Why would an Orb have secrets?
Maybe some round things should stay covered in secrecy you say? But one special type of orb seems to like airplanes and fly around them, let’s call them the Orb Bros. I’m no expert but I’ve seen orbs around planes that then melt into famous buildings, or that spin around airplanes and makes them disappear.
Let me go back to this VERY IMPORTANT post by Pasheen of Diva Drops the other day that has an extremely deep connection.
At first blush the vid at the bottom looks like another one of those UFO vids. The vid on Diva’s post has been made private, but here is another version, I think it will be obvious to readers of the Proton Magic News that the description is full of propaganda to confuse the public about the fate of MH370. In the vid the Orb Bros rapidly circle the plane and then POOF! The plane disappears (some said it was “teleported” away).
Well this proton is not new to teleportation. I have a coffee cup that beams Kirk & crew away if you put boiling water in it,
and a vintage teleport set-up from Trek the original series if anyone needs to escape a bad marriage (while my substack is free, teleportations to your escape destination will cost you enough for me to finally buy my TSHF love bunker).
Now pls see this fantastic page on 9.11 plane hoaxes.
It’s a long web page. At the top is proof that the “planes” seemed to melt into the towers, not crash and no plane or bldg debris was seen at the instant of impact, but the building does explode just AFTER and fast enough that your eyes cant catch that the plane went into the building, the plane and the building both UNBROKEN first.
Next, do an in page search for “orbs” in that page and you will see that just like in Pasheen’s post, near the bottom of the page you can see our buddies the Orb Bros flying around “flight USA 175”:
You will also see some amazing stuff on this video. Here starting at 2:40 you can see this. The gash in the wall started to form 6 seconds AFTER the plane projection melted into the wall. The earth’s magnetic field changed then so that it seems it was caused by directed energy (Dr. Judy Wood).
See this vid from 1:36:48 about orbs and the whole vid to learn about directed energy and projections:
Further below that in the links you can see modern day holograms that look like real objects. They can seem to bounce on and melt right thru your hand. Link to this vid.
As photons they are real but that’s it. They are projections and that is the only thing that “hit” the WTC. The Orb Bros were smart, they exited stage left at the moment of impact.
This is the most lucid explanation of all the mystery of 9.11. The orbs seem to be related to the projection of the plane, likely to be drones that do projecting and/or help with the screen function, etc. The planners couldn’t take a chance real planes would miss the target (and a real plane can’t fly that fast and not break up at that low altitude). The link may say DEWs made the crash damage but I personally think the explosions of the bldgs that also ignited jet fuel had to be pre-planted in the bldgs. to get the exact pyrotechnics they needed-I suppose by the same people who planted the demolition explosives/incendiaries.
Now you can understand that the plane in DIVAs post with the orbs is a projection, it didn’t teleport anywhere because it never existed except as a projection (if I use the word “hologram” I’ll be labeled a nut job).
What about CGs?
Now I’m not saying the airplane images are definitely projections. They could also be CG mock-ups that were then put on TV and from commissioned “private” cameramen most all of which seemed to have ties to video editing experts or themselves were an expert (link below), and these vids were put out as “grass-roots” evidence. If you’re a Proton Magic news reader you shouldn’t be buying that grass roots shit. Did the planners decide to just have on TV and these “private” vids? EMFs around Manhattan were turned off (HERF electromagnetic jamming) during the attacks so that cell phones did not function. Also, the many people interviewed about planes said, “I didn’t see a plane, when I looked up the buildings were exploding”.
What about the Orb bros? I really don’t know their function and whether related to projections in real time or an artifact of GC making. Sorry protons are little and only know a little!
In any case this proton is leaning towards the no-plane camp. Hey if you’re a no-virus proton it’s an easy shoe to fit in. These are large Enterprise fraud projects, nothing can be left to chance. If a real plane misses its target just by a little the show is over and you get all those nasty families with class action suits coming. Better to have a projector, videographer and cinema going (the TV in your home!). Check out this great explanation of video editing on 9.11 for public consumption by Simon Shack.
This is the same strategy with Covid, the planes are the virus, neither exist and both of these non-exist truths must be guarded at all costs. The bldgs’ controlled demolition corresponds to the pandemic numbers and/or the bioweapon story. They are happy for us to argue about these issues forever.
Let me add a few more great points from a comment by Petra Liverani in the comments below:
The planes are more important not only because their fakery immediately means the buildings came down by controlled demolition and any need to question what caused their destruction is immediately obviated by that clear fact but also because:
1. Planes keep the focus more on the ludicrous failure of defense while the buildings keep focus off that.
2. It means the passenger deaths were faked and the fakery of the passenger deaths can more easily lead to the questioning of ALL the deaths.
The most important fact about the planes is that none of the alleged passengers died in a plane crash. Very few truthers, really understand the False Dilemma propaganda strategy and even when you try to explain it they're resolutely anchored in their "the evil US government cold-bloodily and callously murdered all those poor people in the buildings." Propaganda is about pushing people's buttons but using fakery to do it.
The simple image from DIVA DROPS led to one of my most fortuitous findings about fakery in both 9.11 and these “UFO” sightings, and connects to COVID-19 propaganda tactics at the same time. Hats off to DIVA!
Finally Proton Magic said something about 9.11
"This is the same strategy with Covid, the planes are the virus, neither exist and both of these non-exist truths must be guarded at all costs. The bldgs’ controlled demolition corresponds to the pandemic numbers and/or the bioweapon story. They are happy for us to argue about these issues forever."
Spot on to a degree ... yes the planes are more important than the buildings and WTC-7 especially is a propaganda decoy ... the planes are more important not only because their fakery immediately means the buildings came down by controlled demolition and any need to question what caused their destructions is immediately obviated by that clear fact but also because:
1. Planes keep the focus more on the ludicrous failure of defence while the buildings keep focus off that
2. It means the passenger deaths were faked and the fakery of the passenger deaths can more easily lead to the questioning of ALL the deaths
The most important element of the 9/11 story is the False Dilemma propaganda strategy. The propagandists anticipated the disbelievers of their nonsense story, of course, and they had a propaganda campaign all worked out for them. Very few truthers, however, really understand the False Dilemma propaganda strategy and even when you try to explain it they're resolutely anchored in their "the evil US government cold-bloodedly and callously murdered all those poor people in the buildings."
Generally, in response to my statement, "It was really just a big demolition job where the planes and death and injury were faked," I get the response, "Oh, they wouldn't care about the people," or "They would have killed the people for real because that was easier / for more emotional impact."
No, of course, they don't care about the people but just because they don't care about the people doesn't mean they killed them, they can always have other reasons not to kill them.
Easier to kill them as an argument? "Easier" doesn't come into psyops. They don't care how hard or difficult anything is to do in a psyop. Who's paying for it? The punters. They are not concerned about "easier", they are concerned about pulling off the psyop exactly the way it suits them whatever way that is.
For greater emotional impact? No, no, no, no, no. Propaganda is not about doing things for real for greater emotional impact, propaganda is about fakery, it's about pushing people's buttons but using fakery to do it which is probably very psychologically damaging ... and just what they want.
The irony is that while you can propagandise and coerce thousands upon thousands of health professionals to inject people with toxins that injure, maim and kill, you cannot propagandise and coerce demolition professionals to only partially evacuate buildings before destroying them, that's not a thing. Anyone who doesn't think there were a lot of demolition professionals involved in destroying over seven buildings at the World Trade Centre??? All the buildings were either completely destroyed or severely "damaged" on 9/11 - no doubt the "damaged" ones had a little help from the demolition professionals.
I know someone who was in the vicinity of the WTC on 9/11 and he said he saw a plane heading to the South tower although he didn't see it penetrate so perhaps what he saw was a hologram but the most important fact about the planes is that none of the alleged passenger airliners crashed which means none of the alleged passengers died in a plane crash. That's the most important element. Whether it was holograms, military aircraft, some other kind of aeronautical object - whatever - all distraction propaganda. All that matters is that it wasn't the nominated passenger airliners so no one died in a plane crash. Sure, I wouldn't mind knowing what they used to create the planes for the people who were there (something different from what we're shown on film I think) but it's really not of crucial importance.
My post here explains 9/11 in a nutshell. If you're already on board with it being an inside job you can skip the 15 points from David Ray Griffin and go from there.
https://petraliverani.substack.com/p/both-believers-and-disbelievers-of
If you view the whole event of 9/11 as a Hollywood production with scriptwriters, managers, special effects operators, and crisis actors hitting their marks perfectly on the day then you also have to accept that if anything went wrong it would blow the whole operation wide open and all the perps would immediately rat on all their buddies and the public would know exactly who to go after for payback.
Just saying.
And whichever way you view Lucky Larry's involvement in the whole affair, it certainly should be front and center in these discussions. His family not in the buildings that day as well as many other prominent friends and associates.
Then you have to judge whether the insurance claims and the need to demolish the asbestos laden buildings "carefully by hand" provides enough motivation to set up the "Hollywood production" and bring the buildings down "some other way" with a little help from Larry's friends.
We also know that the Pentagon had plans to invade Iraq and Afghanistan followed by other countries in the ME. They just needed the right crisis to magically appear. A new Pearl Harbor no less.
That said, there are still many 9/11 Truth talking points that make absolutely zero sense and have not been satisfactorily settled since the whole thing kicked off.
https://www.tsubion.com/9-11-truth-is-full-of-lies/