The Contamination Psyopđ§«
When the major hazardous material is the reporter themselves
â Today we will look at the catch-word, âcontaminationâ. This is trying to signify some dangerous material that finds its way into humans, unintentionally of course. Looking into the details of these stated contaminants however, it is clear they are being positioned purposely for nefarious purposes.
Lets look at just a couple of recent contamination incidents so you donât need to ruin your day with a long post. The reporter story will be in #3.
1. GenX contamination of NC drinking water
Since everyone is on the NC radiation hurricane incident Iâll get into the fray.
The stateâs investigation focused on protection of public health and drinking water. Chemours [a spin-off of the Globalist Co. Dupont] was required to stop the discharge of wastewaterâŠand provide alternate water for thousand(s) of household(s) whose drinking water wells have been
contaminated[intentionally put there to poison the people].Â
đThey are smart enough to make complex chemicals but not smart enough to keep them out of the drinking water? Ok, Iâll believe that.
From Wikipedia:
GenX is a organofluorine chemical compoundâŠused in products such as food packaging, paints, cleaning products, non-stick coatings, outdoor fabrics and firefighting foam.
đThis means it was meant to get inside the human body.
Although GenX was designed to be less persistent in the environmentâŠits effects may be equally harmful or even more detrimental than those of the chemical it was meant to replace. [Wiki lists numerous organ systems it can damage].
In North Carolina, the Chemours Fayetteville plant released GenX compounds into the Cape Fear River which is a drinking water source for the Wilmington area.
đI guess chemical engineers focus on chemical reactions all day and donât know a drinking source when they see one as large as the Caper fear river.
Who would name a chemical GenX? Maybe the generation called GenX IS the target:
Generation X : born from 1965 to 1980. There are 65.2 million Gen Xers in the United States as of 2019.
đLots of people with lots of assets. Sounds like a good eugenics target if Iâve ever heard one.
2. Japan Covid shot steel contamination
TOKYO, Aug 30 (Reuters) - Moderna Inc's COVID-19 vaccine contamination woes in Japan widened after two regions put temporary holds on shots following the discovery of foreign substances in more batches
đContamination is so hard to avoid, especially when you are a multi billion dollar company. With all that $ in the way you just canât get your quality control division to work properly. Life is a bitch when youâre rich.
Image linked to article
Contamination could be due to wrong needle extraction [What kind of bull-shit is this?]
Other vials from the lots can continue to be used [Just a few days later they recalled all the lots]
Rovi [vial maker] shares close down 13.5% on Monday
đthe contaminants were said to be âSteelâ and1.6 mil doses were recalled.
đIt seems that a Dr. in the vax center looked at one of the vials that warmed up and noticed something strange-a little metallic substance it seems. Just another contaminant, no worry. We donât want those vials to warm up before the injection now do we?
Understand why frozen shot vials are colloid suspensions just like ice cream and hide their real content :
Now letâs move onto the peoples choice, âcontamination of the dayâ:
3. Plasmid DNA in covid shots.
đWeâve seen that the word âcontaminationâ can be used to make things seem unintentional. Now I will show you how âcontaminationâ can also be used to distract from real poisons in shots (nanoparticles, heavy metals, and others).
đThis requires the reporter be a contaminant themselves.
Rebekah Barnett tries to incinerate Proton Magic by flame-throwing the wild and incendiary key words, âhostileâ and âwingingâ at me but dirt just flies back in her face.
From this note:
đIâm concerned here they keep calling the problem of âDNA in the shotsâ CONTAMINATION, meaning it is a mistake. NO it is not a mistake, this is the plan to harm people.
đI am also concerned they want to blame this on DNA, and not metals and other nanoparticles. The death problem is becoming obvious so they have to say something, âcontaminationâ is a diversion and making people think it is something that can be fixed and there can be a âgoodâ shot.
đThe report finding DNA news.rebekahbarnett.com.au/p/breaking-d⊠noted it used fluometry which finds elements not molecules and is not finding purified DNA which can be done.
đThe SS author Barnett only allows paid âscriber comments. This is one method to pre-screen the people who comment, so far none of which mention any of the 3 points I made above.
And yet here you are commenting for free! Iâm not sure that making a living from Substack is something to complain about, but regarding your other criticisms, no one is suggesting that contamination is the only issue. The post you commented on is about contamination, hence that is the issue discussed. Feel free to peruse my archive for discussion of other issues. Also, I have not commented on motive in this post, So I donât agree with your claim that accident is implied (or not). See Anandamideâs discussion of the snap gene tool for suggestion of intent.
Regarding your claim that Courageous Truthâs report uses fluorometry, you ommitted mention of his qPCR findings. Did you read the report and the article? All testing methods used are discussed in both.
Thank you for replying. Well, this note only goes to my followers not the ones reading your comment section, so no it is not the same a commenting for free. Even if you blocked me and all others from restacking, I could still make a note and leave the URL to your public post and put in the image.
đSo did your post allow me to comment? Nope.
đPlease indicate to me where you wrote about nanoparticles or heavy metals, or other things, not as a contamination but intentionally being in the shots.
đPCR is even a less accurate tool to measure anything in the shot. I suppose you know all the problems by now in 2024 so I wont repeat them.
đI have made full posts on DNA and RNA in the shots, here, all free for anyone to comment their opinions and I wont even allow anyone to pay me ANYTHING PERIOD for any of my 130 substack posts.
Thank you for replying.
NP. Your tone is hostile so I probably wonât reply again as this convo seems more about trying to pin me to the wall than constructively collaborating on collective truth-seeking. [đâhostile?â Will she report me to the Substack Police for noting I couldnât make a comment?] Thereâs no need to be aggressive. Collaboration is the better way IMO, especially when people are working on the same side of the fence.
Proton: Well, this note only goes to my followers not the ones reading your comment section, so no it is not the same a commenting for free. Even if you blocked me and all others from restacking, I could still make a note and leave the URL to your public post and put in the image.
đSo did your post allow me to comment? Nope.
I offer all my content for free to read, you can comment on literally EVERY platform Iâm on in EVERY CHANNEL with ONE SINGLE exception - do you want me to sign over my first born too or is that enough free stuff provided by me for you? Really, enough with the whinging [đSuggesting to allow comments is âwingingâ? Iâll have to keep that in mind whenever I hit a pay-wall].
Proton:đPlease indicate to me where you wrote about nanoparticles or heavy metals, or other things, not as a contamination but intentionally being in the shots.
See references I already mentioned in previous comment. Also search LNPs in my archive [đIâve gotta search her archive? when I want to see about LNPs in the DNA contamination post? She is still not noting any kind of intent in the âcontaminationâ dig which is the whole point.] These are discussed in most of my contamination articles. If you still have questions after reading the references already offered, feel free to ask. I always respond to genuine questions.
Proton:đPCR is even a less accurate tool to measure anything in the shot. I suppose you know all the problems by now in 2024 so I wont repeat them.
They are not a good measurement of whether someone has a virus in any meaningful sense. They are good at measuring other things. [Really?]
Proton:đI have made full posts on DNA and RNA in the shots, here, all free for anyone to comment their opinions and I wont even allow anyone to pay me ANYTHING PERIOD for any of my 130 substack posts.
Good for you, I presume you have other ways of paying for food. Unless you are homeless with access to tax payer funded food programs, a tax-payer funded laptop, tax-payer funded lodging and good internet. Either way, thatâs great for you.
đWhy doesnât she think I might have a job, assets, investments, etc. like most middle-class people, and that I want to write to help humanity? I must be on a food program. Sheâs right about that, I make my own, and food stamps do not pay to rent farm space honey:
Donât bother with RB. I used to follow her on Instagram and would often ask her why she still pushed the virology agenda, politely of course. She refused to engage with me, saying she âdidnât think people were readyâ to question virology, and eventually blocked me. Sheâs very much embedded in the controlled op mainstream âalt-mediaâ here in Australia so, even though sheâs obviously got some good things to say, I donât pay any attention to her anymore. You either delve into the whole truth or not. You canât pick out one part of the agenda and ignore the others.
Yes, I am trying to confirm a number of the issues in your post about âcontaminationâ, the methods used to âfind DNAâ and your not letting free discussion on your comment section-which is different from accepting pledges which would not stifle open discussion. This is normal critique and confirmation of important points. You have resorted to ad hominem attacks even calling me âhostileâ and âwhingingâ-I have questioned you but did not say anything about you. I see others are not happy with your commentary pay-wall.
đTell ya what, I will put this thread on a full post because the issues are so important and we can see what opinions we can get. Thank you for writing the post for me so I donât have to bother.
âconstructively collaborating on collective truth-seekingâ how the heck can this happen when only paid subscribers are allowed to comment? đ€Ż
Omg. I just said everyone can comment in every channel except one, scroll up. Thatâs 3 platforms x multiple channels. You are commenting now. We are having a discussion. If it were a friendly collaborative discussion, we could even be âconstructively collaborating on collective truth-seekingâ but IâŠ
If you ever need to contact someone for their welfare on Substack, FYI you can simply DM them (unless the person has DMs turned off). You can also quote Note them like in this thread. I have to agree Iâm not sure I understand the rationale of posting a cry for help if you donât allow responses, unless the catharsis is simply in posting it. Nevertheless, anyone who canât understand running a paid comments section on a regular news blog has perhaps never had to support themselves financially by working and being paid for it. In case, I can understand if they really lack imagination that they might not be able to wrap their heads around the idea that other people do need to make a living from their work. [đshe still doesnât imagine I have a job, assets, and investments like most everyone in the work force and just do not think it feels right to charge for this kind of info to help humanity].
đWell I guess âRebekah Barnettâ will be a household name now that I have 8 million followers:
Being polite and logical will get you a great discussion, being nasty will get you your own personal and unique Proton Magic post.
As we say down south, a hit dog is gonna holler.
Polite but pointed questions are hostile only to the dishonest and deceitful.
We are like rats fighting in a sack. The trouble is the sack is provided by the system and we are fighting each other, not the system. That must suit them down to the ground.
We are not afraid to think and speak our minds so we must be contained. We need more people to stand up for what is right and obvious. They are going to have to be pretty desperate though as many are comfortable living in the industrial-technological system that is increasingly centralised.
Or there is going to have to be a trigger. A point where the powerful, rich people behind the scenes, go too far. But then they monitor what we do and say and think so they are building the system to adjust automatically to keep things in balance. That is what they will use AI for.
We don't need freedom of speech within the rules laid down by the system. We need real freedom. Freedom means being in control (either as an individual or as a member of a SMALL group) of life-and-death issues. Freedom means having power; not the power to control other people but the power to control the circumstances of oneâs own life. Sorry all you who love their gadgets, freedom means getting rid of technology!