NB. The Australian authorities (consistent with their frenzied devotion to jabs) are currently embarked full noise on promoting blood donation, reported by SkyNews:
Dec 20. Australians urged to donate blood to prevent shortage
Vampiric? I don't know if you have found credible the subject of adrenochrome, but somehow I feel that all of this is very closely related, with this business, and lab-grown blood, and blood transfusions for the health of those ($ickos) that can afford such, being kicked about in the "news"...
I personally have never donated, nor received blood, and cannot condemn those that do, but anyone with any sense would be hesitant to receive any blood, short of saving a life, I would think.
I am sure that the average person would be sickened to discover what horrors the medical establishment conducts behind the curtains, as profit galore is made from our collective misery, and our direct and subliminally enforced subjugation to the jack-boots.
So, let us find strength in our ability to face down these purveyors of filth, and perhaps a few will be miraculously turned away from their perversions, to turn a new leaf, and join the Good Side?
I'll put my faith in Spirit, not man, nor his science, and my decision has paid me handsomely many times over during this lifetime.
Cheers! - and thank you for your time and energy writing .
My husband had to have a planned back surgery a few months after our son was killed by the J&J in 2021. Although there was not a need for a transfusion he banked his blood before hand at a private facility. We would have done this regardless of the entire psyop that spike, etc whatever is supposedly in jabbed blood. You would think that hospitals would keep fresh blood for others if it wasn’t needed for the recipient but they don’t. At least not at the hospital in NJ my husband was at. They toss it. In any type of ER you can’t choose between unvaccinated or vaccinated blood, so yea, it’s a scam. Giving blood is very beneficial for your body. It gets excess iron out. Especially for women past menopause
"I have yet to hear of a study showing mRNA-Spike dose response curve, so is mRNA and/or Spike protein even in the shots?"
It'll unlikely such studies will be undertaken, as the individual response is unpredictable.
"We did observe highly variable immune responses including those with well below average anti-RBD IgG levels and avidity. It is therefore important to monitor immune responses at the individualized and personalized level, identify those who are still at risk even after vaccination, and provide meaningful measures to protect them from infections."
Evolution of Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG Antibody and IgG Avidity Post Pfizer and Moderna mRNA Vaccinations. Bliden KP et al. (July 2021)
I didn’t see any measure of mRNA so that this isn’t a dose-response study. They say, “Anti-spike protein receptor binding domain IgG antibody levels and IgG avidity indices were measured”. Antibodies can bind to many kinds of foreign antigens, we would need to see specific epitope affinity and avidity studies just to see if the said antibody was related to what the mRNA was said to be making (Even before that, we need to see the mRNA in the shot, sequence it, and see that is makes what is said to be spike to begin with). And even if there is individual response, there should clearly be some dose-response even if variable, otherwise the entire mechanism explanation falls on its face, which seems to be the case.
Separately, the paper starts off with a false statement on 2 levels.
“Messenger RNA (mRNA) based vaccines (Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna) have shown to be highly effective at providing immunity against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)”
1. even if we assume that the shots are actually doing what they say, that there is a sars-c-2 to treat, and that the PCR actually measures infection with sars-c-2, the studies used relative risk not absolute risk (see the Pfizer clinical trial report). Relative risk is only comparing a few subjects who did or did not have a +pcr and maybe a cough, low fever, muscle pains etc. So in a study with thousands of persons, >99% who had no symptoms or +pcr, the "shot” helped a few cough less. Well…? You need to compare the effects on these nothing burger symptoms to all the thousands of people in the study which would give you <1% “efficacy”, AND look at the side effects (I think there was 1 more death in the vaxed group).
2. No one has shown that sars-c-2 exists (see https://protonmagic.substack.com/p/fan-wu-naked-centerfold and the references at the bottom), and so a PCR test cannot test for something that doesn’t exist (probably cant test for things that do exist anyway because pcr only tests for DNA fragments that are in everyone).
Yes, thank you PM. I am well acquainted with all of those important points. However, the point I was making was the acknowledgement by the authors tucked away in the conclusion that there is in fact no generalisability of immune response seen in their study, which may also may also speak to RNA epigenetics, as in, Willbanks, A.;Wood, S.; Cheng, J.X. RNA Epigenetics:Fine-Tuning Chromatin Plasticity and Transcriptional Regulation, and the Implications in Human Diseases. Genes 2021, 12, 627. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12050627
The nonsensical hand-waving use of RR, RRR, metagenomic in silico fantasies, in fact, I recurrently wonder I am engaged in any of this nonsense. So, another reason such studies will not be undertaken is precisely because (my point) there is no 'dose response' to be observed.
Ok great, I now see what you were thinking! About RNA epigenetics, that is a topic I'm not familiar with, though I know a bit about DNA epigenetics. It's a long paper, sorry I can't go thru it all. It seems that mRNA can also have epigenetics: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24768686/ If synthetic mRNA was in the shots would it get modified epigenetically? If so, what would that do to making the spike protein? Seems to me another spanner in the works of mRNA vaccine technology altogether. Thanks for bringing up these interesting points.
The list of artifice and 'construct' is accompanied by a counter-list of uncertainties or unknowns around deleterious effects, many of which are being discerned. I was thinking that an additional factor of unpredictability seen in individual responses (aside from inflammatory responses associated with LNP) may also depend on the individual variation in the epigenetic manner in which the synthetic mRNA is handled?
Thank you for your excellent commentary. BTW, Firefox labels your link as a "fake site" ..."danger" etc ... The SillyConMen are working hard at censorship!
I used to donate blood regularly. Then I read the fine print and found out that most of what I was donating was actually being sold to private labs and not saving anyone’s life. Are you kidding me?
There are blood banks that offer non-vaxxed blood exclusively, I believe in Europe. Whether they will be shut down or not remains to be seen.
NB. The Australian authorities (consistent with their frenzied devotion to jabs) are currently embarked full noise on promoting blood donation, reported by SkyNews:
Dec 20. Australians urged to donate blood to prevent shortage
https://www.skynews.com.au/australia-news/australians-urged-to-donate-blood-to-prevent-shortage/video/76f221d18786b1911797513779b2c821
Dec 29. Red Cross makes desperate plea for blood donors to avoid national shortage crisis
https://www.skynews.com.au/breaking-news/red-cross-makes-desperate-plea-for-blood-donors-to-avoid-national-shortage-crisis/news-story/2bd209cbbe928085bfaa6e8eae7a8144
Vampiric? I don't know if you have found credible the subject of adrenochrome, but somehow I feel that all of this is very closely related, with this business, and lab-grown blood, and blood transfusions for the health of those ($ickos) that can afford such, being kicked about in the "news"...
I personally have never donated, nor received blood, and cannot condemn those that do, but anyone with any sense would be hesitant to receive any blood, short of saving a life, I would think.
I am sure that the average person would be sickened to discover what horrors the medical establishment conducts behind the curtains, as profit galore is made from our collective misery, and our direct and subliminally enforced subjugation to the jack-boots.
So, let us find strength in our ability to face down these purveyors of filth, and perhaps a few will be miraculously turned away from their perversions, to turn a new leaf, and join the Good Side?
I'll put my faith in Spirit, not man, nor his science, and my decision has paid me handsomely many times over during this lifetime.
Cheers! - and thank you for your time and energy writing .
My husband had to have a planned back surgery a few months after our son was killed by the J&J in 2021. Although there was not a need for a transfusion he banked his blood before hand at a private facility. We would have done this regardless of the entire psyop that spike, etc whatever is supposedly in jabbed blood. You would think that hospitals would keep fresh blood for others if it wasn’t needed for the recipient but they don’t. At least not at the hospital in NJ my husband was at. They toss it. In any type of ER you can’t choose between unvaccinated or vaccinated blood, so yea, it’s a scam. Giving blood is very beneficial for your body. It gets excess iron out. Especially for women past menopause
Thanks for sharing your moving story Pamela and best wishes.
"I have yet to hear of a study showing mRNA-Spike dose response curve, so is mRNA and/or Spike protein even in the shots?"
It'll unlikely such studies will be undertaken, as the individual response is unpredictable.
"We did observe highly variable immune responses including those with well below average anti-RBD IgG levels and avidity. It is therefore important to monitor immune responses at the individualized and personalized level, identify those who are still at risk even after vaccination, and provide meaningful measures to protect them from infections."
Evolution of Anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG Antibody and IgG Avidity Post Pfizer and Moderna mRNA Vaccinations. Bliden KP et al. (July 2021)
Hello Latus, in the paper you reference here
https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/circ.144.suppl_1.12430
I didn’t see any measure of mRNA so that this isn’t a dose-response study. They say, “Anti-spike protein receptor binding domain IgG antibody levels and IgG avidity indices were measured”. Antibodies can bind to many kinds of foreign antigens, we would need to see specific epitope affinity and avidity studies just to see if the said antibody was related to what the mRNA was said to be making (Even before that, we need to see the mRNA in the shot, sequence it, and see that is makes what is said to be spike to begin with). And even if there is individual response, there should clearly be some dose-response even if variable, otherwise the entire mechanism explanation falls on its face, which seems to be the case.
Separately, the paper starts off with a false statement on 2 levels.
“Messenger RNA (mRNA) based vaccines (Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna) have shown to be highly effective at providing immunity against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)”
1. even if we assume that the shots are actually doing what they say, that there is a sars-c-2 to treat, and that the PCR actually measures infection with sars-c-2, the studies used relative risk not absolute risk (see the Pfizer clinical trial report). Relative risk is only comparing a few subjects who did or did not have a +pcr and maybe a cough, low fever, muscle pains etc. So in a study with thousands of persons, >99% who had no symptoms or +pcr, the "shot” helped a few cough less. Well…? You need to compare the effects on these nothing burger symptoms to all the thousands of people in the study which would give you <1% “efficacy”, AND look at the side effects (I think there was 1 more death in the vaxed group).
2. No one has shown that sars-c-2 exists (see https://protonmagic.substack.com/p/fan-wu-naked-centerfold and the references at the bottom), and so a PCR test cannot test for something that doesn’t exist (probably cant test for things that do exist anyway because pcr only tests for DNA fragments that are in everyone).
Yes, thank you PM. I am well acquainted with all of those important points. However, the point I was making was the acknowledgement by the authors tucked away in the conclusion that there is in fact no generalisability of immune response seen in their study, which may also may also speak to RNA epigenetics, as in, Willbanks, A.;Wood, S.; Cheng, J.X. RNA Epigenetics:Fine-Tuning Chromatin Plasticity and Transcriptional Regulation, and the Implications in Human Diseases. Genes 2021, 12, 627. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12050627
The nonsensical hand-waving use of RR, RRR, metagenomic in silico fantasies, in fact, I recurrently wonder I am engaged in any of this nonsense. So, another reason such studies will not be undertaken is precisely because (my point) there is no 'dose response' to be observed.
Ok great, I now see what you were thinking! About RNA epigenetics, that is a topic I'm not familiar with, though I know a bit about DNA epigenetics. It's a long paper, sorry I can't go thru it all. It seems that mRNA can also have epigenetics: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24768686/ If synthetic mRNA was in the shots would it get modified epigenetically? If so, what would that do to making the spike protein? Seems to me another spanner in the works of mRNA vaccine technology altogether. Thanks for bringing up these interesting points.
The list of artifice and 'construct' is accompanied by a counter-list of uncertainties or unknowns around deleterious effects, many of which are being discerned. I was thinking that an additional factor of unpredictability seen in individual responses (aside from inflammatory responses associated with LNP) may also depend on the individual variation in the epigenetic manner in which the synthetic mRNA is handled?
Thank you for your excellent commentary. BTW, Firefox labels your link as a "fake site" ..."danger" etc ... The SillyConMen are working hard at censorship!
The pubmed link or my substack link?
Substack.
Click on substack link in email and this comes up with a box to tick to accept the "risk."
"Warning: suspected fake website"
I used to donate blood regularly. Then I read the fine print and found out that most of what I was donating was actually being sold to private labs and not saving anyone’s life. Are you kidding me?