Here I will make a summary of the cell culture procedure looking for cytopathologic effect (CPE).
CPE is a toxicology study of monkey kidney cells for whatever sample you put in it. It is not a scientific experiment even if there were purified particles used because the cell culture is a mixed substrate with undeterminable and changing content (abnormal genetics, millions of ongoing chemical reactions, and added material like antibiotics, etc).
-The study of patient fluid (patient sample) as an independent variable (IV, the thing you want to test an effect of) in a toxicology study is a valid study design. However, patient fluid doesn't tell you much about the finding of or effects of a virus, whether or not that is the stated purpose of the study.
-Adding nothing to the cell culture as in the Japan time lapse video shown in this post is a type of validation of the procedure itself in looking for CPE. The cell culture substrate without any patient sample running on its own shows a similar kind of CPE as is commonly seen in virology studies. This proves the study is invalid before needing any other control. It’s like a bicycle that doesn’t move when you pedal it, naturally you can’t use it to test endurance. It just goes into the garbage.
-Some persons opine that you need to use purified virus as an IV for a valid test of CPE. First, this is reifying virus existence because there is no such thing as a purified virus. They should use the term, “purified particles”. In any case, the cell culture as currently used is invalid as noted above.
-What about putting purified particles in a cell culture that doesn’t self-destruct like an immortal cell line even with antibiotics and other substances added? I’m not sure this cell culture exists. While these additives increase variable complexity, this type of study could theoretically tell you that the purified particles destroyed the cells, and you could look in the cells on EM to see if the virus particles were in the cells (how they got into the cells would be hard to determine). We would still need controls with nothing added, and immortal cell lines have abnormal genetics and thus abnormal biochemistry so this is not the same as putting purified particles in the natural tissue substrate of a living body (it’s sounding like a cellular house of horrors actually). CPE seen in an the immortal cell line case would need to be put together with many other studies on the purified particles, and CPE in itself doesn’t prove a virus has been found.
👉Note that the topic of what a valid independent variable is for a cell-culture that might be tested in virology has become a hot topic resulting in censorship of myself and others who question the front and center no-virus narrative of, “there has never been a valid control used for cell-cultures in virology”.
👉As noted in this comment and post, we do consider a no-patient sample as a valid control to confirm if a cell-culture can be used as study of CPE. In addition, CPE as an endpoint has multiple problems and limited study utility no matter how you slice it because of the issues discussed above.
Such a great and easy to understand breakdown of the scam PM, thank you!
Truly unbelievable how they cannot see the obvious flaws in their own reasoning even when you walk them through it.
Your sense of humor is fabulous too! >> “This study allowed us to see things we have never seen before.” (does she mean because of the tight pants?)." 😂
PCR isn't just bad at high cycles.... It's bullshit from the start, just like the double slit quantum theory experiment which also has wrong methods.... Sound familiar? Methods with huge ASSumptions just like virology.
Good recap! Someone has to keep hammering the last nail on this coffin before it spits out another insufferable wave of viral bullcrap. Part of me wonders whether another load would stick to the normies the next time after the insanity we just went through. I sincerely hope we don't get to run that experiment but it's definitely a possibility. The majority still believe TV propaganda about viruses and contagion... I hear the muttering when I get up close to the herd.
Great work, Inspector PM. I feel so much safer and relieved knowing you’re doing the proper research to protect us all from the government propaganda and lies related to Convid and human health in general. 🥇 👍
When one is engaged in circular reasoning the wonderful journey in the rolling sunlit hills of confirmation bias is unending. So it is with the unfalsifiable belief that lies at the epistemological foundation of the virological delusion born simply out of rigid ignorance and cemented adherence to a preconceived 19th century surety that the answer lay with a hitherto unseen 'germ', which is still to this day looking to prove its existence in Hisenberg's realm of 'in silico' uncertainty.
So this belief, like phlogiston persists, unseen, undemonstrated, lacking methodological integrity and bereft of clinical and scientific provenance. Much like the theories of Dr Sutherland DO and cranio-sacral osteopathy, who examined a disarticulated human cranium and concluded that the bevelled edges of the temporal bones resembled the gills of a fish. From this he imagined a rhythmic "breathing" motion in the cranial vault, and hey prestissimo, cranial manipulation was born. The adherents are quite similar to virologists: fanatical, and belief driven. Like virologists, impossible to foster any intellectual engagement that transcends a pervading belief in something that doesn't exist.
Respectfully, I think we need to be more careful with our language.
"The no patient sample condition, as seen in the video above thus serves as a control or validation mechanism for the cell culture."
The no-patient-sample experiment is not a valid control for the virologists' purposes. It shows that virologists are ridiculous in their typical assumption that CPE are caused by a "virus" in a clinical sample, which highlights the invalid nature of their cell culture experiments. It doesn't validate anything.
THE TRUTH is in a ultra-mega-super marathon, so anyone that is dimming the spotlight of the truth is doing a disservice to himself being swallowed up again - they call it flooding the info space - by THE SYNAGOGUE OF DECEPTION.
Here I will make a summary of the cell culture procedure looking for cytopathologic effect (CPE).
CPE is a toxicology study of monkey kidney cells for whatever sample you put in it. It is not a scientific experiment even if there were purified particles used because the cell culture is a mixed substrate with undeterminable and changing content (abnormal genetics, millions of ongoing chemical reactions, and added material like antibiotics, etc).
-The study of patient fluid (patient sample) as an independent variable (IV, the thing you want to test an effect of) in a toxicology study is a valid study design. However, patient fluid doesn't tell you much about the finding of or effects of a virus, whether or not that is the stated purpose of the study.
-Adding nothing to the cell culture as in the Japan time lapse video shown in this post is a type of validation of the procedure itself in looking for CPE. The cell culture substrate without any patient sample running on its own shows a similar kind of CPE as is commonly seen in virology studies. This proves the study is invalid before needing any other control. It’s like a bicycle that doesn’t move when you pedal it, naturally you can’t use it to test endurance. It just goes into the garbage.
-Some persons opine that you need to use purified virus as an IV for a valid test of CPE. First, this is reifying virus existence because there is no such thing as a purified virus. They should use the term, “purified particles”. In any case, the cell culture as currently used is invalid as noted above.
-What about putting purified particles in a cell culture that doesn’t self-destruct like an immortal cell line even with antibiotics and other substances added? I’m not sure this cell culture exists. While these additives increase variable complexity, this type of study could theoretically tell you that the purified particles destroyed the cells, and you could look in the cells on EM to see if the virus particles were in the cells (how they got into the cells would be hard to determine). We would still need controls with nothing added, and immortal cell lines have abnormal genetics and thus abnormal biochemistry so this is not the same as putting purified particles in the natural tissue substrate of a living body (it’s sounding like a cellular house of horrors actually). CPE seen in an the immortal cell line case would need to be put together with many other studies on the purified particles, and CPE in itself doesn’t prove a virus has been found.
👉Note that the topic of what a valid independent variable is for a cell-culture that might be tested in virology has become a hot topic resulting in censorship of myself and others who question the front and center no-virus narrative of, “there has never been a valid control used for cell-cultures in virology”.
👉As noted in this comment and post, we do consider a no-patient sample as a valid control to confirm if a cell-culture can be used as study of CPE. In addition, CPE as an endpoint has multiple problems and limited study utility no matter how you slice it because of the issues discussed above.
Such a great and easy to understand breakdown of the scam PM, thank you!
Truly unbelievable how they cannot see the obvious flaws in their own reasoning even when you walk them through it.
Your sense of humor is fabulous too! >> “This study allowed us to see things we have never seen before.” (does she mean because of the tight pants?)." 😂
PCR isn't just bad at high cycles.... It's bullshit from the start, just like the double slit quantum theory experiment which also has wrong methods.... Sound familiar? Methods with huge ASSumptions just like virology.
https://robc137.substack.com/p/pcr-fails-logic-from-the-start-sorry
not to be contentious, but bullshit is only dazzling when it's fresh and glinting in the sunshine.
While this viral bullshit is getting so old it absorbs light.
(btw- I was pleasantly surprised to learn that there is a human coronavirus for each chakra...!)
;)
Viriegists the length and breadth of Japan shitting their pants at the prospect of a call from PM exposing their deadly fraud. Great work PM 👊
Good recap! Someone has to keep hammering the last nail on this coffin before it spits out another insufferable wave of viral bullcrap. Part of me wonders whether another load would stick to the normies the next time after the insanity we just went through. I sincerely hope we don't get to run that experiment but it's definitely a possibility. The majority still believe TV propaganda about viruses and contagion... I hear the muttering when I get up close to the herd.
I do adore Your style! And showing the BS on top of that? Priceless!!! EveryOne should read Your work!
Great work, Inspector PM. I feel so much safer and relieved knowing you’re doing the proper research to protect us all from the government propaganda and lies related to Convid and human health in general. 🥇 👍
Thanks for exposing the medical scams PM!!
When one is engaged in circular reasoning the wonderful journey in the rolling sunlit hills of confirmation bias is unending. So it is with the unfalsifiable belief that lies at the epistemological foundation of the virological delusion born simply out of rigid ignorance and cemented adherence to a preconceived 19th century surety that the answer lay with a hitherto unseen 'germ', which is still to this day looking to prove its existence in Hisenberg's realm of 'in silico' uncertainty.
So this belief, like phlogiston persists, unseen, undemonstrated, lacking methodological integrity and bereft of clinical and scientific provenance. Much like the theories of Dr Sutherland DO and cranio-sacral osteopathy, who examined a disarticulated human cranium and concluded that the bevelled edges of the temporal bones resembled the gills of a fish. From this he imagined a rhythmic "breathing" motion in the cranial vault, and hey prestissimo, cranial manipulation was born. The adherents are quite similar to virologists: fanatical, and belief driven. Like virologists, impossible to foster any intellectual engagement that transcends a pervading belief in something that doesn't exist.
You’re amazing and I love you. Thanks, PM! 👏
You rock! (Dr. Eimi does not rock.) :)
Respectfully, I think we need to be more careful with our language.
"The no patient sample condition, as seen in the video above thus serves as a control or validation mechanism for the cell culture."
The no-patient-sample experiment is not a valid control for the virologists' purposes. It shows that virologists are ridiculous in their typical assumption that CPE are caused by a "virus" in a clinical sample, which highlights the invalid nature of their cell culture experiments. It doesn't validate anything.
Looks like the prof is up to monkey business with 'dem kidney cells
THE TRUTH is in a ultra-mega-super marathon, so anyone that is dimming the spotlight of the truth is doing a disservice to himself being swallowed up again - they call it flooding the info space - by THE SYNAGOGUE OF DECEPTION.
Let's keep going PM and everyone else!
https://expose-news.com/2024/04/27/treaty-of-lies-pandemic-of-lies-whistleblowers-of-truth-viroliegy-is-wholly-fraudulent-says-dr-yeadon/