Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Betsy's avatar

This film does a good job of laying out why there is no climate crisis--for me, when I first heard that in past climate cycles carbon dioxide has risen AFTER the temperatures rose, not before, was all I needed to hear to disabuse me of my belief in it (and I did, for years. Years!). But the story has some major gaps in the second half when it discusses the politics of it. It seems to say that Al Gore is responsible for starting the whole industry of climate change, which is now self-perpetuating just because of the amount of money involved. That doesn't quite wash, to me. How could one person, granted he became vice president of the US, have ignited this "crisis?" The film barely mentions the UN, WEF, or the banks, and says nothing about their role in pushing this issue. The "climate crisis" didn't just arise because government funding to study climate suddenly became available, and then quickly take on the proportions of a juggernaut. The bourgeois environmentalists have been useful idiots, but they are not responsible for it either and are worth at most a footnote. It's these global organizations and the puppeteers who control them (Club of Rome etc.) that created and have guided the idea of climate change into a gigantic excuse for world government and depopulation, starting back in the early 1970s, long before Al Gore had a platform as a US senator. My 2 cents.

Expand full comment
Peter 🔒's avatar

But Proton, when I drive my electric car - no pollution comes out the exhaust pipe :\

Expand full comment
22 more comments...

No posts