It's also more recent. If you're interested in the IoBNT, I've found John Lukach to explain it very well. See articles on his blog on the subject. Parts 1 thru 5 analyse IEEE doc(s) and translate into layman's terms, as far as possible. Akyildiz is too rambling for my liking, and also a psychopath:
Thanks your replies are very thorough! Yesterday I was up to 3am being chased around the comments by Mr. Coppolino you saw. I've got 2 Clark Kent jobs and can only jump on small bits of info right now, happy if you have a skinny to give me. About the Italian guy, my opinion is that all discussions to the public need to start from a position of truth or unknowns, not of what is said officially unless the speaker states, "this is only the official story, there is or there is not evidence for xyz". Hope this makes sense. What he says in court should also only be, "this is what we are told...."
I have NOT seen this one. It’s different from one I watched. Thanks again
It's also more recent. If you're interested in the IoBNT, I've found John Lukach to explain it very well. See articles on his blog on the subject. Parts 1 thru 5 analyse IEEE doc(s) and translate into layman's terms, as far as possible. Akyildiz is too rambling for my liking, and also a psychopath:
http://estateartistry.com/blog/this-is-only-a-test ; http://estateartistry.com/blog/exposing-the-bio-api-part-one ; http://estateartistry.com/blog/exposing-the-bio-api-part-two ; http://estateartistry.com/blog/exposing-the-bio-api-part-three ; http://estateartistry.com/blog/exposing-the-bio-api-part-four ;
http://estateartistry.com/blog/exposing-the-bio-api-part-five ;
http://estateartistry.com/blog/now-do-you-believe-me
Thanks your replies are very thorough! Yesterday I was up to 3am being chased around the comments by Mr. Coppolino you saw. I've got 2 Clark Kent jobs and can only jump on small bits of info right now, happy if you have a skinny to give me. About the Italian guy, my opinion is that all discussions to the public need to start from a position of truth or unknowns, not of what is said officially unless the speaker states, "this is only the official story, there is or there is not evidence for xyz". Hope this makes sense. What he says in court should also only be, "this is what we are told...."