Discover more from Proton Magic News
Proton’s Last Theorem
Proton’s Last Theorem states that:
No paper satisfies definitive proof that RNA related to any “Sars-CoV-2” sequences exists in the C-19 injections vials, nor that RNA from these sequences in shots or so-called virus can integrate into the human genome. An infinite number of cases of unsolved medical fraud have been known since antiquity, and Proton Magic conjectures that RNA fraud is ongoing today.
The question of whether RNA was in Covid shots got reignited when reader John H. asked Proton to critique this paper from 2021:
Paper 1: Protein Expression Correlates Linearly with mRNA Dose over Up to Five Orders of Magnitude In Vitro and In Vivo
The paper is using a computer simulation from PCR and cell cultures, not direct measurement. You may think I’m leading to something grand, but mRNA to protein itself isn’t our objective here so we’ll skip the methods and results. What we want to takeaway is this line:
The paper states, "mRNA provides several advantages: There is no possibility of genomic insertion".
Huh? Lets see:
Paper 2: Reverse-transcribed SARS-CoV-2 RNA can integrate into the genome of cultured human cells and can be expressed in patient-derived tissues
Now this is nuts because Sars-CoV-2 does not exist, refer to the Proton Magic Fan Wu Expose. IF YOU DON’T UNDERSTAND THE FAN WU FRAUD YOU WILL HAVE A HARD TIME WITH THE REST OF THIS POST.
We show here that SARS-CoV-2 RNA can be reverse-transcribed and integrated into the genome of the infected cell.
Didn’t Paper 1 just say mRNA can not be integrated into the genome? Paper 4 below also says mRNA can integrate into the genome.
Our data suggest that, in some patient tissues, the majority of all viral transcripts are derived from integrated sequences.
Methods: SARS-CoV-2 USA-WA1/2020 (GenBank: MN985325.1) was obtained from BEI Resources and expanded and tittered on Vero cells.
⇒ I’ve already vetted-out BEI Resources (administered by ATCC) as only having non-purified Sars-CoV-2 cell cultures so this study is likely fraud.
We have the usual suspects again, Illumina (also used by Fan Wu) both for library construction as well as sequencing, and our old friend qPCR for quant analysis (cycles not specified).
There was a mock sample but not blind so that is missing, and Vero cells have abnormal genetics which just makes any genetic examination muddy.
We constructed [not found] libraries for HEK293T cell whole-genome sequencing using the llumina DNA Prep kit
Conclusion: SARS-CoV-2 sequences can be reverse-transcribed and integrated into the DNA of infected human cells in culture. Only a fraction of patients may carry SARS-CoV-2 sequences integrated in the DNA of some cells. However, with more than 140 million humans infected with SARS-CoV-2 worldwide (as of April, 2021), even a rare event could be of significant clinical relevance.
That’s one hell of a mouthful of bullshit. I gotta take a gargle break. Be right back...
Paper 3: Oligonucleotide mapping via mass spectrometry to enable comprehensive primary structure characterization of an mRNA vaccine against SARS‑CoV‑2
Oligonucleotide mapping via liquid chromatography with UV detection coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (LC‑UV‑MS/MS) was recently developed to support development of Comirnaty, the world’s first commercial mRNA vaccine which immunizes against the SARS‑CoV‑2 virus.
⇒ Note, this procedure itself was made specifically for Comirnaty, could it actually fail? And even the paper states it, “immunizes against the SARS‑CoV‑2 virus” promoting two false statements, vaccine efficacy and existence of a virus in one sentence. Do you smell the conflict of interest cake baking in the oven?
⇒ They didn’t study the EUA injection that everyone got, it was the “approved” formulation which wasn’t used (because they would have then had to get informed consent and disclose all the ingredients of the shots).
BioPharma Finder version 5.0 software (Thermo Fisher Scientific) was used to identify oligonucleotides based on both MS [mass spectroscopy] and MS/MS matches to theoretical [our favorite science word] RNase digest products.
⇒ Ooh, the ol’ laptop PC in the back pocket” trick pumping our those beautiful theoretical matches.
LC-MS/MS-oligonucleotide mapping was developed to provide direct, comprehensive characterization of mRNA primary structure for the Comirnaty BNT162b2 vaccine against SARS-CoV-2.
⇒ How can it be “against SARS-CoV-2” since it doesn’t even exist? Aah, it’s matching the same sequences printed out from a prior software output (Trinity and Megahit). Proton’s last theorem is looking good.
Note, I’m only seeing big problems in the sequences of the RNA said to be found, it may be that RNA itself was found, but this study would need to be reproduced by independent and blinded researchers using the EUA formulation, different boosters, bivalent, etc. shots and batches. Importantly, purified RNA should be confirmed along with doing any mass spectroscopy studies.
Paper4: Intracellular Reverse Transcription of Pfizer BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 In Vitro in Human Liver Cell Line
Immortal liver carcinoma cells (Huh7) were exposed to BNT162b2, and quantitative PCR was performed on RNA extracted from the cells. Results indicate a fast up-take of BNT162b2 into human liver cell DNA.
⇒ HuH－7 is a complex karyotype composed of massive loss of heterozygosity. This means the chromosomes are quite disordered in these cells, like Vero cells we don’t know what we’re getting.
Note: Comirnaty, the approved injection is BNT162b2 which was the code name during development and testing, tozinameran is the international nonproprietary name, and Comirnaty is the brand name. According to BioNTech, the name “Comirnaty represents a combination of the terms COVID‑19, mRNA, community, and immunity".
Huh7 cells were cultured with or without increasing concentrations of BNT162b2 (0.5, 1.0 and 2.0 µg/mL) for 6, 24, and 48 h. RNA was extracted from cells and a real-time quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) was performed using primers targeting the BNT162b2 sequence at 35 cycles. 444 out of 4284 bases were looked at.
RT-qPCR results showed that Huh7 cells treated with BNT162b2 had high levels of BNT162b2 mRNA relative to “housekeeping genes” with fast entry of BNT162b2 into the cells and subsequent intracellular reverse transcription of BNT162b2 mRNA into DNA.
⇒ Now how do we know that the 444 bases were not known to be in these abnormal liver cells and THEN looked at, or that there wasn’t even more abject manipulation of the findings to fit the results? At least we need this study repeated by independent groups, blinded to the addition of BNT to cell cultures or not, and in a cell culture with a normal genome. Again, Cominarty is not the EUA formulation that has been injected into people.
👉 Wouldn’t it be better to purify RNA and direct sequence the vials of the EUA shots themselves under blind conditions (without a blind there is no full control group)? This proton votes this study has too many problems, but that’s like voting after the election.
Summary & Discussion
Paper 1 says RNA cannot integrate into the host’s genome, but papers 2 and 4 seem to think it can integrate.
Paper 2 in Vero cells says Sars-CoV-2 RNA CAN integrate into the host’s genome.
Paper 3 using vials, says Sars-Cov-2 RNA oligonucleotides are matched in the shot vials on mass spectroscopy.
Paper 4 in liver cancer cells says, vax mRNA can integrate into host genome.
Using the term “Sars-CoV-2” in these papers mean high-level researchers are either intentionally avoiding or ignorant of the fraud of non-discovery of any virus, the latter completely incongruent with their research skills.
Paper 1 is not about Sars or injections and is not the subject of method analysis here, it is just to show you that some researchers say RNA cannot get into your DNA, a contradiction to 2 of the other papers.
Papers 2 & 4 used PCR, paper 2 with no ct specified (that I could find), paper 4 at 35 cycles which is on the high-side, and PCR is not a direct measurement of the independent variable only a partial surrogate marker with many other problems.
Papers 2 and 3 used software analyses to confirm sequences which can easily be fabricated.
Paper 2 had mock samples but no blind and used non human Vero cells known to have abnormal genetic material.
Paper 3 had unblinded decoy controls, paper 4 had controls but no blind, used cells with disordered chromatin instead of normal human cells. Paper 3 may have found RNA on mass spectroscopy, but the methods do not prove any RNA was related to Sars-CoV-2 specified sequences. This study would need to be reproduced by independent and blinded researchers and validated on finding RNA itself. Since the sample was not independently purified this could also lead to questions about whether there was an independent validation of the spectroscopy callibration which I didn’t delve into.
Papers 3 & 4 used the Cominarty formulation, not the EUA in actual use. Thanks to Dr. Mark Bailey for directing me to read papers 3 & 4.
Papers 2,3,4 show limitations to direct measurement of the variables in question.
Now, Proton’s Last Theorem isn’t fully proven, because you never know when the miracle paper will appear that has researcher blinded mock samples showing purified and direct sequenced mRNA in the shots, how much RNA, what it does, consistency by batch etc.
👉 But be sure, RNA can be purified! Why do all this merry-go-round cell culturing, pcr. & mass spectroscopy? Let’s first directly confirm that it is in the shots and how much!
There is one more important point, This little proton has never seen any C-19 “vaccine” making drug company documents with CMC (formulation), PK (pharmacokinetics), or PD (pharmacodynamics) reports of any kind much less one discussing mRNA. The one external biodistribution study ordered by the Japanese authorities looked only at the LNPs, not RNA nor spike proteins (which have also not been found to be made by the shots).
👉As of now, we can’t confidently say that any drug maker’s stated Sars-CoV-2 RNA sequences have been found in the shots, nor that RNA from the shots (and certainly not from any virus) are integrated into the human genome. And yes, I knew this before I made the theorem, so I have to admit the theorem was reverse engineered after getting the data, we can call this “circular theorem making”. IF that’s fraud then this proton is guilty as charged.
Yours Truly, Proton Magic & Co.
Thanks for reading Proton Magic News! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.