Sep 10, 2023·edited Sep 10, 2023Liked by Proton Magic
Okay, you didn't really lick the slides, did you? There's so much around that's more satiric than satire, more sarcastic than sarcasm, more facetious than facetiousness, and more just plain crazy than ever before in my lifetime, that I'm losing my ability to distinguish. Thank you.
No worries, I'm a crazy writer because I love to laugh as writing-I've written enough serious papers in my time, not fun! Most anything I write is either clearly for fun/satire or serious, little inbetween. The fun part is to get myself and the readers into the serious part, and it is DEAD SERIOUS now a days.
I think some of this was just artifact from unclean slide or cover slip....I don't know because this is the first time I've done this since fooling around with a scope as a grade schooler. Matt will probably chime in later and give me advice on re-scoping the remaining sample. I can tell you that I did ask the Drug co to put a magnet to the lido and did so myself so no obvious graphene yet but this is a coarse test I think, then now I just thought of and put the magnet next to the slide and nothing moved. Still I wouldn't take lido from a globalist drug co like 3M etc.
I recommend analyzing the slides before placing the sample on it, to ensure that what you’re seeing is not an environmental contaminant or a defect on the slide.
I definitely think some people are jumping at microscopic shadows (I’ve seen people claiming there are Quantum dots in toilet paper now). That being said, there is absolutely an adulteration of our drugs. Our next case study involves a patient who once had clean blood and now shows signs of nanotech infection after being given IV drugs at the emergency room.
Just wiped it, very bad I'm sure, BUT I did focus to confirm the objects were in the solution layer. Anyway, I'm on the learning curve for sure. As a head up, I'm pretty good at histology but that's not the same as microscopy...thanks for keeping me in check though, actually posting this was to get advice NOT to give it this time!
For first go , that is great work. congrats P.M. You can see fibres and these buggers have peculiarities that you will be able to ID easily as time goes on.
Thanks Matt, do you think the fibres are are part of the lido or artifact, and if in the lido, and if you know, do you think just a common contaminant or nefarious?
Sep 11, 2023·edited Sep 11, 2023Liked by Proton Magic
That last fibre that looks flat with twists ? classic blue from the look of it.
On cleaning the slides , you only really need to clean the centre 3/4 and leave the ends for handling. A fresh paper towel and one drop of isopropl alcohol per side and only stroke in one direction. Then put slide in scope and see how good your method is. once you get it down its easy.
The cover slips are harder and a bit fiddly but lift them out place on paper towel , put fat forefinger on corner and swipe the same . then turn over trying to handle only the same corner. This way when you pick the cover slip up and drop it on your sample it has been tipped upside down from when it was removed from the holder. (the treated ones are only treated on one side.) Its actually noticeable as one side has more resistance and squeaks a bit sometimes. If you dont notice that you probably got uncontaminated ones.
For taking your blood , get a accu -chek fast clix type of device, saves heaps of time and pain. they have a revolver barrel for fresh needles and an adjuster so you only go as deep as you need.
Persevere with the darkfield experimentation, its worth it.
Also a good uv torch jacked up on the side, above / alongside the slide will spark up some things for you. The is a guy on mira al microscopio who does this and takes some fine images of this crap.
No worries, we need more people doing this work with a critical eye.
We bathe ours in 70% isopropyl alcohol, and we wipe them down with a paper towel or a specialized slide cleaning cloth.
As for testing medications, it should be sampled by itself and another mixed with blood. These structures require our bio electricity and cells to assembles themselves, so I’m not sure how the nanostructures are being built in the solutions without heavy exposure to EMF.
Wow, I was distracted with trying to make a dark filter with plastic and printed black paper-which didn't go well....
I've got the scope right next to the WiFi, lets see if things change at all. The objects didnt move with magnet applied close to slide...I'm just winging ideas, but MUCH THANKS Scipio!
“These GQDs showed blue emission at 461.5 nm under the excitation wavelength at 367 nm, making GGels formed from these GQDs emit strong blue fluorescence as a unique photoluminescent property suitable for bioimaging”
This has worked for us too, the flashlights are like $20-30.
This is why I am learning herbalism. Anything I use to help my body detox or relieve difficult symptoms will be made by me from plants I grew or know the source of. Not that I've ever taken lots of pharma drugs, almost none, but never again.
Good call, its easy to chuck the slide on naked first. A quick scan at lower mag and then you know the xtra fibres , especially if they are different) come from your sample.
Toot paper , someone better put magnets on the roll holders to remove the graphene huh. But no the fibres are not magnetic nor is the graphene.
Found out how to prove the qdots 100% and its being arranged now. should be interesting.
This is exactly what's needed. People we know aren't controlled opposition running these tests. There are lab protocols for making sure your slides are free of debris so that can be overcome with information. I hope you can redo this with whatever is left to confirm your results. The string like objects look very consistent with what others have shown. I have seen results where these fibers actually respond to drastic temperature changes by moving toward the heat source, usually a hot piece of wire or the like. Good luck with it!
That doesn’t change the fact that crystals and filaments should not be found in human blood. We are finding structures in people’s blood who don’t have cholesterol issues or plaque build up, which removes the possibility that these are cholesterol crystals.
The structures we have seen in the blood of our patients is clearly not a naturally forming crystal. (See image below for an example of a cholesterol crystal seen in human blood.)
I see current issues from a terrain theory perspective..
Yes, The jabs have crystals of many things, like metals, etc.
But it's not just that. A healthy body wouldn't keep junk in the blood. It's supposed to get regularly filtered out by the kidneys and liver. But if the liver, spleen, and kidneys are backed up, as we have seen with the lipid distribution study, the garbage collects in the blood. It also increases clotting, especially micro clots.
Some of the weird crystals are from the shots, but there's also a lot more garbage that would show up because when cells die, they also release bits and pieces into the blood. Also metabolic byproducts build up too!
Even for patients in severe kidney/liver failure, crystals/nanochips should not be found in the blood. The patients we have analyzed are not in kidney/liver failure, and their routine blood tests come back within normal ranges.
I mean crystals are just not found in human blood, and I have not found any natural disease, contagion, organism, or bacteria that conforms with what we have seen in the blood of my patients, family and friends.
𝒯𝒽𝒶𝓃𝓀 𝒴❁𝓊 I appreciate the direction into getting RELIEF. I TRIED cannabis oil with no relief. I gave it a good 6 months thinking it needs to build up. I'll try the DMSO. I didn't know I was hurt this bad until I went off pain killers.
Here are a couple of other natural remedies to try :
Turmeric w/ Bioperine
Ashwagandha
Neither are very expensive, but buy quality over cost. Makes a difference.
One of the weird things about feeling your pain w/o pain killers is how extreme it feels at first, then the body adjusts and it becomes more tolerable.
I have a lot of bad pains from injuries, etc. and I know it was true for me that after a while, it eased. Also exercise (nice and easy exercise...) helps a lot.
Congrats to you for going off the meds. One of the best moves you can make.
Lower Dose of THC may be more effective and better tolerated by patientLess is more. Cancer patients who received 21 mg/day of Sativex (a cannabis sublingual spray with roughly equal amounts of CBD and THC) experienced significant reductions in pain, more so than cancer patients who received 52 mg of Sativex, while those who were given 83 mg of Sativex reduced their pain no better than a placebo. Cumulative doses of THC exceeding 20-30 mg per day – or a single dose of 10 mg or more – may cause unwanted side effects. (9)"
THANK YOU ROB! I live in a state that doesn't have legal pot for medicinal or otherwise .. .. Funny tho...I wouldn't get pot from a dispensary anyways.... It's my belief that it has been GMO'd AND they have done third party tests & found it laced with stuff like asbestos, arsenic & multi different molds. ... It's all about NOT getting the side effects .... OR ....My genes are just SOOOOO broken that I can't even get the EFFECTS..... :) I appreciate You.
You can get edibles that are legal in any state from a site such as buydeltas, which a friend uses for his pain mgmt needs. They have lab reports of most of the products.
They use hemp instead, and chemically extract it to different THC versions that are legal, like delta8.
Delta8 is not as much anxiety producing as 9 is.
Just start low, 10mg... you might even need to split gummies to get that low dose, or a tincture counting drops that equal to 10mg.
Smoking is definitely an issue with the concerns you bring up because inhaling something has less protection than eating it which goes through the digestive system which can filter out bad things.
Also the edible form works a bit differently than smoking. It has more of an effect on the whole body, whereas smoking is said to be more focused on the upper part of the body.
Good luck on your healing and when in doubt, Google the question and there's tons of reddit threads and websites that address concerns and methods.
It's an exciting time when we're relearning the medicines that were hidden from us due to the dominance of the allopathic model.
I've heard things about that delta ... Like it's a synthetic....& don't use it.....But I dunno what's REALLY up, I haven't looked into it.
I did NOT know that the smoking & eating of pot made for a different ride. Is this common knowledge? Seems like it should be, But I had NO idea. Wow Man.
If you watch California Insider (De-monitiezed, lol) - you'll see the narco traffic from cartels is horrible in CA. Stuff is doused with pesticide (for higher yields). Does it make it into the supply? I don't know.
Welcome to the microscopic world of science, Proton Man. Now you can teach Dr. Faucist a thing or two about cell formation in human blood. Looking forward to your followup post.
Having hundreds of hrs on a regular light microscopy and some playing with a confocal unit, I am reduced to "yikes!" Contamination would seem necessary to disprove. Sterile slides and cover slips? Any coatings used? Room free from dust? etc.
Is the sample what it claims to be?
Fascinating.
If you'd like a protocol for washing and oven drying slides prior to coating with (for example) silane please advise.
Right, I didn't pay enough attention to the slide making, only that the fibers and objects were in the solution layer on focus...I think. I'm ok (was ok?) at histology pics but scoping tech will take some experience and I'm REALLY BUSY with other stuff...I do have lots left still, will get to it.
The impetus for the lido is because I need some dental work, and I go the scope thinking I might need to check blood of someone (myself?) someday and it was just collecting dust on the shelf. The drug co honestly just sent me a sample box with their logo and all just from a web page inquiry and my telling them I was an MD. but they didnt ask for any confirmation.
Bravo! I was thinking that a slide and cover slip set up would be predicated on what one thought one might be looking at ... but since there seems to be a significant degree of uncertainty, where exactly to start, organic or inorganic, +ve or -ve charged substances?
Go for the lignocaine that is the oldest most established unadulterated straight-up formulation, without adrenaline. Tell them your topple into suprventricular arrhythmia at the merest whiff of adrenaline. I suppose one could go with oil of cloves and gird one's loins. Personally, that would be a living hell, but eminently survivable.
Thanks much for your Substack. I still have way too much cognitive dissonance about those in the Medical Health Freedom Movement who are true believers that viruses (either naturally occurring or laboratory created) cause sickness & death.
Maybe soon I’ll simply accept the (testable and verifiable and falsifiable) hypothesis that viruses-as-causative-agents-of-death-and-disease doesn’t have the necessary and sufficient supportive scientific evidence to substantiate the hypothesis.
I’m tired of the cognitive dissonance. I’m tired of giving credence to propagandists for virology and epidemiology, even if these propagandists are against injecting experimental liquids with unknown ingredients into human bodies and even if these propagandists are leaders in the Medical Freedom Movement and even if these propagandists can fully explain conspiracy realities such as the moon landings being faked or 9/11 being an inside job.
Sep 14, 2023·edited Sep 14, 2023Liked by Proton Magic
See this related post, Kinetically Active Microstructures (KAMS) formed in injectable Dental Anaesthetic Carbocaine (3% solution, product of Abbott Pharmaceuticals) upon adding human blood, are as motile as the day they were formed at: https://lenbermd.substack.com/p/630-hours-following-slide-preparation. By traditional criteria, these entities are not biological and therefore are not alive. They do persist, enlarge and interact with/in living organisms, apparently by "feeding" off energy sources within and without (e.g., EMF's). They are therefore, nonbiological parasites. Where am I wrong?
I like the term Kinetically Active Microstructures (KAMS) because it does not imply that they are alive by traditional criteria which would make them nonbiological entities that are yet capable of interacting with living organisms. I have a problem with calling them cross domain bacteria, cross domain micro-organisms or synthetic biology because doing so says they are fundamentally biological, rather than biologically compatible. It may seem like nit-picking but being concise I think, is more likely to help in better understanding their nature and combatting them.
What these things appear to be doing is setting up a transhuman cyborg state in humans, by that I mean converting human beings into part human/part machine entities rather than part human/part non-human living organisms (chimeras) as would be the case if non-human DNA was being mixed with human DNA. What do others here think?
Are you familiar with Clifford Carnicom's work? RIP Clifford. He collected and dissected and studied chemtrail fallout and what became known as Morgellon's for 20 years. https://carnicominstitute.org/author/clifford-carnicom/ Happy super-sleuthing!
The nice girl with the blue gloves called me to say that you are a bit confused and she's concerned.
Microscope yes, beautiful girl no.
And she sincerely hopes you do not turn blue holding your breath waiting for a knock on your door from her.
Meanwhile. . . Emerald lidocaine? Oh is this the stuff people get at the dentist's? Searching for nano particles?
I like to experiment too, once I filled a large plastic bucket with pee paper and lit it on fire. It was thick plastic. I was being incredibly dumb. That bucket melted so fast it was amazing. And no I wouldn't do it again.
And once I dripped a tiny bit of essential oil on a lit candle. And no I wouldn't do that again either.
As far as viruses go:
If I hear the word virus one more time I'm going to be sick!
(and yes humor is subjective)
And and and, if I find one more anti-virus 'person' being reactive and ugly and 'I'm so smart and your so dumb'. And convincing the general population that anti virus anti vaxxers are insane. I'm going to pull out my anti-reactivity laser from my pocket and do what needs to be done.
Just you watch me! (She said huffing and puffing, with her hands in her hips, stamping her feet and rolling her eyes)
-------------------------
And no Little Proton this is not aimed at you. Except the part about the blue gloved beauty.
Fyi, I'm not aiming at humor actually, there is something very serious, behind every satirical remark I make. But as a strategy, yes, you see people open their email and only read a few lines to decide to go on or not, an off-beat remark is the best way to get them to keep reading as they're just a click away from the next mail in line (its not about the girl with the gloves, it's about anything to catch attention). Actuallly, I think the title today was an eye catcher, I spent a LONG time thinking about the title for today.
For me it's all to let off steam, this is 100% volunteer SS, I won't even let you donate even if you scream deep love for my writing. Nope, I only accept love letters in the comments, and bunker tickets. And I'm dedicated to the message, its past 2am here in Tokyo and still on the machine.
Sep 10, 2023·edited Sep 10, 2023Liked by Proton Magic
To Proton: First, just fyi, I'm going to read what you post even if the headline or the first paragraph doesn't grab me. And second, have you heard of how ChatGPT can help you write catchy headlines? Just kidding, I'm not really suggesting it. I just heard of a guy starting a power-washing business who got AI to help him name the enterprise and come up with a slogan and a marketing campaign. But for real, don't do it. I also know of one SS writer who has openly admitted using ChatGPT to help them with writing. I am not down with that.
Sep 11, 2023·edited Sep 11, 2023Liked by Proton Magic
I had actually not been joking but reading the Massey article I have been surprised of the polemic tone from Coleman. (I was joking of course when I suggested you start selling epheresis treatment as Dr Michalcea does.) I think in many of these discussions especially where strawmen are successfully defeated, part of the problem seems to be that this defeat requires conflation of bacterial and viral infection, as well as conflation of toxic pathogens creating an immune response with explicit viruses causing that response? I personally am very unclear lately on whether to continue accepting the viral paradigm.
Completely agree, after reading as well (lots of info to read and parse). Coleman was seemingly pro-health and against most medical interventions, but Massey was more convincing in her arguments. Sometimes I wonder if these Formerly 'Allied' Docs get coerced to flip their stance, or that mind-control stuff is working on them, or tech being tech -- someone else got into their account.
You point is valid, in saying that I am yet to find a single person that has seen this before or can give a reasonable explanation (with evidence or links to examples)
4). The past 150-200 years of hoomin civilisation was an anomaly, an exception...
#4 is my preference...We were allowed to run free but now our shackles are being refitted,,,(We were only ever allowed to do what we were allowed to do !)...
Okay, you didn't really lick the slides, did you? There's so much around that's more satiric than satire, more sarcastic than sarcasm, more facetious than facetiousness, and more just plain crazy than ever before in my lifetime, that I'm losing my ability to distinguish. Thank you.
No worries, I'm a crazy writer because I love to laugh as writing-I've written enough serious papers in my time, not fun! Most anything I write is either clearly for fun/satire or serious, little inbetween. The fun part is to get myself and the readers into the serious part, and it is DEAD SERIOUS now a days.
TAKE YOUR TIME!
NEVER rush ... as it is THE RECIPE for disaster.
Hey PM. well that went down like a control experiment in a virology lab ;O)
I was hoping we had moved on to naked green aliens. I guess loch ness will have to do.
Came for the comedy, stayed for the slides. Thanks 🙏
Nicely done slides. So I'm just going to ASSUME the creepy critters are in the Lidocaine gel that I schmere on my back?
Lovely.
I think some of this was just artifact from unclean slide or cover slip....I don't know because this is the first time I've done this since fooling around with a scope as a grade schooler. Matt will probably chime in later and give me advice on re-scoping the remaining sample. I can tell you that I did ask the Drug co to put a magnet to the lido and did so myself so no obvious graphene yet but this is a coarse test I think, then now I just thought of and put the magnet next to the slide and nothing moved. Still I wouldn't take lido from a globalist drug co like 3M etc.
How are you preparing the slides?
I recommend analyzing the slides before placing the sample on it, to ensure that what you’re seeing is not an environmental contaminant or a defect on the slide.
I definitely think some people are jumping at microscopic shadows (I’ve seen people claiming there are Quantum dots in toilet paper now). That being said, there is absolutely an adulteration of our drugs. Our next case study involves a patient who once had clean blood and now shows signs of nanotech infection after being given IV drugs at the emergency room.
Just wiped it, very bad I'm sure, BUT I did focus to confirm the objects were in the solution layer. Anyway, I'm on the learning curve for sure. As a head up, I'm pretty good at histology but that's not the same as microscopy...thanks for keeping me in check though, actually posting this was to get advice NOT to give it this time!
For first go , that is great work. congrats P.M. You can see fibres and these buggers have peculiarities that you will be able to ID easily as time goes on.
Thanks Matt, do you think the fibres are are part of the lido or artifact, and if in the lido, and if you know, do you think just a common contaminant or nefarious?
That last fibre that looks flat with twists ? classic blue from the look of it.
On cleaning the slides , you only really need to clean the centre 3/4 and leave the ends for handling. A fresh paper towel and one drop of isopropl alcohol per side and only stroke in one direction. Then put slide in scope and see how good your method is. once you get it down its easy.
The cover slips are harder and a bit fiddly but lift them out place on paper towel , put fat forefinger on corner and swipe the same . then turn over trying to handle only the same corner. This way when you pick the cover slip up and drop it on your sample it has been tipped upside down from when it was removed from the holder. (the treated ones are only treated on one side.) Its actually noticeable as one side has more resistance and squeaks a bit sometimes. If you dont notice that you probably got uncontaminated ones.
For taking your blood , get a accu -chek fast clix type of device, saves heaps of time and pain. they have a revolver barrel for fresh needles and an adjuster so you only go as deep as you need.
Persevere with the darkfield experimentation, its worth it.
Also a good uv torch jacked up on the side, above / alongside the slide will spark up some things for you. The is a guy on mira al microscopio who does this and takes some fine images of this crap.
Lido - nefarious as others have shown.
No worries, we need more people doing this work with a critical eye.
We bathe ours in 70% isopropyl alcohol, and we wipe them down with a paper towel or a specialized slide cleaning cloth.
As for testing medications, it should be sampled by itself and another mixed with blood. These structures require our bio electricity and cells to assembles themselves, so I’m not sure how the nanostructures are being built in the solutions without heavy exposure to EMF.
Wow, I was distracted with trying to make a dark filter with plastic and printed black paper-which didn't go well....
I've got the scope right next to the WiFi, lets see if things change at all. The objects didnt move with magnet applied close to slide...I'm just winging ideas, but MUCH THANKS Scipio!
From my Forced Evolution of Humanity article:
“These GQDs showed blue emission at 461.5 nm under the excitation wavelength at 367 nm, making GGels formed from these GQDs emit strong blue fluorescence as a unique photoluminescent property suitable for bioimaging”
This has worked for us too, the flashlights are like $20-30.
This is why I am learning herbalism. Anything I use to help my body detox or relieve difficult symptoms will be made by me from plants I grew or know the source of. Not that I've ever taken lots of pharma drugs, almost none, but never again.
Hi Scipio,
Good call, its easy to chuck the slide on naked first. A quick scan at lower mag and then you know the xtra fibres , especially if they are different) come from your sample.
Toot paper , someone better put magnets on the roll holders to remove the graphene huh. But no the fibres are not magnetic nor is the graphene.
Found out how to prove the qdots 100% and its being arranged now. should be interesting.
This is exactly what's needed. People we know aren't controlled opposition running these tests. There are lab protocols for making sure your slides are free of debris so that can be overcome with information. I hope you can redo this with whatever is left to confirm your results. The string like objects look very consistent with what others have shown. I have seen results where these fibers actually respond to drastic temperature changes by moving toward the heat source, usually a hot piece of wire or the like. Good luck with it!
I know, I hear ya....But I got DESPERATE when I was bent in a L shape for almost a WEEK.
I'm pissed cuz I went off all globalists drugs....Abruptly & with no real game plan. Knda dumb....But...what can I say.
Anyways, Thank You & Good luck with that microscope of yours :)
I don't think critters, but look into cannabis oil and dmso, both of which are better than pain killers, because they also address inflammation. https://yummy.doctor/?s=Dmso&subset=posts&bp_search=1
He said this in the article:
"More mundanely, I guess these objects are filaments, dust, and lido crystals."
I would agree. Microscopes can make a normal crystal look like a chip, as people have seen with the cv jabs...
The long ones could be like a hair, but much thinner.
That doesn’t change the fact that crystals and filaments should not be found in human blood. We are finding structures in people’s blood who don’t have cholesterol issues or plaque build up, which removes the possibility that these are cholesterol crystals.
https://dfreality.substack.com/p/the-forced-evolution-of-humanity
The structures we have seen in the blood of our patients is clearly not a naturally forming crystal. (See image below for an example of a cholesterol crystal seen in human blood.)
https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F8a155bdc-65e8-41dc-8d9e-85f5f9635a82_300x216.jpeg
I see current issues from a terrain theory perspective..
Yes, The jabs have crystals of many things, like metals, etc.
But it's not just that. A healthy body wouldn't keep junk in the blood. It's supposed to get regularly filtered out by the kidneys and liver. But if the liver, spleen, and kidneys are backed up, as we have seen with the lipid distribution study, the garbage collects in the blood. It also increases clotting, especially micro clots.
Some of the weird crystals are from the shots, but there's also a lot more garbage that would show up because when cells die, they also release bits and pieces into the blood. Also metabolic byproducts build up too!
Even for patients in severe kidney/liver failure, crystals/nanochips should not be found in the blood. The patients we have analyzed are not in kidney/liver failure, and their routine blood tests come back within normal ranges.
I mean crystals are just not found in human blood, and I have not found any natural disease, contagion, organism, or bacteria that conforms with what we have seen in the blood of my patients, family and friends.
The common denominator amongst the infected?
💉
𝒯𝒽𝒶𝓃𝓀 𝒴❁𝓊 I appreciate the direction into getting RELIEF. I TRIED cannabis oil with no relief. I gave it a good 6 months thinking it needs to build up. I'll try the DMSO. I didn't know I was hurt this bad until I went off pain killers.
Microscopes seem complicated :)
Its just a training run, I really don't know what I'm doing so don't take it too seriously.
Yeah, I know...I remember the days of the "training bra" .... Eventually you get good at it. Lol
Here are a couple of other natural remedies to try :
Turmeric w/ Bioperine
Ashwagandha
Neither are very expensive, but buy quality over cost. Makes a difference.
One of the weird things about feeling your pain w/o pain killers is how extreme it feels at first, then the body adjusts and it becomes more tolerable.
I have a lot of bad pains from injuries, etc. and I know it was true for me that after a while, it eased. Also exercise (nice and easy exercise...) helps a lot.
Congrats to you for going off the meds. One of the best moves you can make.
Godspeed.
Thank You very much.
It's all a work in progress & I appreciate your help:)
If the oil doesn't help, you might want to try edibles instead that have CBD and THC.
That's what they use for cancer. Too much of it gives less results.
https://www.leafly.com/news/health/a-physicians-perspective-on-optimal-cannabis-dosing
"
Lower Dose of THC may be more effective and better tolerated by patientLess is more. Cancer patients who received 21 mg/day of Sativex (a cannabis sublingual spray with roughly equal amounts of CBD and THC) experienced significant reductions in pain, more so than cancer patients who received 52 mg of Sativex, while those who were given 83 mg of Sativex reduced their pain no better than a placebo. Cumulative doses of THC exceeding 20-30 mg per day – or a single dose of 10 mg or more – may cause unwanted side effects. (9)"
THANK YOU ROB! I live in a state that doesn't have legal pot for medicinal or otherwise .. .. Funny tho...I wouldn't get pot from a dispensary anyways.... It's my belief that it has been GMO'd AND they have done third party tests & found it laced with stuff like asbestos, arsenic & multi different molds. ... It's all about NOT getting the side effects .... OR ....My genes are just SOOOOO broken that I can't even get the EFFECTS..... :) I appreciate You.
You can get edibles that are legal in any state from a site such as buydeltas, which a friend uses for his pain mgmt needs. They have lab reports of most of the products.
They use hemp instead, and chemically extract it to different THC versions that are legal, like delta8.
Delta8 is not as much anxiety producing as 9 is.
Just start low, 10mg... you might even need to split gummies to get that low dose, or a tincture counting drops that equal to 10mg.
Smoking is definitely an issue with the concerns you bring up because inhaling something has less protection than eating it which goes through the digestive system which can filter out bad things.
Also the edible form works a bit differently than smoking. It has more of an effect on the whole body, whereas smoking is said to be more focused on the upper part of the body.
Good luck on your healing and when in doubt, Google the question and there's tons of reddit threads and websites that address concerns and methods.
It's an exciting time when we're relearning the medicines that were hidden from us due to the dominance of the allopathic model.
I've heard things about that delta ... Like it's a synthetic....& don't use it.....But I dunno what's REALLY up, I haven't looked into it.
I did NOT know that the smoking & eating of pot made for a different ride. Is this common knowledge? Seems like it should be, But I had NO idea. Wow Man.
If you watch California Insider (De-monitiezed, lol) - you'll see the narco traffic from cartels is horrible in CA. Stuff is doused with pesticide (for higher yields). Does it make it into the supply? I don't know.
https://www.youtube.com/@CaliforniaInsider/videos
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jpNtnPzc7fU - Siskyou County 38 mins (select chapters u like)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XAaxRn1rEOc - Darkside of Legalize it - 36 mins
Yeah too much is actually negative. Legalizing is not the problem, it's that people are not being educated in moderation.
There's a dose response curve in the article I linked before that shows this issue.
Like any substance, even food , moderation is key.
NO potency cap ? Holy Moly. 8 OUNCES of pot a DAY w/ 99& THC?
That's not even possible to smoke in a day! This is PLANNED DECAY!
Thank You for the links :)
Welcome to the microscopic world of science, Proton Man. Now you can teach Dr. Faucist a thing or two about cell formation in human blood. Looking forward to your followup post.
Just "yikes!"
Having hundreds of hrs on a regular light microscopy and some playing with a confocal unit, I am reduced to "yikes!" Contamination would seem necessary to disprove. Sterile slides and cover slips? Any coatings used? Room free from dust? etc.
Is the sample what it claims to be?
Fascinating.
If you'd like a protocol for washing and oven drying slides prior to coating with (for example) silane please advise.
Right, I didn't pay enough attention to the slide making, only that the fibers and objects were in the solution layer on focus...I think. I'm ok (was ok?) at histology pics but scoping tech will take some experience and I'm REALLY BUSY with other stuff...I do have lots left still, will get to it.
The impetus for the lido is because I need some dental work, and I go the scope thinking I might need to check blood of someone (myself?) someday and it was just collecting dust on the shelf. The drug co honestly just sent me a sample box with their logo and all just from a web page inquiry and my telling them I was an MD. but they didnt ask for any confirmation.
Bravo! I was thinking that a slide and cover slip set up would be predicated on what one thought one might be looking at ... but since there seems to be a significant degree of uncertainty, where exactly to start, organic or inorganic, +ve or -ve charged substances?
Go for the lignocaine that is the oldest most established unadulterated straight-up formulation, without adrenaline. Tell them your topple into suprventricular arrhythmia at the merest whiff of adrenaline. I suppose one could go with oil of cloves and gird one's loins. Personally, that would be a living hell, but eminently survivable.
I added to the post, this sample was
1ml cartridge: Lidocaine HCL 20mg, Epinephrine Bitartrate 0.025mg
Thanks much for your Substack. I still have way too much cognitive dissonance about those in the Medical Health Freedom Movement who are true believers that viruses (either naturally occurring or laboratory created) cause sickness & death.
Maybe soon I’ll simply accept the (testable and verifiable and falsifiable) hypothesis that viruses-as-causative-agents-of-death-and-disease doesn’t have the necessary and sufficient supportive scientific evidence to substantiate the hypothesis.
I’m tired of the cognitive dissonance. I’m tired of giving credence to propagandists for virology and epidemiology, even if these propagandists are against injecting experimental liquids with unknown ingredients into human bodies and even if these propagandists are leaders in the Medical Freedom Movement and even if these propagandists can fully explain conspiracy realities such as the moon landings being faked or 9/11 being an inside job.
See this related post, Kinetically Active Microstructures (KAMS) formed in injectable Dental Anaesthetic Carbocaine (3% solution, product of Abbott Pharmaceuticals) upon adding human blood, are as motile as the day they were formed at: https://lenbermd.substack.com/p/630-hours-following-slide-preparation. By traditional criteria, these entities are not biological and therefore are not alive. They do persist, enlarge and interact with/in living organisms, apparently by "feeding" off energy sources within and without (e.g., EMF's). They are therefore, nonbiological parasites. Where am I wrong?
Thanks John, that was actually the follow up to a prior vid he did on that sample at 400+ hours that let me to get a sample and scope it!
I like the term Kinetically Active Microstructures (KAMS) because it does not imply that they are alive by traditional criteria which would make them nonbiological entities that are yet capable of interacting with living organisms. I have a problem with calling them cross domain bacteria, cross domain micro-organisms or synthetic biology because doing so says they are fundamentally biological, rather than biologically compatible. It may seem like nit-picking but being concise I think, is more likely to help in better understanding their nature and combatting them.
What these things appear to be doing is setting up a transhuman cyborg state in humans, by that I mean converting human beings into part human/part machine entities rather than part human/part non-human living organisms (chimeras) as would be the case if non-human DNA was being mixed with human DNA. What do others here think?
Hay PM you have inspired me to have a go ! will you look at my first substack not publish yet, it meant to be satirical mmm https://peter179.substack.com/p/d0091f38-9af4-4713-8d11-f5831c903149
Are you familiar with Clifford Carnicom's work? RIP Clifford. He collected and dissected and studied chemtrail fallout and what became known as Morgellon's for 20 years. https://carnicominstitute.org/author/clifford-carnicom/ Happy super-sleuthing!
RIP Clifford? Has he died? I just looked this up. Apparently he is alive and well. I don't have a clue why you wrote that...
Just in:
The nice girl with the blue gloves called me to say that you are a bit confused and she's concerned.
Microscope yes, beautiful girl no.
And she sincerely hopes you do not turn blue holding your breath waiting for a knock on your door from her.
Meanwhile. . . Emerald lidocaine? Oh is this the stuff people get at the dentist's? Searching for nano particles?
I like to experiment too, once I filled a large plastic bucket with pee paper and lit it on fire. It was thick plastic. I was being incredibly dumb. That bucket melted so fast it was amazing. And no I wouldn't do it again.
And once I dripped a tiny bit of essential oil on a lit candle. And no I wouldn't do that again either.
As far as viruses go:
If I hear the word virus one more time I'm going to be sick!
(and yes humor is subjective)
And and and, if I find one more anti-virus 'person' being reactive and ugly and 'I'm so smart and your so dumb'. And convincing the general population that anti virus anti vaxxers are insane. I'm going to pull out my anti-reactivity laser from my pocket and do what needs to be done.
Just you watch me! (She said huffing and puffing, with her hands in her hips, stamping her feet and rolling her eyes)
-------------------------
And no Little Proton this is not aimed at you. Except the part about the blue gloved beauty.
Hi Elizabeth, see here
https://anamihalceamdphd.substack.com/p/hydrogel-in-injectable-medications (incl lido).
Fyi, I'm not aiming at humor actually, there is something very serious, behind every satirical remark I make. But as a strategy, yes, you see people open their email and only read a few lines to decide to go on or not, an off-beat remark is the best way to get them to keep reading as they're just a click away from the next mail in line (its not about the girl with the gloves, it's about anything to catch attention). Actuallly, I think the title today was an eye catcher, I spent a LONG time thinking about the title for today.
For me it's all to let off steam, this is 100% volunteer SS, I won't even let you donate even if you scream deep love for my writing. Nope, I only accept love letters in the comments, and bunker tickets. And I'm dedicated to the message, its past 2am here in Tokyo and still on the machine.
Hey, I think satire likely has the same roots for all. Letting off steam, speaking to something deeper.
Sorry if I gave offense.
I would doubt that you need attention grabbing headlines though. And I guess the girl in the gloves comment was a bit offensive to me.
Sorry I was thinking of novocaine. But I don't do meds and am not familiar with most.
Good luck learning your microscope!
No worries! Yes the scope actually did cost something like $89. You see the ...mine and .99 rhyme, it's hidden lyrics in the post just for fun.
"The nice girl with the blue gloves is all mine, and she only cost me about $89.99"
Okay... so you were rhyming, good rhyme.
Thanks for explaining.
Still offensive though.
That's why I was riffing off it. I guess to kind of let you know in a somewhat gentle way. Your forgiven though.
It's just that girls don't want to be bought for 89.99, no matter how much it rhymes.
You're still forgiven though. I know you meant no harm.
And weren't trying to set off any bells of alarm.
Real love cant be bought no matter what the price💕
See you next post!
Very true 💕
See you next post!
You got 89.99 problems but a blue glove ain't one.
To Proton: First, just fyi, I'm going to read what you post even if the headline or the first paragraph doesn't grab me. And second, have you heard of how ChatGPT can help you write catchy headlines? Just kidding, I'm not really suggesting it. I just heard of a guy starting a power-washing business who got AI to help him name the enterprise and come up with a slogan and a marketing campaign. But for real, don't do it. I also know of one SS writer who has openly admitted using ChatGPT to help them with writing. I am not down with that.
I want it to be just from me even if AI could help the popularity, that's not what I wish and this is just volunteer, but I do have to go to sleep!
Bravo Elizabeth!
Thank you Gram! (red heart or blue...?)
💙
Now you have to sell chelation/apheresis.
Is Dr Coleman unpopular with you?
https://christinemasseyfois.substack.com/p/a-response-to-dr-vernon-coleman
think he was joking.
I had actually not been joking but reading the Massey article I have been surprised of the polemic tone from Coleman. (I was joking of course when I suggested you start selling epheresis treatment as Dr Michalcea does.) I think in many of these discussions especially where strawmen are successfully defeated, part of the problem seems to be that this defeat requires conflation of bacterial and viral infection, as well as conflation of toxic pathogens creating an immune response with explicit viruses causing that response? I personally am very unclear lately on whether to continue accepting the viral paradigm.
Completely agree, after reading as well (lots of info to read and parse). Coleman was seemingly pro-health and against most medical interventions, but Massey was more convincing in her arguments. Sometimes I wonder if these Formerly 'Allied' Docs get coerced to flip their stance, or that mind-control stuff is working on them, or tech being tech -- someone else got into their account.
You point is valid, in saying that I am yet to find a single person that has seen this before or can give a reasonable explanation (with evidence or links to examples)
https://rumble.com/v2e2nls-unknown-moving-structure-within-the-blood.html
I must say !
1). Well done Old Chap !
2). Jolly Good Show !
3). Eureka! You've revealed The Meaning of Life !
4). The past 150-200 years of hoomin civilisation was an anomaly, an exception...
#4 is my preference...We were allowed to run free but now our shackles are being refitted,,,(We were only ever allowed to do what we were allowed to do !)...
Emerald lidocaine?