This film does a good job of laying out why there is no climate crisis--for me, when I first heard that in past climate cycles carbon dioxide has risen AFTER the temperatures rose, not before, was all I needed to hear to disabuse me of my belief in it (and I did, for years. Years!). But the story has some major gaps in the second half when it discusses the politics of it. It seems to say that Al Gore is responsible for starting the whole industry of climate change, which is now self-perpetuating just because of the amount of money involved. That doesn't quite wash, to me. How could one person, granted he became vice president of the US, have ignited this "crisis?" The film barely mentions the UN, WEF, or the banks, and says nothing about their role in pushing this issue. The "climate crisis" didn't just arise because government funding to study climate suddenly became available, and then quickly take on the proportions of a juggernaut. The bourgeois environmentalists have been useful idiots, but they are not responsible for it either and are worth at most a footnote. It's these global organizations and the puppeteers who control them (Club of Rome etc.) that created and have guided the idea of climate change into a gigantic excuse for world government and depopulation, starting back in the early 1970s, long before Al Gore had a platform as a US senator. My 2 cents.
I suppose getting into the Club of Rome etc would've made the film too long (?) and they skimmed over but did not ignore "conspiracy" stuff, I suppose to make the film widely acceptable (?), but didn't they mention the COR name in passing? Sorry It was late at night...
Maybe I missed reference to COR too. I wouldn't say they need to get into detail about the nefarious agenda behind climate change. I do think there must be a way to give that aspect of the issue more importance than just mentioning that the WEF and UN have large climate change programs with large staffs. Even just noting some of the WEF and UN pronouncements about climate change and how it is woven into their agendas of control could be a way to include this info and help those who have never heard of such things to see behind the curtain a little, without alienating them completely. That's what I think. The story is incomplete and therefore disappointing to me.
There is, as we all appear to agree, so much more to this! Of course there is. In order to produce something for the consumption of the most possible viewers, producers put together (imo) a tidy, well formed and cohesive examination of the Chicken Little-Sky is Falling narrative that has ordinary folks scared. Ordinary people, consumers, the working class will suffer the most from all of these edicts being handed down by the Masters; lithium and cobalt mining is destroying the environment in their extraction and killing poor people struggling to live (including children who are forced to dig the stuff out of the earth). There is so, so much more to this. The only possible way to introduce these awful realities is to spoon feed it gently- at least initially. Turning this gigantic ship around (millions have been spent promoting the 'climate change' narrative) is going to require more exposes like this.
We've got to start somewhere and I, for one, am glad for this effort.
Oh, yes, there is much more! I am very disappointed, for example, at how the destruction of our natural environment by war and the preparations for war is NEVER addressed- an area that requires some very serious conversations- for a host of reasons. Let's keep the conversation alive!
The same people who brought you the IVM double cross are fooling you with pretending to take away our chickens and stop us burning fossil fuels. Health freedom has fallen for it hook, line and sinker.
While Gore had a whole lot of support, he was also investing in myriad 'environmental' programs and such. There is no disputing the involvement of the globalists on this subject, is there? That little ferret Greta Thunberg for one. Have a good look at just some of the organizations (most of them NGOs) that are in place. They rake in millions (if not billions) for their shareholders.
Total agreement. Gore was on this long before he was VP. And certainly he has made a mint by fashioning himself as this "prophet" bringing the "inconvenient truth" to people. The amount of money involved in the climate change issue is staggering, and that's an important piece of it that may not be obvious to everyone. I appreciate that the filmmakers focused a lot of attention on that point.
When you first heard, but didn't look into, co2 rising after warming (because it is both a consequence and a measured cause of warming), it disabused you?
This past winter there was a power outage in Boston and...guess which cars couldn't budge to get out of the way of the snowplows? Hmmmm...a farce writ bold!
Yes! The film is magnificent and we all need to spread it around! The hoax that is 'climate change' is only going to profit the usual suspects. Very telling that one of the original founders of GREENPEACE is front and center on underscoring the baloney being sliced very thickly out there. Thanks for this!
This film does a good job of laying out why there is no climate crisis--for me, when I first heard that in past climate cycles carbon dioxide has risen AFTER the temperatures rose, not before, was all I needed to hear to disabuse me of my belief in it (and I did, for years. Years!). But the story has some major gaps in the second half when it discusses the politics of it. It seems to say that Al Gore is responsible for starting the whole industry of climate change, which is now self-perpetuating just because of the amount of money involved. That doesn't quite wash, to me. How could one person, granted he became vice president of the US, have ignited this "crisis?" The film barely mentions the UN, WEF, or the banks, and says nothing about their role in pushing this issue. The "climate crisis" didn't just arise because government funding to study climate suddenly became available, and then quickly take on the proportions of a juggernaut. The bourgeois environmentalists have been useful idiots, but they are not responsible for it either and are worth at most a footnote. It's these global organizations and the puppeteers who control them (Club of Rome etc.) that created and have guided the idea of climate change into a gigantic excuse for world government and depopulation, starting back in the early 1970s, long before Al Gore had a platform as a US senator. My 2 cents.
I suppose getting into the Club of Rome etc would've made the film too long (?) and they skimmed over but did not ignore "conspiracy" stuff, I suppose to make the film widely acceptable (?), but didn't they mention the COR name in passing? Sorry It was late at night...
Maybe I missed reference to COR too. I wouldn't say they need to get into detail about the nefarious agenda behind climate change. I do think there must be a way to give that aspect of the issue more importance than just mentioning that the WEF and UN have large climate change programs with large staffs. Even just noting some of the WEF and UN pronouncements about climate change and how it is woven into their agendas of control could be a way to include this info and help those who have never heard of such things to see behind the curtain a little, without alienating them completely. That's what I think. The story is incomplete and therefore disappointing to me.
True!
There is, as we all appear to agree, so much more to this! Of course there is. In order to produce something for the consumption of the most possible viewers, producers put together (imo) a tidy, well formed and cohesive examination of the Chicken Little-Sky is Falling narrative that has ordinary folks scared. Ordinary people, consumers, the working class will suffer the most from all of these edicts being handed down by the Masters; lithium and cobalt mining is destroying the environment in their extraction and killing poor people struggling to live (including children who are forced to dig the stuff out of the earth). There is so, so much more to this. The only possible way to introduce these awful realities is to spoon feed it gently- at least initially. Turning this gigantic ship around (millions have been spent promoting the 'climate change' narrative) is going to require more exposes like this.
We've got to start somewhere and I, for one, am glad for this effort.
Oh, yes, there is much more! I am very disappointed, for example, at how the destruction of our natural environment by war and the preparations for war is NEVER addressed- an area that requires some very serious conversations- for a host of reasons. Let's keep the conversation alive!
The same people who brought you the IVM double cross are fooling you with pretending to take away our chickens and stop us burning fossil fuels. Health freedom has fallen for it hook, line and sinker.
https://jowaller.substack.com/p/increasing-the-price-and-demand-for?utm_source=publication-search
Profits, market and demand for animal ag is soaring as is fossil fuels- $313 billion net income in the 3 years under Biden.
You are right about the whole Al Gore 'thing', but he was the one who produced and pressed that propaganda film "An Inconvenient Truth".
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0497116
While Gore had a whole lot of support, he was also investing in myriad 'environmental' programs and such. There is no disputing the involvement of the globalists on this subject, is there? That little ferret Greta Thunberg for one. Have a good look at just some of the organizations (most of them NGOs) that are in place. They rake in millions (if not billions) for their shareholders.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_environmental_organizations
Total agreement. Gore was on this long before he was VP. And certainly he has made a mint by fashioning himself as this "prophet" bringing the "inconvenient truth" to people. The amount of money involved in the climate change issue is staggering, and that's an important piece of it that may not be obvious to everyone. I appreciate that the filmmakers focused a lot of attention on that point.
When you first heard, but didn't look into, co2 rising after warming (because it is both a consequence and a measured cause of warming), it disabused you?
No critical thinkers in health freedom it seems.
https://jowaller.substack.com/p/climate-change-hasnt-been-debunked?utm_source=publication-search
But Proton, when I drive my electric car - no pollution comes out the exhaust pipe :\
I know you guys love to see if I can take a joke that's not mine, sure, we can keep score even.
This past winter there was a power outage in Boston and...guess which cars couldn't budge to get out of the way of the snowplows? Hmmmm...a farce writ bold!
EV's are BETTER than Gas Cars. We swear.*
* Terms and Conditions apply.
*Be sure to read the fine print! ;)
😂
😹😻
nice scary Context Warning from the UN on the vid - https://www.un.org/en/climatechange/what-is-climate-change
notice how the terminology conveniently changed from global warming to climate change?
Yes! The film is magnificent and we all need to spread it around! The hoax that is 'climate change' is only going to profit the usual suspects. Very telling that one of the original founders of GREENPEACE is front and center on underscoring the baloney being sliced very thickly out there. Thanks for this!
First movie I watched all the way through in many decades. WELL worth it! I concur! We ALL should watch in!
Perhaps a future post could be about the fossil fuel hoax? :)
Here Scipio Eruditis is a prolific writer in our circle on SS and I recommend you subscribe to him: https://dfreality.substack.com/p/the-fossil-fuel-farce
and other info:
https://atlasreport.substack.com/p/abiotic-oil
https://www.nature.com/articles/ngeo591
http://viewzone.com/abioticoilx.html
Great movie, similar to Climate Hussle 1 and 2, also a must see in this context.
PS: it would be great to link to a non-CensorTube video instead, perhaps https://odysee.com/@Gmail.com:52/Climate---The-Movie:e. The less traffic censortube gets, the better.
76% of the retired academics and talking heads in this film are in the DeSmog hall of fame with fossil fuel industry ties. https://www.desmog.com/climate-disinformation-database/
I thought health freedom was all about following the money? Apparently not.
'The environmental movement is, the movie mansplains, the “sworn enemy of free-market industrial capitalism” says the quiet part out loud.
Free markets eh? https://jowaller.substack.com/p/the-wef-agenda-of-depopulation-and?utm_source=profile&utm_medium=reader2
Who are the people who want to protect, and get us to protect, free markets? The 1% who profit the most from them.