The Contamination Psyopš§«
When the major hazardous material is the reporter themselves
ā Today we will look at the catch-word, ācontaminationā. This is trying to signify some dangerous material that finds its way into humans, unintentionally of course. Looking into the details of these stated contaminants however, it is clear they are beingĀ positioned purposely for nefarious purposes.
Lets look at just a couple of recent contamination incidents so you donāt need to ruin your day with a long post. The reporter story will be in #3.
1. GenX contamination of NC drinking water
Since everyone is on the NC radiation hurricane incident Iāll get into the fray.
The stateās investigation focused on protection of public health and drinking water. Chemours [a spin-off of the Globalist Co. Dupont] was required to stop the discharge of wastewaterā¦and provide alternate water for thousand(s) of household(s) whose drinking water wells have been
contaminated[intentionally put there to poison the people].Ā
šThey are smart enough to make complex chemicals but not smart enough to keep them out of the drinking water? Ok, Iāll believe that.
From Wikipedia:
GenX is a organofluorine chemical compoundā¦used in products such as food packaging, paints, cleaning products, non-stick coatings, outdoor fabrics and firefighting foam.
šThis means it was meant to get inside the human body.
Although GenX was designed to be less persistent in the environmentā¦its effects may be equally harmful or even more detrimental than those of the chemical it was meant to replace. [Wiki lists numerous organ systems it can damage].
In North Carolina, the Chemours Fayetteville plant released GenX compounds into the Cape Fear River which is a drinking water source for the Wilmington area.
šI guess chemical engineers focus on chemical reactions all day and donāt know a drinking source when they see one as large as the Caper fear river.
Who would name a chemical GenX? Maybe the generation called GenX IS the target:
Generation X : born from 1965 to 1980. There are 65.2 million Gen Xers in the United States as of 2019.
šLots of people with lots of assets. Sounds like a good eugenics target if Iāve ever heard one.
2. Japan Covid shot steel contamination
TOKYO, Aug 30 (Reuters) - Moderna Inc's COVID-19 vaccine contamination woes in Japan widened after two regions put temporary holds on shots following the discovery of foreign substances in more batches
šContamination is so hard to avoid, especially when you are a multi billion dollar company. With all that $ in the way you just canāt get your quality control division to work properly. Life is a bitch when youāre rich.
Image linked to article
Contamination could be due to wrong needle extraction [What kind of bull-shit is this?]
Other vials from the lots can continue to be used [Just a few days later they recalled all the lots]
Rovi [vial maker] shares close down 13.5% on Monday
šthe contaminants were said to be āSteelā and1.6 mil doses were recalled.
šIt seems that a Dr. in the vax center looked at one of the vials that warmed up and noticed something strange-a little metallic substance it seems. Just another contaminant, no worry. We donāt want those vials to warm up before the injection now do we?
Understand why frozen shot vials are colloid suspensions just like ice cream and hide their real content :
Now letās move onto the peoples choice, ācontamination of the dayā:
3. Plasmid DNA in covid shots.
šWeāve seen that the word ācontaminationā can be used to make things seem unintentional. Now I will show you how ācontaminationā can also be used to distract from real poisons in shots (nanoparticles, heavy metals, and others).
šThis requires the reporter be a contaminant themselves.
Rebekah Barnett tries to incinerate Proton Magic by flame-throwing the wild and incendiary key words, āhostileā and āwingingā at me but dirt just flies back in her face.
From this note:
šIām concerned here they keep calling the problem of āDNA in the shotsā CONTAMINATION, meaning it is a mistake. NO it is not a mistake, this is the plan to harm people.
šI am also concerned they want to blame this on DNA, and not metals and other nanoparticles. The death problem is becoming obvious so they have to say something, ācontaminationā is a diversion and making people think it is something that can be fixed and there can be a āgoodā shot.
šThe report finding DNA news.rebekahbarnett.com.au/p/breaking-dā¦ noted it used fluometry which finds elements not molecules and is not finding purified DNA which can be done.
šThe SS author Barnett only allows paid āscriber comments. This is one method to pre-screen the people who comment, so far none of which mention any of the 3 points I made above.
And yet here you are commenting for free! Iām not sure that making a living from Substack is something to complain about, but regarding your other criticisms, no one is suggesting that contamination is the only issue. The post you commented on is about contamination, hence that is the issue discussed. Feel free to peruse my archive for discussion of other issues. Also, I have not commented on motive in this post, So I donāt agree with your claim that accident is implied (or not). See Anandamideās discussion of the snap gene tool for suggestion of intent.
Regarding your claim that Courageous Truthās report uses fluorometry, you ommitted mention of his qPCR findings. Did you read the report and the article? All testing methods used are discussed in both.
Thank you for replying. Well, this note only goes to my followers not the ones reading your comment section, so no it is not the same a commenting for free. Even if you blocked me and all others from restacking, I could still make a note and leave the URL to your public post and put in the image.
šSo did your post allow me to comment? Nope.
šPlease indicate to me where you wrote about nanoparticles or heavy metals, or other things, not as a contamination but intentionally being in the shots.
šPCR is even a less accurate tool to measure anything in the shot. I suppose you know all the problems by now in 2024 so I wont repeat them.
šI have made full posts on DNA and RNA in the shots, here, all free for anyone to comment their opinions and I wont even allow anyone to pay me ANYTHING PERIOD for any of my 130 substack posts.
Thank you for replying.
NP. Your tone is hostile so I probably wonāt reply again as this convo seems more about trying to pin me to the wall than constructively collaborating on collective truth-seeking. [šāhostile?ā Will she report me to the Substack Police for noting I couldnāt make a comment?] Thereās no need to be aggressive. Collaboration is the better way IMO, especially when people are working on the same side of the fence.
Proton: Well, this note only goes to my followers not the ones reading your comment section, so no it is not the same a commenting for free. Even if you blocked me and all others from restacking, I could still make a note and leave the URL to your public post and put in the image.
šSo did your post allow me to comment? Nope.
I offer all my content for free to read, you can comment on literally EVERY platform Iām on in EVERY CHANNEL with ONE SINGLE exception - do you want me to sign over my first born too or is that enough free stuff provided by me for you? Really, enough with the whinging [šSuggesting to allow comments is āwingingā? Iāll have to keep that in mind whenever I hit a pay-wall].
Proton:šPlease indicate to me where you wrote about nanoparticles or heavy metals, or other things, not as a contamination but intentionally being in the shots.
See references I already mentioned in previous comment. Also search LNPs in my archive [šIāve gotta search her archive? when I want to see about LNPs in the DNA contamination post? She is still not noting any kind of intent in the ācontaminationā dig which is the whole point.] These are discussed in most of my contamination articles. If you still have questions after reading the references already offered, feel free to ask. I always respond to genuine questions.
Proton:šPCR is even a less accurate tool to measure anything in the shot. I suppose you know all the problems by now in 2024 so I wont repeat them.
They are not a good measurement of whether someone has a virus in any meaningful sense. They are good at measuring other things. [Really?]
Proton:šI have made full posts on DNA and RNA in the shots, here, all free for anyone to comment their opinions and I wont even allow anyone to pay me ANYTHING PERIOD for any of my 130 substack posts.
Good for you, I presume you have other ways of paying for food. Unless you are homeless with access to tax payer funded food programs, a tax-payer funded laptop, tax-payer funded lodging and good internet. Either way, thatās great for you.
šWhy doesnāt she think I might have a job, assets, investments, etc. like most middle-class people, and that I want to write to help humanity? I must be on a food program. Sheās right about that, I make my own, and food stamps do not pay to rent farm space honey:
Donāt bother with RB. I used to follow her on Instagram and would often ask her why she still pushed the virology agenda, politely of course. She refused to engage with me, saying she ādidnāt think people were readyā to question virology, and eventually blocked me. Sheās very much embedded in the controlled op mainstream āalt-mediaā here in Australia so, even though sheās obviously got some good things to say, I donāt pay any attention to her anymore. You either delve into the whole truth or not. You canāt pick out one part of the agenda and ignore the others.
Yes, I am trying to confirm a number of the issues in your post about ācontaminationā, the methods used to āfind DNAā and your not letting free discussion on your comment section-which is different from accepting pledges which would not stifle open discussion. This is normal critique and confirmation of important points. You have resorted to ad hominem attacks even calling me āhostileā and āwhingingā-I have questioned you but did not say anything about you. I see others are not happy with your commentary pay-wall.
šTell ya what, I will put this thread on a full post because the issues are so important and we can see what opinions we can get. Thank you for writing the post for me so I donāt have to bother.
āconstructively collaborating on collective truth-seekingā how the heck can this happen when only paid subscribers are allowed to comment? š¤Æ
Omg. I just said everyone can comment in every channel except one, scroll up. Thatās 3 platforms x multiple channels. You are commenting now. We are having a discussion. If it were a friendly collaborative discussion, we could even be āconstructively collaborating on collective truth-seekingā but Iā¦
If you ever need to contact someone for their welfare on Substack, FYI you can simply DM them (unless the person has DMs turned off). You can also quote Note them like in this thread. I have to agree Iām not sure I understand the rationale of posting a cry for help if you donāt allow responses, unless the catharsis is simply in posting it. Nevertheless, anyone who canāt understand running a paid comments section on a regular news blog has perhaps never had to support themselves financially by working and being paid for it. In case, I can understand if they really lack imagination that they might not be able to wrap their heads around the idea that other people do need to make a living from their work. [šshe still doesnāt imagine I have a job, assets, and investments like most everyone in the work force and just do not think it feels right to charge for this kind of info to help humanity].
šWell I guess āRebekah Barnettā will be a household name now that I have 8 million followers:
Being polite and logical will get you a great discussion, being nasty will get you your own personal and unique Proton Magic post.
As we say down south, a hit dog is gonna holler.
Polite but pointed questions are hostile only to the dishonest and deceitful.
We are like rats fighting in a sack. The trouble is the sack is provided by the system and we are fighting each other, not the system. That must suit them down to the ground.
We are not afraid to think and speak our minds so we must be contained. We need more people to stand up for what is right and obvious. They are going to have to be pretty desperate though as many are comfortable living in the industrial-technological system that is increasingly centralised.
Or there is going to have to be a trigger. A point where the powerful, rich people behind the scenes, go too far. But then they monitor what we do and say and think so they are building the system to adjust automatically to keep things in balance. That is what they will use AI for.
We don't need freedom of speech within the rules laid down by the system. We need real freedom. Freedom means being in control (either as an individual or as a member of a SMALL group) of life-and-death issues. Freedom means having power; not the power to control other people but the power to control the circumstances of oneās own life. Sorry all you who love their gadgets, freedom means getting rid of technology!