government on viruses and vaxes? Repeat after me, âTrauma--Based--Mind--Controlâ, and you will realize we were had. What happened to Bert? I heard he opened a school for dancing nurses.
What can you read from this Hiroshima photo below taken at exactly ground zero with the destruction unchanged even miles out, a few weeks after the âbombâ? Concrete buildings look like a pretty good real estate investment. The bridge isnât even dirty, and the telephone lines are all functional just so you can call your family to report you are sheltering at ground zero. âGROUND ZERO!!?? How did you survive?â you were asked and you replied, âI ducked and took coverâ.
Notice the destruction of wooden building keeps going for miles with no letting up. Even a nuke would show less damage with increasing distance, so it must have been carpet bombed. Do you know the song, Magic Carpet Ride?
Another building at ground zero, the âHiroshima Domeâ. Registered as a Heritage Site now. Gotta keep the fear going and the $$ from the treasury flowing.
Below, Hiroshima ground zero the day after the âFire A-bombingâ. Who the hellđĽtook this photo and survived to develop it the day after a >5,432°F A-bomb fire ball?
Some temperature data from the Nagasaki National Peace Memorial Hallâs website:
When the [Hiroshima] atomic bomb exploded, the temperature at the epicenter soared to over one million degrees centigrade. In one second, the fireball expanded to 306 yards (280 m) in diameter. The heat rays emitted in all directions by the fireball brought temperatures on the ground near the hypocenter to 3,000 to 4,000°C (5,432 to 7,232°F). [Iron melts at 1,536°C (2,797°F)]
Concrete begins to decompose and lose its structural integrity at temperatures around 800°C (1472°F)
đConcrete buildings remaining around ground zero after 5,000+°F doesnât seem like good bet does it? We still have wind pressure to deal with.
Wind pressure & speed from the BBC:
The explosion of the atomic bomb generated a shockwave followed by a tremendous blast of wind. It is estimated that the pressure of the shockwave was 11 tons per square meter even 500 meters from the hypocenter, and the blast speed reached 280 meters per second (626 mph) at 100 meters from the hypocenter.
DuckDuckGo Search AI: Concrete buildings can be damaged or destroyed by winds exceeding 130 mph.
âThe shockwave of 11 tons/m2 of wind pressure calculates to 945 mph! (assuming the explosion would overwhelm any other variable like angles, type of concrete, etc. at 500m from the hypocenter. So the BBC speed estimate of 626 mph is quite low [intentionally?]. In any case damage/destruction was noted to start at 130 mph, much less than the 945 mph expected by the A-bomb.
đThe officially stated temperature and pressure data mean that the likelihood of concrete buildings standing at ground zero after the supposed A-bomb at Hiroshima is MUCH lower than those seen standing in the post-bombing photos.
I used the converters linked below to calculate wind speed at ground zero from the BBC report:
Tons/m2 to psf: 11 tons/m2=2289psf (Pounds per Square Foot)
Wind pressure to wind speed: 2289psf wind pressure=wind speed 945mph
đ§ The only thing nuked that day was your brainđ§
It looks so bleak. Got it, bleak=nukeâŚ
The Bank of Japan built in 1936, was almost right under the âfire bombâ, it sustained little damage. You all know how much I love banks. If a nuke canât even blow up a central bank, do you think you will avoid CBDC? Lol.
For reference, Tokyo fire bombing WWII. Does it look the same or different than Hiroshima? Hint: Tokyo was built up with more concrete buildings.
Did I need to remind you that 67 Japanese cities were firebombed? Yes, but now add 67+2 (Hiroshima and Nagasaki) and you get 69. Oh, a Masonic number!
Carpet fire bombing (napalm) is frickkken terrible, make no mistake. Living in Japan I have terrible dreams nightly, frequently awaking with radioactive tears. That still doesnât make it a nuke.
đBelow, dynamite blows up a concrete building quite well. But nukes, no matter how many thousands of times more powerful canât keep up with dynamite.
đDid you ever see a âdynamiteđ§¨non-proliferation treatyâ? I didnât think so. The only thing non-proliferating for normies is the truth.
Youâd think people would catch on by now and that mind control is over right? Not so fast:
Russian military parade:
Hi Proton, I haven't read part 1 because I'm new to the assembly. This is a memory collection of being under the spell.
The airplane melting into the building and the buildings vaporizing bugged me when I was a normie. It looked wrong, but I didn't watch the reels playing over and over to burn it into my neurons. I couldn't see the logic in attacking a whole country to kill one guy that I thought was already dead. It looked to me like a national Where's Waldo and Where in the World is Carmen San Diego game. If the incident at Waco in our own country was an indicator, they would burn up the entire place and that didn't make sense to me. I was in school at the time, and they ceased classes for the rest of the day and people sat in the lounges and watched the reels play. I just walked around watching everybody watching. It seemed like a spell to me even at the time, but I didn't understand any of it.
I felt like there was something weird about the dean stopping everything to watch TV, because at a previous assembly job I had, they stopped work to watch the verdict on the OJ Simpson trial. I hadn't watched the proceedings for that either, but being a normie I did go to restaurants and this was the era when TV screens were showing up everywhere, so the Luby's shooting and the slow speed chase or various discussions about murders accompanied my dining pleasure.
The Weirdness accumulated. Why were TVs suddenly everywhere? Why would they stop all operations at a 'university' (it didn't make sense then), stop production at my job, announce that the whole country was on red or Orange alert about terrorists being everywhere?
I may have some of my facts conflated, but my normie-hood is probably typical. The nonsense of events gets registered like a splinter that you don't have time to dig out. The explanations don't fit previous experience or knowledge but there is nobody smart around to compare notes with or get a new idea sparking. People relayed what they heard from the TV.
As I recall, the advice from the TV for the possible anthrax attacks was to tape up your house with plastic sheeting and duct tape. If the TV told you in time. Ah. That reminded me of the post box bombings and the advice to stand back and open the box with a long stick.
Well. That ruled out the TV as a good advisor for me.
I knew a little about JP-8 from an excursion in our defense industry. And a little bit about chemical warfare from the same bunch of maniacs. Once, during an exercise, I was given a small slip of paper that said, "M-16" on it when I was a door guard, checking ids. Being dressed in gas mask helmet suit etc with a little piece of paper was my defense when the base was overrun by the enemy.
I didn't actively think about how the towers looked when they were falling down but I sort of guessed that unless there was something stored there or in the plane that would torch concrete, it probably wasn't jet fuel that burned up the towers. At the time there was a TV show about the demolitions of buildings, that was reminiscent. Why would the buildings look the same way?
When you are a normie and you don't know you're a normie it seems normal to keep your non consensus thoughts to yourself. Keep in mind, this was before the Google oracle was widely available for quick reference. I wasn't an early adopter. After all, if you did present a 'novel' notion, the normie rejoinder was and still is, "Why would they do that?", " You don't have a degree in ------. " or uh. "You don't know what you're talking about".
What they said was true, I didn't know why, I didn't have a degree and I wasn't sure what I was talking about, but I knew that the bozos on TV and the lying politicians and the nutjobs in the military or the corporate world had their own reasons for what they do and I didn't have to believe nonsense even if I couldn't talk about it.
I'm giving "nuclear bombs" a probability of existing at... Approaching zero. Like actual planes on 9/11.
Excellent work, little proton!!!