Didn't Tedros unilaterally--without the vote of his council--declare the international emergency thing for monkeypox last year around this time, and the world just yawned? Why would they try this same gambit again a year later? What is different that they'd think it would be taken seriously this time?
Those are pre-operational primers, this one is a lead in to what's coming, my guess is a conflagration of bird flu, Covid, and monk pox, but we'll see.
Conflagration? You mean pulling them all in at once to raise the fear level because separately they aren't making people scared enough? Do you think that will work?
These are just the stories (the Macguffin of the plot). Turn up 5G on all the vaxed and nanoed from chemtrails, train wrecks, glyphosate, and the fog of war maybe with fake nukes and people will get sick then they will get desperate and follow like lemmings.
Well... it'll be an interesting telltale experiment to se what's what and who's who. Only the Nanoed by Jabbing should/would react to 5G signal whereas surely everyone in a chemtrail environment would be affected more or less equally. Same with glyphosate consumers vs organic produce eaters. And who's going to get their hands dirty in the weeds of all that data when it's available? I know some of you are good at that part but it's going to look like a knot that no one can unravel at that point. The same already happened with vax injury and death - most of it got blended in with the already established background heart disease, stroke and cancer that people have grown to accept as part of life. There was more of it and they mostly blamed Covid and antivaxxers.
Well said Tsubion. All cause xs deaths is the best we have, in Covid is gave some clarity, the next one may indeed have too many variables and be a bit murky.
So they are just throwing shit on the wall to have a scapegoat for whatever the boosted range of the band has in store of physical ramifications people have to deal with.... fits their operation model.
The original (moneypox) 2022 declaration of a ‘public health emergency of international concern’, or ‘PHEIC', was about to expire. So they're renewing it now to maintain the powers that the PHEIC gives them i suppose. Can't believe they couldn't choose a term whose acronym didn't sound like "fake".
Because since then, the governments have signed the WHO treaty, and all countries have passed the law that if a "health emergency" is declared, the population can/must be vaccinated by force by the military. Moreover, anyone who disobeys is imprisoned in the camp and can be deprived of all his property...
They are just lying or the fake pcr test was positive. Either way, it goes to show the hype is starting because monkey pox in water is ridiculous. How can we find a virus or even its genes or proteins in a HUGE water supply with billions of gallons but we can't find one virus particle the snot of persons said to be infected with a virus.
Another excellent article, PM. I’m so glad when it comes to reporting super important news that shames any government medical agency misinformation given to the masses, you don’t monkey around. 🐵
The first clue I had of the most recent nonsense was an image of the hands of an alleged African person showing the signs. What would be great is to identify what this condition actually is. It looks a bit like warts to me. Any clue? Also, images could be photoshopped too, of course.
Not sure to call them tubers or less likely pustules, but more likely papular, but they are a systemic inflammatory reaction in the skin. Systemic as on both hands and arms.
Interestinger and interestinger. So it seems "molluscum" in the condition molluscum contagiosum comes from the fact that the lesions are soft which is the same etymology for the mollusc animal.
"Traditionally, only zoonoses were named after animals or properly styled as zoonymic (e.g., mad cow disease, swine flu, avian flu, cat scratch fever, monkey pox, etc.) [8], which also reinforces the non-standard use of the term molluscum contagiosum. Not even the whitish substance/cheesy material (termed ‘molluscum body’ or Henderson-Patterson bodies) within the tubercles, vesicles, pustules, bumps or waxy papules (= skin lesions, known as ‘mollusca’) observed in the patient’s skin is always “soft” (= molis) [9]. In fact, it sometimes has a liquid or even fluid consistency. So why was the name molluscum contagiosum accepted and consolidated in the scientific literature?"
So rather hilariously the paper authors accept zoonoses as a thing and that there is a pox caught from monkeys but object to the name, molluscum contagiosum, because it unfairly smears molluscs although it wasn't named after them and I wonder who thinks molluscs cause it ... whereas people probably think that monkeys cause "monkey pox" as the paper authors clearly do.
I think I'll write to these authors and ask them what the difference is between monkey pox and molluscum contagiosum.
Thanks so much, PM, I think you've led me to the answer. So I notice that they provide four possible diagnoses for the case study presented and ask people to vote:
Acne keloidalis nuchae
Pseudofolliculitis barbae
Molluscum contagiosum
Acne mechanica
The most voted for was the first one and when you look up images of it it seems to match best. It seems a condition that is most common on the head and isn't really a good match for what they show us for the alleged mpox.
It is the third condition mentioned, molluscum contagiosum, which seems to be the best match to me ... and funnily enough it is said to be caused by a pox virus. However, it says it is not particularly serious and will go away by itself in from 6 months to 2 years. They say it's caused by a weak immune system or - aka among the rejecters of "immune system" being a thing - not being in the best health. I can't help thinking, "Bingo!"
A long time ago I saw a video of a press conference with a doctor (I can not remember his name, Horrowitz or something like that - it happened in the late 1990s, in NYC I think) pulling out an "AIDS infected" needle and showing it to all the press in the room saying:
"Look, I will now jab myself with this "AIDS" infected needle and I will REMAIN completely HEALTHY -> because AIDS does not exist!"..and then jabbing himself in front of cameras.
Who in 1994 wrote; "I do not wish to be diplomatic or mince words, because there is no time for diplomacy. Mass manslaughter is being committed by a few scientists who have knowingly and purposely misled thousands of their trusting colleagues in a carnage that could be unparalleled in history. They cannot claim ignorance, for they have answered serious scientific challenges with slander instead of proof. They have used unsuspecting, well meaning physicians to deliver their victims into the arms of death. This horrendous murder and profiteering must be stopped now!" https://archive.org/details/deadly-deception-robert-willner/page/n33/mode/2up
Its very good Andy but notice he doesnt say there is no virus, in fact look how many times he mentions "virus". Many people will still think they are at risk, same as Deuesberg who said there was a dormant virus. "Well that dormant virus is sure coming out isn't it" people will think. Sound just like the fake freedom fighters now. If he is writing a book he should have seen a paper finding a virus not a mix of proteins-he doesn't talk about that. He uses the word HIV many times in the doc as well.
Fair comment, I've re-reviewed my notes on Willner.
I always assumed he was referring to the "virus" ironically. I will have a look through his book "The Ultimate Deception" later on. I also seem to have thought Willner wrote this; "The AIDS Myth" it's actually by Karl Horst Poehlmann (5 min read)
No problem, am skimming through "The Ultimate Deception" now.....You're right, it's "virus this" & "virus that" on every page😮 When I read it 4 years ago it was a revelation to me that there was no such thing as AIDS, I didn't fully figure out the "virus" hoax for another year.
Seems I had a false memory of Millner & "The Ultimate Deception"
The existence of HIV was never proven, but there was some sleight of hand. Most of the early cases of AIDS were caused by alkyl nitrite and affected almost exclusively gay men. To create the illusion that AIDS was spreading into the general population, they used HIV. Luc Montagnier claimed to have isolated HIV, and sent a sample to Richard Gallo, who then claimed that he had isolated it. A lawsuit ensued. See how it is done? Classic misdirection.
There were a lot of AIDS deaths, most caused by harsh antiviral drugs given to those who tested HIV positive. God only knows how many healthy people were killed in that manner.
As I've long maintained, governments don't lie as much as misdirect, which is so much more effective.
Didn't Tedros unilaterally--without the vote of his council--declare the international emergency thing for monkeypox last year around this time, and the world just yawned? Why would they try this same gambit again a year later? What is different that they'd think it would be taken seriously this time?
Those are pre-operational primers, this one is a lead in to what's coming, my guess is a conflagration of bird flu, Covid, and monk pox, but we'll see.
Conflagration? You mean pulling them all in at once to raise the fear level because separately they aren't making people scared enough? Do you think that will work?
These are just the stories (the Macguffin of the plot). Turn up 5G on all the vaxed and nanoed from chemtrails, train wrecks, glyphosate, and the fog of war maybe with fake nukes and people will get sick then they will get desperate and follow like lemmings.
Well... it'll be an interesting telltale experiment to se what's what and who's who. Only the Nanoed by Jabbing should/would react to 5G signal whereas surely everyone in a chemtrail environment would be affected more or less equally. Same with glyphosate consumers vs organic produce eaters. And who's going to get their hands dirty in the weeds of all that data when it's available? I know some of you are good at that part but it's going to look like a knot that no one can unravel at that point. The same already happened with vax injury and death - most of it got blended in with the already established background heart disease, stroke and cancer that people have grown to accept as part of life. There was more of it and they mostly blamed Covid and antivaxxers.
Well said Tsubion. All cause xs deaths is the best we have, in Covid is gave some clarity, the next one may indeed have too many variables and be a bit murky.
So they are just throwing shit on the wall to have a scapegoat for whatever the boosted range of the band has in store of physical ramifications people have to deal with.... fits their operation model.
Yes! Sorry I initially put a different reply here, later realizing I got my comment blanks mixed, sorry.
The original (moneypox) 2022 declaration of a ‘public health emergency of international concern’, or ‘PHEIC', was about to expire. So they're renewing it now to maintain the powers that the PHEIC gives them i suppose. Can't believe they couldn't choose a term whose acronym didn't sound like "fake".
Because since then, the governments have signed the WHO treaty, and all countries have passed the law that if a "health emergency" is declared, the population can/must be vaccinated by force by the military. Moreover, anyone who disobeys is imprisoned in the camp and can be deprived of all his property...
Oh, of course. I forgot about that.
I heard a news bit this morning on how monkey pox was found in some water supply somewhere but it wasn't enough to worry about.
I was immediately curious as to how they quantified something that doesn't exist.
They are just lying or the fake pcr test was positive. Either way, it goes to show the hype is starting because monkey pox in water is ridiculous. How can we find a virus or even its genes or proteins in a HUGE water supply with billions of gallons but we can't find one virus particle the snot of persons said to be infected with a virus.
perhaps they were testing those springs in Japan where the snow monkeys gather...?
;)
Ah, that is a way to get HIV.
I am naturally reticent to bathe with macaques,
and I don't believe in HIV-
thus, I am double bagged...(so to speak)
;)
Of course it's bullshit, it was 7am and I was on the road or I might have looked into the source, but I didn't catch what that was.
...as is 'George'.
Another excellent article, PM. I’m so glad when it comes to reporting super important news that shames any government medical agency misinformation given to the masses, you don’t monkey around. 🐵
The first clue I had of the most recent nonsense was an image of the hands of an alleged African person showing the signs. What would be great is to identify what this condition actually is. It looks a bit like warts to me. Any clue? Also, images could be photoshopped too, of course.
One of the nonsense images - https://bsmedia.business-standard.com/_media/bs/img/article/2024-08/14/full/1723641863-747.jpg?im=FitAndFill=(826,465)
Recognised warts - https://ulmerwuderm.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/wart-removal-hand-300x203.jpg
Not sure to call them tubers or less likely pustules, but more likely papular, but they are a systemic inflammatory reaction in the skin. Systemic as on both hands and arms.
https://www.dermatologyadvisor.com/slideshow/case-studies/dermdx-papular-lesions-on-the-scalp/
Interestinger and interestinger. So it seems "molluscum" in the condition molluscum contagiosum comes from the fact that the lesions are soft which is the same etymology for the mollusc animal.
The paper, Why avoid naming diseases after animals? The case of “Molluscum contagiosum” (https://tropmedhealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s41182-024-00586-4) says:
"Traditionally, only zoonoses were named after animals or properly styled as zoonymic (e.g., mad cow disease, swine flu, avian flu, cat scratch fever, monkey pox, etc.) [8], which also reinforces the non-standard use of the term molluscum contagiosum. Not even the whitish substance/cheesy material (termed ‘molluscum body’ or Henderson-Patterson bodies) within the tubercles, vesicles, pustules, bumps or waxy papules (= skin lesions, known as ‘mollusca’) observed in the patient’s skin is always “soft” (= molis) [9]. In fact, it sometimes has a liquid or even fluid consistency. So why was the name molluscum contagiosum accepted and consolidated in the scientific literature?"
So rather hilariously the paper authors accept zoonoses as a thing and that there is a pox caught from monkeys but object to the name, molluscum contagiosum, because it unfairly smears molluscs although it wasn't named after them and I wonder who thinks molluscs cause it ... whereas people probably think that monkeys cause "monkey pox" as the paper authors clearly do.
I think I'll write to these authors and ask them what the difference is between monkey pox and molluscum contagiosum.
Thanks, PM. Your answer has inspired my post, Is the alleged monkey pox really common and garden molluscum contagiosum? - https://petraliverani.substack.com/p/is-the-alleged-monkey-pox-really
Thanks so much, PM, I think you've led me to the answer. So I notice that they provide four possible diagnoses for the case study presented and ask people to vote:
Acne keloidalis nuchae
Pseudofolliculitis barbae
Molluscum contagiosum
Acne mechanica
The most voted for was the first one and when you look up images of it it seems to match best. It seems a condition that is most common on the head and isn't really a good match for what they show us for the alleged mpox.
It is the third condition mentioned, molluscum contagiosum, which seems to be the best match to me ... and funnily enough it is said to be caused by a pox virus. However, it says it is not particularly serious and will go away by itself in from 6 months to 2 years. They say it's caused by a weak immune system or - aka among the rejecters of "immune system" being a thing - not being in the best health. I can't help thinking, "Bingo!"
https://www.healthline.com/health/molluscum-contagiosum#gallery-open
https://www.mountsinai.org/health-library/diseases-conditions/molluscum-contagiosum
Really glad you dug into this Petra!
Is the teddy-pox back?
A long time ago I saw a video of a press conference with a doctor (I can not remember his name, Horrowitz or something like that - it happened in the late 1990s, in NYC I think) pulling out an "AIDS infected" needle and showing it to all the press in the room saying:
"Look, I will now jab myself with this "AIDS" infected needle and I will REMAIN completely HEALTHY -> because AIDS does not exist!"..and then jabbing himself in front of cameras.
Robert E. Willner, M.D., Ph.D?
https://old.bitchute.com/video/ugs526VPFk95/?fbclid=IwAR0XEaRqlCCnXRDEN74EJjGYhuK1sPd3kZBYq1IQ7HZLLS6AbAcTzF49DZE
Who in 1994 wrote; "I do not wish to be diplomatic or mince words, because there is no time for diplomacy. Mass manslaughter is being committed by a few scientists who have knowingly and purposely misled thousands of their trusting colleagues in a carnage that could be unparalleled in history. They cannot claim ignorance, for they have answered serious scientific challenges with slander instead of proof. They have used unsuspecting, well meaning physicians to deliver their victims into the arms of death. This horrendous murder and profiteering must be stopped now!" https://archive.org/details/deadly-deception-robert-willner/page/n33/mode/2up
Its very good Andy but notice he doesnt say there is no virus, in fact look how many times he mentions "virus". Many people will still think they are at risk, same as Deuesberg who said there was a dormant virus. "Well that dormant virus is sure coming out isn't it" people will think. Sound just like the fake freedom fighters now. If he is writing a book he should have seen a paper finding a virus not a mix of proteins-he doesn't talk about that. He uses the word HIV many times in the doc as well.
Fair comment, I've re-reviewed my notes on Willner.
I always assumed he was referring to the "virus" ironically. I will have a look through his book "The Ultimate Deception" later on. I also seem to have thought Willner wrote this; "The AIDS Myth" it's actually by Karl Horst Poehlmann (5 min read)
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/224898003_The_AIDS_myth
Thanks for your kind reply Andy!
No problem, am skimming through "The Ultimate Deception" now.....You're right, it's "virus this" & "virus that" on every page😮 When I read it 4 years ago it was a revelation to me that there was no such thing as AIDS, I didn't fully figure out the "virus" hoax for another year.
Seems I had a false memory of Millner & "The Ultimate Deception"
Yes! I think it was him!! Thanks a bunch mate
I remember it as "Horrowitz" eh? hahaha - jeez
God bless you :)
I'm calling it punky mocks - They're punking Us and They're mocking Us.
Genius spoonerism!
🙏🏻💜🙏🏻 I love spoonerisms!
Dr Spooner visits "The Shower Flow" (classic British comedy)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ksIjcjF8c_Y
LOL!!! Thanks for the laughs!!!
The existence of HIV was never proven, but there was some sleight of hand. Most of the early cases of AIDS were caused by alkyl nitrite and affected almost exclusively gay men. To create the illusion that AIDS was spreading into the general population, they used HIV. Luc Montagnier claimed to have isolated HIV, and sent a sample to Richard Gallo, who then claimed that he had isolated it. A lawsuit ensued. See how it is done? Classic misdirection.
There were a lot of AIDS deaths, most caused by harsh antiviral drugs given to those who tested HIV positive. God only knows how many healthy people were killed in that manner.
As I've long maintained, governments don't lie as much as misdirect, which is so much more effective.
PS: alkyl nitrite aka as "poppers".
It had been known since at least 1981 that poppers use in gay men was causing an upsurge in pneumonia, source;... https://archive.org/details/hustler-march-1982/page/30/mode/2up
I am sticking with muskrat love.
https://odysee.com/@drsambailey:c/Narcissists-Who-Hate-The-Baileys:0?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email
Hi Mel I've made a note on this here
https://substack.com/@protonmagic/note/c-65873919
and will make more detailed post in coming days. Regards.