"Isolated Terrain"

Comedy Duo Corbett and Broze bring down the house

I had to pick myself up from the floor due to heavy laughing attack at James Corbett’s ridiculous logic, desperado facial expressions, and hand gestures imitating Bill Gates on a bad day…in a gawkily rehearsed interview where he states he put in a FOIA (Freedom of Information Act) request to “isolate terrain”, hmm. Well, we know James is on CHD with virus lover Meryl Nass getting lots of exposure, so today it’s my honor to announce his election into the Proton Magic Shrine of Shameless Hucksterism.

Now about FOIs, saying it is not meaningful if they don’t turn up proof of a virus is subterfuge. Any institution or Govt would be more than happy to show proof of purified and pathogen-proven particles, they would get credibility and many more people would get shots. Since they don’t, sorry James, someone’s putting things in your piggy bank and/or got their hand on your matrix plug.

So, in the vid in the link just below at 6:48 we have an erudite James Corbett state, “I put in a FOIA request for the govt to tell me that it isolated terrain and they didn’t have anything therefore terrain theory doesn’t exist.” “Isolated terrain”, is that someplace in Siberia?

This is the video where they cook themselves alive: 

Click to get the video on FB

Now don’t get me wrong, Corbett is no FOIA hater, here he states he wants to make use of the FOI Clinton emails and this site in general: http://foia.state.gov/Search/Collections.aspx But FOI for virus isolation is NG? You figure.

See the bottom part of this post for a Proton Magic Original investigation.

And here you can see lively commentary from Christine Massey and others on this Facebook Post:

---

Christine Massey (June 5th, 2023)

Derrick Broze and James Corbett talk about how uncool it is for no-virus people to accuse yes-virus people of being controlled op (as if all no-virus people do this, and no yes-virus people do this)... and in the same breath speculate about no-virus people being cognitive infiltrators and "part of a plan" (as in "controlled op") lol.

Next Derek misrepresents no-virus people as naively thinking/claiming that getting the world to understand the no-virus reality will magically solve all problems. I don't know anyone who thinks or claims that. It would be a lot more useful if Derek interviewed some no-virus people instead of speculating and putting words in our mouths.

Next James asks Derek to stand in and speak for no-virus people (!!) and answer the question as to whether or not governments would have the right to violate people's bodily autonomy IF there really was a contagious health threat. Derek says "no" (so does everyone else that I know). But then James ironically goes on an almost-hysterical rant saying that anyone who answers "yes" is NOT part of the health freedom movement and is missing the whole point. It's almost as if he's trying to cause division over people's hypothetical answers to a hypothetical question.

James also claims that answering "no" to this hypothetical question is more important than addressing the real-world issue of whether or not we've been lied to all our lives about "viruses".

What was the purpose of all this in the middle of a discussion about no-virus people, I wonder?

James also makes reference to some people not believing in bacterial infections. He seems not to realize that people are actually pointing out the lack of science showing that bacteria are the CAUSE of disease. He wouldn't have this misconception if he had just spoken to some well-known no-virus people instead of speculating about them. Meanwhile Derek keeps nodding and looking into the camera as if to say "those ridiculous no-virus people".

Next James claims that germ theory and terrain theory go together! And talks about how a healthy immune system will protect you from pathogens. Maybe someone will ask him to share the successful, valid germ theory controlled experiments that progressed a germ hypothesis to the theory stage.

Then Derek shared his "feeling" that there could be other reasons for the hundreds of failures by institutions in 40 countries to provide even 1 record of "SARS-COV-2" being purified from any alleged host (which would only be the 1st step necessary to show the existence of a "virus"). He speculates that maybe institutions really do have responsive records. Hmm, well if Derek knows of any such record, for any "virus" in the history of virology, I do hope he will share it with the rest of the world post haste.

Then James makes a ridiculous comment about how he supposedly filed a FOIA with the government for "isolated terrain" and got no records - which makes absolutely no sense whatsoever since terrain isn't a specific particle/thing that can be isolated/purified. He then quips that therefore "terrain theory doesn't exist", as if this shows that the hundreds of FOIs responses about imaginary viruses (which are alleged to be specific particles in "hosts") are actually irrelevant and useless. Derek nods smugly and laughs.

Are Derek and James really so clued out that they don't realize that the FOI responses align with what is seen in the published literature, and simply confirm what could already be seen?

Victor Irzak

Derrick Broze interviews James Corbett on the no virus question and Christine Massey's work.

As much as I like James' work, I couldn't disagree with him more.

1. No one I know of in #TeamNoVirus is saying that if contagion was shown to be real, the government would have the right to violate bodily autonomy.

2. The FOIA request for terrain theory is a laughable argument. The difference is that the government claimed that SARS-COV-2 existed and locked us down for that. He and Derrick disregard the fact that it wasn't just one request or one government.

3. James is completely inconsistent on this versus his 9/11 stance (second video). What happened to the court of public opinion? What happened to taking away government tools? Should we wait another 20 years to demand the proof of existence of SARS-COV-2? Breaking the tools of virology itself is not a priority?

Dave Davey

The few times I watched Corbett there was something about him that never sat right with me, and it only got worse. Good, that's the end of him and his clique.

Jeffrey Strahl

No proof of isolated terrain? That's HYSTERICAL! "We are not controlled opposition. But you are."

Tracey Northern

Sound like a couple of clowns to me. 'Bring on the clowns' time is it? I'd say it's a good sign. No valid argument.

Claire Higgins

I sure wish Calvin perrins was still on FB he would rip this guy to pieces with his knowledge. Maybe mark or Sam Bailey will see this and respond

Daniel Baronne

https://docs.google.com/.../1_GpBf6nBDuSvrGqdJdr5SSw.../edit

JAMES CORBETT IS NOT YOUR FRIEND [👈DO READ THIS ONE]

Scott Snitzer

Corbett has always been controlled opposition. He's not a "good guy."

Kristen Welch

My head hurts lol

Steve Falconer

Two more “diet woke” twinkies afraid to lose their gravy trains

Wild Forager

James has always been really helpful, kind and we've emailed a few times despite the fact he knew I wasn't a subscriber he always replied, and was genuinely helpful...it's sad to see the loyalties of the Passion groupies over at the 'One great Network' supporting each other in fallacies that will only hurt themselves. Sad indeed, but it's their own path to walk.

Timothy J. Lochhead

Great post! I do watch NWNW (New World Next Week) and enjoy some of Corbett's content; and it's fine if not everyone get's everything.

However, they don't seem to putting in an honest effort here. For example, if they spent say 10% of the time they do looking at 911 and did this looking at the bogus germ theory, they would easily debunk the germ trash! It is much easier and faster because more is out in the open compared to how obfuscated 911 was/is.

K-dot Michelle

Isn't bodily autonomy one of the first steps of understanding terrain theory? Being responsible for one's own body, mind and spirit, was my first lesson learned. I believe James ultimately is missing the point.

It's just an observation. What do I k...

Dawn Lester

Christine If James has made a positive claim that "...a healthy immune system will protect you from pathogens," surely he ought to know that he needs to support such a claim with evidence? And so we need to ask him, where is his evidence?

Wild Forager

Maybe it shouldn't matter if we believe in man made climate change either, let's embrace it lest we divide the freedom community.

Judith Mulcahy

These so called 'truth' reporters/journalists are actually quite smart. They tell you 99.9% sensible information & draw you in. But it's that pesky 0.1% that then misleads/misdirects. Once you spot that, you know they are not on the side they appear to be.

Thread Continues on FB…

---

Proton Magic Original Investigation

In case it’s not clear about Corbett and Broze, I put in some search terms in Corbett’s Search blank that tend to be topics controlled opposition avoids or censures at all costs.

1. Search for “Graphene” leads to a talk about desalination in 2017, and mum since then.

   

2. Searching for “5G”. Corbett has a post from none other than Derek(!) to tell us the “shortcomings” with the 5g and coronavirus hypothesis in 2020, so we should all relax and don’t have to worry about 5g, right? Now that you know the ‘oze and the ‘bett are “bros in bed” you can see their smirks and game plan in Derek’s vid below.

3. Searching for “sars isolation” and you’ll get this post on “pandemic predictions”.

Leading to this page that has the “Sars” term in it, which pushes bioweapons (another scare tactic as they are impossible to make) and Sars-Cov-2 variants (another scare tactic impossible to exist as there is no original)!

---

Screen shots for searches on Broze’s site to accompany my reply to his comment pinned to the top of the comment section.

1. Graphene: no posts for what has been injected to 6 bil+ people at least once.

2. Virus Isolation: One post in 3 years. Derrick does not have any proof of the Sars virus though lets Cowan and Kaufman know no-virus is not the mainstream. The Fan Wu (fake) “discovery” paper is not brought up, and Derrick is mum on the topic since besides the vid in this post with Corbett to deride FOI.

3. 5G: A few vids that warn not to “hypothesize” or “speculate” about 5G causing “corona virus” symptoms.

Derrick’s take on these 3 topics does not seem to be on the side of the common man.

---

These guys are very, very good at the info manipulation game they play, finally the FOI and virus isolation issue has really smoked them out.

But I like James Corbett and wish to give him the gift of Isolated Terrain in beautiful harmony with a swarm of germs so he doesn’t have to get so worked up about their mutually beneficial existence again:

---

---

ViroLIEgy also had an interesting write up on Broze:

Broze's Blunder