Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Amaterasu Solar's avatar

Good look at things. I would say that irrespective of specifics - cities, etc. - We can say for sure that the jabs o' toxins did kill Many.

Expand full comment
J Shannon's avatar

Thanks Proton for interpreting the Japanese. This quote resonates with me:

"I think they are CO (controlled opposition) even though the vax info is good. This is a common motif around the world. They want to promote the virus exists even if the shots are bad. 'You don’t like the shots? Ok, we’ve got death-lite with a coterie of pills (and new mRNA products that are much better) you can take. And no, neither pcr test nor 5G are dangerous”' They play this chess game very well." Indeed they do.

CO/LHO (limited hangout) operatives preserve the original narrative which includes, there was a new virus discovered in late 2019/early 2020. It was very dangerous, especially to the elderly. It caused a global pandemic which could only be minimized by lock-downs, masks, other extraordinary measures. The only way to stop the "pandemic" was to administer a new kind (mRNA) of "vaccine" to everyone. All of these claims were false.

One claim (by many of the so-called medical freedom activists) that still persists, is that the "spike protein" (SP) portion of the Sars-CoV-2 virus is toxic to humans and it was a mistake to insert the mRNA sequence that codes for it in the "vaccine." Since everything else associated with the received narrative is false, it is appropriate to assume the SP claim is as well, until proven otherwise

Specifically, since no Sars-CoV-2 "virus" was isolated, purified, sequenced etc.,, there can be no spike protein from it that served as a target antigen. These MF "experts" refuse to admit that inescapable logic. If there is any mRNA in the CV19 "vaccines", it must either be from some foreign (to humans) natural source or a synthetic one, either of which could theoretically code for a foreign toxic protein.

Those who endorse the "spike protein" narrative, should have to enunciate in detail, how the SP was originally identified/sequenced (the source and the methods). For those who claim that antibodies to SP have been found in the tissues of the living and dead, they must indicate how the antibodies used to identify them were originally obtained. Maybe I will post something further on that topic.

Expand full comment
17 more comments...

No posts