Good batch of stuff there, little proton! You might be interested in My last two pieces... The latest is about the interesting phenomenon of actors playing parts on the LITERAL world STAGE...
The snipers on the roof did not fire any of those shots for the following reasons:
It has already been explained that there is no video of the snipers who took the shots. Allegedly, one shot was taken by a Secret Service counter sniper, which killed Trump’s shooter. The other was taken by a local SWAT sniper, who either struck his body, or missed. Since the autopsy results haven’t been released, who knows? I also don't know if any of that it true.
Both snipers on the roof were using bolt-action rifles. This requires the bolt to be cycled to the rear and back forward with the right hand to eject the spent cartridge casing and insert a new cartridge after each shot. We don't see either sniper cycling their bolts.
Snipers do not come off of their scopes while cycling the bolt.
After taking a shot snipers stay “on gun” (behind the scope) so they can quickly acquire the sight picture for the next shot if necessary. They also stay on gun until it is verified that the target is down. The sniper lying prone was likely acting as a spotter for the sniper on the tripod. He comes off of his gun and tries to get behind the crest of the roof to hide as the shots are heard.
Both snipers believed they were being shot at and were moving to the rear to avoid being shot. The “bullet man” Max Malone apparently doesn’t know anything about sniper teams, the rifles they use, or rifle recoil characteristics. He shouldn’t be analyzing this video and spreading his ignorance to ignorant people all over the world. Not stupid. Ignorant.
This is what actually happened:
Something caught both sniper's attention. It's possible that they heard the first shot and the sound is delayed on the video that we are watching. Whatever caught their attention caused the sniper in the foreground to come off of the scope (raised his head slightly), likely trying to figure out where the shot came from. Your field of vision is very small when looking through a scope. Then he ducks (downward flinch to avoid being shot), which causes the barrel of his gun to rise sharply. (It coincidentally rises in time with the first shot. It is not recoil. If he had taken a shot the gun would have recoiled slightly to the rear and upward. The barrel would not have risen so sharply from a shot. The sniper would have stayed behind the scope and cycled the bolt.) Max then attributes the two follow-up shots to the same sniper. We have already determined that he is shooting a bolt-action rifle so we know the shots didn’t come from his gun, plus he’s not even behind the scope when the shots are heard and the barrel is facing downward.
Watch the barrel of the gun and the sniper’s actions in sequence. After the first shot is heard the barrel rises when the sniper ducks. The sniper then begins moving backwards, pulling the tripod with him, which causes the barrel of the gun to dip well off of any intended target. He thinks he’s being shot at but doesn’t know where the shots are coming from. He’s just trying to get the fuck out of there. Are we to believe he’s just blindly taking two follow-up shots with the barrel pointed downward? Sorry. Not going to happen.
The real tell is the actions of the sniper in the background. Watch his actions as the shots are heard. He also moves backwards and ducks because he thinks he’s being shot at. If he was acting as a spotter and the guy to his left had fired the shots he wouldn’t have moved at all. I don't know who fired the three shots we heard, but it wasn't the guys in the video.
You have some interesting ideas. Some are theoretically possible, but there is no proof shots are coming from anywhere. Blanks I guess.
☞ Having a rally at a place surrounded by roofs is crazy to being with, but if one had to have these roofs they could easily be fenced for no entry. Thus no need for snipers on a roof. The rest of the action with Trumps fake ear blood, the flag right behind the guts-pose, etc. It's all Hollywood.
☞ Still, if you have doubts, please write Max Malone and send us his reply. Thanks.
You're quite the simpleton, there were no actual gunshots fired at people that day. Stagecraft is very advanced these days, it easily fools people like yourself.
Thank you. This is the type of attention to detail that adds disbelief in the video's narrative. Not to mention that the counter sniper rifle is "silenced", most likely bolt action, but could be a semi-auto 308 Winchester, but still it would be a silenced rifle. I don't think the first 3 shots are silenced. Just trying to make sense of a senseless scenario being projected into the airwaves.
We need to look at both big and little points. On JFK for example, we don't need to know the details of Oswald's gun if that angle of shot is impossible with any kind of gun. Don't want to argue JFK but big picture is quite important or we get lost in minutiae. You don't have a rally near roofs where you need snipers, you go elsewhere, or you fence off all roofs. It's all nonsense.
When I saw this video it seemed plausible, but then you need to verify that this SR is actually a semi-auto (auto loader) type of rifle. Typically they are semi-auto if it is a SR-25, and a bolt action 300 Winchester magnum which is the usual for anti-sniper teams. I am not convinced this was the person firing those rounds until that is the confirmed rifle used. But yes I agree, the sound and the movement are very in sync.
Thanks, to me and others these sounds are when Trump ducks. Are you saying other guns firing at basically identical times hit Trump? Seems quite low possibility. I encourage to ask your questions via the main vid and report back to us.
I agree with the timing. That whole staged event is a ClusterF--k. I don't think it was meant to do anything except generate a public response to see what the masses think and retool their game plan and control algorithms as necessary. Divide and rule.
Thanks for the video links. But anyone who thinks Butler was a staged event using crisis actors must deny the fact that the FBI and deep state WANTED him DEAD. And a real person really died there.
Yes, the FBI has used crisis actors many times, such as the Boston marathon psyop, and the fake sandy hook and uvalde "parents".
Dave, this is the only angle showing the gun, the sounds, and when trump went down. All the agencies and DS work together in the GOVT. They do make believe fights all the time. they want to keep you in "these things are separate agencies" mindset and confuse you.
Trump was at the helm during the 2020 US democide, and he towed the Covid party line so know one would know what was happening. Why would the deep state want a friend like that dead.
Trump is as Deep State as it gets. That's how good he is at chess. Dave, you are not alone in your thinking, the script has been exquisitely designed so.
Dave, Trump is Deep State, and they don't want him dead, he's their "good guy" actor. Also, no, that fireman did not actually get killed, because there were no bullets fired, that would be against Smith Mundt Act and other NDAA laws if they used real bullets and actually killed someone. They faked a death like they always do, don't be a damned retard.
Proton .. He's been up to this sorta stage acting for a very long time!
https://www.motherjones.com/2020-elections/2020/06/donald-trump-files-helicopter-crash/
Donald Trumps near death experience (That HE invented) 1989
Smoke and Mirrors, but their pulling another trick on us it's all AI-GAN-CGI.
Good batch of stuff there, little proton! You might be interested in My last two pieces... The latest is about the interesting phenomenon of actors playing parts on the LITERAL world STAGE...
Can You Gaetz Which One is Which? (article): https://amaterasusolar.substack.com/p/can-you-gaetz-which-one-is-which
Response to a Meme (article): https://amaterasusolar.substack.com/p/response-to-a-meme
“One Trump with Ketchup, please! To go!”
The snipers on the roof did not fire any of those shots for the following reasons:
It has already been explained that there is no video of the snipers who took the shots. Allegedly, one shot was taken by a Secret Service counter sniper, which killed Trump’s shooter. The other was taken by a local SWAT sniper, who either struck his body, or missed. Since the autopsy results haven’t been released, who knows? I also don't know if any of that it true.
Both snipers on the roof were using bolt-action rifles. This requires the bolt to be cycled to the rear and back forward with the right hand to eject the spent cartridge casing and insert a new cartridge after each shot. We don't see either sniper cycling their bolts.
Snipers do not come off of their scopes while cycling the bolt.
After taking a shot snipers stay “on gun” (behind the scope) so they can quickly acquire the sight picture for the next shot if necessary. They also stay on gun until it is verified that the target is down. The sniper lying prone was likely acting as a spotter for the sniper on the tripod. He comes off of his gun and tries to get behind the crest of the roof to hide as the shots are heard.
Both snipers believed they were being shot at and were moving to the rear to avoid being shot. The “bullet man” Max Malone apparently doesn’t know anything about sniper teams, the rifles they use, or rifle recoil characteristics. He shouldn’t be analyzing this video and spreading his ignorance to ignorant people all over the world. Not stupid. Ignorant.
This is what actually happened:
Something caught both sniper's attention. It's possible that they heard the first shot and the sound is delayed on the video that we are watching. Whatever caught their attention caused the sniper in the foreground to come off of the scope (raised his head slightly), likely trying to figure out where the shot came from. Your field of vision is very small when looking through a scope. Then he ducks (downward flinch to avoid being shot), which causes the barrel of his gun to rise sharply. (It coincidentally rises in time with the first shot. It is not recoil. If he had taken a shot the gun would have recoiled slightly to the rear and upward. The barrel would not have risen so sharply from a shot. The sniper would have stayed behind the scope and cycled the bolt.) Max then attributes the two follow-up shots to the same sniper. We have already determined that he is shooting a bolt-action rifle so we know the shots didn’t come from his gun, plus he’s not even behind the scope when the shots are heard and the barrel is facing downward.
Watch the barrel of the gun and the sniper’s actions in sequence. After the first shot is heard the barrel rises when the sniper ducks. The sniper then begins moving backwards, pulling the tripod with him, which causes the barrel of the gun to dip well off of any intended target. He thinks he’s being shot at but doesn’t know where the shots are coming from. He’s just trying to get the fuck out of there. Are we to believe he’s just blindly taking two follow-up shots with the barrel pointed downward? Sorry. Not going to happen.
The real tell is the actions of the sniper in the background. Watch his actions as the shots are heard. He also moves backwards and ducks because he thinks he’s being shot at. If he was acting as a spotter and the guy to his left had fired the shots he wouldn’t have moved at all. I don't know who fired the three shots we heard, but it wasn't the guys in the video.
You have some interesting ideas. Some are theoretically possible, but there is no proof shots are coming from anywhere. Blanks I guess.
☞ Having a rally at a place surrounded by roofs is crazy to being with, but if one had to have these roofs they could easily be fenced for no entry. Thus no need for snipers on a roof. The rest of the action with Trumps fake ear blood, the flag right behind the guts-pose, etc. It's all Hollywood.
☞ Still, if you have doubts, please write Max Malone and send us his reply. Thanks.
You're quite the simpleton, there were no actual gunshots fired at people that day. Stagecraft is very advanced these days, it easily fools people like yourself.
Thank you. This is the type of attention to detail that adds disbelief in the video's narrative. Not to mention that the counter sniper rifle is "silenced", most likely bolt action, but could be a semi-auto 308 Winchester, but still it would be a silenced rifle. I don't think the first 3 shots are silenced. Just trying to make sense of a senseless scenario being projected into the airwaves.
We need to look at both big and little points. On JFK for example, we don't need to know the details of Oswald's gun if that angle of shot is impossible with any kind of gun. Don't want to argue JFK but big picture is quite important or we get lost in minutiae. You don't have a rally near roofs where you need snipers, you go elsewhere, or you fence off all roofs. It's all nonsense.
Ass-Ass-A-Nation!
https://thcsofdaisymoses.substack.com/p/ass-ass-a-nation-take-2
I don't care what you say about Trump, but YEADON IS SPOT ON.
Like it or not, he is truthy.
When I saw this video it seemed plausible, but then you need to verify that this SR is actually a semi-auto (auto loader) type of rifle. Typically they are semi-auto if it is a SR-25, and a bolt action 300 Winchester magnum which is the usual for anti-sniper teams. I am not convinced this was the person firing those rounds until that is the confirmed rifle used. But yes I agree, the sound and the movement are very in sync.
Thanks, to me and others these sounds are when Trump ducks. Are you saying other guns firing at basically identical times hit Trump? Seems quite low possibility. I encourage to ask your questions via the main vid and report back to us.
I agree with the timing. That whole staged event is a ClusterF--k. I don't think it was meant to do anything except generate a public response to see what the masses think and retool their game plan and control algorithms as necessary. Divide and rule.
Thanks for the video links. But anyone who thinks Butler was a staged event using crisis actors must deny the fact that the FBI and deep state WANTED him DEAD. And a real person really died there.
Yes, the FBI has used crisis actors many times, such as the Boston marathon psyop, and the fake sandy hook and uvalde "parents".
The FBI must be abolished.
Dave, this is the only angle showing the gun, the sounds, and when trump went down. All the agencies and DS work together in the GOVT. They do make believe fights all the time. they want to keep you in "these things are separate agencies" mindset and confuse you.
Trump was at the helm during the 2020 US democide, and he towed the Covid party line so know one would know what was happening. Why would the deep state want a friend like that dead.
Trump is as Deep State as it gets. That's how good he is at chess. Dave, you are not alone in your thinking, the script has been exquisitely designed so.
Dave, Trump is Deep State, and they don't want him dead, he's their "good guy" actor. Also, no, that fireman did not actually get killed, because there were no bullets fired, that would be against Smith Mundt Act and other NDAA laws if they used real bullets and actually killed someone. They faked a death like they always do, don't be a damned retard.
The "deep state" is a plot element in Their play... Ala Plato's.
Escape the Cave! (article): https://amaterasusolar.substack.com/p/escape-the-cave
Thanks just getting into it, It's quite well done, predictive programming to accept transhumanism it seems...and that it's cool to be in the military.