A choice quote: "These results highlight the potential viability of SARS-CoV-2 in feces, its ongoing mutational accumulation, and its possible role in fecal-oral transmission."
Hi Sanjoy, this post wasnt about Hazan but there was someone on Kirsch's sub pushing Hazan that made me look into it and respond. I think the main problem with Hazan was she(?) called taking RNA out of the turd as "isolate" which is a shitty way to prove a virus.
What inspired this post was the fact that we in the no-virus group have to better explain why SOME persons do get sick when around other sick persons in physical and temporal proximity SOMETIMES. Psychological suggestion or electromagnetic/energy resonance are unprovable and these theories are just giving ammo to our detractors. The fact is, when we sneeze or cough, cell debris and maybe cell signals and other stuff does get out in the air, just sneeze in your hands. We don't need unprovable theories (which I'm not saying are false) to know that sh*t (but not viruses) goes from person to person.
Thanks so much. I thought it would flop like a doggie's ears and almost ditched it a few times. Wasn't sure if my no-virus buddies would get it, or accept the fact that a non-germ sickness can be transmitted.
Visual cues and many other factors can definitely transmit things, yawning is not caused by germs but is surely contagious, even reading the word! And I don't think it is sickness that's being transmitted between people- I think it's health https://georgiedonny.substack.com/p/brainwashing-about-contagion-is-a
You are right, there are many factors at play in the many different phenomena that seem catchable" between persons. The problem is that only those phenomena with easily measurable parameters (like studying respiratory symptoms from plaster particles in an experiment room where plaster is pulverized) lend themselves to objective measurement. I.e., having a number of groups with different plaster particle levels incl a mock group. Then again you'd have to blind or mask the plaster smell to rule-out the "knowing" you are breathing it in factor-not so easy.
But to say there is a pathogen causing transmissible illness when you have not even found any pathogen in the transmitter or transmittee is no different than doing the plaster experiment where there is no plaster found to exist either in the plaster pulverizer nor in the air, ergo "nonsense" (oh, that's exactly what virology is!).
Were you inspired by Sabine Hazan, MD etc., who insists on finding the prodigal virus in sh*t?
"Detection of SARS-CoV-2 from patient fecal samples by whole genome sequencing"
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33516247/
A choice quote: "These results highlight the potential viability of SARS-CoV-2 in feces, its ongoing mutational accumulation, and its possible role in fecal-oral transmission."
Hi Sanjoy, this post wasnt about Hazan but there was someone on Kirsch's sub pushing Hazan that made me look into it and respond. I think the main problem with Hazan was she(?) called taking RNA out of the turd as "isolate" which is a shitty way to prove a virus.
What inspired this post was the fact that we in the no-virus group have to better explain why SOME persons do get sick when around other sick persons in physical and temporal proximity SOMETIMES. Psychological suggestion or electromagnetic/energy resonance are unprovable and these theories are just giving ammo to our detractors. The fact is, when we sneeze or cough, cell debris and maybe cell signals and other stuff does get out in the air, just sneeze in your hands. We don't need unprovable theories (which I'm not saying are false) to know that sh*t (but not viruses) goes from person to person.
Sabine Hazan insinuates that she has "smelled the virus", page 7:
https://www.fluoridefreepeel.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/exchange-with-Hazan.pdf
She doesn't write or have the maturity an actual Dr. should have. Something doesn't smell right about her.
😂
😂
Hilarious! Thank you.
Lol, genius!!
Thanks so much. I thought it would flop like a doggie's ears and almost ditched it a few times. Wasn't sure if my no-virus buddies would get it, or accept the fact that a non-germ sickness can be transmitted.
Visual cues and many other factors can definitely transmit things, yawning is not caused by germs but is surely contagious, even reading the word! And I don't think it is sickness that's being transmitted between people- I think it's health https://georgiedonny.substack.com/p/brainwashing-about-contagion-is-a
Jo
🐒
You are right, there are many factors at play in the many different phenomena that seem catchable" between persons. The problem is that only those phenomena with easily measurable parameters (like studying respiratory symptoms from plaster particles in an experiment room where plaster is pulverized) lend themselves to objective measurement. I.e., having a number of groups with different plaster particle levels incl a mock group. Then again you'd have to blind or mask the plaster smell to rule-out the "knowing" you are breathing it in factor-not so easy.
But to say there is a pathogen causing transmissible illness when you have not even found any pathogen in the transmitter or transmittee is no different than doing the plaster experiment where there is no plaster found to exist either in the plaster pulverizer nor in the air, ergo "nonsense" (oh, that's exactly what virology is!).
Hiya PM news, this new methodology has also been used to show the existence of the lovely little flower fairies x https://georgiedonny.substack.com/p/we-cant-find-them-therefore-they
🐒