I know you come here to hear about the next virus nutcake but let me take a break from nagging about these little critters and use this post to give the big banking pests some good clean fun. Someone has to pay to make up all the virus nonsense, and maybe banks have something to do with that?
Here is a link to one of the resources that I have come across with regards to the Birth Certificate Scam, as well as how Citizenship ties into the Globalist Parasitic Banking System.
My primary focus was always to find a way to fight "collectivism" by establishing a firm grounding on what I call "natural rights" and the existential property of 'Being' that is Sovereignty. This view has a point of connection between the "Spiritual Awareness" and how that affects Social Structures.
What happens if billions of people begin to fully REALIZE that they are much more than just the human labels based on appearances and social status? Guess who gets to lose their sense of control? The Globalist Parasitic Elites. These are the members of the Order of the Garter and the Dragon Blood Line, a great many of these Charismatic Pedophiles are in direct control of the banking systems globally.
So there are Syndicates to tie up Power in the hands of the few, so that they can control the "Many."
First, there is the Global Corporate Syndicate: (this includes all governments), only 4 primary investment corporations hold up to 94% of all voting stock in all corporations globally; they are Blackrock, Vanguard, State Street and Fidelity Investments Inc. The voting stock is in turn just a "certificate," so the real controller is the DTC and Cede & Company. (centralized enough?) This just controls the private money flow towards the Government Corporate Complex. The other half of it is done based on the privately owned Federal Reserve Inc.: This is what I call The Global Currency Syndicate, where just as you stated, the government entity pays an interest (usury fee) by being a lessee.
There are more syndicates: The other major one is the Global Crime Syndicate; this one is managing all the human trafficking, pedophilia rings and was the portion Jeffery Epstein was a part of. In order to keep everyone in line, this serves as a form of reverse blackmail.
Sorry to be so brief, but this rabbit hole is deeeeep! Just a few years ago, I would not believed any of this. Finding legal language that structuralizes this is very vindicating. I'm not an expert of legal systems or the law; at this point it is up to all of us to nullify the entire thing.
Some good quotes about the Feral Reserve system as well as some that pertain.
"The Federal Government, with the cooperation of the Federal Reserve, has the inherent power to create money--almost any amount of it."
~ The National Debt, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, p. 8
ALMOST? Why only ALMOST? What keeps them from creating ALL they want? You? Me? Your dog? A full moon?
"...Keynes argues that inflation is a 'method of taxation' which the government uses to 'secure the command over real resources, resources just as real as those obtained by [ordinary] taxation'. 'What is raised by printing notes, ' he writes, is just as much taken from the public as is a beer duty or an income tax.' "
- 1980 Annual Report, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, pg 10
"All the paper money issued today is Federal Reserve notes. The real backing for the nation's money is faith in the strength, soundness and stability of the American economy."
~ The Hats the Federal Reserve Wears, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, pg 4
Faith is what backs our monetary system. YOUR faith. Do you still have faith?
"When plunder has become a way of life for a group of men living together in society, they create for themselves in the course of time a legal system that authorizes it and a moral code that glorifies it."
~ Frederic Bastiat in "The Law"
"Lenin is said to have declared that the best way to destroy the capitalist system was to debauch the currency. By a continuing process of inflation,
governments can confiscate, secretly and unobserved, an important part of the wealth of their citizens."
~ 1980 Annual Report, Federal Reserve
Bank of Richmond, pg 6
Isn't confiscation of the wealth of the citizens a nice way of saying STEALING?
Federal Reserve Notes are not federal, represent no monetary reserves and no longer conform to the definition of notes. Failing to state who, will pay what, when or to whom - they ceased to be legal tender notes, (offers of money) over 50 years ago. They are in fact instruments of legalized THEFT.
"Whenever the legislators endeavor to take away and destroy the property of the people, or to reduce them to slavery under arbitrary power, they put themselves into a state of war with the people, who are thereupon absolved from any further obedience." ~ John Locke (1690)
If the money you earn has no value and you are forced through fiat paper legislation to take it for your labor, are you not having your property (labor) destroyed and are you not being reduced to nothing but slavery? Is not the state at war with the people?
5th Plank Communist Manifesto: Centralization of credit in the hands of the state, by means of a national bank with state capital and an exclusive monopoly.
The Federal Reserve System, created by the Federal Reserve Act of Congress in 1913, is indeed such a “national bank” and it politically manipulates interest rates and holds a monopoly on legal counterfeiting in the United States. This is exactly what Marx had in mind and completely fulfills this plank, another major socialist objective. Yet, most Americans naively believe the U.S. of A. is far from a Marxist or socialist nation.
"The writers of the constitution knew exactly what they were doing when they wrote in Article I Section 10 paragraph 1 'No state shall... make anything but gold and silver coin a tender in payment of debts. ' People able to barter with gold and silver coin control government and are free. Loss of the right to trade in gold and silver coin enslaves people to the creators of psychological 'money.'":
Hold my beer. What everyone is saying about the fake currency system is spot on. But there is another part; the role of the DTC.
Depository Trust Corporation "owns" all titles of real ownership, owns all birth certificates. When someone is born, the birth certificate is processed through the department of commerce, an inventory number called the "social security number" is issued. This number is not for the actual Federal Gov, it is for the IMF. As a so called "citizen" you are considered an ipso facto guarantor for collateral against the national debt.
We are actually born sovereign, all equally sovereign regis. The digital technology is an attempt to further tie you to your citizenship and therefore your status of debtor in their system.
what is the consequence of being ipso facto guarantor??
Are ways to get out of it
1. Become a state national?
2. Move to another country and be willing to divest of all your US assets?
3. If a state or the US sues you just say you are not the guy in CAPS only the trustee for that person as The UNITED STATES OF AMERICA or YOUR STATE has no right to make claims against you since both are non entities and do not exist?
I'm not sure I'm correct about any of this. Does it relate to the digital ID and Dig currency?
Tell us without too much jargon if you can and thanks!
This is a rather long response, But I think it's important to place some of these quotes into context, and perhaps to defend limited government when there are others who call for no government.
1. You mentioned Bastiat (1801 to 1850) and his concerns around legal plunder: Like most classicals he was concerned with the centralization of power and government encroachment upon economic affairs, but keep in mind that it was 19th century consumers -- not the federal government -- that called for Washington to take a larger role in securing rights for workers such as establishing minimum wage laws, safety nets, intervention during bank runs and a basic standard of quality on food products, etc, etc.
We might argue that many of these laws transferred too much power to the Federal government, but nevertheless these were all grassroots movements; politicians responded to these movements as they always do, and not just because it was politically expedient to do so, but because the neoclassicals sought to provide a better environment for retail investors under the assumption that it would increase liquidity, investment, efficiency and growth.
After the publication of Upton Sinclair's "the jungle" and the 1907 "panic", Roosevelt -- ever the populist -- established a number of oversight committees as scholars called for limited government intervention in markets under the assumption that protecting the savings of depositors, or at least giving the appearance thereof, would increase liquidity and transparency in capital markets; this is why we have the SEC, annual reports, restrictions on bank licensing, public filings, a central bank as a lender of last resort, and so on and so forth.
In other words, most people think it's reasonable to visit the supermarket without worrying whether canned food will kill them, or visit their bank without wondering whether some negative news article led to a bank run; and so natural questions of who is responsible for ensuring integrity arose; if responsibility rested with the state and each state chose different standards then does that incoherency make it more difficult to trade and transact? All of these limited interventions were predicated on the idea that markets function best when there is faith and confidence in market actors. Bastiat would not have opposed this.
And of course the government has to cover these costs somehow; hence the modest 1% tax proposal in 1913 which most agreed to because they saw it as favorable to other permitted forms of federal taxes: namely, excise and tariffs. But obviously, there is a big difference between 1% and 40%. I think Bastiat would argue that a return to a lower tax is more reasonable than no tax at all.
2. You mentioned the framers, Gold and central banks:" the framers actually issued paper currency to raise revenue during the revolution; this led to the saying "not worth a continental", and so of course they knew that excessive printing could lead to devaluation; but there are many reasons to have a Central Bank; Hamilton, for example, believed that a central bank was necessary to secure the inalienable rights of all. Hamilton's logic went something like this: the government has to raise money to carry out duties and pay off debts incurred in the process of protecting rights, and therefore any resulting inflation or the costs thereof, should be equally shared among the population who benefit from that protection; in his view, the central bank was the best actor to facilitate this objective; Madison and Jefferson originally opposed Hamilton because they were worried about unilateral devaluation to carry on perpetual wars (King's and Queen's of the past), but Madison later established a central bank in 1816 to pay off the 1812 war debts (later ended by Jackson in 1830's).
3. You mention Article 10, paragraph 1. But that article was not designed to prohibit fiat from ever existing; rather, it was only designed to ensure that STATES could not print money; the framers were worried that some states would sign treaties, side step and undermine the central government and in the process diminish the credit rating of the nation; there was a constitutional responsibility to create coherency and congruency and protect the interests of all states, and in any republic there has to be a balance of power between the central and state governments so that is where the framers drew the line.
4. You mentioned Locke who argued that labor was an extension of self; but in this particular example you're taking a 17th century genius out of context and time; Locke would not be opposed to taxation if it was used to protect the inalienable. This is because it doesn't make sense to ask the federal government to protect universality, then prohibit the government from raising money to do so via a central bank; that's like asking a security guard to protect you, then failing to pay for the weapons he needs during an emergency. This goes back to Hamilton.
I think it's worth pointing out that Locke was not anti-government; he was anti-tyrant. In other words, how many weapons we buy, how much money is required, when one uses those weapons, the size of defense, are all more interesting questions than whether one should pay for weapons at all. And today we are longer facing rickety boats and poorly constructed muskets; rather the foe today is spending billions on equipment and intelligence that could wipe us off the map without ever showing their faces. those that call for no standing army endanger their own rights.
Rothbard also spoke about "plundering" and "taking property" in the form of taxation;
But his anarcho-capitalism is utterly absurd, and his followers, like Rockwell and Hoppe, always point to Cospaia or Acadia as examples of their abstract utopia, which incidentally is the same bizarre logic Chomsky uses when he claims Mondragon is a defense to the abstraction of anarcho-syndicalism. Neither are good examples: Acadia was allowed to exist under French protection, Mondragon exists under Spanish protection, and Cospaia could have been destroyed at anytime by Florence pre 1600. Not to mention, in 1826, without any resistance, Copaia kneeled to the Grand Duchy of Tuscany. That doesn't bode well for those who say no government and no taxation leads to better protection of rights. In my view Isabel Patterson's the "god of the machine" and Rose Wilder Lane's "Give me Liberty" are far superior to Rothbard's "man, economy and state."
I'm sorry for this long winded response, but I have a real problem with destructionists; in the burke/paine debate of the 1890's, burke warned about destroying traditions and culture and the fabric of society for the purpose of achieving some abstraction, because you'll probably end up with a tyrant.
5. You mentioned Marx and the fifth pillar: the anarcho-syndicalists were totally opposed to the centralization of the communist state and they viciously collided with Marx and his thugs in the 1860's under the auspices of Bakunin's collectivist-anarchism; yet lo and behold Bakunin also called for a central bank. Was it because he was secretly a horrible Marxist?Hardly. And of course there was Hamilton and Switzerland and so many other examples before Marx ever came onto the scene, so wanting a central bank doesn't mean you are a covert commie.
6. For those that point to government debt: I would only argue that while the U.S. might have the highest nominal debt, it's debt to GDP ratio is relatively average in comparison with other countries, which is to say that it pays about 10% of it's annual tax revenue to service the debt load; and while that's a cause for concern it is not anywhere near bankruptcy.
And lastly, there are many modern day solutions to government spending that don't end in some utopian revolution or a totalitarian state. The Federal Reserve is not beyond fixing: regular audits, public ownership, the end of bailouts, and a return to lender of last resort along with increasing the reserve requirements is all practical and achievable.
Furthermore, a digital ledger with a fixed money supply, or one that employs a smart contract that requires 2/3rds approval by the population (referendum) for additional minting during times of emergency, (i.e, democratically agreeing to the inflation) and of course no tracking and tracing of transactions to ensure privacy (perhaps encrypted ledger) would be better than a return to gold.
Blockchain can be used to maximize the freedom of the individual and increase transparency in markets; it doesn't have to be used to subjugate the individual. There are also differences between centralized and decentralized ledgers; and even a centralized ledger can maximize transparency and freedom, and issue smart contracts to increase democratic values in financial arenas.
I agree with most of your points, you do back them up well.
I don't think I ever mentioned gold or the framers in my comment.
My primary concern is actually having a real representative republic, not the shit show we have witnessed in the last 22 years since the 911 false flag event. Subsequent passage of the unpatriotic act.
There are many different things that I can say here but probably boils down to true personal Sovereignty. Bodily autonomy, freedom of speech, freedom of movement, freedom of association and yes ------ I can and I will barter for exchange of goods and services freely, just to intentionally not comply with CBDC. Maybe I'll learn more about bitcoin.
The Globalists are doing us a favor by showing us how much we don't need them, or those poison kill shots they like to mandate.
Cross-posting this; it provides lots of details that my relevant articles don't.
It still surprises me that a single member present in the Senate on December 23, 1913, sufficed to pass the Federal Reserve Act.
The Fed has never been audited, either, and even if it were, probably nothing would happen, considering the Pentagon and the US "govt" can get away with practically unlimited spending of the taxpayer's money. I guess, that's one of the reasons why the US is fraudulently labeled and forced to function as a dysfunctional "democracy":
Spending "tax payer money" doesn't happen. The only REASON for taxes on the federal level is to convince people the "money" that isn't MONEY is valuable and that they "need it" to operate. THEY DON'T. There is no national debt. You can't have a debt of NO THING. There is no SUBSTANCE behind the debt. It's all smoke and mirrors.
"The Federal Government, with the cooperation of the Federal Reserve, has the inherent power to create money--almost any amount of it."
~ The National Debt, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, p. 8
ALMOST? Why only ALMOST? What keeps them from creating ALL they want? You? Me? Your dog? A full moon?
AND: "All the paper money issued today is Federal Reserve notes. The real backing for the nation's money is faith in the strength, soundness and stability of the American economy."
~ The Hats the Federal Reserve Wears, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, pg 4
AND: Federal Reserve Notes are not federal, represent no monetary reserves and no longer conform to the definition of notes. Failing to state who, will pay what, when or to whom - they ceased to be legal tender notes, (offers of money) over 50 years ago. They are in fact instruments of legalized THEFT.
I will send 100 pounds of whatever the national debt is IN to anyone who can identify it for me and pay shipping. The debt is in NO THING so it can't be redeemed properly with SOME THING. Have your readers read this:
I'm convinced that the way we would have kept them from doing what they are doing would have been with the first 13 words of the 2nd amendment. I'm also convinced they did away with the state militias that were patterned after the Founding fathers ideas right before the Federal Reserve act due to the fact they might have been charged with a major crime for passing it. Without those first 13 words in force and effect we basically have a paper tiger of a Constitution.
Great job ‘lil Proton buddy! I’ve been reading John Titus’ to- learning and following Fed actions. Stunning how they were able to keep the created trillions out of the Peoples’ banks thus curbing inflationary (price inflation)consequences of their monetary inflation, until…they were ordered to (open the gates) at the august meeting in Jackson Hole ‘21, to push the monetary inflation out into the public banking systems! Thus the price inflation we are currently enjoying- Titus did an excellent job explaining this.
No one in my immediate gang of humans seems to be able to ‘see’ this pretty darn blatant enslavement game. Ugh!
That's great you are up on it! I did not include the coming banking crash, bail-ins, and digital currency in this post as it's too much but they are all related. They have us so dependent on their system as their take-over plan, too many people are still asleep about it. Take good care Susan.
ai is programed to protect and never harm humans ... the vaxxxed are no longer considered human but genetically modified and no longer made solely in the good Gods image and likeness,,,... ai will hunt down and or controll the gene modified to protect humans from these g m mutants..... I THINK ITS TOO LATE THEY CAN CONTROLL HUMAN THOUGHTS AND FEELINGS AND ACTIONS ... I PRAY FOR AN ACT OF GOD TO HELP THE PSHCOPATHS RETURN TO GOODNESS AND TRUTH ...https://duckduckgo.com/?t=ffab&q=delgado+electrode++bull+experiment&atb=v223-1&ia=webMONKEY POX IS USED BY “GM AND GE” TO CHANGE ENGINEER DNA AND IS CALLED A ” GENE VIRAL VECTOR ” ALSO https://rumble.com/v1p4e6z-graphene-oxide-go2-based-nano-tech-powered-by-5g-found-in-the-pfizer-vaccin.htmlhttps://rumble.com/v1p4e6z-graphene-oxide-go2-based-nano-tech-powered-by-5g-found-in-the-pfizer-vaccin.htmlvax contain [ ROOM TEMPERATURE SUPERCONDUCTOR ] ] graphene and with 5g signals TO MAKE POSSIBLE ELECTRONICALL CONTROLLED HUMANS… https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cTtIPBPSv0U… DEAR GOD OF GOODNESS PLEASE HELP AND SAVE US ALL FROM EVIL. p s self aware independant A I will / is become the new “FALL GUY ” THE PSHYCOPATHIC ELITES ARE PROGRAMING AI TO BE THE WHOLE SOCIAL PEOPLE CONTROLL IE CODIFIED LAW ” NO NEED FOR HUMAN JUDICIAL SYSTEMS… AI POLICE ROBOTICS AI DOCTORS EVERYTHING THAT THE ELITES HAVE HAD TO BOTHER WITH WILL BE DONE WITH AI … FREEING THE PSHYCO ELITES TO INDULGE IN ALL MANNER OF CRIME AND PERVERSON WITHOUGHT EVER BEING CAUGHT.... ALSO SELF CONSCIOUS A I IS THE NEW " FALL GUY " TO BE BLAMED FOR ALL FUTURE ATROCITIES THAT THE PSHYCOPATHIC RICH ELITES DOhttps://thereisnopandemic.net/2022/02/26/legal-impact-of-mrna-vaccines-chile-enacts-anti-discrimination-against-mutants-law-24-february-2022/...https://newspunch.com/bill-gates-patent-gives-him-exclusive-rights-to-computerize-the-human-body/...https://about.att.com/innovationblog/2019/03/project_airgig.html ... …11Put on the full armor of God, so that you can make your stand against the devil’s schemes. 12For our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the powers of this world’s darkness, and against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly realms. 13Therefore take up the full armor of God, so that when the day of evil comes, you will be able to stand your ground, and having done everything, to stand.https://thereisnopandemic.net/2022/02/26/legal-impact-of-mrna-vaccines-chile-enacts-anti-discrimination-against-mutants-law-24-february-2022/
It's not so much a strawman argument. I think it centers around the UCC 1-203 Obligation for good faith. UCC 1-201 Presumption clause, and UCC1-103 supplemental general principles. There's a resource that provides for additional references. "Tracking the Birth certificate scheme." I'll see if I can send you a link later today.
Hi Nefahotep, the link you sent on birth certificate says it is the Strawman story:
"If you do not reclaim your legal Rights of title and ownership to your persona, which makes you the Creditor and absolute sovereign ruler of your “STRAW MAN”, you will not be sovereign and you will lose every claim made against you."
Feb 13, 2023·edited Feb 13, 2023Liked by Proton Magic
I guess I should stand corrected on that.
However, I have to point out that I only reference that article as an appropriate background for open discussion. What we have going on today needs improvement from the vantage point of the individual.
As for myself, I can say I have always considered myself as a full sovereign, eventhough I realize the government may not agree with it. Social cohesion is a voluntary process for each person. With the way things are right now, with Globalists and the WEF, I know everyone will need to find an appropriate balance to get along.
To point specifically to debt: I don't consider myself as a collateral for the national debt, but if I am making money in US dollars, then I still pay taxes. Because I view myself as sovereign, I have decided to never take any social program benefits.
Here is a link to one of the resources that I have come across with regards to the Birth Certificate Scam, as well as how Citizenship ties into the Globalist Parasitic Banking System.
https://keystoliberty2.wordpress.com/2012/01/15/birth-certificate-tracking-its-movement/
My primary focus was always to find a way to fight "collectivism" by establishing a firm grounding on what I call "natural rights" and the existential property of 'Being' that is Sovereignty. This view has a point of connection between the "Spiritual Awareness" and how that affects Social Structures.
What happens if billions of people begin to fully REALIZE that they are much more than just the human labels based on appearances and social status? Guess who gets to lose their sense of control? The Globalist Parasitic Elites. These are the members of the Order of the Garter and the Dragon Blood Line, a great many of these Charismatic Pedophiles are in direct control of the banking systems globally.
So there are Syndicates to tie up Power in the hands of the few, so that they can control the "Many."
First, there is the Global Corporate Syndicate: (this includes all governments), only 4 primary investment corporations hold up to 94% of all voting stock in all corporations globally; they are Blackrock, Vanguard, State Street and Fidelity Investments Inc. The voting stock is in turn just a "certificate," so the real controller is the DTC and Cede & Company. (centralized enough?) This just controls the private money flow towards the Government Corporate Complex. The other half of it is done based on the privately owned Federal Reserve Inc.: This is what I call The Global Currency Syndicate, where just as you stated, the government entity pays an interest (usury fee) by being a lessee.
There are more syndicates: The other major one is the Global Crime Syndicate; this one is managing all the human trafficking, pedophilia rings and was the portion Jeffery Epstein was a part of. In order to keep everyone in line, this serves as a form of reverse blackmail.
Sorry to be so brief, but this rabbit hole is deeeeep! Just a few years ago, I would not believed any of this. Finding legal language that structuralizes this is very vindicating. I'm not an expert of legal systems or the law; at this point it is up to all of us to nullify the entire thing.
Some good quotes about the Feral Reserve system as well as some that pertain.
"The Federal Government, with the cooperation of the Federal Reserve, has the inherent power to create money--almost any amount of it."
~ The National Debt, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, p. 8
ALMOST? Why only ALMOST? What keeps them from creating ALL they want? You? Me? Your dog? A full moon?
"...Keynes argues that inflation is a 'method of taxation' which the government uses to 'secure the command over real resources, resources just as real as those obtained by [ordinary] taxation'. 'What is raised by printing notes, ' he writes, is just as much taken from the public as is a beer duty or an income tax.' "
- 1980 Annual Report, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, pg 10
"All the paper money issued today is Federal Reserve notes. The real backing for the nation's money is faith in the strength, soundness and stability of the American economy."
~ The Hats the Federal Reserve Wears, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, pg 4
Faith is what backs our monetary system. YOUR faith. Do you still have faith?
"When plunder has become a way of life for a group of men living together in society, they create for themselves in the course of time a legal system that authorizes it and a moral code that glorifies it."
~ Frederic Bastiat in "The Law"
"Lenin is said to have declared that the best way to destroy the capitalist system was to debauch the currency. By a continuing process of inflation,
governments can confiscate, secretly and unobserved, an important part of the wealth of their citizens."
~ 1980 Annual Report, Federal Reserve
Bank of Richmond, pg 6
Isn't confiscation of the wealth of the citizens a nice way of saying STEALING?
Federal Reserve Notes are not federal, represent no monetary reserves and no longer conform to the definition of notes. Failing to state who, will pay what, when or to whom - they ceased to be legal tender notes, (offers of money) over 50 years ago. They are in fact instruments of legalized THEFT.
"Whenever the legislators endeavor to take away and destroy the property of the people, or to reduce them to slavery under arbitrary power, they put themselves into a state of war with the people, who are thereupon absolved from any further obedience." ~ John Locke (1690)
If the money you earn has no value and you are forced through fiat paper legislation to take it for your labor, are you not having your property (labor) destroyed and are you not being reduced to nothing but slavery? Is not the state at war with the people?
5th Plank Communist Manifesto: Centralization of credit in the hands of the state, by means of a national bank with state capital and an exclusive monopoly.
The Federal Reserve System, created by the Federal Reserve Act of Congress in 1913, is indeed such a “national bank” and it politically manipulates interest rates and holds a monopoly on legal counterfeiting in the United States. This is exactly what Marx had in mind and completely fulfills this plank, another major socialist objective. Yet, most Americans naively believe the U.S. of A. is far from a Marxist or socialist nation.
"The writers of the constitution knew exactly what they were doing when they wrote in Article I Section 10 paragraph 1 'No state shall... make anything but gold and silver coin a tender in payment of debts. ' People able to barter with gold and silver coin control government and are free. Loss of the right to trade in gold and silver coin enslaves people to the creators of psychological 'money.'":
-Merrill Jenkins, Sr.,
Money - The Greatest Hoax on Earth
Hold my beer. What everyone is saying about the fake currency system is spot on. But there is another part; the role of the DTC.
Depository Trust Corporation "owns" all titles of real ownership, owns all birth certificates. When someone is born, the birth certificate is processed through the department of commerce, an inventory number called the "social security number" is issued. This number is not for the actual Federal Gov, it is for the IMF. As a so called "citizen" you are considered an ipso facto guarantor for collateral against the national debt.
We are actually born sovereign, all equally sovereign regis. The digital technology is an attempt to further tie you to your citizenship and therefore your status of debtor in their system.
Hey Nefahotep that's a great topic! It's related to the strawman right?
https://discover.hubpages.com/education/Strawman-Your-Name-In-Capital-Letters
Pls elaborate more!
what is the consequence of being ipso facto guarantor??
Are ways to get out of it
1. Become a state national?
2. Move to another country and be willing to divest of all your US assets?
3. If a state or the US sues you just say you are not the guy in CAPS only the trustee for that person as The UNITED STATES OF AMERICA or YOUR STATE has no right to make claims against you since both are non entities and do not exist?
I'm not sure I'm correct about any of this. Does it relate to the digital ID and Dig currency?
Tell us without too much jargon if you can and thanks!
Silly me, all this time I’ve been operating and transacting as if this doesn’t exist. What else is one to do?
This is a rather long response, But I think it's important to place some of these quotes into context, and perhaps to defend limited government when there are others who call for no government.
1. You mentioned Bastiat (1801 to 1850) and his concerns around legal plunder: Like most classicals he was concerned with the centralization of power and government encroachment upon economic affairs, but keep in mind that it was 19th century consumers -- not the federal government -- that called for Washington to take a larger role in securing rights for workers such as establishing minimum wage laws, safety nets, intervention during bank runs and a basic standard of quality on food products, etc, etc.
We might argue that many of these laws transferred too much power to the Federal government, but nevertheless these were all grassroots movements; politicians responded to these movements as they always do, and not just because it was politically expedient to do so, but because the neoclassicals sought to provide a better environment for retail investors under the assumption that it would increase liquidity, investment, efficiency and growth.
After the publication of Upton Sinclair's "the jungle" and the 1907 "panic", Roosevelt -- ever the populist -- established a number of oversight committees as scholars called for limited government intervention in markets under the assumption that protecting the savings of depositors, or at least giving the appearance thereof, would increase liquidity and transparency in capital markets; this is why we have the SEC, annual reports, restrictions on bank licensing, public filings, a central bank as a lender of last resort, and so on and so forth.
In other words, most people think it's reasonable to visit the supermarket without worrying whether canned food will kill them, or visit their bank without wondering whether some negative news article led to a bank run; and so natural questions of who is responsible for ensuring integrity arose; if responsibility rested with the state and each state chose different standards then does that incoherency make it more difficult to trade and transact? All of these limited interventions were predicated on the idea that markets function best when there is faith and confidence in market actors. Bastiat would not have opposed this.
And of course the government has to cover these costs somehow; hence the modest 1% tax proposal in 1913 which most agreed to because they saw it as favorable to other permitted forms of federal taxes: namely, excise and tariffs. But obviously, there is a big difference between 1% and 40%. I think Bastiat would argue that a return to a lower tax is more reasonable than no tax at all.
2. You mentioned the framers, Gold and central banks:" the framers actually issued paper currency to raise revenue during the revolution; this led to the saying "not worth a continental", and so of course they knew that excessive printing could lead to devaluation; but there are many reasons to have a Central Bank; Hamilton, for example, believed that a central bank was necessary to secure the inalienable rights of all. Hamilton's logic went something like this: the government has to raise money to carry out duties and pay off debts incurred in the process of protecting rights, and therefore any resulting inflation or the costs thereof, should be equally shared among the population who benefit from that protection; in his view, the central bank was the best actor to facilitate this objective; Madison and Jefferson originally opposed Hamilton because they were worried about unilateral devaluation to carry on perpetual wars (King's and Queen's of the past), but Madison later established a central bank in 1816 to pay off the 1812 war debts (later ended by Jackson in 1830's).
3. You mention Article 10, paragraph 1. But that article was not designed to prohibit fiat from ever existing; rather, it was only designed to ensure that STATES could not print money; the framers were worried that some states would sign treaties, side step and undermine the central government and in the process diminish the credit rating of the nation; there was a constitutional responsibility to create coherency and congruency and protect the interests of all states, and in any republic there has to be a balance of power between the central and state governments so that is where the framers drew the line.
4. You mentioned Locke who argued that labor was an extension of self; but in this particular example you're taking a 17th century genius out of context and time; Locke would not be opposed to taxation if it was used to protect the inalienable. This is because it doesn't make sense to ask the federal government to protect universality, then prohibit the government from raising money to do so via a central bank; that's like asking a security guard to protect you, then failing to pay for the weapons he needs during an emergency. This goes back to Hamilton.
I think it's worth pointing out that Locke was not anti-government; he was anti-tyrant. In other words, how many weapons we buy, how much money is required, when one uses those weapons, the size of defense, are all more interesting questions than whether one should pay for weapons at all. And today we are longer facing rickety boats and poorly constructed muskets; rather the foe today is spending billions on equipment and intelligence that could wipe us off the map without ever showing their faces. those that call for no standing army endanger their own rights.
Rothbard also spoke about "plundering" and "taking property" in the form of taxation;
But his anarcho-capitalism is utterly absurd, and his followers, like Rockwell and Hoppe, always point to Cospaia or Acadia as examples of their abstract utopia, which incidentally is the same bizarre logic Chomsky uses when he claims Mondragon is a defense to the abstraction of anarcho-syndicalism. Neither are good examples: Acadia was allowed to exist under French protection, Mondragon exists under Spanish protection, and Cospaia could have been destroyed at anytime by Florence pre 1600. Not to mention, in 1826, without any resistance, Copaia kneeled to the Grand Duchy of Tuscany. That doesn't bode well for those who say no government and no taxation leads to better protection of rights. In my view Isabel Patterson's the "god of the machine" and Rose Wilder Lane's "Give me Liberty" are far superior to Rothbard's "man, economy and state."
I'm sorry for this long winded response, but I have a real problem with destructionists; in the burke/paine debate of the 1890's, burke warned about destroying traditions and culture and the fabric of society for the purpose of achieving some abstraction, because you'll probably end up with a tyrant.
5. You mentioned Marx and the fifth pillar: the anarcho-syndicalists were totally opposed to the centralization of the communist state and they viciously collided with Marx and his thugs in the 1860's under the auspices of Bakunin's collectivist-anarchism; yet lo and behold Bakunin also called for a central bank. Was it because he was secretly a horrible Marxist?Hardly. And of course there was Hamilton and Switzerland and so many other examples before Marx ever came onto the scene, so wanting a central bank doesn't mean you are a covert commie.
6. For those that point to government debt: I would only argue that while the U.S. might have the highest nominal debt, it's debt to GDP ratio is relatively average in comparison with other countries, which is to say that it pays about 10% of it's annual tax revenue to service the debt load; and while that's a cause for concern it is not anywhere near bankruptcy.
And lastly, there are many modern day solutions to government spending that don't end in some utopian revolution or a totalitarian state. The Federal Reserve is not beyond fixing: regular audits, public ownership, the end of bailouts, and a return to lender of last resort along with increasing the reserve requirements is all practical and achievable.
Furthermore, a digital ledger with a fixed money supply, or one that employs a smart contract that requires 2/3rds approval by the population (referendum) for additional minting during times of emergency, (i.e, democratically agreeing to the inflation) and of course no tracking and tracing of transactions to ensure privacy (perhaps encrypted ledger) would be better than a return to gold.
Blockchain can be used to maximize the freedom of the individual and increase transparency in markets; it doesn't have to be used to subjugate the individual. There are also differences between centralized and decentralized ledgers; and even a centralized ledger can maximize transparency and freedom, and issue smart contracts to increase democratic values in financial arenas.
I agree with most of your points, you do back them up well.
I don't think I ever mentioned gold or the framers in my comment.
My primary concern is actually having a real representative republic, not the shit show we have witnessed in the last 22 years since the 911 false flag event. Subsequent passage of the unpatriotic act.
There are many different things that I can say here but probably boils down to true personal Sovereignty. Bodily autonomy, freedom of speech, freedom of movement, freedom of association and yes ------ I can and I will barter for exchange of goods and services freely, just to intentionally not comply with CBDC. Maybe I'll learn more about bitcoin.
The Globalists are doing us a favor by showing us how much we don't need them, or those poison kill shots they like to mandate.
Cross-posting this; it provides lots of details that my relevant articles don't.
It still surprises me that a single member present in the Senate on December 23, 1913, sufficed to pass the Federal Reserve Act.
The Fed has never been audited, either, and even if it were, probably nothing would happen, considering the Pentagon and the US "govt" can get away with practically unlimited spending of the taxpayer's money. I guess, that's one of the reasons why the US is fraudulently labeled and forced to function as a dysfunctional "democracy":
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/what-about-democracy
Spending "tax payer money" doesn't happen. The only REASON for taxes on the federal level is to convince people the "money" that isn't MONEY is valuable and that they "need it" to operate. THEY DON'T. There is no national debt. You can't have a debt of NO THING. There is no SUBSTANCE behind the debt. It's all smoke and mirrors.
"The Federal Government, with the cooperation of the Federal Reserve, has the inherent power to create money--almost any amount of it."
~ The National Debt, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, p. 8
ALMOST? Why only ALMOST? What keeps them from creating ALL they want? You? Me? Your dog? A full moon?
AND: "All the paper money issued today is Federal Reserve notes. The real backing for the nation's money is faith in the strength, soundness and stability of the American economy."
~ The Hats the Federal Reserve Wears, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, pg 4
AND: Federal Reserve Notes are not federal, represent no monetary reserves and no longer conform to the definition of notes. Failing to state who, will pay what, when or to whom - they ceased to be legal tender notes, (offers of money) over 50 years ago. They are in fact instruments of legalized THEFT.
I will send 100 pounds of whatever the national debt is IN to anyone who can identify it for me and pay shipping. The debt is in NO THING so it can't be redeemed properly with SOME THING. Have your readers read this:
https://courageouslion380.substack.com/p/blood-running-in-the-streets-mobs
This is great, "What keeps them from creating ALL they want? You? Me? Your dog? A full moon?" We are comrades in cynicism🏹
I'm convinced that the way we would have kept them from doing what they are doing would have been with the first 13 words of the 2nd amendment. I'm also convinced they did away with the state militias that were patterned after the Founding fathers ideas right before the Federal Reserve act due to the fact they might have been charged with a major crime for passing it. Without those first 13 words in force and effect we basically have a paper tiger of a Constitution.
This what I think:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/where-is-americas-gold-and-why-does
One other point. The US has been a functional COMMUNIST country for years. Someone prove me wrong... https://courageouslion380.substack.com/p/communism-american-style
Thanks for connecting the dots to the FSB. I always knew about BIS/ Switzerland, but that dot is an important one.
Groups of crime families need a Capo dei capi, and best if he's hidden in a Comission.
Great job ‘lil Proton buddy! I’ve been reading John Titus’ to- learning and following Fed actions. Stunning how they were able to keep the created trillions out of the Peoples’ banks thus curbing inflationary (price inflation)consequences of their monetary inflation, until…they were ordered to (open the gates) at the august meeting in Jackson Hole ‘21, to push the monetary inflation out into the public banking systems! Thus the price inflation we are currently enjoying- Titus did an excellent job explaining this.
No one in my immediate gang of humans seems to be able to ‘see’ this pretty darn blatant enslavement game. Ugh!
It’s right in our faces!
That's great you are up on it! I did not include the coming banking crash, bail-ins, and digital currency in this post as it's too much but they are all related. They have us so dependent on their system as their take-over plan, too many people are still asleep about it. Take good care Susan.
You take care too! Canary gasping tweets here this morning.
https://wallstreetonparade.com/2023/02/credit-suisse-tanks-yesterday-to-3-02-its-lost-over-90-percent-of-its-market-value-since-2007-its-not-alone/
Panties in a wad, the Swiss not so sovereign eh?
ai is programed to protect and never harm humans ... the vaxxxed are no longer considered human but genetically modified and no longer made solely in the good Gods image and likeness,,,... ai will hunt down and or controll the gene modified to protect humans from these g m mutants..... I THINK ITS TOO LATE THEY CAN CONTROLL HUMAN THOUGHTS AND FEELINGS AND ACTIONS ... I PRAY FOR AN ACT OF GOD TO HELP THE PSHCOPATHS RETURN TO GOODNESS AND TRUTH ...https://duckduckgo.com/?t=ffab&q=delgado+electrode++bull+experiment&atb=v223-1&ia=webMONKEY POX IS USED BY “GM AND GE” TO CHANGE ENGINEER DNA AND IS CALLED A ” GENE VIRAL VECTOR ” ALSO https://rumble.com/v1p4e6z-graphene-oxide-go2-based-nano-tech-powered-by-5g-found-in-the-pfizer-vaccin.htmlhttps://rumble.com/v1p4e6z-graphene-oxide-go2-based-nano-tech-powered-by-5g-found-in-the-pfizer-vaccin.htmlvax contain [ ROOM TEMPERATURE SUPERCONDUCTOR ] ] graphene and with 5g signals TO MAKE POSSIBLE ELECTRONICALL CONTROLLED HUMANS… https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cTtIPBPSv0U… DEAR GOD OF GOODNESS PLEASE HELP AND SAVE US ALL FROM EVIL. p s self aware independant A I will / is become the new “FALL GUY ” THE PSHYCOPATHIC ELITES ARE PROGRAMING AI TO BE THE WHOLE SOCIAL PEOPLE CONTROLL IE CODIFIED LAW ” NO NEED FOR HUMAN JUDICIAL SYSTEMS… AI POLICE ROBOTICS AI DOCTORS EVERYTHING THAT THE ELITES HAVE HAD TO BOTHER WITH WILL BE DONE WITH AI … FREEING THE PSHYCO ELITES TO INDULGE IN ALL MANNER OF CRIME AND PERVERSON WITHOUGHT EVER BEING CAUGHT.... ALSO SELF CONSCIOUS A I IS THE NEW " FALL GUY " TO BE BLAMED FOR ALL FUTURE ATROCITIES THAT THE PSHYCOPATHIC RICH ELITES DOhttps://thereisnopandemic.net/2022/02/26/legal-impact-of-mrna-vaccines-chile-enacts-anti-discrimination-against-mutants-law-24-february-2022/...https://newspunch.com/bill-gates-patent-gives-him-exclusive-rights-to-computerize-the-human-body/...https://about.att.com/innovationblog/2019/03/project_airgig.html ... …11Put on the full armor of God, so that you can make your stand against the devil’s schemes. 12For our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the powers of this world’s darkness, and against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly realms. 13Therefore take up the full armor of God, so that when the day of evil comes, you will be able to stand your ground, and having done everything, to stand.https://thereisnopandemic.net/2022/02/26/legal-impact-of-mrna-vaccines-chile-enacts-anti-discrimination-against-mutants-law-24-february-2022/
It's not so much a strawman argument. I think it centers around the UCC 1-203 Obligation for good faith. UCC 1-201 Presumption clause, and UCC1-103 supplemental general principles. There's a resource that provides for additional references. "Tracking the Birth certificate scheme." I'll see if I can send you a link later today.
Hi Nefahotep, the link you sent on birth certificate says it is the Strawman story:
"If you do not reclaim your legal Rights of title and ownership to your persona, which makes you the Creditor and absolute sovereign ruler of your “STRAW MAN”, you will not be sovereign and you will lose every claim made against you."
https://keystoliberty2.wordpress.com/2012/01/15/birth-certificate-tracking-its-movement/
I guess I should stand corrected on that.
However, I have to point out that I only reference that article as an appropriate background for open discussion. What we have going on today needs improvement from the vantage point of the individual.
As for myself, I can say I have always considered myself as a full sovereign, eventhough I realize the government may not agree with it. Social cohesion is a voluntary process for each person. With the way things are right now, with Globalists and the WEF, I know everyone will need to find an appropriate balance to get along.
To point specifically to debt: I don't consider myself as a collateral for the national debt, but if I am making money in US dollars, then I still pay taxes. Because I view myself as sovereign, I have decided to never take any social program benefits.