Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Petra Liverani's avatar

"This is the same strategy with Covid, the planes are the virus, neither exist and both of these non-exist truths must be guarded at all costs. The bldgs’ controlled demolition corresponds to the pandemic numbers and/or the bioweapon story. They are happy for us to argue about these issues forever."

Spot on to a degree ... yes the planes are more important than the buildings and WTC-7 especially is a propaganda decoy ... the planes are more important not only because their fakery immediately means the buildings came down by controlled demolition and any need to question what caused their destructions is immediately obviated by that clear fact but also because:

1. Planes keep the focus more on the ludicrous failure of defence while the buildings keep focus off that

2. It means the passenger deaths were faked and the fakery of the passenger deaths can more easily lead to the questioning of ALL the deaths

The most important element of the 9/11 story is the False Dilemma propaganda strategy. The propagandists anticipated the disbelievers of their nonsense story, of course, and they had a propaganda campaign all worked out for them. Very few truthers, however, really understand the False Dilemma propaganda strategy and even when you try to explain it they're resolutely anchored in their "the evil US government cold-bloodedly and callously murdered all those poor people in the buildings."

Generally, in response to my statement, "It was really just a big demolition job where the planes and death and injury were faked," I get the response, "Oh, they wouldn't care about the people," or "They would have killed the people for real because that was easier / for more emotional impact."

No, of course, they don't care about the people but just because they don't care about the people doesn't mean they killed them, they can always have other reasons not to kill them.

Easier to kill them as an argument? "Easier" doesn't come into psyops. They don't care how hard or difficult anything is to do in a psyop. Who's paying for it? The punters. They are not concerned about "easier", they are concerned about pulling off the psyop exactly the way it suits them whatever way that is.

For greater emotional impact? No, no, no, no, no. Propaganda is not about doing things for real for greater emotional impact, propaganda is about fakery, it's about pushing people's buttons but using fakery to do it which is probably very psychologically damaging ... and just what they want.

The irony is that while you can propagandise and coerce thousands upon thousands of health professionals to inject people with toxins that injure, maim and kill, you cannot propagandise and coerce demolition professionals to only partially evacuate buildings before destroying them, that's not a thing. Anyone who doesn't think there were a lot of demolition professionals involved in destroying over seven buildings at the World Trade Centre??? All the buildings were either completely destroyed or severely "damaged" on 9/11 - no doubt the "damaged" ones had a little help from the demolition professionals.

I know someone who was in the vicinity of the WTC on 9/11 and he said he saw a plane heading to the South tower although he didn't see it penetrate so perhaps what he saw was a hologram but the most important fact about the planes is that none of the alleged passenger airliners crashed which means none of the alleged passengers died in a plane crash. That's the most important element. Whether it was holograms, military aircraft, some other kind of aeronautical object - whatever - all distraction propaganda. All that matters is that it wasn't the nominated passenger airliners so no one died in a plane crash. Sure, I wouldn't mind knowing what they used to create the planes for the people who were there (something different from what we're shown on film I think) but it's really not of crucial importance.

My post here explains 9/11 in a nutshell. If you're already on board with it being an inside job you can skip the 15 points from David Ray Griffin and go from there.

https://petraliverani.substack.com/p/both-believers-and-disbelievers-of

Expand full comment
Tsubion's avatar

If you view the whole event of 9/11 as a Hollywood production with scriptwriters, managers, special effects operators, and crisis actors hitting their marks perfectly on the day then you also have to accept that if anything went wrong it would blow the whole operation wide open and all the perps would immediately rat on all their buddies and the public would know exactly who to go after for payback.

Just saying.

And whichever way you view Lucky Larry's involvement in the whole affair, it certainly should be front and center in these discussions. His family not in the buildings that day as well as many other prominent friends and associates.

Then you have to judge whether the insurance claims and the need to demolish the asbestos laden buildings "carefully by hand" provides enough motivation to set up the "Hollywood production" and bring the buildings down "some other way" with a little help from Larry's friends.

We also know that the Pentagon had plans to invade Iraq and Afghanistan followed by other countries in the ME. They just needed the right crisis to magically appear. A new Pearl Harbor no less.

That said, there are still many 9/11 Truth talking points that make absolutely zero sense and have not been satisfactorily settled since the whole thing kicked off.

https://www.tsubion.com/9-11-truth-is-full-of-lies/

Expand full comment
114 more comments...

No posts