Postscript, Marian has banned me since a few days ago. I have pasted the thread in this post with a screen shot of part of it as well. Well, she made a mess of her own comment section to save her scamy science from being public on her site. I'm happy to stand up to the plate for her. Have a great weekend Marian!
Eric Weinstein posted recently about a "string theorist" conference where all of the so-called string theory experts struggled to answer the question: what is string theory?
We have mathematical physicists who create models that cannot account for most of the Universe, so to make their mathematical model work they create "dark matter" out of thin air which is all speculation.
We have Virologists who cannot grasp the dictionary definition of of isolation.
And then we have the postmodernists who believe men can give birth, and life can be reduced to two variables: oppressed and oppressor. No nuance needed.
Today, the worst purveyor of misinformation is the govt, followed closely by so-called 'experts' in academy.
It may seem they cannot grasp the definition of isolation, but it is either accept the spin on it, or leave the field, which means quit your job that you sunk a lot of time and money for training into and continue to be paid by. This cost is too high for many, so the fraud continues.
I mean it's really their whole life from high school indoctrination through college and career. Their entire life is based on a scam. That's a hard pill to swallow.
It would be so easy to shut the whole 'no virus' movement down. Just show us a paper that proves a contagious, pathogenic virus exists and that it was done according to the scientific method. We are not asking for much, just some real science.
The epistemological problem (h/t Bailey) lies is proving a negative, which is something science is unable to undertake. This is distinct from falsification that uses the clever tool of disproving the null hypothesis .
Germ theory installed the belief that a virus must account for a hitherto unseen modus of 'infection'. Thereafter, an obsessive belief has always run far ahead (or behind) the science, as our esteemed author points out with his 'TIme Tunnel' analogy ~ https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0060036/
Once installed, a belief becomes unshakable as it defeats 'science' by definition. Science cannot test faith, it cannot falsify belief. Science cannot extol the beauty of a sunset, or a miraculous grace. However, the recurrent methodological flaws that virology demonstrate places alleged 'science', purported 'medicine' and demonstrated fly paper quite reliably to shame.
PM, we won't defeat 'belief'. It is only doomed to slowly die under the weight of empirical evidence surrounding the ineffectiveness and adverse events of shots....problem is... those appear to be desired outcomes.
Take for example, 'Phlogiston Theory a theory that states that all combustible materials contain a substance called “phlogiston” and that the presence of phlogiston caused combustion. The theory was first proposed in the 17th century by the German chemist Georg Ernst Stahl and was widely accepted in the 18th century. However, the theory was eventually disproven in the 19th century by the French chemist Antoine Lavoisier'.
They pretend like scientists have a consensus on that too, just like virology. Both misinterpreted experiments to push a belief.
Even the double slit experiment is crazy because it assumes a detector doesn't influence the light... They assume the detector uses no energy... Haha never heard of any instrument not use energy to detect a thing. It's a 🦄 unicorn.
I agree! The whole of the "physics" based on the work They gave Einstein to promote (because it did not predict the energy in the aether) is bunk.
Are You familiar with the counter-theory proposed by the late Dr. Paul A. LaViolette called subquantum kinetics (SQK)? He predicted all the "mysteries" in the einsteinian bunk, including the Biefeld-Brown effect, had no need for "dark matter," "dark energy," "black holes," all of which were added as hoc to the einsteinian crap to make it work.
And... It is euclidean. No "bending of spacetime" - also added ad hoc. Along with lots of "renormalizations" to get that pesky theory of Einstein's to work.
Well, I am not much into such theories, but give high probability that everything is made from energetic electro-gravito-magnetic fields, from the "subatomic" to universal...
So she acts concerned about quackcine harms, while reifying the existence of imaginary "viruses" and slipping in a suggestion that maybe "the newly mRNA vaccinated should be isolated for 3-4 months".
I think all virologists should be isolated until they come up with some real scientific evidence that what they are doing is anything more than smoke and mirrors. No virologists = no viruses= no quackcines. Win, Win, Win!
I time traveled over to Laderoute’s article. Laughed and left.
She is clearly immune to facts, putatively because she clearly is correct about her assumptions that her word is the truth. So there! Prove her findings? Just believe her, because she knows everything, okay?
Got it.
I wonder how many tax dollars it took for her to be so confident?
She is confident because she can cite other papers that support her view. What she didn't do is critically examine if those papers actually did real science. Evidently she just assumes that because it is in a paper, it must be science. Peer review has failed us and failed science.
Cheers to the warriors in Japan. I see a few other people remember the tenets of honour over there (Prof Masayasu Inoue, Prof Murakami (sp?) James Corbett). Good luck to all of you !
No trouble. It was still showing to me thank God on my screen as a response to your response to Le Chat Noir. I just deleted it and re-added it a higher level, not as a response to your response.
Dr. Laderoute is a prime example why so many have lost confidence in the “health care” industry. No virus has been proven to exist via the isolation, purification, characterization, and causation process.
Oh, the smoke and mirrors! The pointing over there while doing something here. All the magician's tricks. All to ensure that the Rockefeller twin towers of lies ("deadly viruses" and "contagion") keep standing.
Very good piece and I applaud Your holding Your ground!
Seems like our smiling Viroliegist is stuck in a game of 'viral Déjà vu' - referencing papers like a viral remix, but struggling to isolate the 'tune' without a time-traveling sheet. DJ Marian tries to play the peeps, but PM ain't booking her.
Brilliant exposé! I love it when these cushy-job-keeping career clowns get backed into a corner and then go mute. Like I've been saying for years, all of these whack agencies essentially have to say this when pressed to Show Us The Virus:
PM what kind of lab research have you done to prove that viruses do not exist? I would love to personally interview you on my podcast so that you can enlighten my audience on this topic? If you can convince me I will throw away my college diploma in biology and ask the University that I went to for a full refund!
Hey, you've asked me before, I've never proven viruses do not EXIST, I and others before me have shown that virus claimers have not proven they have FOUND a virus, and unfortunately I can not do live interviews because of personal and professional complications. I only read the research papers that give away what they have and have not done, read docs on govt and health ministry web sites that often have data that gives away the scam, call/write research centers and biotech firms that are usually honest what they don't have, and some prominent docs and virologists who usually hem and haw subterfuge. I've read a few viro books and hundreds of articles and vids on line to get info. Anyone can do it, but having some history in related fields is helpful.
Postscript, Marian has banned me since a few days ago. I have pasted the thread in this post with a screen shot of part of it as well. Well, she made a mess of her own comment section to save her scamy science from being public on her site. I'm happy to stand up to the plate for her. Have a great weekend Marian!
A sure sign that science is nowhere to be found. Hmm, should I refer to the paper that disproves my detractors or just ban them??
Eric Weinstein posted recently about a "string theorist" conference where all of the so-called string theory experts struggled to answer the question: what is string theory?
We have mathematical physicists who create models that cannot account for most of the Universe, so to make their mathematical model work they create "dark matter" out of thin air which is all speculation.
We have Virologists who cannot grasp the dictionary definition of of isolation.
And then we have the postmodernists who believe men can give birth, and life can be reduced to two variables: oppressed and oppressor. No nuance needed.
Today, the worst purveyor of misinformation is the govt, followed closely by so-called 'experts' in academy.
Excellent point applicable to many fields that are stuck in a paradigm.
It may seem they cannot grasp the definition of isolation, but it is either accept the spin on it, or leave the field, which means quit your job that you sunk a lot of time and money for training into and continue to be paid by. This cost is too high for many, so the fraud continues.
I mean it's really their whole life from high school indoctrination through college and career. Their entire life is based on a scam. That's a hard pill to swallow.
It would be so easy to shut the whole 'no virus' movement down. Just show us a paper that proves a contagious, pathogenic virus exists and that it was done according to the scientific method. We are not asking for much, just some real science.
The epistemological problem (h/t Bailey) lies is proving a negative, which is something science is unable to undertake. This is distinct from falsification that uses the clever tool of disproving the null hypothesis .
Germ theory installed the belief that a virus must account for a hitherto unseen modus of 'infection'. Thereafter, an obsessive belief has always run far ahead (or behind) the science, as our esteemed author points out with his 'TIme Tunnel' analogy ~ https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0060036/
Once installed, a belief becomes unshakable as it defeats 'science' by definition. Science cannot test faith, it cannot falsify belief. Science cannot extol the beauty of a sunset, or a miraculous grace. However, the recurrent methodological flaws that virology demonstrate places alleged 'science', purported 'medicine' and demonstrated fly paper quite reliably to shame.
PM, we won't defeat 'belief'. It is only doomed to slowly die under the weight of empirical evidence surrounding the ineffectiveness and adverse events of shots....problem is... those appear to be desired outcomes.
Take for example, 'Phlogiston Theory a theory that states that all combustible materials contain a substance called “phlogiston” and that the presence of phlogiston caused combustion. The theory was first proposed in the 17th century by the German chemist Georg Ernst Stahl and was widely accepted in the 18th century. However, the theory was eventually disproven in the 19th century by the French chemist Antoine Lavoisier'.
200 years......give or take!
yes. I think they have more fun spending Billions on prestige, propaganda, and suppression. Those that own the Gold, make the rules.
Lol and quantum theory is a fraud too.
They pretend like scientists have a consensus on that too, just like virology. Both misinterpreted experiments to push a belief.
Even the double slit experiment is crazy because it assumes a detector doesn't influence the light... They assume the detector uses no energy... Haha never heard of any instrument not use energy to detect a thing. It's a 🦄 unicorn.
Quantum mechanics is wrong playlist
https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLkdAkAC4ItcHNLDIK9ORydQl_Ik6GJ0bD
I agree! The whole of the "physics" based on the work They gave Einstein to promote (because it did not predict the energy in the aether) is bunk.
Are You familiar with the counter-theory proposed by the late Dr. Paul A. LaViolette called subquantum kinetics (SQK)? He predicted all the "mysteries" in the einsteinian bunk, including the Biefeld-Brown effect, had no need for "dark matter," "dark energy," "black holes," all of which were added as hoc to the einsteinian crap to make it work.
And... It is euclidean. No "bending of spacetime" - also added ad hoc. Along with lots of "renormalizations" to get that pesky theory of Einstein's to work.
SQK: https://starburstfound.org/category/research/subquantum-kinetics/
I've heard of it but I'm not into the subatomic theories.
Heck, we still have limited ability to detect some things and a lot of subatomic physics is imaginary.
Heinz von Foerester explains this view wonderfully here
https://youtu.be/ev7e9sfWIJo
Well, I am not much into such theories, but give high probability that everything is made from energetic electro-gravito-magnetic fields, from the "subatomic" to universal...
I'll take a look. Thanks!
So she acts concerned about quackcine harms, while reifying the existence of imaginary "viruses" and slipping in a suggestion that maybe "the newly mRNA vaccinated should be isolated for 3-4 months".
I think all virologists should be isolated until they come up with some real scientific evidence that what they are doing is anything more than smoke and mirrors. No virologists = no viruses= no quackcines. Win, Win, Win!
Let's start a petition lol :)
I haven't had such a Monthy Python afternoon in a while ;)
Namaste PM
I time traveled over to Laderoute’s article. Laughed and left.
She is clearly immune to facts, putatively because she clearly is correct about her assumptions that her word is the truth. So there! Prove her findings? Just believe her, because she knows everything, okay?
Got it.
I wonder how many tax dollars it took for her to be so confident?
She is confident because she can cite other papers that support her view. What she didn't do is critically examine if those papers actually did real science. Evidently she just assumes that because it is in a paper, it must be science. Peer review has failed us and failed science.
True but I think she knows exactly that virology is a go-nowhere endeavor and was hoping I would just swallow her subterfuge.
Canadian tax dollars so if you are not a Canadite you can sleep easy.
I feel for Canadians. Trudeau and Laderoute both feeding at the same trough.
We are not any better off south of you.
I'm not in Canada, I'm in Japan
Cheers to the warriors in Japan. I see a few other people remember the tenets of honour over there (Prof Masayasu Inoue, Prof Murakami (sp?) James Corbett). Good luck to all of you !
Japan? Good for you! Nice!
My comments were really directed towards a general audience, but good to know that you live in Japan.
No matter where we are our tax dollars are being spent in ways it's best not to think about.
Great angle, as usual, PM.
Hi Petra I think you just replied to my note about your sister....but that note was deleted and is recreated here
https://substack.com/@protonmagic/note/c-54841838
sorry for the trouble.
No trouble. It was still showing to me thank God on my screen as a response to your response to Le Chat Noir. I just deleted it and re-added it a higher level, not as a response to your response.
Dr. Laderoute is a prime example why so many have lost confidence in the “health care” industry. No virus has been proven to exist via the isolation, purification, characterization, and causation process.
If it wasn't so dangerous to human health then these virologists ( AKA FRAUDS ) would be funny.
Oh, the smoke and mirrors! The pointing over there while doing something here. All the magician's tricks. All to ensure that the Rockefeller twin towers of lies ("deadly viruses" and "contagion") keep standing.
Very good piece and I applaud Your holding Your ground!
Seems like our smiling Viroliegist is stuck in a game of 'viral Déjà vu' - referencing papers like a viral remix, but struggling to isolate the 'tune' without a time-traveling sheet. DJ Marian tries to play the peeps, but PM ain't booking her.
Excellent work, Inspector PM. You really know how to silence the “experts.”
Pleasure
Many false claims are couched in scientific jargon.
Brilliant exposé! I love it when these cushy-job-keeping career clowns get backed into a corner and then go mute. Like I've been saying for years, all of these whack agencies essentially have to say this when pressed to Show Us The Virus:
June 19, 2024 Official Statement from the CDC:
"We got nothin'."
PM what kind of lab research have you done to prove that viruses do not exist? I would love to personally interview you on my podcast so that you can enlighten my audience on this topic? If you can convince me I will throw away my college diploma in biology and ask the University that I went to for a full refund!
Hey, you've asked me before, I've never proven viruses do not EXIST, I and others before me have shown that virus claimers have not proven they have FOUND a virus, and unfortunately I can not do live interviews because of personal and professional complications. I only read the research papers that give away what they have and have not done, read docs on govt and health ministry web sites that often have data that gives away the scam, call/write research centers and biotech firms that are usually honest what they don't have, and some prominent docs and virologists who usually hem and haw subterfuge. I've read a few viro books and hundreds of articles and vids on line to get info. Anyone can do it, but having some history in related fields is helpful.
PM what kind of lab-work have you done to prove that Unicorns don't exist...?
(asking for an imaginary friend)
My mommy told me so and I believe her.
"mother should I trust the government..."
We no longer believe the science...
Believe the seance...