The Lying Cream in the Pretty Cupcake
I can’t calculate regression analysis, I don’t understand Bayesian theory, to me the Monte Carlo multiple probability simulation means losing at the Casino, BUT I KNOW A HIGH PROBABILITY BULLSHITTING STATISTICIAN WHEN I SEE ONE.
So today Proton Magic will introduce you to how a statistician can put rotten lying cream into a tasty truth cupcake.
The cupcake post:
Dismantling The Covid Pandemic & mRNA “Vaccine” Narratives on a SS that has >13,000 subscribers.
Pretty cupcake huh? Sorry Proton Magic doesn’t do deliveries.
The delicious cake part is about the cases and deaths (refer to the post), but then they start coughing up the rotten cream part right on top of us with viruses, Covid, bioweapons, infection, and variants-not just one, but all 4 lying ingredients. BRAZEN BAKING!
Their not knowing about the fact that no Sars-CoV-2 virus has been found now in mid 2023 is completely incongruent with their no-pandemic analytic skills.
In other words, the smelly BS probability cloud of these deception agents is hanging low over our heads.
Here are their statements about the never-found Sars-CoV-2 in the top part of their post:
Is the SARS-CoV-2 virus actually relatively more lethal than the respiratory viruses that typically occur during winter?
The IFR of SARS-CoV-2 is in the ballpark of seasonal flu…
Our data reveal that SARS-CoV-2 incidence emerged rapidly and almost simultaneously across a broad demographic population in the region. These findings support the premise that SARS-CoV-2 infection was widely distributed prior to virus testing availability.”
☛ Guys, “infection was widely distributed”? Don’t you think maybe the fake test was widely distributed and that’s about it? Isn’t deep thinking necessary to become a statistician? Good God brothers!
So Sars-CoV-2 is a living creature in the dimension these shape-shifters live in. Now let’s see if we will choke on the cream part. (Proton Magic’s retort after the finger point: 👉).
They go on:
Of course, the truth is that leaks at biolabs happen rather frequently.
👉No, there are no pathogens so bioweapons can not be made, thus there are no pathogens to leak.
In a study of infection rates, the effect above is magnified…by an active censoring process. By suppressing immunity, the injections might have made the recipient more vulnerable to infection shortly after vaccination.
👉No, there is no virus to be infected with.
This would effectively pull-backwards infections that might have occurred naturally, but at some later point in time. Thus, infections in injection recipients would tend to be concentrated within this short period of time, rather than subject to the natural infection process. By censoring any reports of infections that occurred in this short period the reported infection rate in the injected would then be significantly smaller than the reported infection rate in those not injected."
👉how many times to you want to drill the word "infection" which does not exist into us?
Most analyses only examine “covid” related events (infections, hospitalizations and deaths). However, given the inconsistencies and uncertainties around categorization into “covid” and “non-covid” buckets…
👉how many times to you want to drill the word "covid", which is nonexistent into us?
Specific blood-borne antibody to one discrete part of a highly mutable virus provides little clinically relevant protection, especially to “variants”.
👉there is no antibody or mutant or variant because there is no pathogen. Antibodies are not specific anyway.
Because its written in Aug '23 they should know better about the no-virus. This smells like an intentional deception, priming us for the next infection, virus, and variants, and the vax coming in September (“marketing for death”). This little proton fell down 2 energy levels in shock after getting a whiff of this Crème Du Jour septic tank.
Here, even the famous Proton Magic only got the cold shoulder from these probability pundits:
The authors
No stranger to study but doesn’t have 20 min to read one paper on the discovery of Sars-CoV-2?
Medically and legally qualified. A million times more times concerned about the response to “covid”…[sounds like he’s not allowed to talk about the virus].
Martin Neil
Professor of computer science and statistics at Queen Mary, University of London. UK.
Ooh aah, “Professor” of computer science impressive, but he doesn’t have 20 min to read one paper on the discovery of Sars-CoV-2 that is about the computer assembly of the most dangerous issue to ever face humanity?
～Hope their ghost writers will step forward～
The substack housing this article wherearethenumbers is jointly owned by Neil and the “renowned” Norman Fenton:
Norman writes this:
Why does a Professor of Risk let his wife with dementia get an untested irreversible injection? Let the “professor of risk” title sink in a bit.
Have you ever noticed the number of gateway pundits that seem to have close family members, if not themselves getting shots or Covid illness? I’m dumbfounded.
I revealed publicly for the first time that my wife was diagnosed with frontotemporal dementia (pre-covid, 2019) but there was a rapid deterioration in her condition following two doses of the AstraZeneca vaccination in March and April 2021 (taken against my advice).
Here, https://www.normanfenton.com/full-cv we can see the “journalists” Fenton hangs out with:
Interview on NTD News 12 April 2023 (5 minutes) "Climate Change: What Is ‘Absolute Zero’?"
👉 Notice he talks about the restrictions coming, and mentions methane as a greenhouse gas [isn’t water vapor 95% of green house gases and Co2 near 5%? How much is left for our booby prize methane? 1% maybe? Yeah BS MSM will say it’s much more.], but doesn’t once call out the fact that human caused global warming is a sham. He’s just a predictive programming shill.
Article and Interview with Robery F Kennedy Jr. (30 minutes) "Officials Manipulated COVID Data to Exaggerate Crisis, Mathematician Tells RFK, Jr.", The Defender, 18 April 2022
Article: Steve Kirsch Newsletter "UK Professor Norman Fenton explains how they manipulate the data" 28 March 2022
Interview on The Highwire by Del Bigtree (35 minutes) on Covid statistics, 16 December 2021
Robert Malone Forum Conversation with Norman Fenton: "On the revelations of pandemic data", 21 Nov 2022
His interview buddies are all our favorite commentators! Its a small world after all. I know, Disney told me.
I have to admit these guys are real Goooood at this game. They give their all in beautiful logic and graphs about the fake pandemic. But why are these high-level people writing all this SS stuff? If this little unknown proton was at their level I wouldn’t be writing on SS except for an occasional guest appearance on another stack while I was using my computer science and stats skills for a great company like google making $1m a year. Maybe they are forced, coerced, or paid handsomely to do this for some agency you say? Dangnabbit! I Shoulda thought about that.
All this virus pushing still lingers in our minds like a bad song.
Having had some statistics during my education, with a little bit stuck, here is the first thing about it:
Applying statistics to a problem is an admission that <you don't know> the underlying cause and effect mechanism (or you are unable to express and calculate it deterministically). Statistics is an attempt to extract correlations via measurements on a black box.
Thinking of it, this applies to the whole "medical" and pharma business ... ;-O
The second point is the data selection - here is where most of the trickery happens (read: "How to lie with statistics", e.g. ISBN 0-393-31072-8).
In this case, I can see fraud on every end. Not only are the "Covid" cases and deaths proven to be fraudulent (via the content-free PCR "test").
I think the vaxx damage statistics are even worse. Not only are many claimed to be "long Covid" or outright discounted (in the first three weeks after the shot). With the recent admission from Pfizer/Moderna that most vaxx doses in the West were actually placebos, there will be no remotely accurate assessment of this shots. Unless the pharma industry - in collaboration with government officials and "healthcare providers" - disclose on a case basis who got the placebo, who the toxic nanocarbon sludge, and how did he/she fare.
But I don't need statistics to express the likelihood of that to happen ...
"I have to admit these guys are real goooood at this game. They give their all in beautiful logic and graphs about the fake pandemic." Another one to watch out for in this regard is Mikki Willis, former model and actor turned "documentary filmmaker." Promotes the virus narrative while somehow managing to largely feature himself in his glitzy uber-stylized productions that have people like two of my neighbors (both women) singing his praises. Ugh. Feel like I'm the only one who can see through that guy and his phony films.