There is a pattern that repeats over and over with many Phoenician operatives. THEY have a secret you see. Whether they are entertainers or nearly any profession with notoriety the narrative is almost always put out there that they started out poor or middle class. The poorer they can get away with the better. Oprah, for example, spun her upbringing which was modest but perfectly comfortable into a tale of destitute poverty, living in SHACK! THEY can't have the public figuring out that all advancement, in every field, is because of family connections and not any particular talent or drive. That is one of the main illusions that holds their matrix together and keeps people working to advance, even though they never will without the connections. This is an illusion THEY will and do maintain at any cost. You start seeing this everywhere once you are aware of it.
So what is the name of this New dance craze we are experiencing please Dr Mike;
You know the one where we place an object in the middle of the room, point at it, shout at it and then spiral our heads out of control until we all fall on the floor.........
Thank you for the important links and the detailed history of Mike's viewpoints!
The first and last time I conversed with him was sometime around May, 2022, and he was "not convinced" that viruses don't exist. I told him what probably truckloads of others told him, and he changed his stance a few weeks later.
Personally, I am finding it an abomination that he is now pushing the mRNA/spike protein BS, but this red herring seems to mislead a lot of people, so I had to sum up the logic in plain English:
"The next step is to call out graphene and self-assembling nano structures and how EMFs will interact with them.”
I'm not sure your profession, PM, (well, maybe I do) but I have had a career as a technologist.
My first title was "electronics technician" and I repaired electronic cash registers. My last title when I retired was Systems Engineer, and I helped repair, maintain, and operate a datacenter w/ massive linux clusters and custom supercomputers. I attended some college (2 years) but have no degree.
In 1984 I was hired by Texas Instruments. I was hired as an electronics tech for an integrated circuit design shop. That's when I encountered Unix, and my life changed.
I'm just saying this to establish that I know something about technology,
I am 100% certain that "self assembling nano-robots" that are both injectable, but also chirp over Bluetooth and/or Wifi => these things are SCI FI. It is ridiculous nonsense. Nothing close to this is possible.
It's just a different kind of Fear Porn, only targeted to those who got the shot.
"Wuh!? I am turning into a CYBORG!? I can feel the machine taking control of my spinal cord and neo-cortext". No no no, please.
We have limited time here. We need to be efficient.
If you want to go after 1 thing, then make it "The Virus".
2 things? Add the PCR test
3? No diagnostic OF ANY KIND exists for covid!
There are more, but each one of those is a complete SHOW STOPPER!
Christine Massey has DESTROYED #1. She built the evidence record herself (with helpers).
Eric Coppolino did the deepest dive into PCR that I know. He is recognized as a worldwide authority on PCR.
We don't need to go into vaccines AT ALL. Especially dodgy areas like graphene oxide, self assembling nano robots, and other Science Fiction.
Going after Vaccines to stop the COVID Hoax
is like trying to stop the war by suing the company that makes the bullets.
Of course the Clotshots are Toxic!
We knew that a year ago!
It is very easy to show.
33,000 are DEAD in VAERS,
likely 100x worse (Harvard Pilgrim study)
33,000 x 100 = 3.3M Dead.
That's just for the United States.
But the main point is the shots are CONTRAINDICATED
FOR ALL PERSONS, because they ain't no Fxcking CONVID!
So let's focus on that. The Narrative "Root Causes".
The "Core Lie" of the Hoax, as Debbie Lusignan would say.
I hadn't read his exchange with Christine. It's interesting what he says about T cells that were MOSTLY absent from about HALF of the people who hadn't gone through a detox event! They WERE present in about HALF (were the other half not tested? he doesn't give the paper) Understanding more now about how the body triggers inflammation and healing events with proteins, mistakenly thought to be viral, possibly p132-230 (spiky), of course T cells that recognise these cellular factors and proteins will be present in those detoxing, in order to regulate them and control homeostasis. They will also be present in those who haven't recently detoxed, maybe in smaller amounts.
I have been wondering why he has gone quiet. Maybe he's not allowed to speak in the 'controlled opposition' virus believers against the clot shots. Maybe he's still coming to terms with a career which he thought was helping people in fact was making them ill.
"I've actually come to the conclusion, [and] I will credit Cowen and his colleagues...I had a really good chat with those guys early in 2020...and it bothered me bothered me... and I realized over time that I could no longer maintain my understanding of respiratory viruses as I thought I knew them....I learned a new bit of information recently...just it collapsed...the possibility that respiratory viruses as currently desribed exist at all: they don't. "
In regards to this statement:
“Can you outline why attempting to persuade the public AND ALL OTHER COMMENTATORS ON OUR SIDE that “viruses don’t exist” is superior to the isolated truth (independent both of viruses AND of “vaccines”) that governments have lied continually?
I will play the devils advocate here so that Yeadon has some form of defense:
1) In the 1970's, Saul Alinsky published a book titled: "Rules for Radicals," in which he warns about trying to accomplish too much, at one time, because people overwhelmed with unconformist, radical, information will simply ignore what you have to say.
2) If the objective is to warn people about the dangers of the vaccine, then Alinksy might ask himself whether it's better to attack the government or virologists at this particular point in time.
3) People like Yeadon might believe it's counterpoductive to attack virology, which is a debate that will rage on for decades; and while that debate is necessary and productive in the long term, it might be counterproductive in the short term.
In other words, the average citizen might think your position is so improbable, that they will simply ignore everything else that you have to say. In the end, according to Alinsky, and perhaps this is how Yeadon feels, you will accomplish nothing.
This might also speak to the sacred and the profane. Centralized actors, historically, have leaned towards tyranny. In other words, convincing folks that the CDC is corrupt, that Pharma might be corrupt, and that the vaccines side effects have been ignored for personal gain, etc, is a much easier task, then convincing them that thousands of scientists are wrong, and not just wrong, but possibly conspiring and collaborating to commit crimes against humanity.
Back in 2020 or 2021 I had a brief back and forth with Yeadon on Telegram.
He was pushing "treatments", specifically I think it was Dr Z's protocol.
I called him out for pushing bs.
He told me it was very effective when treated early.
I pointed out that there was no way to differentiate if someone had "the flu", "covid" or simply a headache.
He told me it doesn't matter, it was effective.
I asked how he could be sure it was effective he stated that the people treated had better outcomes than those not treated.
Then I asked how he knew how severe those treated would have been without treatment if he couldn't even determine if they were sick with "covid" or not.
Again he replied that it doesn't matter.
He stopped replying after I asked how you compare those "treated" with a "disease" that is mostly "asymptomatic".
That is when I knew beyond a shadow of a doubt that he was controlled op or just very stupid.
A while later I watched the clip of him saying that respiratory viruses do not exist as described and thought that he may have chosen to be truthful.
He disappeared from the spotlight and decided not to push that fact out.
I can't say I'm surprised by the fact that he still pushes the virus deception.
This seems like a divisive piece to be honest. I don't think everyone has to believe in the same things to work together. In essence I get "if you don't agree with me, you're a shill" "we better all think alike"
Narcissistic gatekeeper by traits, beyond the ability to see themselves and their own glass ceiling. See the Ana, Harold interview.
See loops back to her achievements ( very notable), but fails to comprehend that everything she has discovered he looked at years ago. She failed to listen carefully and ask pertinent questions to probe to where his thoughts are currently and the understanding to get there.
There is a pattern that repeats over and over with many Phoenician operatives. THEY have a secret you see. Whether they are entertainers or nearly any profession with notoriety the narrative is almost always put out there that they started out poor or middle class. The poorer they can get away with the better. Oprah, for example, spun her upbringing which was modest but perfectly comfortable into a tale of destitute poverty, living in SHACK! THEY can't have the public figuring out that all advancement, in every field, is because of family connections and not any particular talent or drive. That is one of the main illusions that holds their matrix together and keeps people working to advance, even though they never will without the connections. This is an illusion THEY will and do maintain at any cost. You start seeing this everywhere once you are aware of it.
So what is the name of this New dance craze we are experiencing please Dr Mike;
You know the one where we place an object in the middle of the room, point at it, shout at it and then spiral our heads out of control until we all fall on the floor.........
This is a brilliant critical (robustly cynical) commentary, thank you.
I was unable to identify a date for the Ziarco article, either here on the the linked website?
https://drug-dev.com/ziarco-pharma-acquires-pfizer-drugs-secures-financing/?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email
Thank you for the important links and the detailed history of Mike's viewpoints!
The first and last time I conversed with him was sometime around May, 2022, and he was "not convinced" that viruses don't exist. I told him what probably truckloads of others told him, and he changed his stance a few weeks later.
Personally, I am finding it an abomination that he is now pushing the mRNA/spike protein BS, but this red herring seems to mislead a lot of people, so I had to sum up the logic in plain English:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/why-not-mrna
Actually, I have doubts that "Mike" is really Mike. Deepfakes are just about perfect by now:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/welcome-to-the-fake-world-neo
Nothing is what it seems:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/you-are-constantly-being-misled
I like a lot about this, Proton.
But I gotta tell you, Act 2 was a BIG FLOP, imho.
"The next step is to call out graphene and self-assembling nano structures and how EMFs will interact with them.”
I'm not sure your profession, PM, (well, maybe I do) but I have had a career as a technologist.
My first title was "electronics technician" and I repaired electronic cash registers. My last title when I retired was Systems Engineer, and I helped repair, maintain, and operate a datacenter w/ massive linux clusters and custom supercomputers. I attended some college (2 years) but have no degree.
In 1984 I was hired by Texas Instruments. I was hired as an electronics tech for an integrated circuit design shop. That's when I encountered Unix, and my life changed.
I'm just saying this to establish that I know something about technology,
I am 100% certain that "self assembling nano-robots" that are both injectable, but also chirp over Bluetooth and/or Wifi => these things are SCI FI. It is ridiculous nonsense. Nothing close to this is possible.
It's just a different kind of Fear Porn, only targeted to those who got the shot.
"Wuh!? I am turning into a CYBORG!? I can feel the machine taking control of my spinal cord and neo-cortext". No no no, please.
We have limited time here. We need to be efficient.
If you want to go after 1 thing, then make it "The Virus".
2 things? Add the PCR test
3? No diagnostic OF ANY KIND exists for covid!
There are more, but each one of those is a complete SHOW STOPPER!
Christine Massey has DESTROYED #1. She built the evidence record herself (with helpers).
Eric Coppolino did the deepest dive into PCR that I know. He is recognized as a worldwide authority on PCR.
We don't need to go into vaccines AT ALL. Especially dodgy areas like graphene oxide, self assembling nano robots, and other Science Fiction.
Going after Vaccines to stop the COVID Hoax
is like trying to stop the war by suing the company that makes the bullets.
Of course the Clotshots are Toxic!
We knew that a year ago!
It is very easy to show.
33,000 are DEAD in VAERS,
likely 100x worse (Harvard Pilgrim study)
33,000 x 100 = 3.3M Dead.
That's just for the United States.
But the main point is the shots are CONTRAINDICATED
FOR ALL PERSONS, because they ain't no Fxcking CONVID!
So let's focus on that. The Narrative "Root Causes".
The "Core Lie" of the Hoax, as Debbie Lusignan would say.
Rest in Peace.
Thank you little proton- I had similar exchanges with Mikey https://georgiedonny.substack.com/p/what-they-really-dont-want-us-talking/comments
I hadn't read his exchange with Christine. It's interesting what he says about T cells that were MOSTLY absent from about HALF of the people who hadn't gone through a detox event! They WERE present in about HALF (were the other half not tested? he doesn't give the paper) Understanding more now about how the body triggers inflammation and healing events with proteins, mistakenly thought to be viral, possibly p132-230 (spiky), of course T cells that recognise these cellular factors and proteins will be present in those detoxing, in order to regulate them and control homeostasis. They will also be present in those who haven't recently detoxed, maybe in smaller amounts.
I have been wondering why he has gone quiet. Maybe he's not allowed to speak in the 'controlled opposition' virus believers against the clot shots. Maybe he's still coming to terms with a career which he thought was helping people in fact was making them ill.
🐒
In this video Yeadon says:
https://odysee.com/@CitizenScience:0/Mike-Yeadon-Respiratory-Viruses:f
"I've actually come to the conclusion, [and] I will credit Cowen and his colleagues...I had a really good chat with those guys early in 2020...and it bothered me bothered me... and I realized over time that I could no longer maintain my understanding of respiratory viruses as I thought I knew them....I learned a new bit of information recently...just it collapsed...the possibility that respiratory viruses as currently desribed exist at all: they don't. "
In regards to this statement:
“Can you outline why attempting to persuade the public AND ALL OTHER COMMENTATORS ON OUR SIDE that “viruses don’t exist” is superior to the isolated truth (independent both of viruses AND of “vaccines”) that governments have lied continually?
I will play the devils advocate here so that Yeadon has some form of defense:
1) In the 1970's, Saul Alinsky published a book titled: "Rules for Radicals," in which he warns about trying to accomplish too much, at one time, because people overwhelmed with unconformist, radical, information will simply ignore what you have to say.
2) If the objective is to warn people about the dangers of the vaccine, then Alinksy might ask himself whether it's better to attack the government or virologists at this particular point in time.
3) People like Yeadon might believe it's counterpoductive to attack virology, which is a debate that will rage on for decades; and while that debate is necessary and productive in the long term, it might be counterproductive in the short term.
In other words, the average citizen might think your position is so improbable, that they will simply ignore everything else that you have to say. In the end, according to Alinsky, and perhaps this is how Yeadon feels, you will accomplish nothing.
This might also speak to the sacred and the profane. Centralized actors, historically, have leaned towards tyranny. In other words, convincing folks that the CDC is corrupt, that Pharma might be corrupt, and that the vaccines side effects have been ignored for personal gain, etc, is a much easier task, then convincing them that thousands of scientists are wrong, and not just wrong, but possibly conspiring and collaborating to commit crimes against humanity.
Back in 2020 or 2021 I had a brief back and forth with Yeadon on Telegram.
He was pushing "treatments", specifically I think it was Dr Z's protocol.
I called him out for pushing bs.
He told me it was very effective when treated early.
I pointed out that there was no way to differentiate if someone had "the flu", "covid" or simply a headache.
He told me it doesn't matter, it was effective.
I asked how he could be sure it was effective he stated that the people treated had better outcomes than those not treated.
Then I asked how he knew how severe those treated would have been without treatment if he couldn't even determine if they were sick with "covid" or not.
Again he replied that it doesn't matter.
He stopped replying after I asked how you compare those "treated" with a "disease" that is mostly "asymptomatic".
That is when I knew beyond a shadow of a doubt that he was controlled op or just very stupid.
A while later I watched the clip of him saying that respiratory viruses do not exist as described and thought that he may have chosen to be truthful.
He disappeared from the spotlight and decided not to push that fact out.
I can't say I'm surprised by the fact that he still pushes the virus deception.
Noice again! The volumes of information on Mike is surely stacking up.
This seems like a divisive piece to be honest. I don't think everyone has to believe in the same things to work together. In essence I get "if you don't agree with me, you're a shill" "we better all think alike"
Narcissistic gatekeeper by traits, beyond the ability to see themselves and their own glass ceiling. See the Ana, Harold interview.
See loops back to her achievements ( very notable), but fails to comprehend that everything she has discovered he looked at years ago. She failed to listen carefully and ask pertinent questions to probe to where his thoughts are currently and the understanding to get there.
Classic narcissist interview...