Just another grand deception foisted upon us by these shysters in lab coats.
The so-called studies that “prove” the spike protein causes clotting are even more pathetic than these. Non-purified samples, in silico (aka computer models) galore, and they still don’t know why it does it!
Fuck knows what Pfizer and Moderna think they have put into their hydrogel - it certainly wasn't a naturally occurring substance, that is for sure.
In December of 2020 I waded through all the bumph from Pfizer ahead of UK MHRA giving it approval for emergency use on Brits. I was incensed. I had studied the Chinese papers and the flaws in their method were clear. The worst part was realising that the genetic code they had identified as a 'virus' was entirely computer generated from recombined scraps of RNA found after the usual preparations.
I honestly felt nauseous. So I emailed UK MHRA and was able to get confirmation of my worst fears.
You may have seen my email exchange before, Proton. If not, the above link is the 4th edition which I copied and pasted over to Substack as soon as I opened an account here.
I have been permanently banned from Facebook, Twitter and Discord for sharing this information. My work has been mirrored by Jon Rappoport, David Icke and several alternative media outlets. Christine Massey added it to her long list of FOIA requests seeking proof of the isolation of SARSCov2.
Yes I indeed read a thread of yours with MHRA in 2020 and that was one important stimulus for me to try to figure all this out so heartfelt thanks! The impact you make often percolates quietly.
this question is for frances, proton and ray, i've been following this subject through the help of the three of you and others, and at times it feels like these narcissistic clowns knew exactly what they were doing and knew the outcomes before they even tested the vaxxines, and then there are moments when it feels like they are high school chemistry students playing with stuff they shouldn't be, not really knowing what's going to happen, but what the hell let's just see what happens. either way the outcome is the same and either way they should hang for their actions. but i'm curious on your takes. did they know that it would cause infertility in both sexes? or the death toll be as large as it is? just a few questions of many. and if they did, how did they know without testing throughly? thanks for your response
Even if their plan was to implant nanos and shave down the population, this requires fine tuning the weapon with MANY tests in advance of the product, how to mass produce and ship it, and pharma testing..
No proof, but I've suspected that the shots, along with other medical experiments, organ harvesting, child abductions, & weapons were tested in those huge Uyghur camps in China. Just makes sense knowing what the blob does and the timing of those camps starting in the decade leading up to Covid.
My guess is that work on the fabrication of poisons (cos that is precisely what the word virus actually means) using computerised genetic sequencing started a very long time ago. I think SARSCov2 is one such poison.
The reason I believe this is because, in the late 90s, I was temporarily living in Falmouth, Cornwall and I regularly met a lady when we were both out walking our dogs. This lady worked in a bio chemistry lab and was very quiet natured until one particular day when she was emotionally distraught. She had been waiting for me at the entrance of the woods and was crying when I got there. She explained that she had just walked out of her job and doubted that she would find another which paid as well. She poured out her misgivings about the work she was required to do and she described the creation of deadly 'viruses'. She could not continue to work at that lab. I asked her how many of these deadly things were being created and I will never forget her tear-stained face as she said "There are so many thousands that they do not name them any more. They are coded and numbered."
Thats very interesting. She may have been told cell cultures or other broths had viruses but really had some toxin or cancer cell lines. No paper has ever proven a virus so MY GUESS is yes something nefarious, but viruses in name only. Lab procedures would be very similar.
So - they release an infectious agent in one of million possible ways - which is then carried around by people who are open to infections - which then infect others through osmosis/touch.
Hm. Being open to infections means you can be closed to infections!
From the start of the plandemic I have wondered about infectious diseases. And this question kinda didnt want to go away: How come the black plague didnt kill all people which came into contact with it/with the sick?
Now I wonder how much truth there was in the stories about Black death. And how much of it is complete bs....
So it could be that people who did'nt die were 'in the know'. Lets say they did mass poisoning via water supply, like in so many cases during wars. Perhaps they were informed not to drink publicly available water in a certain period et voila. Or they had antidotes available...
I don't believe in contagious disease. I believe that several people may be intoxicated by being in a toxic environment which is polluted with untold muck from industry/biolabs/geo-engineering etc. I also believe that the symptoms we are hearing about are caused by electro-magnetic radiation since the roll out of 5G and Starlink satellites.
Ok, maybe I used wrong words. What I meant was that a poisoned person can "infect" other persons which are open to such "infections". If you have a weak biofield, you do not have to come into physical contact with poisons to be poisoned, you get poisoned/sick just by being around infected/poisoned/sick people.
You gently, and with your usual good sense of humor, provide details for the mRNA/spike protein red herring, which I only conjectured in my old article in which I have included a link to yours:
In short, my current description of the process is this:
Hydrogel-coated graphene oxide (GO) is often delivered, mostly in injections of any kind, and the GO self-assembles into a transmitter, a receiver, and a CPU. The resulting nano-computer attaches itself to the body and operates on bioelectricity. After that, it communicates with a central AI that is running a global simulation by receiving, sending, storing, and evaluating live data and sending commands to recipient units (just about anything or anyone among the IoT). Through possibly a protein-based neural interface, it is capable of downloading and uploading information, issue commands to the body to produce or not to produce certain enzymes, hormones, or the kitchen sink, and is able to modify the DNA. The latter is often mistaken for mRNA/spike protein technology, which is redundant under the circumstances, unless it has become controllable since the Soviets invented it in the early 1980s:
There is simply no need to commit a layered mountain of fraudulent experiments & gamed studies to convince people that something exists when it's existence is self-evident, when it actually does exist.
- If you watch magic shows not because you believe in magic, but because it's fun to try to figure out how they pull off their tricks & fool an audience, you likely enjoy reading Proton Magic's substack.
lipid nanoparticles (tagged in the biodistribution study) , hydrogel, quantum dots, peg, other chemicals but I don't have full data and proof on these things, metals...
Excellent debunking, Proton Man. Out of all the wisdom you shared in this post, these wise words hit me the hardest: "That’s one hell of a mouthful of bullshit. I gotta take a gargle break. Be right back..." 😂
Thanks for your kind words, be sure, the studies 3 and 4 being suspicious doesn't mean I air-tight debunked them. Someone else might see something I missed or a new study might change the game!
Hydrogel is one of many generic terms for Vitaliano's clathrin GQD.
The tech is not just GO and 5G, GO cannot enter cells of neurons without clathrin. Clathrin is key for endocytosis; Clathrin delivers the GO into cells.
Let me copy the Note thread for the readers. Be clear my post is about mRNA as noted, not about GO, which I do not deny. However, you are making some statements which you need to have some research to back them up.
Your statement:
“CLATHRIN PROTEIN has been shown to act as the carrier for both the SARS-CoV-1 infection of 2004 and the more recent SARS-CoV-2 infection of 2019. The NWO just figured out a way to weaponize this protein and have inserted its mRNA code into the vaccine and COVID swab.”
mRNA + 5G + Graphene Oxide = Clathrin Graphene Quantum Dots, a “viral like particle”; the neural interface or “chip”.
There are some subscribers out there that have enjoyed my 5G/EMF and Graphene Oxide coverage, and I know there are going to question their subscription when I now start getting into the mRNA. I encourage those to stay, at least for a while. I have studied the mRNA, I have studied the GO and their 5G/EMF activating fields. In many ways are currently conflicting sides creating unnecessary debate; debate that divide the alt-COVID movement.
------------------------------------------------
Proton Magic:
Shawn, you only briefly mention Sars and mRNA in your post.
If you are saying these sars 1 and 2 exist, can you show us a study with a purified isolated particle characterized to be a pathogen with a non patient control sample? Nobody has yet done so on sars 1 or 2 (or any corona virus-but lets not widen the discussion), so you would become instantly very famous and win the 1.5Mil Euro prize, but you havn’t have you?
If you want to say the prize is invalid, fine, still show us the paper. This requires a density gradient, confirmation of this particle is the only on EM after gradient, direct genome sequencing on this purified particle, and optional (but preferred) reinfection of a host and reisolation.
Next, show us a paper, not just an SPM post, finding purified mRNA in the shots, and mRNA isolated purified FROM A SHOT VIAL with a dose-response curve to Clathrin or any other protein proven by purification in a chem analytic report.
Is it your opinion that there is no RNA in any of the shots/jabs and that those still talking about mRNA (messenger or modified), spike proteins, and antibodies to spike proteins, are either ignorant or engaged in perpetrating a fraud?
No, there is no final proof of RNA in or not in the shots. I can only say that no purified mRNA has been found that I and others have seen as of yet (though the mass spec study I reported may have found some RNA of unknown code, only the study wasn't blind, wasn't in the EUA formulation, wasn't confirmed with RNA purification, and needs reproducing), and neither has Sars related mRNA been shown to be in the shots by purification and direct sequencing. Should really just be in the Drug co CMC, PK/PD and Chem analyt reports but they didn't give those out and I havn't seen any. Spike though has no reports, no mRNA-spike dose response and a FOIA of no study showing it -link in the post.
Although this comment may not directly apply to so called mRNA it may apply across the board to the other "creatures" spike, GO etc....
But even the "so called good guys" have been contaminated by a century of Rockefeller medicine and fake science. Images of the Spike Protein ? Obviously impossible by any form of optical microscopy. And even with the best electron microscopes, an “object” of that size at best would appear as a dot at their highest resolution possible.
Electron microscopes were a direct outcome of the quantum revolution when they discovered that “physical” particles had a wave length. The wavelength of light and of an electron determine the maximum resolution possible. But to reduce the wavelength of an electron they have to juice its kinetic energy which has a tendency to damage the object under study. These objects are often coated with metals which produce other artifacts. Don’t believe anything you hear and little of what you see.
I've consistently floated the idea that there appear multiple arms of 'pilot studies'. The single generalisable entity and the most powerful one always remains (in my jaundiced view) the psy-op assault, from whence all else comes, most especially, "social licence," and a very large quantity of paralysing malaise that affects wider society to this day.
There appear results from autopsies suggesting a degradation process (attributable to synthetic jab derived spike arising from DNA plasmid contamination) https://arkmedic.substack.com/p/mini-me-update. I have yet to study the articles in detail.
All of this is an unending task and it is apparent that we need to 'live' and 'breathe' despite being at the barricades in a bloody full-on war to which so many seem wantonly oblivious.
Scaglio is absolutely right. You want to prove the existence of the spike proteins in the bodies of the jabbed. Then test directly for these proteins. Why do they test with phony antigen tests when they have automated machines now that can separate and purify proteins in low concentrations? When I was in graduate school 30 years ago, it was somewhat tedious running the proteins through gels in an electrostatic field. But today, as Scaglio says, they have automated machines. So I assume they are not testing for spike proteins because there aren’t any and they need phony tests to cover it up. Just like the fake PCR test. Hope Scaglio has his life insurance paid up.
Thanks for reading. There is no virus so there is no sars and no sars spike. There is no mRNA to any synthetic spike dose response and if there was a spike you can be sure they would have done this study. The studies in this post don't conclusively show there is RNA in the shots to begin with, assuming RNA actually exists.
Graphitic materials may be on pcr swabs and masks, but graphene is only hypothetical as you saw on my, "True Nature of Graphene post". You are free to have a different opinion but you would need to show a paper proving isolation and characterization of graphene, not just Ramen spectroscopy which does not show structure and function.
where THE FINDERS state it is hypothetical. Now you have been able to say your part on my SS but we are at the end of our discussion rope, pls don't chase me further around the comments as noted in the About page. Best regards.
2. On Sabrina, do you have a link to her bio, any academic record, or even self publishing articles BEFORE COVID, so we can see something about her? And if she has graduated from a Univ has anyone confirmed that?
I have other concerns about your list but at least if you can't debunk Yeadon who is abjectly NOT on the side of the common person, OR write to us that you have removed him from your list, I have SERIOUS misgivings about your honesty in making this list.
You are confusing her true claims with her propaganda tactic which is called "discredit by association". Can you show us her bio, not just that her info is true. You are not honestly replying.
Anyone who can spend all that time making placards can spend a few min to cover her disaster shelf and pin up her hair and put on a shirt. Her quirky placards she can't hold straight for 2 sec, rapid and hard to follow speech/messy room and self (in many vids) means she is associating true info with nutty people so that the masses (not people who know it's true) will conclude that anyone with the truths she says is nutty and the info is nutty.
is making out a traumatized and quirky persona (w/the spooky music), which will associate these traits with her other vids that tell the truth. That is a propaganda strategy called "discredit by association" also called poisoning the well. She is also taking up band width from more reasonable and rational presenters.
You did not read the Omar piece on Yeadon and your comments do not debunk this:
"Yeadon, a former vice-president and chief scientific officer of the Allergy and Respiratory at Pfizer, provided a simple explanation of why lockdowns could never have worked, went on to explain that there is “zero” chance of incessantly reported new variants escaping immunity. Since SARS-COV-2 has never been properly isolated, then there can be no proof of a variant of a thing that doesn’t exist. No scientist anywhere in the world can possibly verify a “variant” of a thing that doesn’t exist, for the simple fact that they have nothing to compare it to. So, anytime you hear Yeadon say the word “variant,” you can rest assured that he is lying."
You are avoiding the crux of the matter in my Omar quote above. I suggest you delete all your comments because you are clearly invading this post that is only about RNA. I can delete them for you or ban you if you want. I have them and all my replies copied.
It's much too late and completely incongruous with his work history to not have denied the virus in 2020 nor the pandemic. He is lying as Omar also says. Now pls make your reply into one or I will delete 3/4 of your replies here because your comments are misleading and have nothing to do with RNA really which is what this post is about. And you are not answering my question about Sabrina's bio.
Just another grand deception foisted upon us by these shysters in lab coats.
The so-called studies that “prove” the spike protein causes clotting are even more pathetic than these. Non-purified samples, in silico (aka computer models) galore, and they still don’t know why it does it!
Perhaps it’s the GO hydrogel, a known clotting agent? (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9273113/)
PM once again doing the work 99.9% of these researchers are too intellectually lazy or corrupt to do. Thank you.
Yeah, it was a bit intensive and had to wait for a rainy day to get it done. Thanks for your spiritual support!
Fuck knows what Pfizer and Moderna think they have put into their hydrogel - it certainly wasn't a naturally occurring substance, that is for sure.
In December of 2020 I waded through all the bumph from Pfizer ahead of UK MHRA giving it approval for emergency use on Brits. I was incensed. I had studied the Chinese papers and the flaws in their method were clear. The worst part was realising that the genetic code they had identified as a 'virus' was entirely computer generated from recombined scraps of RNA found after the usual preparations.
I honestly felt nauseous. So I emailed UK MHRA and was able to get confirmation of my worst fears.
https://francesleader.substack.com/p/sarscov2-mrna-is-synthetic
You may have seen my email exchange before, Proton. If not, the above link is the 4th edition which I copied and pasted over to Substack as soon as I opened an account here.
I have been permanently banned from Facebook, Twitter and Discord for sharing this information. My work has been mirrored by Jon Rappoport, David Icke and several alternative media outlets. Christine Massey added it to her long list of FOIA requests seeking proof of the isolation of SARSCov2.
Yes I indeed read a thread of yours with MHRA in 2020 and that was one important stimulus for me to try to figure all this out so heartfelt thanks! The impact you make often percolates quietly.
this question is for frances, proton and ray, i've been following this subject through the help of the three of you and others, and at times it feels like these narcissistic clowns knew exactly what they were doing and knew the outcomes before they even tested the vaxxines, and then there are moments when it feels like they are high school chemistry students playing with stuff they shouldn't be, not really knowing what's going to happen, but what the hell let's just see what happens. either way the outcome is the same and either way they should hang for their actions. but i'm curious on your takes. did they know that it would cause infertility in both sexes? or the death toll be as large as it is? just a few questions of many. and if they did, how did they know without testing throughly? thanks for your response
James, here you can see this was planned many years in advance
https://protonmagic.substack.com/p/the-corona-fake-dating-dossier
Even if their plan was to implant nanos and shave down the population, this requires fine tuning the weapon with MANY tests in advance of the product, how to mass produce and ship it, and pharma testing..
No proof, but I've suspected that the shots, along with other medical experiments, organ harvesting, child abductions, & weapons were tested in those huge Uyghur camps in China. Just makes sense knowing what the blob does and the timing of those camps starting in the decade leading up to Covid.
My guess is that work on the fabrication of poisons (cos that is precisely what the word virus actually means) using computerised genetic sequencing started a very long time ago. I think SARSCov2 is one such poison.
The reason I believe this is because, in the late 90s, I was temporarily living in Falmouth, Cornwall and I regularly met a lady when we were both out walking our dogs. This lady worked in a bio chemistry lab and was very quiet natured until one particular day when she was emotionally distraught. She had been waiting for me at the entrance of the woods and was crying when I got there. She explained that she had just walked out of her job and doubted that she would find another which paid as well. She poured out her misgivings about the work she was required to do and she described the creation of deadly 'viruses'. She could not continue to work at that lab. I asked her how many of these deadly things were being created and I will never forget her tear-stained face as she said "There are so many thousands that they do not name them any more. They are coded and numbered."
Thats very interesting. She may have been told cell cultures or other broths had viruses but really had some toxin or cancer cell lines. No paper has ever proven a virus so MY GUESS is yes something nefarious, but viruses in name only. Lab procedures would be very similar.
I have no doubt that anyone working in that industry is thoroughly indoctrinated in germ theory - otherwise they would not get a job!
So - they release an infectious agent in one of million possible ways - which is then carried around by people who are open to infections - which then infect others through osmosis/touch.
Hm. Being open to infections means you can be closed to infections!
From the start of the plandemic I have wondered about infectious diseases. And this question kinda didnt want to go away: How come the black plague didnt kill all people which came into contact with it/with the sick?
https://odysee.com/@drsambailey:c/Bioweapon-BS:b
https://odysee.com/@drsambailey:c/gain-of-function-garbage:c
Now I wonder how much truth there was in the stories about Black death. And how much of it is complete bs....
So it could be that people who did'nt die were 'in the know'. Lets say they did mass poisoning via water supply, like in so many cases during wars. Perhaps they were informed not to drink publicly available water in a certain period et voila. Or they had antidotes available...
Makes sense!
I don't believe in contagious disease. I believe that several people may be intoxicated by being in a toxic environment which is polluted with untold muck from industry/biolabs/geo-engineering etc. I also believe that the symptoms we are hearing about are caused by electro-magnetic radiation since the roll out of 5G and Starlink satellites.
🎯
Ok, maybe I used wrong words. What I meant was that a poisoned person can "infect" other persons which are open to such "infections". If you have a weak biofield, you do not have to come into physical contact with poisons to be poisoned, you get poisoned/sick just by being around infected/poisoned/sick people.
You gently, and with your usual good sense of humor, provide details for the mRNA/spike protein red herring, which I only conjectured in my old article in which I have included a link to yours:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/the-problem-with-mrna
In short, my current description of the process is this:
Hydrogel-coated graphene oxide (GO) is often delivered, mostly in injections of any kind, and the GO self-assembles into a transmitter, a receiver, and a CPU. The resulting nano-computer attaches itself to the body and operates on bioelectricity. After that, it communicates with a central AI that is running a global simulation by receiving, sending, storing, and evaluating live data and sending commands to recipient units (just about anything or anyone among the IoT). Through possibly a protein-based neural interface, it is capable of downloading and uploading information, issue commands to the body to produce or not to produce certain enzymes, hormones, or the kitchen sink, and is able to modify the DNA. The latter is often mistaken for mRNA/spike protein technology, which is redundant under the circumstances, unless it has become controllable since the Soviets invented it in the early 1980s:
Thanks Ray, you've helped mold my ideas over your many helpful posts!
The gratitude is mutual. You usually provide details, where I don't.
There is simply no need to commit a layered mountain of fraudulent experiments & gamed studies to convince people that something exists when it's existence is self-evident, when it actually does exist.
- If you watch magic shows not because you believe in magic, but because it's fun to try to figure out how they pull off their tricks & fool an audience, you likely enjoy reading Proton Magic's substack.
🎯
Thank you for your work… so any thoughts as to what’s in the shots? I’d consider liquid Tide at this point
lipid nanoparticles (tagged in the biodistribution study) , hydrogel, quantum dots, peg, other chemicals but I don't have full data and proof on these things, metals...
GO possibly? Is that the hydrogel?
https://protonmagic.substack.com/p/the-true-nature-of-graphene
Many thanks. I have always thought that the modified mRNA made no real sense except that it would be a rubbish toxic product.
So in short, whatever is in the vaccines it is crap and injecting crap back into the body is Bad for us.
I wrote this back in 2021. It might amuse.
https://alphaandomegacloud.wordpress.com/2021/06/11/lies-youre-told-about-the-covid-vaccine-nhs-approved/
Very Good BM!
Excellent debunking, Proton Man. Out of all the wisdom you shared in this post, these wise words hit me the hardest: "That’s one hell of a mouthful of bullshit. I gotta take a gargle break. Be right back..." 😂
Thanks for your kind words, be sure, the studies 3 and 4 being suspicious doesn't mean I air-tight debunked them. Someone else might see something I missed or a new study might change the game!
Well, you've certainly opened a can of worms. 👍
Hydrogel is one of many generic terms for Vitaliano's clathrin GQD.
The tech is not just GO and 5G, GO cannot enter cells of neurons without clathrin. Clathrin is key for endocytosis; Clathrin delivers the GO into cells.
https://open.substack.com/pub/shawnpaulmelville/p/mrna-5g-graphene-oxide-clathrin-graphene
Let me copy the Note thread for the readers. Be clear my post is about mRNA as noted, not about GO, which I do not deny. However, you are making some statements which you need to have some research to back them up.
Your statement:
“CLATHRIN PROTEIN has been shown to act as the carrier for both the SARS-CoV-1 infection of 2004 and the more recent SARS-CoV-2 infection of 2019. The NWO just figured out a way to weaponize this protein and have inserted its mRNA code into the vaccine and COVID swab.”
From: https://substack.com/@protonmagic/note/c-41548287
Shawn Paul Melville
I have read both, the arguments are flawed.
shawnpaulmelville.substack.com/p/mrna-5…
mRNA + 5G + Graphene Oxide = Clathrin Graphene Quantum Dots, a “viral like particle”; the neural interface or “chip”.
There are some subscribers out there that have enjoyed my 5G/EMF and Graphene Oxide coverage, and I know there are going to question their subscription when I now start getting into the mRNA. I encourage those to stay, at least for a while. I have studied the mRNA, I have studied the GO and their 5G/EMF activating fields. In many ways are currently conflicting sides creating unnecessary debate; debate that divide the alt-COVID movement.
------------------------------------------------
Proton Magic:
Shawn, you only briefly mention Sars and mRNA in your post.
If you are saying these sars 1 and 2 exist, can you show us a study with a purified isolated particle characterized to be a pathogen with a non patient control sample? Nobody has yet done so on sars 1 or 2 (or any corona virus-but lets not widen the discussion), so you would become instantly very famous and win the 1.5Mil Euro prize, but you havn’t have you?
samueleckert.net/isolate-truth-fund
If you want to say the prize is invalid, fine, still show us the paper. This requires a density gradient, confirmation of this particle is the only on EM after gradient, direct genome sequencing on this purified particle, and optional (but preferred) reinfection of a host and reisolation.
Next, show us a paper, not just an SPM post, finding purified mRNA in the shots, and mRNA isolated purified FROM A SHOT VIAL with a dose-response curve to Clathrin or any other protein proven by purification in a chem analytic report.
Is it your opinion that there is no RNA in any of the shots/jabs and that those still talking about mRNA (messenger or modified), spike proteins, and antibodies to spike proteins, are either ignorant or engaged in perpetrating a fraud?
No, there is no final proof of RNA in or not in the shots. I can only say that no purified mRNA has been found that I and others have seen as of yet (though the mass spec study I reported may have found some RNA of unknown code, only the study wasn't blind, wasn't in the EUA formulation, wasn't confirmed with RNA purification, and needs reproducing), and neither has Sars related mRNA been shown to be in the shots by purification and direct sequencing. Should really just be in the Drug co CMC, PK/PD and Chem analyt reports but they didn't give those out and I havn't seen any. Spike though has no reports, no mRNA-spike dose response and a FOIA of no study showing it -link in the post.
big TQ
You surely did an awesome job of showing the BS They use to try and convince Us We should live in fear! Thanks!
Excellent work PM.
Glad you directed me over here.
The circus continues.
Although this comment may not directly apply to so called mRNA it may apply across the board to the other "creatures" spike, GO etc....
But even the "so called good guys" have been contaminated by a century of Rockefeller medicine and fake science. Images of the Spike Protein ? Obviously impossible by any form of optical microscopy. And even with the best electron microscopes, an “object” of that size at best would appear as a dot at their highest resolution possible.
Electron microscopes were a direct outcome of the quantum revolution when they discovered that “physical” particles had a wave length. The wavelength of light and of an electron determine the maximum resolution possible. But to reduce the wavelength of an electron they have to juice its kinetic energy which has a tendency to damage the object under study. These objects are often coated with metals which produce other artifacts. Don’t believe anything you hear and little of what you see.
I've consistently floated the idea that there appear multiple arms of 'pilot studies'. The single generalisable entity and the most powerful one always remains (in my jaundiced view) the psy-op assault, from whence all else comes, most especially, "social licence," and a very large quantity of paralysing malaise that affects wider society to this day.
There appear results from autopsies suggesting a degradation process (attributable to synthetic jab derived spike arising from DNA plasmid contamination) https://arkmedic.substack.com/p/mini-me-update. I have yet to study the articles in detail.
All of this is an unending task and it is apparent that we need to 'live' and 'breathe' despite being at the barricades in a bloody full-on war to which so many seem wantonly oblivious.
See if these are relevant to spike:
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/CDC-no-purified-spike-protein-PACKAGE-to-Dec-16-redacted.pdf
https://off-guardian.org/2022/11/07/that-mrna-vaccines-cause-cells-to-produce-spike-proteins-is-a-fairy-tale/
Scaglio is absolutely right. You want to prove the existence of the spike proteins in the bodies of the jabbed. Then test directly for these proteins. Why do they test with phony antigen tests when they have automated machines now that can separate and purify proteins in low concentrations? When I was in graduate school 30 years ago, it was somewhat tedious running the proteins through gels in an electrostatic field. But today, as Scaglio says, they have automated machines. So I assume they are not testing for spike proteins because there aren’t any and they need phony tests to cover it up. Just like the fake PCR test. Hope Scaglio has his life insurance paid up.
Thanks for reading. There is no virus so there is no sars and no sars spike. There is no mRNA to any synthetic spike dose response and if there was a spike you can be sure they would have done this study. The studies in this post don't conclusively show there is RNA in the shots to begin with, assuming RNA actually exists.
I'm not sure what is real or not from a computer, but the more presidential awards you get the more likely you are working for the blob.
On Graphene and Dr. Scog, see this
https://protonmagic.substack.com/p/the-true-nature-of-graphene
Great material here !
What a mind virus "-)
blob
Good point! BTW, do you have a link to the study looking for phosphorus and nitrogen?
But still it is good to debunk what papers say otherwise it can be said that "a paper said so".
Graphitic materials may be on pcr swabs and masks, but graphene is only hypothetical as you saw on my, "True Nature of Graphene post". You are free to have a different opinion but you would need to show a paper proving isolation and characterization of graphene, not just Ramen spectroscopy which does not show structure and function.
Sorry about the typo. I did make the post on The True Nature of Graphene
https://protonmagic.substack.com/p/the-true-nature-of-graphene
where THE FINDERS state it is hypothetical. Now you have been able to say your part on my SS but we are at the end of our discussion rope, pls don't chase me further around the comments as noted in the About page. Best regards.
1. See this on Yeadon, and you obviously missed my 2 posts on Yeadon,
https://mega.nz/file/MEI2XSDb#dqHqCI7rjZbm-AyLsWdi3zRutf2MiKb1OLILQ7gmnGE
and he's part of Team Enigma
https://mega.nz/file/sAB3BRbQ#SEy2C3tNwlsmEFscyRXdaDjqfMZzO7-QKTyJ7dOh5as
Here's one of my posts
https://protonmagic.substack.com/p/the-yeadon-challenge
2. On Sabrina, do you have a link to her bio, any academic record, or even self publishing articles BEFORE COVID, so we can see something about her? And if she has graduated from a Univ has anyone confirmed that?
I have other concerns about your list but at least if you can't debunk Yeadon who is abjectly NOT on the side of the common person, OR write to us that you have removed him from your list, I have SERIOUS misgivings about your honesty in making this list.
You are confusing her true claims with her propaganda tactic which is called "discredit by association". Can you show us her bio, not just that her info is true. You are not honestly replying.
Anyone who can spend all that time making placards can spend a few min to cover her disaster shelf and pin up her hair and put on a shirt. Her quirky placards she can't hold straight for 2 sec, rapid and hard to follow speech/messy room and self (in many vids) means she is associating true info with nutty people so that the masses (not people who know it's true) will conclude that anyone with the truths she says is nutty and the info is nutty.
This video here
https://francesleader.substack.com/p/sabrina-wallace-talks-to-frances/comment/41129013
is making out a traumatized and quirky persona (w/the spooky music), which will associate these traits with her other vids that tell the truth. That is a propaganda strategy called "discredit by association" also called poisoning the well. She is also taking up band width from more reasonable and rational presenters.
You did not read the Omar piece on Yeadon and your comments do not debunk this:
"Yeadon, a former vice-president and chief scientific officer of the Allergy and Respiratory at Pfizer, provided a simple explanation of why lockdowns could never have worked, went on to explain that there is “zero” chance of incessantly reported new variants escaping immunity. Since SARS-COV-2 has never been properly isolated, then there can be no proof of a variant of a thing that doesn’t exist. No scientist anywhere in the world can possibly verify a “variant” of a thing that doesn’t exist, for the simple fact that they have nothing to compare it to. So, anytime you hear Yeadon say the word “variant,” you can rest assured that he is lying."
You are avoiding the crux of the matter in my Omar quote above. I suggest you delete all your comments because you are clearly invading this post that is only about RNA. I can delete them for you or ban you if you want. I have them and all my replies copied.
It's much too late and completely incongruous with his work history to not have denied the virus in 2020 nor the pandemic. He is lying as Omar also says. Now pls make your reply into one or I will delete 3/4 of your replies here because your comments are misleading and have nothing to do with RNA really which is what this post is about. And you are not answering my question about Sabrina's bio.
You've made 4 replies, pls condense your replies into one otherwise I will have to assume that you are purposely overloading the comment section.