Jun 19, 2023·edited Jun 19, 2023Liked by Proton Magic
Until proved otherwise ~ diabolical
Seneff et al. (2022):In this paper, we present evidence that vaccination induces a profound impairment in type I interferon signaling, which has diverse adverse consequences to human health. Immune cells that have taken up the vaccine nanoparticles release into circulation large numbers of exosomes containing spike protein along with critical microRNAs that induce a signaling response in recipient cells at distant sites. We also identify potential profound disturbances in regulatory control of protein synthesis and cancer surveillance. These disturbances potentially have a causal link to neurodegenerative disease, myocarditis, immune thrombocytopenia, Bell's palsy, liver disease, impaired adaptive immunity, impaired DNA damage response and tumorigenesis.
The unreliability of vial composition and the presence of DNA and cRNA and microRNA appear enough on their own. That much is shown from the European analysis of composition (from memory). I don't think one even needs 'spike' or intact mRNA allegedly coding for it.
Yeah I heard there ware rna frags probably from other cell line crap in them, but not in the LNPs. BTW, the isolated terrain post got >1000 views, so you helped with exposing the issues. Me and you seem to be only people awake at this time the world is turning.
Jun 19, 2023·edited Jun 19, 2023Liked by Proton Magic
PM, thank you for the compliment. Fortunately, I think a legion of awake of all flavours exists, many gradually inching their way toward Terrain or hybrid Terrain. Given the billions of shots and vials, the variation in toxic brews appears mind bending. Unsurprising then that established variation leads to unpredictability. This latter feature lies at the heart of this assault, and it so often seems to be glossed over in generalisations of unsafe and ineffective? Study comparing Moderna / Pfizer early on, clearly demonstrated the absence of generalisability in the participant population, and the authors sounded a clarion call of concern, buried at the end of the discussion. (Bliden et al. 2021) https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.06.28.21259338v1
The Bliden paper seems full-on to prove the Ab-RBD mechanism of the shots, and are sure to put in the scare wording:
"until herd immunity is successfully induced in a large population throughout the world, SARS-CoV-2 infections are likely to become endemic, leading to further loss of life."
There were only 88 sub in this short 5 month study, and they are pcr test believers: "For comparative analysis, anti-RBD IgG and anti-NCP antibody data in a cohort of healthy volunteers from the pre-pandemic era (n = 200), and COVID-19 patients hospitalized (n = 34) from a previous study (NCT# 04493307) confirmed by positive reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) tests were included."
They vaguely mention "more severe side-effects" in Moderna but it's only a 146 day follow up, and I didn't see what more severe was defined as.
"We clearly observed increasing anti-RBD avidity and maturation with the Pfizer vaccinee cohort. The Moderna vaccinee cohort showed high antibody levels and avidity in the first 4 months period with more severe side-effects, without an obvious increase in avidity."
Even personally I know many people who did ok for a few months only to crash and even die 1-2 years later.
The study is one in the coterie of narrative-supporting academic blitzkrieg and was supported by Nirmidas Biotech. Clearly a NWO funded company. From their HP big Pharm: (Janssen, Intel: Stamford, MIT:
Founded in September of 2013. Prof. Hongjie Dai, Stanford University, is the scientifc co-founder. The founding mission was to develop and commercialize the new innovations including tools and reagents for cutting edge life science research and clinical translations. We are a member of the Janssen Labs (JLABS) and QB3 programs, the Stanford StartX Med Program, and the MIT Industrial Liaison Program (MIT ILP). We are also a StartX Med COVID-19 Task Force Company since early 2020.
The study per se is of little interest to me. However, this bit is the throw-away of critical comment:
"We did observe highly variable immune responses including those with well below average anti-RBD IgG levels and avidity. It is therefore important to monitor immune responses at the individualized and personalized level, identify those who are still at risk even after vaccination, and provide meaningful measures to protect them from infections."
It thus speaks specifically to the clearly unpredictable nature of the useless, ineffective, dangerous shots.
Circular RNAs (circRNAs) are endogenous, covalently circularised, non-protein-coding RNAs generated from back-splicing. Most circRNAs are very stable, highly conserved, and expressed in a tissue-, cell- and developmental stage-specific manner. circRNAs play a significant role in various biological processes, such as regulation of gene expression and protein translation via sponging of microRNAs and binding with RNA-binding proteins. circRNAs have become a topic of great interest in research due to their close link with the development of various diseases.
Thanks PM. The rise in turbo & strange or rare cancers is an inescapable & horrendous fact.
Until proved otherwise ~ diabolical
Seneff et al. (2022):In this paper, we present evidence that vaccination induces a profound impairment in type I interferon signaling, which has diverse adverse consequences to human health. Immune cells that have taken up the vaccine nanoparticles release into circulation large numbers of exosomes containing spike protein along with critical microRNAs that induce a signaling response in recipient cells at distant sites. We also identify potential profound disturbances in regulatory control of protein synthesis and cancer surveillance. These disturbances potentially have a causal link to neurodegenerative disease, myocarditis, immune thrombocytopenia, Bell's palsy, liver disease, impaired adaptive immunity, impaired DNA damage response and tumorigenesis.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35436552/
Great link, I didn't have time to search around today. I guess they are just repeating the narrative Re the the spike and mRNA part.
The unreliability of vial composition and the presence of DNA and cRNA and microRNA appear enough on their own. That much is shown from the European analysis of composition (from memory). I don't think one even needs 'spike' or intact mRNA allegedly coding for it.
Yeah I heard there ware rna frags probably from other cell line crap in them, but not in the LNPs. BTW, the isolated terrain post got >1000 views, so you helped with exposing the issues. Me and you seem to be only people awake at this time the world is turning.
PM, thank you for the compliment. Fortunately, I think a legion of awake of all flavours exists, many gradually inching their way toward Terrain or hybrid Terrain. Given the billions of shots and vials, the variation in toxic brews appears mind bending. Unsurprising then that established variation leads to unpredictability. This latter feature lies at the heart of this assault, and it so often seems to be glossed over in generalisations of unsafe and ineffective? Study comparing Moderna / Pfizer early on, clearly demonstrated the absence of generalisability in the participant population, and the authors sounded a clarion call of concern, buried at the end of the discussion. (Bliden et al. 2021) https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.06.28.21259338v1
I actually meant being up and awake not enlightened, of course best to be enlightened whether asleep or awake.
The Bliden paper seems full-on to prove the Ab-RBD mechanism of the shots, and are sure to put in the scare wording:
"until herd immunity is successfully induced in a large population throughout the world, SARS-CoV-2 infections are likely to become endemic, leading to further loss of life."
There were only 88 sub in this short 5 month study, and they are pcr test believers: "For comparative analysis, anti-RBD IgG and anti-NCP antibody data in a cohort of healthy volunteers from the pre-pandemic era (n = 200), and COVID-19 patients hospitalized (n = 34) from a previous study (NCT# 04493307) confirmed by positive reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) tests were included."
They vaguely mention "more severe side-effects" in Moderna but it's only a 146 day follow up, and I didn't see what more severe was defined as.
"We clearly observed increasing anti-RBD avidity and maturation with the Pfizer vaccinee cohort. The Moderna vaccinee cohort showed high antibody levels and avidity in the first 4 months period with more severe side-effects, without an obvious increase in avidity."
Even personally I know many people who did ok for a few months only to crash and even die 1-2 years later.
The study is one in the coterie of narrative-supporting academic blitzkrieg and was supported by Nirmidas Biotech. Clearly a NWO funded company. From their HP big Pharm: (Janssen, Intel: Stamford, MIT:
Founded in September of 2013. Prof. Hongjie Dai, Stanford University, is the scientifc co-founder. The founding mission was to develop and commercialize the new innovations including tools and reagents for cutting edge life science research and clinical translations. We are a member of the Janssen Labs (JLABS) and QB3 programs, the Stanford StartX Med Program, and the MIT Industrial Liaison Program (MIT ILP). We are also a StartX Med COVID-19 Task Force Company since early 2020.
The study per se is of little interest to me. However, this bit is the throw-away of critical comment:
"We did observe highly variable immune responses including those with well below average anti-RBD IgG levels and avidity. It is therefore important to monitor immune responses at the individualized and personalized level, identify those who are still at risk even after vaccination, and provide meaningful measures to protect them from infections."
It thus speaks specifically to the clearly unpredictable nature of the useless, ineffective, dangerous shots.
Circular RNAs (circRNAs) are endogenous, covalently circularised, non-protein-coding RNAs generated from back-splicing. Most circRNAs are very stable, highly conserved, and expressed in a tissue-, cell- and developmental stage-specific manner. circRNAs play a significant role in various biological processes, such as regulation of gene expression and protein translation via sponging of microRNAs and binding with RNA-binding proteins. circRNAs have become a topic of great interest in research due to their close link with the development of various diseases.
https://erj.ersjournals.com/content/60/6/2200012
Interesting. Thank you.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28336671/
Add up all the metals in our bodies and epigenetically, combined with the electrification of the Earth for the last 150 years, and it's no surprise "why": https://romanshapoval.substack.com/p/a-common-sense-cure-for-cancer-part-bae
Thank you so much Reante! I'm so glad you got something out of it!