I've written about this in my 7 part series, where I also tried to contact Wu to ask about the specific library preparation steps, if you want to read more, see here: usmortality.substack.co…
Righto, Almost a year ago I also asked the contact mail on that paper for the raw patient and machine data, no reply. We also sent FOI to China on their Govt FOI portal in Chinese, in July, no reply.
The paper is virology fraud in claiming there was a virus from software, no controls, then immediately published and the PCR test made form it immediately. Since C-19 test kit patent 2015 and exports 2017-18 and others in my "Fake Dating Dossier..." post you can see, it's all fraud, and conveniently in China so there isn't even a veneer of accountability clearly.
I've written about this in my 7 part series, where I also tried to contact Wu to ask about the specific library preparation steps, if you want to read more, see here: https://usmortality.substack.com/p/why-do-wu-et-al-2020-refuse-to-answer?utm_source=profile&utm_medium=reader2
Righto, Almost a year ago I also asked the contact mail on that paper for the raw patient and machine data, no reply. We also sent FOI to China on their Govt FOI portal in Chinese, in July, no reply.
Well, not sure why they are not replying, Eddie Holmes replied, but he didn't know anything.... Maybe this was intentionally planted by Chinese?
The paper is virology fraud in claiming there was a virus from software, no controls, then immediately published and the PCR test made form it immediately. Since C-19 test kit patent 2015 and exports 2017-18 and others in my "Fake Dating Dossier..." post you can see, it's all fraud, and conveniently in China so there isn't even a veneer of accountability clearly.