Did Fan Wu poop then flush or flush then poop?

Jul 02, 2023

Proton magic was in the “no-virus war-room” with Sam and Mark B, Andy K, Tom C, and Stefan L, taking notes for the next post. Now the question came up whether Fan Wu really did his fraudulent experiments (you know the guy said to have found Sars-CoV-2) or if he just wrote up papers from pre-determined fabricated results? In common parlance, was he a front-loader (poop then flush) or an after-loader (flush then poop)?

Meeting Minutes:

Proton Magic: Guys, you may remember that Theranos, the criminal genetic company had fabricated and printed-out cancer risk tests, they didn’t test anyone for anything. After closing, some Theranos staff moved to Illumina, the genetic company Fan Wu used. Whose to say Fan didn’t just make up results he wanted at the start considering that the PCR makers and Pharma were counting on Fan to get a genome that fit in lockstep with what we all know as a pre-concocted plandemic?
Sam: “Front-Loading has to be a crock of poop. God I’d have to redo all those vids if he was really a front-loader”.
Mark: “Sam, your work stands for itself. But still, Fan must have pooped then flushed down his farewells. I like farewells as you know”.
Andy: “Poop doesn’t exist don’t sweat it”.
Tom: “I can’t answer that, I believe in the “natural expulsion” method”.
Stefan: “I’ve actually offered a prize to anyone who could prove front-loading doesn’t stain the toilet because my studies show that either process leads to dirty toilet stains”.
Proton Magic: Enough with the jokes guys, we’re in a real war even though 90% of the population doesn’t see it. I vote for the, “poop then rush to flush” method. They’re on a tight timeline, nothing can be left to chance”.
All: “Proton you’ve shat a pile of poop on this party. Well, as long as you believe in virology fraud we still love you, but you better have some good logic!”

Being well toilet-trained, I knew I had to get down and dirty with how a fake genetic report could lead to a fake genetic test and a fake vaccine based on all the preceding fake shit.

Background

To start, The Pfizer protocol template in humans was dated as of Dec 5th 2019. CT02-GSOP Clinical Protocol Template Phase 1 2 3 4 (05 December 2019) PF-07302048 (BNT162 RNA-Based COVID-19 Vaccines) Protocol C4591001. Fan Wu didn’t even meet his first Covid patient until Dec. 26^th 2019. How can Pfizer know they should spend that time on a protocol almost 6 weeks before the discovery of Sars-Cov-2 by Fan Wu, et al. on January 12^th, 2020? Sure we can see this was a template that was refurbished for Covid-19, but where are all the preclinical pharmacology, biodistribution, toxicology, stability and CMC (chemical product production) studies that need to be done? You can’t just pour a fluid into a syringe and SHOOT!! That alone makes everything a front-loaded pile of shit.

Later on Jan 25^th 2020 ONE GUY at BioNTech made the Covid vaccine one day after getting a sequence, 3 days before the Fan Wu defining paper for Sars-Cov-2 was accepted and 8 days before it was published. Genome sequences are becoming like Tarot cards.

Moderna began human testing the 2019-nCoV vaccine (mRNA-1273) on Feb. 25, 2020, before any toxicology, preclinical pharmacology, and stability and formulation studies. Where do they all of a sudden have THOUSANDS of freezers that go to -70 C and where are the stability studies associated with this?

The (fake) PCR test validation paper by Corman (and Drosten) et al., Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RTPCR (the pcr maker who made the test, “without having virus material available”), was published on January 23rd, submitted only 14 days after Fan Wu et al. was submitted, and 6 days before Fan Wu et al. was even accepted. Including Fan Wu et al. The Corman-Drosten PCR was based on 6 gene sources from Wuhan (See Fig. 8 on p. 54 of A Farewell to Virology where Fan Wu's, Little Mountain Dog's and the other team's in silico unicorns were lined up. - Mark Bailey personal communication).

So all the gene sources have to match what was to be tested by the PCR, and as the PCR genes test for human and bacterial genetics, there would be little time to adjust if they didn’t match. There was only about a week to do the PCR validation and write up the paper, the PCR paper was also likely written in advance, it certainly wasn’t actually peer-reviewed in the two days from submission to publication (the authors are also on the Board of the journal) .

Analysis & Rationale

This all means that Fan Wu must have written their paper in advance of any actual patient visit to make sure things would fit with what Pfizer and BioNTech were doing (all parts of a machine have to be ready to be put together beforehand), as well as what Drosten was doing to make the PCR (the genes the pcr test for must be in the Sars-CoV-2 fabricated genome), which means it must be smoke and mirrors. They needed to FRONT-LOAD all the BS about spikes, ACE receptor binding, HIV seqs, and furin cleavage etc. in the genome in order to fit with the narrative of mRNA to Spike protein, bioweapons, ADE, immune suppression, etc.

Discussion

Did they even do the pesudoscientific metagenomic genomic studies? I suspect not, but we can’t prove either way. Fan Wu won’t give us the original data or the software parameters or usage logs, etc, and I personally asked. To me, nothing in the theater of virus psy-ops can be left to chance when each cog in the wheel is moving in tight lockstep (👈see pg. 18). Pre-written or not, the research Fan Wu describes is pseudoscience on its own: there was no purified virus found, no pathogen determined, and no adequate control.

So who wrote it? Fan is likely just the face and name to others that wrote it, probably Eco Health (sent millions of DOD$ to the Wuhan Institute of Virology), Edward Holmes (Fan Wu Co-author) & Charles Lieber (nanoscientist at the Wuhan University of Technology), just some guesses, but let’s leave that part of the rabbit hole for another post.

Epilogue

IN OUTWARD ARGUMENT, we need to continue to focus on what the papers say as it is straight forward to debunk what WAS PROVEN TO BE SAID. In CONCEPTUAL ARGUMENT however, we need to realize that the logistics of pulling off this fraud means that what they actually did is more likely very different than what they say they did. This is the standard black-magic terrorism that we have seen the planners of this world take-over do many times. They plan their projects meticulously in advance of the initiation phase. We are all well aware that the Covid plandemic was planned way in advance, the “virus discovery” being the lynchpin step on the way, it has to fit with the other steps that are counting on its “success”.