Many are aware the Stargate Project circus is another jab-and-stab shit show. The planners of smart cities and land grabbing management can’t do it with the large people numbers now on the planet, they have to whittle down the population to fit with the number of seats on the bus to hell.
People talk about Trump suddenly pushing this out, and the shady backgrounds of Ellison and Altman. That is all fine and dandy but misses the whole biological illogic of the circus. Here I will give the five short bio-bullet points that you will want to use to talk your friends and family out of this nonsense before desperate people euthanize themselves.
1. 👉Since there is no mRNA in the Covid shots, saying there will be mRNA in the Stargate shots is ridiculous.
There was never any mRNA-Spike protein dose-response curve presented. If there was it would quickly be shown to not be reproducible exposing that there is no mRNA nor spike protein in the shots.
☞In addition, See Hagimă, G. (2023a). Electron microscopy investigation of COVID “vaccines” (SEM-EDX) Comirnaty Omicron and Moderna.
2.👉Proteins (the antigens) do not need to be made by mRNA, industry does just fine making them.
According to the “mRNA to protein to antibody response” vaccine logic, there should already be cancer fragments that could be found that would lead to an antigenic protein made by industrial cell lines and injected into an individual to make an antibody response, where are they?
Many famous protein therapeutics are already on the market. Proteins are not hard to make (note that antibodies (-mabs) ARE proteins; yes proteins can be foreign antigens, antibodies, and cell receptors for antigens). The number of protein drugs in the source is even greater than in this redacted image and this was 10 years ago:
3.👉Why use the mRNA story since we know it’s is so dangerous? Because the story for public consumption is that they saved so many lives from Covid and will surely save so many lives from cancer.
4.👉Is there a clinical trial for even one type of cancer using AI & mRNA to make a protein antigen that stimulates antibodies? They didn’t present any trial data nor a proof-of-concept much less ask where the data is.
The trial list is in this review paper published just 2 weeks ago (coincidence?): Clinical advances of mRNA vaccines for cancer immunotherapy (BUT, they did not use AI). You can see the list of studies, only one of 42 studies listed is complete which included antibody therapy in addition so that evaluation of vax efficacy is nearly impossible. Still, there is the no-mRNA problem, that there is actually no need for mRNA to begin with since protein antigens can easily be made and given to patients, that the studies in the list are not using the patient-specific protein antigens that Stargate wants to use they are only using protein fragments derived from tumor-specific mutations, and the lack of antibody specificity as described below.
How will Stargate do a clinical trial when tumor-specific antigens may differ from patient to patient?
How will Stargate get animal data or pre-clinical toxicology data when the proteins in the mRNA code may be specific to only one patient. It would only be “clinical experience”.
We know there is no mRNA anyway, how can there be clinical experience even?
The avg American can’t even spell “clinical” much less understand how a clinical trial would need to be done especially when they’ve been spun in circles by tumor fragment spotted by AI→mRNA vax →protein antigen→antibody→tumor merry-go-round.
5.👉Even if mRNA was there making the “cancer-specific protein” we know that antibodies are not specific anyway. There is no fucking point to any of this mRNA making a protein antigen to stimulating antibody production.
Here, “cross-reactive” means non-specific, “peptides” are small protein antigens, and “MHC” are the T cell surface proteins (receptors) essential to recognize foreign antigens:
Just so you understand how T cells are supposedly connected to antibodies from wiki:
killer T cells function by further activating memory B cells [that make antibodies] and cytotoxic T cells, which leads to a larger immune response.
☞ Then again, even wikipedia admits that T cell descriptions are just a model. Ah, immunity is all just a model.😮
Artwork photos that prove antibodies will kill tumors. However, even art can’t illustrate specificity, it’s just an antibody free-for-all.
If you search whether antibodies are specific or not you will find that the main stream says they are both and that there are “memory B cells”. They are hedging the truth with a lie because non-specificity doesn’t bode well for various therapeutics, nor personalized euthanasia medical care AKA Stargate. Read the Nature article just above to understand why they must be non-specific.
☞From cooker to plate it’s all a crock of shit☜
mRNA in-situ
Ok, I give in to showing the political circus-just a little.
Note the gold-fringed flag showing the US is under Admiralty Law. See this:
Either Ellison and Son both wear diapers causing their pants to crunch-up, or this is a symbol of a secret fraternity, or the White House tailor is on adrenochrome. Here is a real man’s trouser break:
Yours Truly,
Proton Magic
The only spike I recall seeing was Spike Milligan. At least he was funny.
Production cost of mrna went from over $3k to $2 odd in one year, for one shot, we are led to believe. I don't.
They took turns testing different poisons with open allowances of changing up to 50% of the constituents of the jabs. That's why different places / times may have produced different analysis of jabs.
When you are going to commit democide you'd want to do it as cheaply as possible. I think they achieved that.
Thanks Proton.
Great catch on the fringe of the flag! I can't believe people are falling over this BS. Trump may have gotten us out of the WHO, but put us into Gates' nightmare who owns the WHO anyway. Trump doesn't surround himself with "top people" but bottom feeders. Thank you Proton for getting this info out there.