yes how many people understand this ‘T-index takes into account the avidity of the NTD for lipid raft gangliosides (ΔGmut/ΔGwt [NTD-ganglioside]), the affinity of the RBD for ACE-2 (ΔGmut/ΔGwt [RBD-ACE-2]), and a global estimation of the electrostatic surface potential of both the NTD and the RBD (kinetic parameter). Values of T-index ranged from 2.16 for the Wuhan B.1 strain to 10.67 for the India B.1.617 variant (ca. 500% increase of transmissibility)???? from a paper in August https://georgiedonny.substack.com/p/the-dangers-of-using-computer-modelling
Good Substack topic, "Most all research publications on viruses are propaganda to make you believe in them and their deadly nature so you will agree to take shots and accept the response measures no matter how draconian."
They don't seem to understand the golden rule of data validity... GIGO! aka garbage in, garbage out. In this case, all the data is false from the get go. The "data believers" are chasing fairies and unicorns.
My first choice post to read coming to your Subsy. Glad I chose it! I thought I was the only one seeing so many unicorns. And now, two and a half years later, it seems that the unicorns have been procreating *a lot* (or are they simply "proteasing"?)😆
lol :)
Hey my unicorn is more beautiful and real looking than Proton magic's !!! https://georgiedonny.substack.com/p/x-ray-crystallography-and-3d-computer
🐒
Yes your Uni has its own charm, still my baby Crystal is mine.
yes and she is very cute and looks really happy. Princess Candy Sparkles is looking rather more serious and could do with loosening up a little
yes how many people understand this ‘T-index takes into account the avidity of the NTD for lipid raft gangliosides (ΔGmut/ΔGwt [NTD-ganglioside]), the affinity of the RBD for ACE-2 (ΔGmut/ΔGwt [RBD-ACE-2]), and a global estimation of the electrostatic surface potential of both the NTD and the RBD (kinetic parameter). Values of T-index ranged from 2.16 for the Wuhan B.1 strain to 10.67 for the India B.1.617 variant (ca. 500% increase of transmissibility)???? from a paper in August https://georgiedonny.substack.com/p/the-dangers-of-using-computer-modelling
x
A lot of people on Substack really need to wake the f*ck up! They still think this is real because... data!
Good Substack topic, "Most all research publications on viruses are propaganda to make you believe in them and their deadly nature so you will agree to take shots and accept the response measures no matter how draconian."
They don't seem to understand the golden rule of data validity... GIGO! aka garbage in, garbage out. In this case, all the data is false from the get go. The "data believers" are chasing fairies and unicorns.
My first choice post to read coming to your Subsy. Glad I chose it! I thought I was the only one seeing so many unicorns. And now, two and a half years later, it seems that the unicorns have been procreating *a lot* (or are they simply "proteasing"?)😆